• Announcements

    • iacas

      GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Contest   09/22/2016

      Join our GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Challenge to win an autographed GAME GOLF, a Pebble Steel watch, and many more great prizes!
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Chris Shades

Taylormade R11 Vs Taylormade Burner 2.0

14 posts in this topic

A few days ago I played a local municipal course that had an R11 for demo with 10.5 degree loft and fujikura regular flex shaft. I jumped at the chance to play a full round with this driver since I have heard good things about it. I didn't try to bother with adjusting the club, I left the settings to neutral and standard loft.

Playing with this club was AWESOME. I was ready to buy this driver after only a couple of tee box shots going longer and straighter into the fairway.

After playing with this driver I'm curious if there are any differences between the R11 and the Burner 2.0 besides the adjustability features on the R11. If the Burner 2.0 is the same club without being adjustable I'd rather make a purchase on that club instead as I don't see myself taking full advantage of the R11's features.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

I purchased my R11 two weeks ago and wondered the same thing as you. Here's what I learned;

1. The 2.0 is an 1-1/12 longer, allowing for added lenght (5-7yds avg) but also more wayward shots. The R11 is straighter and you will end up using the adjustments to fine tune it once you get used to it.

2. The 2.0 is generally for the lower handicap golfer

3. I hit both of them a lot before buying. I have enough distance off the tee that distance isn't an issue, so the added consistancy of the R11 was the tipping point for me.

4. If price is an issue, the R11s are starting to come down, I got mine new for $329.

Hope this helps. Good Luck

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that information. Price isn't much of an issue and I don't mind getting a pre-owned club. I am pretty much sold after hitting another good round with the R11 today. I was also able to test out a Cleveland SL290 which I did not like at all. I'm pretty sure I don't want to mess around and try any other clubs after reading your statements about the Burner 2.0. I'm sure it's a nice club, but wont work for me as good as the R11 has. Thanks again for the reply!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

im a 24 capper, i have the superfast 2.0 9.5degree loft, reg shaft

struggled with it in the beginning but that was my swing and not the club,

now my swing is getting better, i was averaging 280+ straight/straight draws last night according to shot tracker on my gps device.

i presume the R11 with all its adjustments could make hitting shots easier, but if your adjusting the driver to suite your swing faults are you not defeating the object of getting better?

That said, have a swing with both and buy what feels good, no point otherwise lol

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely the R11 is only as straight as your swing or the club head set up?

Originally Posted by Pope33

I purchased my R11 two weeks ago and wondered the same thing as you. Here's what I learned;

1. The 2.0 is an 1-1/12 longer, allowing for added lenght (5-7yds avg) but also more wayward shots. The R11 is straighter and you will end up using the adjustments to fine tune it once you get used to it.

2. The 2.0 is generally for the lower handicap golfer

3. I hit both of them a lot before buying. I have enough distance off the tee that distance isn't an issue, so the added consistancy of the R11 was the tipping point for me.

4. If price is an issue, the R11s are starting to come down, I got mine new for $329.

Hope this helps. Good Luck



0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the R11 driver, because to me it feels better and is more consistent, because of the shorter shaft.

However what many are telling here is you ajust the club to get rid of a swingfoult is crap.

You ajust the club to optimise it. Take the spinrate down or up and the launch angle this has nothing to do

with swingfoults. Of course if your swing has a natural draw or fade you can ajust the club to get a more straight ball flight, but also this

is not have to be a swingfoult. If you play alot of different courses the ajustablity will suite also, playing in the woods you can have a higher ballflight, playing links golf a lower ballflight will be better.

If you hit shots off center i think the Burner is a better club, it's more forgiving than the R11.

so just try and see what suites you

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yes because adjusting the club to help minimize that 40 yard slice into a nice 10-15yard draw is not compensating for a swing fault?!?

Perhaps i made a generalisation,

Indeed you are correct, the club can be fine tuned to a players likes/dislikes, making their game more enjoyable

but the reality is alot of the people buying this club will do so for the "adjustability/cureability" of swing issues, the same as people by draw or fade biased drivers, because its adjustable they just reckon they can set it up to cure there issues

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by carpediem4300

im a 24 capper, i have the superfast 2.0 9.5degree loft, reg shaft

struggled with it in the beginning but that was my swing and not the club,

now my swing is getting better, i was averaging 280+ straight/straight draws last night according to shot tracker on my gps device.

i presume the R11 with all its adjustments could make hitting shots easier, but if your adjusting the driver to suite your swing faults are you not defeating the object of getting better?

