Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5010 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

In my book, Rory is officially on the radar. There is a lot of golf to play, but now he has proven that the first major was not a fluke.

Callaway AI Smoke TD Max 10.5* | Cobra Big Tour 15.5* | Rad Tour 18.5* | Titleist U500 4i | T100 5-P | Vokey 50/8* F, 54/10* S,  58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback 1


Posted
Originally Posted by ApocG10

No he is not. I mean yes, Rory won 2 younger than tiger won two, but I also doubt Rory will achieve the Tiger Slam, which Tiger did immediately after his second major. Not to mention that Tiger had about 5 times as many regular tour wins at Rory's age.

Rory is great. A giant of the sport. But those comparing him to Woods either are not old enough, or were not there to see Tiger Dominate. Tiger didn't go through summers missing cuts and struggling. He won consistently, and rarely missed a cut. Rory is a great player, but he's got a long ways to go to beat TW.

Which is exactly what I said.  Rory's ahead of Tiger in regard to majors based on their ages.  I can only respond to the posts ahead of mine, not where you move the goalposts in regard to the Tiger Slam.

He can certainly be mentioned in the same breath when it comes to majors.  He's won two faster than Nicklaus or Woods, both of whom have been defined by the majors they won.  What he does from here remains to be seen.  However, one thing is clear; the courses have all been lengthened already, so Rory won't be able to take advantage of that the way Woods (admittedly) did.

:ping:

  • G400 - 9° /Alta CB 55 Stiff / G410-SFT - 16° /Project X 6.0S 85G / G410 - 20.5° /Tensei Orange 75S
  • G710 - 4 iron/SteelFiber i110cw Stiff • / i210 - 5 iron - UW / AWT 2.0 Stiff
  • Glide SS - 54° / CFS Wedge / Glide 2.0 SS - 58°/10 / KBS 120S / Hoofer - Black

:scotty_cameron: - Select Squareback / 35"  -  :titleist: - Pro V1 / White  -  :clicgear: - 3.5+ / White

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by TourSpoon

In my book, Rory is officially on the radar. There is a lot of golf to play, but now he has proven that the first major was not a fluke.

I actually think his first major proved that his first major wasn't a fluke.  It wasn't as dominant given the conditions as some other major victories, but it clearly established (for me) that he had the ability to win majors as well as the mental game to finish them off (even if not every time).

Originally Posted by bwdial

Which is exactly what I said.  Rory's ahead of Tiger in regard to majors based on their ages.  I can only respond to the posts ahead of mine, not where you move the goalposts in regard to the Tiger Slam.

He can certainly be mentioned in the same breath when it comes to majors.  He's won two faster than Nicklaus or Woods, both of whom have been defined by the majors they won.

Yes, but that pace only lasts for a few more months.  I forget the numbers, but basically he will have to go on a tear over the next two years to keep up with that pace.  It's a bit misleading...unless you think he is about ready to go on that tear.  Remember, people thought he was ready to go on that tear last year and early this year.

The Fastest Flip in the West


Posted
Originally Posted by bplewis24

I actually think his first major proved that his first major wasn't a fluke.  It wasn't as dominant given the conditions as some other major victories, but it clearly established (for me) that he had the ability to win majors as well as the mental game to finish them off (even if not every time).

True, but I can't resist using cliches.

The US Open was not handed to him, he just took it and he did it again last weekend with the PGA. The mental game was not pushing it with the lead which enabled him to extend his lead and his misses were all in the right spots which allowed him to get up and down with ease. Great performances both times. I look forward to many more.

Callaway AI Smoke TD Max 10.5* | Cobra Big Tour 15.5* | Rad Tour 18.5* | Titleist U500 4i | T100 5-P | Vokey 50/8* F, 54/10* S,  58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback 1


Posted

In another thread on Rory I suggested that Rory didn't have the focus and drive to be a major champion, let alone a multiple major winner.    I based this from listening to him in interviews and walking with his group in a practice round for the 2010 US Open, where he spent most of his time texting friends photos of cars and very little time practicing.    I felt he had achieved so much fame and fortune already in his young life that the proverbial "fire in the belly" seemed to be missing.

This year I again followed him in practice rounds, this time at Augusta, and his preparation was completely different.   At Pebble he'd hit a shot, text a while, hit a shot, text, roll a putt, walk to the next hole.     At Augusta, he'd drop balls in different spots and hit different trajectories to different pin positions.   He'd roll multiple putts from different spots, with his caddy making copious notes.    It was a completely different approach.

