Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5173 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Looking for some insight on Precision flighted rifle shafts.  Is there a noticeable difference between the Project X , S300, and Flighted?  I was looking into lowering my ball flight for accuracy.  I have not hit a set of flighted shaft irons and was considering making a trip to the training center to try them out. Are the flighted worth experimenting with?  Thanks in advance!


  • Moderator
Posted


Originally Posted by Avocado

Looking for some insight on Precision flighted rifle shafts.  Is there a noticeable difference between the Project X , S300, and Flighted?  I was looking into lowering my ball flight for accuracy.  I have not hit a set of flighted shaft irons and was considering making a trip to the training center to try them out. Are the flighted worth experimenting with?  Thanks in advance!

The S300 all have a consistent high kick point for a low trajectory and moderate spin

http://thesandtrap.com/t/36973/shafts-project-x-vs-project-x-flighted#post_478410

Quote:

Originally Posted by kennay92 View Post

project x has high kickpoints all the way from short irons to long irons.

the flighted ones have progressive kickpoints. so in the long irons the low kick points for higher launch to get the ball up easier, mid irons have mid kick points for mid launch angle with still a little help getting the ball up, and short irons have high kickpoints for a bit lower launch as not really any help is needed getting the ball up with these irons.

id say go flighted.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Thanks MVMAC... that thread was quite informative.  I struggle with the equipment vs skill/talent.  I tell myself "its not the arrow its the Indian" but inevitably I end up wanting to purchasing a new driver, wedge, or this time irons... Technology will make it better.  Obviously, this is what drives the golf business... and there has been some great new products, but there is also ALOT of marketing going on. Living in San Diego (Golf Headquarters) its not hard to know someone in the business.  I have a friend who can get an employee cost deal and was going to get a set of irons for me.  I have hit the irons (S300), but I have not hit them with different shafts.  I just thought I would reach out and see if the flighted were a big deal or not. Thanks for sharing


Posted

More on Project X steel. The PX Rifle (the basic) actually provides a "slightly higher launch angle," but then flattens out at lower ball height once airborne. Initial lift transferring to boring trajectory.

The Project X Flighted shafts (info from The GolfWorks) actually have three different shaft templates: 2 iron to 4 iron = low kick / 5i to 7i = mid kick / 8 and above = high kick. Added production and inventory costs of maintaining three shaft templates is one reason the Flighted set packages come in at a pricy $35 a shaft.

If you have good clubhead speed, you might want to try the base PX rifle. As I mentioned, you get an initial lift boost, but flatter trajectory in flight to target.

I play PX Rifle Flighted 5.0, have about 85 mph driver speed, and the 3i works quite well for tee shots with the low kick lift. Using Uniflex midkick shafts in 2010, the 3i didn't do much.

NOTE: The PX 6.0 plays a bit stiffer than the DG S300.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha B16 OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:  image.png.0d90925b4c768ce7c125b16f98313e0d.png Inertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  :srixon: QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I am gaming the Mizuno MP-53's with Project X 4.5 graphite shafts......and man has that shaft made a difference!....My driver swing speed is 87-95 mph and the 4.5's are regular as per the Projext X website.  The pther thing is I tried out Mizuno's stock Exsar graphite shaft and they just did not feel as good.......I also have the Project X 5.0 graphite shaft in my driver---Cally FT-iz 11*


Posted

The PX shafts, flighted or non, will help with your accuracy. As they're both a very low spin shaft. However, neither one is really a low flight shaft. The kick point in the flighted shafts gradually raises, producing a higher ball flight with the long irons and a lower flight with the short irons. Helps get the long irons in the air (if you play them) and helps prevent the short irons from ballooning. The non flighted model has a constant kick point that provides a mid-high launch. They're both great shafts, but won't really help much bringing the ball flight down.

Now, the Dynamic Gold series has the lower ball flight that your looking for, but the spin is higher with these, so dispersion may not be as good. A compromise here could be the KBS C-Taper. I haven't hit these personally, but from what I've heard they are roughly the flight of Dynamic Gold with the spin of PX. However, the price tag is pretty steep.

All that being said though, I'd recommend trying the PX Flighted. I have them in my irons and I love them. Accurate, long, and they feel great. Just make sure you get the right flex.

  • Upvote 1

In the Ogio Chamber Cart Bag w/ Ogio X4 Synergy Push Cart: Driver: Adams Super LS 7.5* w/ Harrison Striper H2 60x Fairway: Adams Tight Lies 16* Fairway Wood w/ Harrison Mugen Black 70x Irons: Adams Idea Pro Black CB1 Irons w/ Project X 6.0 Flighted Steel Shafts (3-PW) Wedges: Yururi Raw Gekku w/ Project X 6.0 Flighted Steel Shafts (53, 57, & 61) Putter: Never Compromise Gambler Straight Ball: Srixon Z-Star/Z-Star XV Tour Yellow GPS: Garmin Approach G6 Shoes: True Linkswear


Posted

Since PX run stiff, I like that I can use 5.0's and get a lower weight shaft than the DG S300. The lighter DG XP S300's launched too high for my liking. I'm 52 with a 103 driver swing speed and love the slightly lighter shafts in my irons.

