Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Myth of Maintaining Your Address Flex in the Rear Knee


Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Posted

Detail question. What do you mean @iacas by any extension of the left knee? If you let the right knee extend doesn't that make the left knee bend more? Oh wait, by keeping the rear knee locked via stick it can make the left knee do some not so good things?

When did I say extending the left knee (except when talking about lefties)?

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

When did I say extending the left knee (except when talking about lefties)?

...

- "Maintain your right knee flex" is ambiguous. Maintain the same? Some of it?  What?

- "Straightening" your right knee technically means "to make straight." Does he mean "extending"? If so, why not say that? Too wordy? Not really. He then says "a locked right knee" implying he means to truly "straighten."

- The drill with the stick implies that he means ANY extension of the left knee.

- You lose your spine angle? Huh? Flat out wrong. Heck, his spine angle looks the same in his NO and YES pictures (it's within a few degrees - he's a bit steeper (IMO in a good way) on the left).

- Extending your trail knee does not limit how far you can rotate back. Flat out wrong. WTH? Goodbye power? Please.

The third point:

- The drill with the stick implies that he means ANY extension of the left knee.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
The third point:

- The drill with the stick implies that he means ANY extension of the left knee.

That's the right knee for most golfers.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 month later...
Posted
So if I understand it right, the flexed right knee straightens a certain amount during the backswing, but doesn't straighten completely. Now, are the knees at address flexed loose, or with a certain amount of tension, that you feel throughout the backswing? My problem is at the moment that I completely straighten my right leg (and the whole body) throughout the backswing. On some days I hit really good shots, some days I start shanking the ball. A South African Pro told me last year my shanks were caused by straightening my right leg (too much), I remembered his advice today and flexed my knees with more tension in the backswing with the results of hitting decent shots again. Can somebody confirm or explain why a straightened right leg can cause shanks?

  • Administrator
Posted

So if I understand it right, the flexed right knee straightens a certain amount during the backswing, but doesn't straighten completely. Now, are the knees at address flexed loose, or with a certain amount of tension, that you feel throughout the backswing?

It can completely straighten - some players do that - it shouldn't hyper-extend, though, and most players don't have to go all the way to "straight" either.

As for the other question, I suppose that's dependent on the individual. I don't know what others feel. Just me.

My problem is at the moment that I completely straighten my right leg (and the whole body) throughout the backswing. On some days I hit really good shots, some days I start shanking the ball. A South African Pro told me last year my shanks were caused by straightening my right leg (too much), I remembered his advice today and flexed my knees with more tension in the backswing with the results of hitting decent shots again. Can somebody confirm or explain why a straightened right leg can cause shanks?

I don't mean this to sound like it could, but some pros just almost literally make stuff up.

I haven't seen your swing, so I can't say. It could have been the perfect thing, or it could have been complete B.S.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

So if I understand it right, the flexed right knee straightens a certain amount during the backswing, but doesn't straighten completely. Now, are the knees at address flexed loose, or with a certain amount of tension, that you feel throughout the backswing?

I would generally say that the knee decreasing in flex isn't something you have to think about or feel. Having the rear foot turned out, knee rotated out, usually takes care of it.

My problem is at the moment that I completely straighten my right leg (and the whole body) throughout the backswing. On some days I hit really good shots, some days I start shanking the ball. A South African Pro told me last year my shanks were caused by straightening my right leg (too much), I remembered his advice today and flexed my knees with more tension in the backswing with the results of hitting decent shots again. Can somebody confirm or explain why a straightened right leg can cause shanks?

Yeah as Erik said we can't say because we haven't seen your swing. If you feel like you straightens it too much, focus more on something like this video and/or the location of the pressure in the foot. Might feel like the foot stays more "planted" rather than the toes being unweighted with all the weight in the heel.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 months later...
  • Moderator
Posted

Billy Horschel

With these next couple pics, you'll notice the knee linkage, evident by the space between the knees at A4. Lead knee gains flex, rear knee decreases.

