Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Oostie's Albatross vs. Bubba's Winner


Note: This thread is 4978 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Which was more impressive?

Obviously the double eagle is the rarest thing in golf, and his shot was incredible.

However, given the setting, the pressure, and circumstances, I'm leaning towards Bubba's shot.  To be able to drop it to 10 feet from that lie with that much pressure is amazing.

What are your thoughts?


  • Replies 82
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Bubba's for sure the pressure of that moment had to be unreal and he was still able to hold it together and make thy shot. Both shots were amazing but Bubba's shot won him The Masters.

Posted
Tough call as both were amazing shots. But, as impressive as Bubba's shot was under pressure, it wasn't inconceivable that he'd pull it off. In spite of coming in 2nd, I'd still have to give Louie's double eagle the edge. Rare and incredible thing to see.

In my Sun Mountain 14 Way Stand Bag:

Driver - Ping G30 10.5* : Fairway - Ping G30 18* : Hybrids - Titleist 915H 21* & 915 H 24* : Irons - Mizuno JPX 850 Forged 5 - GW : Wedges, Vokey 54.14, Vokey 58.12 : Putter - Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2 or Ping Craz-E-R  : Ball - Bridgestone B330RX, Cart - Cliqgear 3.5


Posted
Which was more impressive?

No contest. Albatross. Bubba didn't even make the putt, so anywhere he could get up and down from would have been just as good.


Posted
Impressive? Bubba's shot. Louis hit a fantastic shot, don't get me wrong, but most of that was luck. Bubba's shot was simply amazing.

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Louis hit a 260y 4-iron into the opening on the 2nd green, which was impressive for sure, but from there it was basically luck that it rolled 100+ feet into the hole. And it was also the 2nd hole, meaning it was early into the round.

Bubba's was in the playoff & his back was basically against the wall & hit a 155y wedge with 40y of hook to 12 feet.

Given the situations, I'd go with Bubba's shot.


Posted


Originally Posted by brocks

No contest. Albatross. Bubba didn't even make the putt, so anywhere he could get up and down from would have been just as good.



Sure it would have been just as good, but that's hindsight.  At the time he hit that shot, Oostie was sitting in front of the green, with a very good chance of getting up and down for his par.  If he puts that in the bunker, or shanks it, it's over.

Like Jamo said, an albatross is an incredible feat, but it's still 50% skill and 50% luck.  You would have a hard time putting from where his ball landed and rolled to the hole.  Sure it was a hell of a shot and he was certainly aiming for that area, but there's no way from 250 yards out to pick that precise spot, and that precise line, at that precise speed to roll that thing in.  It was skill up until the ball landed, then the golf gods took over.  Still incredible, but there was also no pressure at that point.


Posted

Why would you even think to compare them?

Both amazing shots.

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


Posted

Why would you even think to compare them?

Both amazing shots.

for the sake of discussion? two very impressive shots but very different scenarios. Considering that they are going to be the most memorable shots of the 2012 Masters, I don't see why it would be odd to compare the two.


Posted


Originally Posted by Shorty

Why would you even think to compare them?

Both amazing shots.


Bandwidth?

I've got to lean toward Bubba's shot.  It just reeked of pure skill.  A double eagle is an amazing thing, but it does take a tremendous amount of luck.  Bubba turned that shot 40 yards to the right through a tube of trees and galler... er... patrons.

:ping:

  • G400 - 9° /Alta CB 55 Stiff / G410-SFT - 16° /Project X 6.0S 85G / G410 - 20.5° /Tensei Orange 75S
  • G710 - 4 iron/SteelFiber i110cw Stiff • / i210 - 5 iron - UW / AWT 2.0 Stiff
  • Glide SS - 54° / CFS Wedge / Glide 2.0 SS - 58°/10 / KBS 120S / Hoofer - Black

:scotty_cameron: - Select Squareback / 35"  -  :titleist: - Pro V1 / White  -  :clicgear: - 3.5+ / White

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Bubba, due to the timing. I hit a simular shot off the tee box this weekend, except I was trying hit it straight.

In the Bag:

 X Driver, 3w & 5w

 Ironwood 4 hybrids

Putter: BigT special


Posted

I think its simple....

One resulted in a Green Jacket, one did not.....

However I am totally biased being a UGA guy myself!


Posted

The albatros was 50/50 luck and skill.  Aim the ball at the green in a precise area, (which he did perfectly) and then luck took the ball the rest of the way across the green into the hole.

Bubba's shot was pure skill and given the pressure he was under, pretty amazing.  Even Faldo said he'd be lucky to get the ball into a position in front of the green.  Bubba did that one better and then some.


Posted

Does anyone happen to have links to videos of these two shots?

Edit: Added video links above...


Posted


Originally Posted by Chipless

Does anyone happen to have links to videos of these two shots?

Type in
"Oosthuizen double eagle"

in Youtube

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


Posted

Originally Posted by brocks

No contest. Albatross. Bubba didn't even make the putt, so anywhere he could get up and down from would have been just as good.


This is the same thing people said about Mickelson's shot out of the pine trees in 2010, and it's as illogical a response to this question now as it was then. (See my last paragraph before you respond, though; I don't think it's a bad observation at all.) The putt doesn't even enter in to the discussion of the shot to hit the green. The shot was a difficult shot in a high-pressure situation, and he pulled it off.

While the albatross was rarer, it was a stock shot that was executed well and got lucky. It wasn't really any better of a shot than an approach that winds up 6 feet or less from the hole on any of the par 5s on Sunday, which is probably what it'd have been if it had happened to land a couple inches from where it did.

Certainly Oosthuizen's shot was more accurate and a better result than Watson's, but it didn't involve the touch or the pressure: it wasn't making a routine par or better out of what, by all rights, was a completely blown play-off hole for the Masters.

The putt is relevant if we're talking about the most impressive moments or performances. Watson did come up short of the miracle birdie to win the Masters "with force." Had Oosthuizen come up with a better pitch, there'd have been another hole and Watson's shot would have been an interesting footnote. So I think the shot itself would be in the top few shots, but the overall win was less impressive than it would have been had it not relied on the good fortune of a poor pitch from the opponent. Still... don't get me wrong, the guy still won a major with it, so this is just a relative comment---in absolute terms, it's impressive as all get-out.

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"


Posted
My friend called me up right after Bubba's shot, I said, "shot of the tournament, right there.". He asked me, "what about the double eagle?". No contest, Bubba.

Carlos


Note: This thread is 4978 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 116 12-6 Still working on getting to lead side. Tonight I also tried some skill work with clubface awareness.  Hit foam balls. 
    • To flog this subject even further, if that's even possible, this article from Golf Monthly just appeared today in one of my news feeds. Written by a golf writer in the UK who I never heard of, he's basically saying that there should be only 3-5 rounds from the most recent 20 that should count towards the average and only competitive rounds should count. He claims the erratic scorers would have less of an advantage than they do now. He makes a lot of references to "club golfers" in the UK being the ones who are mostly dissatisfied. https://share.google/qmZZBEoJvOxHxJGil  In my experience with my league where we have golfers with indexes ranging from 5 to 40, looking at the weekly results from the past two years, I can detect no pattern that would substantiate the claim that the current system gives an unfair advantage to either erratic golfers (aren't we all?) or higher handicappers. Apparently though, at least in the UK, this seems to be "a thing."
    • Day 26 (6 Dec 25) - Another day of rainy weather - got in some mirror work rehearsing forward weight shift as finishing back swing. 
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6* 🟨⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟩🟩⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 no eagle -  but a birdie is a nice follow-up
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.