That said, have a swing with both and buy what feels good, no point otherwise lol


I wouldn't be using the adjustments to correct my swing error. I played two rounds with the R11 with normal settings and hit good shots pretty consistent with the exception of a couple sliced shots at the final holes.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you're not going to adjust the R11, why not just buy the longer but lower in price Burner and then have them cut the shaft down an inch?  By the way, Golf Galaxy in-store or online is offering $75 rebates on the Burner.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After thinking about it, I guess I'll give the Burner a try before I commit to the R11. If I can get the same distance and control With the Burner as I did with the R11, then I will be adding the Burner to my bag.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I purchased the 2.0 Superfast TP stiff shaft a few months ago and love the club and am hitting more fairways.  I bought the 2.0 instead of the R11 because I did not want to start adjusting everytime something new crept into my swing.  While I don't like hitting bad shots I want to adjust the bad habits rather than the club.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I've read the R11 is more of a players club and the Burner 2.0 is in the game improvement category. The Superfast has a 460cc head volume and bigger sweet spot. You can get the TP model which comes with a 45.5 inch shaft, .25 inches shorter than the R11. Check it out: http://www.taylormadegolf.com/products/drivers/Burner-SuperFast-2.0-TP-driver/product-detail-specifications
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I m trying to by R11 set in ebay and I coud not see any price lower than 450 $ for used one. I am looking for a graphite set any suggestion?Thanks

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by pbyrne02

I purchased the 2.0 Superfast TP stiff shaft a few months ago and love the club and am hitting more fairways.  I bought the 2.0 instead of the R11 because I did not want to start adjusting everytime something new crept into my swing.  While I don't like hitting bad shots I want to adjust the bad habits rather than the club.

I'm playing the R11TP, and several of the guys I play with use this club (or the S) as well.

I haven't ever seen a player adjusting the head to fit the shape of a hole or to combat swing flaws that produce wayward shots... and I don't think that is the intention of an 'adjustable' driver.    While the R11 head did allow me to slightly alter the launch angle and shape bias to suit how I'd like to hit the ball, once I found settings that I liked, I've left the wrench at home.

That is the real benefit of these heads; allowing a player to set up the head to produce a more precisely defined ball flight.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • 1. I remark on PP's good shots, and stay quiet on the bad ones. I don't say "good shot" just because I hear good contact ( the ball may be 40 yards off target). 2. I use my PP's names regularly (especially if just-met)...Dale Carnegie training 'the one sound each and every person loves is the sound of their name" 3. Mark someone's ball, replace a divot, rake a bunker (esp if he's thinned it over the green) 
    • Phil had diarhia  of the mouth yesterday, giving a reason for the poor play of he and tiger in 2004 RC as not being prepared to play and test Tigers golf ball that is "higher spin" versus his low spin ball.  Plausible only with Phil.  4-5 hours??? Puh-lease. I have been involved in 3rd party testing of golf balls and i can actually say that Phil is full of Sh*t here. The overall difference in spin from tour caliber golf balls, rememebr we are going back to to 2004, the diference is insignificant off the driver, from eight iron on down to wedges the spin characteriscs averge out  from one one spinny tour ball to and the next low spin tour ball is less than 5%. in other words a 5000 RPM wedge shot with the higher spin ball would be 4750 RPM at the worst case scenario.  Remember these are 20o3-04 golf balls, the TA and PV1 are just a couple of years old at this point. Phil likes to talk, I get that, I like the guy, but please just shut up about ball spin and admit you ( and tiger) played badly, too much limelight for both is much more plausible. Two thumbs up for Hal  Suttons response too.   In alternate shot, you play with one ball, and that was the issue, Mickelson said. "[Woods] found out the year before when we played at the Presidents Cup in 2003 that the golf ball I was playing was not going to work for him," Mickelson said. "He plays a very high-spin ball and I play a very low-spin ball, and we had to come up in two days with a solution. "So I grabbed a couple dozen of his balls, I went off to the side, and tried to learn his golf ball in a four- or five-hour session on kind of an isolated -- one of the other holes out there trying to find out how far the ball goes. And it forced me to stop my preparation for the tournament, to stop chipping and stop putting and stop sharpening my game and stop learning the golf course, in an effort to crash-course and learn a whole different golf ball that we were going to be playing. "In the history of my career, I have never ball-tested two days prior to a major. I've never done it. It doesn't allow me to play my best. What allows me to play my best is to learn the course, sharpen my touch on the greens, sharpen my chipping out of the rough and ball striking and so forth. "Instead, I'm taking four or five hours and I'm out trying to learn another ball to allow us to play our best. Had we known a month in advance, we might have been able to make it work. I think we probably would have made it work. But we didn't know until two days prior."
    • I played baseball at a big 10 university for 4 years, tennis for 40 years, and learned to play golf at a very young age but did not play frequently in my younger years.  Accordingly, I am athletic and have a decent game for my age group now.  Extremely accurate but not long by any stretch.  When I was 60, I started to take golf seriously (Like most people getting close to retirement age) and really can't complain about my game.  The one thing that took me forever to learn and understand is:  "Feel is NOT real."  What you THINK you are doing is NOT really what you are doing.  So......I would advise any player who wants to improve their game to, have some video taken of your swing and watch it.  You will be amazed.  Your swing will be NOTHING like you think it is.  (LOL) 
    • That's great! Is your season ending too? I'm going to be sad to see it end.   Thanks, everyone! He played well yesterday (tied for 2nd out of 21 players) and today he's playing 2 hours away at the "hardest course in our state", according to his coach. Yikes! 
      After today, he will be practicing for the championship. We're going to go play the course on Sunday. (By we, I mean him and his teammate - with me driving the cart.) ;)
      The tournament is Thursday, so we have a week to get ready. 
      Here's a nice hit from yesterday.   
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. mahariji_slice
      mahariji_slice
      (35 years old)
  • Blog Entries