Robert Rock

Zach Johnson

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

That's is right ... especially for golfers who have been physically evaluated to have poor mid-thoracic (mid-spine) rotation and/or hip rotation functional mobility restrictions.  You would never want to limit what the right (back) knee is doing 'if' a golfer had restrictions in rotation potential as this would prevent a full backswing rotation and the likelihood of over-swinging with the arms and 'disconnection' of the arms/club past the front of the body at the top of the backswing.  However, if we can work with a golfer to physically improve their mid-thoracic and hip functional mobility so that they can still accomplish a full turn while also maintaining at least some stability in their back knee during the backswing then their potential to achieve optimal loading from the largest, most powerful muscles and joints in the body can also be accomplished.


  • Administrator
Posted

That's is right ... especially for golfers who have been physically evaluated to have poor mid-thoracic (mid-spine) rotation and/or hip rotation functional mobility restrictions.  You would never want to limit what the right (back) knee is doing 'if' a golfer had restrictions in rotation potential as this would prevent a full backswing rotation and the likelihood of over-swinging with the arms and 'disconnection' of the arms/club past the front of the body at the top of the backswing.  However, if we can work with a golfer to physically improve their mid-thoracic and hip functional mobility so that they can still accomplish a full turn while also maintaining at least some stability in their back knee during the backswing then their potential to achieve optimal loading from the largest, most powerful muscles and joints in the body can also be accomplished.


I disagree. Again, the vast majority of players on the PGA Tour (past and present) extend or decrease the flex (using as synonyms here, not saying fully straighten or lock out) their trail knee on the backswing.

Furthermore, please do not equate extension of that knee with "lack of stability."

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I am sorry. I am not quite sure what you are "disagreeing" about with my previous comments as I was agreeing with your previous points about back knee/hip extension.  I am fully aware that many tour players extend and even externally rotate their back knee during the full backswing.  And, I agree that it is not always due to physical issues with the back hip, knee or even the ankle - only sometimes is this the case as found through 1000's of evaluation I have personally performed on PGA Tour players as well as many other golfers at all levels. In fact, more often then not, the physical restriction is found in the thoracic spine preventing optimal thoracic rotation thus contributing to the compensation of the back knee excessively straightening and rotating outward to help facilitate the full turn. Regardless, the main point I was attempting to clarify originally was whether you combined golf-specific swing re-education moves along with your squats and/or any other exercises you are doing?  You are certainly entitled to and I fully respect your opinion about the function of the back knee in the golf swing.  I have simply found that 'if' a golfer can properly condition their thoracic spine to fully rotate, then the involvement of the back knee can become less, the swing becomes more compact and more powerful with reduced timing issues for proper contact through the hitting zone.  Thanks so much for your input!


  • Moderator
Posted
I am sorry. I am not quite sure what you are "disagreeing" about with my previous comments as I was agreeing with your previous points about back knee/hip extension.

I think we would disagree with the premise that the knee linkage, decreasing flex/gaining flex, is a movement done to "compensate" for a lack of mobility or something.

It almost seems like you would prefer the golfer work on their fitness to a point of not losing flex in the knee. Like that is a goal that should be achieved. I could be wrong in what you're trying to say but I got that vibe from your post.

Decreasing flex in the trail knee/gaining flex in the lead knee is just how the best players make a "full" turn on a tilted angle.

  • Upvote 1

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

While I was typing up my response, Mike said it better than I did, so I'm just throwing up my support for his post and hiding mine in a spoiler.

I am sorry. I am not quite sure what you are "disagreeing" about with my previous comments as I was agreeing with your previous points about back knee/hip extension.

You posed it as if extending (decreasing flex) in the trail knee was necessary if players were otherwise not flexible. You also posed extension as losing stability. Either virtually nobody (including 99% of the PGA Tour) is not "flexible" enough or extending that trail knee is not simply a matter of attaining more flexibility but also because it's part of good mechanics.

In fact, more often then not, the physical restriction is found in the thoracic spine preventing optimal thoracic rotation thus contributing to the compensation of the back knee excessively straightening and rotating outward to help facilitate the full turn.

We are, of course, not suggesting the trail knee "excessively straighten." (Pedantic aside: "straight" is a binary form, which is why I use "extend" or "decrease flex".)