I suspect collapsing a couple years ago at Augusta opened Rory's eyes to a whole different world of attention and adulation, and it sparked a fire that previously wasn't there.   He probably didn't recognize the real difference between being a winner on tour and being a majors winner,  but the collapse gave him a new viewpoint.     With a new focus, he came out and won that first US Open and began to breath that rarefied air of a being in a whole new club - a major winner.   All these guys have super egos (without it they probably wouldn't be able to make it on Tour in the first place), and that probably strokes the ego at a whole new level.   Rory found that out and he likes it.


Posted

He has the talent to stir up the debate... but I don't think he has the consistency yet. It's not uncommon for him to miss 5 footers 4 times a round.


Posted
Originally Posted by ApocG10

No he is not. I mean yes, Rory won 2 younger than tiger won two, but I also doubt Rory will achieve the Tiger Slam, which Tiger did immediately after his second major. Not to mention that Tiger had about 5 times as many regular tour wins at Rory's age.

Rory is great. A giant of the sport. But those comparing him to Woods either are not old enough, or were not there to see Tiger Dominate. Tiger didn't go through summers missing cuts and struggling. He won consistently, and rarely missed a cut. Rory is a great player, but he's got a long ways to go to beat TW.

Just to provide a little perspective, it took Tiger about 9 years to miss as many cuts as Rory has missed this year alone.

It does Rory a disservice to make comparisons at this point.  Let him just be the best Rory he can be without loading a boatload of claims and expectations on him - at least until he has won more majors than the current group of Tiger's competitors.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by turtleback

Just to provide a little perspective, it took Tiger about 9 years to miss as many cuts as Rory has missed this year alone.

It does Rory a disservice to make comparisons at this point.  Let him just be the best Rory he can be without loading a boatload of claims and expectations on him - at least until he has won more majors than the current group of Tiger's competitors.

I would agree that it does Rory a disservice to make a direct comparison to Tiger...  at any point.  It's simply not fair to Rory.  I honestly don't think he is the golfer that Tiger once was.  To quote Graeme McDowell: Tiger is a once in a lifetime golf talent, and Rory is a once in a decade golf talent.

My thoughts behind starting this thread were to simply say:  I am once again feeling the buzz and excitement of an unbelievably talented golfer making his way onto the scene.  I think everyone can agree, they too are feeling something special again.  Rory is to Tiger as Tom Watson was to Jack Nicholas.  He is an exceptionaly great golfer who is the only person worthy in the last 25 years to be compared to the most elite of this sport.

Driver:       Titleist 909D3  (8.5°)
3-Wood:     Titleist 909F3  (13°)
Hybrid:       Titleist 909h  (17°)
3-PW:         Mizuno MP-68 with PROJECT X 6.0
Wedges:     Titleist SM4's  (52°-58°-62°)
Putter:        Scotty Cameron Studio Select 1.5
Ball:            Titleist Pro V1x
Range:        Bushnell Pinseeker PRO 1600
Bag:            PING Hoofer stand bag


Posted

In terms of total wins he's not yet as good as Phil or 28 other golfers throughout history.  At this point he's tied for 44 in Majors won, so I'd hold off on the Tiger comparisons for a while.  He's a great golfer, probably one of the best out there today, but slotting him for 14 majors is premature.

Originally Posted by bwdial

Much as the rest of this thread, this has now changed.  Total wins... yes.  Major wins, Rory is now ahead of Tiger based on age.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by TourSpoon

In my book, Rory is officially on the radar. There is a lot of golf to play, but now he has proven that the first major was not a fluke.

Oh FFS!!!!

Personally, in my opinion, I think McIlroy was the best golfer on the planet at 16 years of age not counting Tiger. Purely in terms of hitting a golf ball.

Forget about titles. How many of you guys saw him playing before he came to the U.S?

As soon as he came to the States there were comments from peole like "There's just something about him I don't like" and "He hasn't won anything" as if that was all that mattered.

Yes, he's flaky at times. Who isn't?

I saw him playing in Malaysia at 17 and his talent was so bleeding obvious you'd be blind not to see it. And that was 5 years before he bulked up.

Anyone who thinks "Hmmmmmmm......another major.........I'll reserve judgement.............but he's on the radar" is not really thinking much about what they have seen.

He might never win another tournament.He has 2 majors.

Greg Norman only won two majors, but no professional golfer who played in the 80s and 90s would say that he wasn't 27 levels above every other player out there at that time in  terms of pure golfing power and ability.