I have flighted 5.0's in my MP 53's and non-flighted 5.0 soft stepped once in my JPX 800 Pro's. Not a real head to head test but they both feel great and the MP 53's launch a bit lower in the short irons. I do not see any real difference in my 5-iron. Then again, my swing varies more that the shafts. I plan to use MP 53's as my swing gets into mid-summer form.

I've read a lot here about PX feeling harsh. In my experience, if I have a good transition tempo, they feel smooth as silk. If I speed up my transition, they feel harsh and play worse than either of the DG shafts.

Russ - Student of the Moe Norman swing as taught by the pros at - http://moenormangolf.com

Titleist 910 D3 8.5* w/ Project X shaft/ Titleist 910F 15* w/ Project X shaft

Cobra Baffler 20* & 23* hybrids with Accra hybrid shafts

Mizuno MP-53 irons 5Iron-PW AeroTech i95 shafts stiff and soft stepped once/Mizuno MP T-11 50.6/56.10/MP T10 60*

Seemore PCB putter with SuperStroke 3.0

Srixon 2012 Z-Star yellow balls/ Iomic Sticky 2.3, X-Evolution grips/Titleist Lightweight Cart Bag---

extra/alternate clubs: Mizunos JPX-800 Pro 5-GW with Project X 5.0 soft-stepped shafts


Posted

After 2009 and 2010 swinging Uniflex iron shafts (about the same weight as PX 5.0), I actually find the PX  5.0 a little livelier.

Just for fun I hit a few 6i shots with PX 6.0 , and that felt harsh. If you want to compare shafts across manufacturers, the GoflWRX.com charts show the frequency coefficient matched (FCM) rating of the different shafts might be helpful.

PX 6.0 has an FCM of 6.0, while the DG S300 has an FCM of 5.8. Comparing FCM and shaft weight can give useful info for estimating clubhead speed across different shafts.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha B16 OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:  image.png.0d90925b4c768ce7c125b16f98313e0d.png Inertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  :srixon: QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by rustyredcab

I've read a lot here about PX feeling harsh. In my experience, if I have a good transition tempo, they feel smooth as silk. If I speed up my transition, they feel harsh and play worse than either of the DG shafts.

The reason people say that PX feels harsh is that they are playing too stiff of a flex. They'll go from a DG S300 to PX 6.0 thinking its only a tiny bit stiffer, when in reality its a almost a full flex stiffer and the PX 5.5 is closer to what they need.

Originally Posted by WUTiger

After 2009 and 2010 swinging Uniflex iron shafts (about the same weight as PX 5.0), I actually find the PX  5.0 a little livelier.

Just for fun I hit a few 6i shots with PX 6.0, and that felt harsh. If you want to compare shafts across manufacturers, the GoflWRX.com charts show the frequency coefficient matched (FCM) rating of the different shafts might be helpful.

PX 6.0 has an FCM of 6.0, while the DG S300 has an FCM of 5.8. Comparing FCM and shaft weight can give useful info for estimating clubhead speed across different shafts.

Standard PX 6.0 has a FCM of 6.5, not 6.0.

FCM chart.jpg

In the Ogio Chamber Cart Bag w/ Ogio X4 Synergy Push Cart: Driver: Adams Super LS 7.5* w/ Harrison Striper H2 60x Fairway: Adams Tight Lies 16* Fairway Wood w/ Harrison Mugen Black 70x Irons: Adams Idea Pro Black CB1 Irons w/ Project X 6.0 Flighted Steel Shafts (3-PW) Wedges: Yururi Raw Gekku w/ Project X 6.0 Flighted Steel Shafts (53, 57, & 61) Putter: Never Compromise Gambler Straight Ball: Srixon Z-Star/Z-Star XV Tour Yellow GPS: Garmin Approach G6 Shoes: True Linkswear


Posted

Thanks for the response everyone... I found the True Temper's website, it has a quite a bit of info as well, and a simple fitting tool... worth a look.  I made an appointment with a local fitting center to get fitted.  Once I realized how many selections there were, it was obvious I am going to need assistance picking the correct shafts.  I am looking forward to the fitting, hoping it will shed some light on a couple of my concerns.  I have a older (2006) set of Callaway Fusion irons (smaller version) which I have become used to.  I would like to move forward with the correct length, lie, grip diameter, etc.  I am sure, like many others,  I just purchased a set of off the shelf irons and went for it.  I do fear I am going to have to go backwards a bit in order to go forward.