Regardless, the main point I was attempting to clarify originally was whether you combined golf-specific swing re-education moves along with your squats and/or any other exercises you are doing?

I think you might have confused the threads here. This isn't the "your workout today" thread.

You are certainly entitled to and I fully respect your opinion about the function of the back knee in the golf swing.  I have simply found that 'if' a golfer can properly condition their thoracic spine to fully rotate, then the involvement of the back knee can become less, the swing becomes more compact and more powerful with reduced timing issues for proper contact through the hitting zone.  Thanks so much for your input!

That right there is the part with which I disagree.

But since we're using vague terms and relying on our own perceptions of what is or isn't "acceptable flexibility" and "excessive straightening" and such, the discussion will go nowhere.

I'll simply, again, point out that the best players in the world extend their trail knees slightly, and very, very, very few people are capable of keeping their trail knee as it is at address while making a full torso turn.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Once again, you are correct..."very, very, few players" can maintain a flexed back knee and complete a full shoulder turn. Whether they should or shouldn't and/or how much they should or shouldn't extend their back knee, however, should be answered as a team decision based on the physical evaluation performed by the golf fitness expert and the student's golf instructor.  The decision should be based on what is both optimally performing AND least stressful on their body --- not just because that's what the best players do.  What the 'best' players did when I was the therapist on tour caused significant injuries...I treated 87% of them over 3 years on tour. Can we simply agree that every golfer should be individually evaluated to find out what swing is best for them and then work toward that objective?


Posted

The human body is pretty similar from individual to individual. Most of us got two arms, two legs, hips etc. Each swing is different and lots of different things work, but I don't see why we should let the back leg do anything but straighten somewhat on the backswing. Our bodies are not that different.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

For my swing I like right side loading with a 'feel' of maintaining right knee flex. Not sure what it really does, but probably straightens a bit .

If S&T or a more centered approach works well for you, great. The more methods & 'feels' to help different players the merrier. Sam Snead is a classic example of a straighter back leg.

For discussion purposes, though, I want to pick a bit at the examples in the original post video. I apologize if I am beating any already dead horses in the forum in my newbie ignorance.

For me, Charles Howell III is not a model of ballstriking. Better player and swinger of the club than me for sure. But among pros in 2013 his effective / expected (accounting for waywardness) driving distance was 124th & his cumulative proximity gain or loss versus the field baseline (average) was 139th. His short game keeps him competitive (4th within 75 yards & 17th in putting).

I would say it is hard to gauge how much Phil's left knee is straightening given the camera angle. By the time he reaches the top it looks to me like his left hip has turned back around toward the target so if he is 'sitting' into his left leg you can't really see because the long axis of his thigh bone has rotated back around with the hip to point toward the camera so the thigh is more face on to the camera than it was at address. I think if you viewed this swing from down the line, but behind his foot line his left knee would look a lot more flexed.

Kevin


  • Administrator
Posted

For me, Charles Howell III is not a model of ballstriking. Better player and swinger of the club than me for sure. But among pros in 2013 his effective / expected (accounting for waywardness) driving distance was 124th & his cumulative proximity gain or loss versus the field baseline (average) was 139th. His short game keeps him competitive (4th within 75 yards & 17th in putting).

I would say it is hard to gauge how much Phil's left knee is straightening given the camera angle. By the time he reaches the top it looks to me like his left hip has turned back around toward the target so if he is 'sitting' into his left leg you can't really see because the long axis of his thigh bone has rotated back around with the hip to point toward the camera so the thigh is more face on to the camera than it was at address. I think if you viewed this swing from down the line, but behind his foot line his left knee would look a lot more flexed.

a) Charles Howell III is a great ballstriker. He wouldn't be on the PGA Tour if he wasn't.

b) Nobody's said "straighten." That's a binary state. Phil's knee definitely decreases flex.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
For me, Charles Howell III is not a model of ballstriking. Better player and swinger of the club than me for sure. But among pros in 2013 his effective / expected (accounting for waywardness) driving distance was 124th & his cumulative proximity gain or loss versus the field baseline (average) was 139th. His short game keeps him competitive (4th within 75 yards & 17th in putting).

As Erik said, CH3 hits it extremely well, I'd give my right arm to hit it like he does.

I made the video 2 1/2 years ago and since then he's found a competent instructor and now gradually reduces flex in the trail knee.

I would say it is hard to gauge how much Phil's left knee is straightening given the camera angle. By the time he reaches the top it looks to me like his left hip has turned back around toward the target so if he is 'sitting' into his left leg you can't really see because the long axis of his thigh bone has rotated back around with the hip to point toward the camera so the thigh is more face on to the camera than it was at address. I think if you viewed this swing from down the line, but behind his foot line his left knee would look a lot more flexed.

I don't know what to say, Phil (and many other great players) release flex in the trail knee. Especially that guy in your avatar pic ;-) Notice the space between his knees at the top of the backswing, that's not happening because his knees aren't changing flexion.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

In fact, our bodies are quite different. Besides different obvious height and weight differences we also have different degrees of lever lengths (arms and legs have different bone lengths ... arms: from the shoulder to the elbow and from the elbow to the wrist; legs: from the hips to the knees and from the knees to the ankles), different widths of shoulders and pelvis, different angles from the hips to the knees (valgus and varus), differences in the amount of pronation and supination of the foot/ankle, different degrees of forearm angles from the elbows down to the hands (carrying angles), in say nothing about the individual differences in posture, balance, flexibility, core and extremity strength, hand-eye coordination, etc.

There have been several golf books written concerning different body types (endomorph, mesomorph and ectomorph) and the benefits of teaching golfers with different body types to swing in a different ways (The Laws; written by Dr. Jim Suttie).

I evaluate golfers physically every day and they do have significant differences in structure.  And, the law of structure governs function is always in play.  Therefore, we need to understand how to evaluate and modify a golfer's structure before we are going to safely, efficiently and permanently improve their swing function. Once golfers get this and swing instructors understand this completely, then golf performance and injury prevention will become much easier and more successful.

Let's stop forcing square pegs into round holes.  Every golfer's body and swing should not be the same!