Posted

I played even older (2001) Fusions for years. Re-shafted them once early on to replace the graphite with DG S300's for distance control. When my index seemed to stabilize under 10 last year, I thought it was time for a look at new irons to improve my distance control and striking consistency. I did not go backwards when I got new irons -- I went straight forward. My consistency is greatly improved with my new irons and lighter shafts. I've never hit the ball as well as I do with the new irons.

Good luck and post what you end up with here.

Russ - Student of the Moe Norman swing as taught by the pros at - http://moenormangolf.com

Titleist 910 D3 8.5* w/ Project X shaft/ Titleist 910F 15* w/ Project X shaft

Cobra Baffler 20* & 23* hybrids with Accra hybrid shafts

Mizuno MP-53 irons 5Iron-PW AeroTech i95 shafts stiff and soft stepped once/Mizuno MP T-11 50.6/56.10/MP T10 60*

Seemore PCB putter with SuperStroke 3.0

Srixon 2012 Z-Star yellow balls/ Iomic Sticky 2.3, X-Evolution grips/Titleist Lightweight Cart Bag---

extra/alternate clubs: Mizunos JPX-800 Pro 5-GW with Project X 5.0 soft-stepped shafts


Note: This thread is 5173 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • StuM,  I have, in the past, added a left handed club. (Ususally a 7 iron) However, I usually take a stroke penalty and move the ball to where I want it.  I play for fun and in a pinch can use theback side if my club if I don't want the penalty stroke.    RetiredOldMan,  Terry 
    • So, Brendan Sorsby, Texas Tech transfer QB, was found guilty of sports betting by the NCAA. He admitted to it. He placed thousands of bets over multiple years while at Indiana and Cincinnati. This included betting on his own teams.  The NCAA rules ban athletes from betting on any sport (college or pro).  A retired visiting judge from Tarrant County, Texas has put an injunction on the NCAA ruling. He is a visiting judge because the first judge was a graduate and big fan of Texas Tech, and he recused himself. The judged ruled the following... "Under Curry's order, Sorsby is permitted to play for Texas Tech's 2026 season on the condition that he continues his treatment for a gambling and anxiety disorder and serves a two-game suspension (missing games against Abilene Christian and Oregon State)."  Don't get me wrong, I don't particularly care for the NCAA. That still doesn't mean that a college can choose when or where to say, "Yea we agree to these rules for all our sports, well except in this case." Here is a breakdown from S&W. The Hidden Weapon in Sorsby’s Injunction: How a Lubbock County Court Order Quietly Neutralized the NCAA’s Most Powerful Enforcement Tool - Law Offices of Snell & Wilmer By Ryan J. Regula On June 8, 2026, Lubbock County District Court Judge Ken Curry issued a temporary injunction in Brendan Sorsby v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, Cause No. DC-2026-CV-0791 (99th Judicial District... The main judgement made sense. Sorsby, I am going to have all this harm done to me if I don't get to play. The Judge, I agree. The penalty for gambling is too harsh, so here are all these things you must do, and I will grant this injunction against the NCAA. Basically, an analogy would be when a person goes into court for a DUI and they agree to all these other things to not end up in jail.  What sucks for the NCAA is the NCAA has appealed to Texas’ Seventh Court of Appeals, based in Amarillo. All four justices that preside over the court are graduates of Texas Tech University School of Law. It would be hilarious if all four of them had to recuse themselves 🤣. For those who like to read legal rulings...  
    • The chatter in my brain is when the distance is between clubs since I am pretty weak at shortened backswings, etc. I try to simply decide if being long or short is the better outcome and choose my club based on that and simply not even try for the “real” distance.  For me a full normal swing is what I strive for.
    • I saw this comment made in a golf article... "Most golfers stand over a 4- or 5-iron still negotiating with themselves. They think about how hard to swing, whether they have the right club, if they have the aim correct and more. It’s a lot to deal with and long irons punish the “half-in” golf swing." I am not sure the "most golfers" is correct regarding the bolded part. I can understand if there is a bunker, water, and/or OB that a lot of golfers would be fixated on that. I am not sure that leads to ending up more times there. Pending your level in golf, the variance is so large in outcomes, it could be just with in the expected outcomes. I can understand if have a big lake on the right side of the hole being one of the most terrifying shots for right-handed amateur golfers.  I am not sure many golfers are standing over the ball talking to themselves, "Ok, maybe I should step back and pull the 4-iron. Am I lined up right? Oh, the wind came up, should I swing harder? What am I going to have for dinner tonight, maybe steak. (Joking, somewhat 😛)" A question is that how much chatter do you get while standing over the ball. Are you questioning the everything about your golf shot?   
    • Wordle 1,816 5/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.