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 610 - 2026-06-03 Got some work in between lessons today. Rare late day, teaching until 7:30pm.
    • Let's continue on… Cool. The thing is, nobody's claiming par is "reliable" and par's inclusion piggy-backs in the course rating, which is awfully close to par and, thus, brings par in to make it make sense. Once again, for those in the back… (CR - Par) just makes it really easy to know what kind of score you need to shoot to best, match, or play worse than your handicap index. Yes, when par is different, the players from the higher par tees get an extra stroke (72 vs. 71, the 72s get an extra stroke. That makes sense and is a small complication (more info at https://www.usga.org/content/usga/home-page/handicapping/roh/Content/rules/Committee%20Content/USGA/LG_R6d.htm). However, most of the time, this adjustment will not be needed, as many courses play to the same par for the same genders from all sets of tees. And, the rare times it is needed, par (measured in whole numbers, integers) and strokes (also whole numbers/integers) map easily and the idea is easily grasped. Dean seems to be unaware of the fact that most every golfer carries something orders of magnitude more powerful than the highest end desktop computers available the last time he consulted with the USGA in their pockets. While it is quaint that his club puts printouts by the first tee… get with the times, Dean. Look up your handicap index and course handicap in the GHIN app and get on with it. It's a better system than the one that didn't account — at all — for a difference in the playing conditions (via an algorithm, not a judgment). Dean's assertions about the "less precise system because of par" continues to make absolutely zero sense. Right, it still changed tee to tee. Now it just changes differently… and in a way that more accurately reflects the score you need to shoot to play to your handicap. Previously, a 1.1 index would get 1 stroke on a 66.7/122 par-72 course. Now they give four strokes back to the course and must shoot 68 to play to their handicap. This makes way more sense. The 18-shot difference is a pretty extreme example. Maybe a long course that also offers a par-three set of tees could play that long, but… man, that's not going to be super common. Sensationalistic much, Dean? Also, once those unhappy (complete assumption) golfers realize a) what the change shows them (playing to net par = playing to your index) and b) realizes that their differential is going to be the same… I think they'll get over their initial questions. No. And yet… if he shoots the same scores, he'll get the same handicap index he has now. But he'll know on each course what score he needs to shoot to "play to his handicap." Sheesh, Dean. This stuff isn't that hard to figure out. Enough with the sensationalistic stuff. I don't find it "unacceptable" at all. Then again, I'm not nearly 80 and seemingly incapable of doing basic math these days. No. This literally makes no sense, as that part of the differential calculation and the course handicap calculation remains identical. Good! No. Categorically wrong. They should have been adjusting their handicaps all along. Previously it was by subtracting the course ratings. Which… is still basically what's done, with the addition of the course rating being "baked in" to the course handicap calculation. Dean is wrong here, or doing some math heretofore unknown by the world. When par is the same, what determines the difference in handicaps? The course rating, which Dean loves! Sheesh! You had to things when players were in situations like this before, too. This is getting exhausting. He keeps using words like "less precise" and "unfair" but does not seem to understand what they mean. This is like the Princess Bride meme: "you keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." The caps reduce upward movement. Committees have reign to reduce a player's handicap, and there's still an automatic Exceptional Score Reduction. I'm going through these more quickly now because… well, it's silly how badly Dean misses the mark with this blog post. Dean is literally confusing the upward movement (with the soft and hard caps) here with the exceptional score reduction which is used when lowering handicaps due to an exceptionally good score. The creators of the WHS are handicap experts. They know more about the current state of handicaps/handicapping than the Pope Emeritus. It's been shown to have almost no effect across all handicaps. Yes, some 36s under the old system are now 35s under the new system. Yawn. He should have stopped there. It's easier to apply and makes more sense. This makes no sense. It's "not complex" but players will have to guess? And, for men or women, the stroke index of each hole doesn't change because they play a different set of tees. They get a different number of strokes, but it's always been true that when you get 14 strokes you apply a stroke to stroke index holes 1-14, and when you get 11, to just holes with a SI of 1-11. Objection, your honor. Assumes facts not in evidence. Dean's just out here continuing to make shit up about "the inaccuracy of par" and ignoring that with Par (an integer) came the Course Rating, which he agrees is precise and accurate. No. No, this is inaccurate. Also, as noted, you can randomly assign stroke indexes, and so long as all the low numbers or all the high numbers are not clumped together at the beginning or ends of the 18 holes, matches generally work out the same. This is inaccurate. It is an algorithm that looks at scores. That's it. Also, this is better than a system like the prior one where no such thing existed at all. Wildly inaccurate and off-base. Did they do actual testing? No need. They have millions and millions of rounds and ran many, many, many simulations. That's testing. Dean seems to continue to be unaware of the fact that computers are more powerful now than they were in 2002. But, he's nearly 80, so we can understand if not going so far as to give him a pass on how much he gets wrong. Cool. Noted. For the most part that was because many countries haven't been able to rate enough of their courses. :sigh:
    • Day 3 (3 Jun 26) - More work on keeping arms connected today - hard foam balls with 7i and 5w…..
    • Day 274 6-3 flow drill getting chest through, arms in front. Arms get a little pinned to the side, not as much in front as I want them when I add speed. 
    • Shot 48 yesterday.  For me bogey golf is good.  I was 10 over through 7 and figured with a Par 3 and 4 coming on all I needed was birdie / par to get my 45. I had a great tee shot on #8 and sunk  a 5 footer for birdie, game was coming together, now just needed par on #9. Had a great tee drive and the green was within range for a hoped GIR or nGIR.  But I pulled the shot left into tall weeds and needed to take a drop.  So much for par, but a bogey for 46 is still good for me. I hit my lob wedge to get over a small tree and saw the ball riding nicely  on line to the pin when my club hit the ball a 2nd time on my follow through causing the ball to change directions and ended up @ pin high but along the same tall weeds I just took an unplayable out of.  had no room for a backswing, Just hacked at it and it shot across the green to the rough on the far side.  Needed a chip & 1 putt got a triple bogey. you can see the hole fall apart in the screenshot below.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.