  • Upvote 2

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


  • Administrator
Posted
Originally Posted by Shorty

Greg Norman only won two majors, but no professional golfer who played in the 80s and 90s would say that he wasn't 27 levels above every other player out there at that time in  terms of pure golfing power and ability.

Tom Watson was pretty good. Nick Price too. Some guy named Faldo too. Langer. Olazabal. Couples. Love. etc.

Little Aussie bias there? :P

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by iacas

Tom Watson was pretty good. Nick Price too. Some guy named Faldo too. Langer. Olazabal. Couples. Love. etc.

Little Aussie bias there? :P

Not really - and noone can argue with Watson's record and longevity. I'm also a huge fan of Nick Price - regarded as one of the nicest guys ever to play the game. - I'm basically talking about the sheer power that generates excitement even amongst those who are not students of the game. Norman and Woods had (;-)) or have it. McIlroy has it. The others you mention had sweet swings, killer instict, Teutonic persistence, ice-cold blood and amazing skills, but it's the X factor I'm referring to.

I believe that in the modern game (post Payer, Nicklaus, Plamer) Norman, Woods and McIroy are the three that rise above all others.

Eric - you are younger than I am and know a lot more about golf than I do and I know that you do not have a bias, but despite my hyperbole and playful nitpickiness the one thing that I know and will always stand by- and this is from seeing Norman in the flesh, many times, in his prime, from the late 1970s through to the mid 90s  - is that his driving, charisma, putting, and all round shot making ability makes him as a player the top of the heap. Nicklaus would agree. But hey, I don't agree with everything he says.

I happen to think now that he is an absolute pr*ck, but I think it would be a tragedy if in 100 years, people only look at majors won to assess the greatness of players past.

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


  • Administrator
Posted
Originally Posted by Shorty

Not really - and noone can argue with Watson's record and longevity. I'm also a huge fan of Nick Price - regarded as one of the nicest guys ever to play the game. - I'm basically talking about the sheer power that generates excitement even amongst those who are not students of the game. Norman and Woods had (;-)) or have it. McIlroy has it. The others you mention had sweet swings, killer instict, Teutonic persistence, ice-cold blood and amazing skills, but it's the X factor I'm referring to.

I believe that in the modern game (post Payer, Nicklaus, Plamer) Norman, Woods and McIroy are the three that rise above all others.

Eric - you are younger than I am and know a lot more about golf than I do and I know that you do not have a bias, but despite my hyperbole and playful nitpickiness the one thing that I know and will always stand by- and this is from seeing Norman in the flesh, many times, in his prime, from the late 1970s through to the mid 90s  - is that his driving, charisma, putting, and all round shot making ability makes him as a player the top of the heap. Nicklaus would agree. But hey, I don't agree with everything he says.

I happen to think now that he is an absolute pr*ck, but I think it would be a tragedy if in 100 years, people only look at majors won to assess the greatness of players past.

To be fair, Shorty, I thought you were limiting the discussion simply to golf. Not "charisma" and "generates excitement."

Basically, you're coming out for Greg Norman, yes?

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by iacas

Basically, you're coming out for Greg Norman, yes?

Guess so.

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


Note: This thread is 5010 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 254 5-4 Arms off chest in backswing and downswing. Short swing, pause and then hit.  Hit foam balls. Keeping arching of wrist a focus as well. 
    • I would think of it in terms of time. The time it takes to get the arm angle into a good position to deliver the club with proper shaft lean. Another component is rotation, but that is also a matter of timing. It relates to how the body stalls to give the golfer time to hit the ball. If you have to get 80+ degrees out of that right elbow in one third of a second versus 50 degrees in the same time then you have to steal time from somewhere. It is usually body rotation. That does not help with shaft lean.  I agree in that amateurs tend to make the swing more complicated than pro golfers. 
    • I haven't been able to practice like I wanted and won't for the next week.  1. The weather sucks in Ohio this year. I have been mostly inside hitting foam balls. Just kind of my basic stuff.  2. I woke up last Saturday with a left side rib muscle on fire. If I turned or leaned a certain way it would spasm that almost buckled my knees. I have been taking a break to let that settle. I don't want to get a long term injury. I think I pinched a nerve or just aggravated a muscles.   3. I am going on a mini-vacation to Florida (screw you Ohio weather) with a friend, and rolling that into a work conference I have next week. I will be with out my clubs for a week.  I will be back next in two Fridays to hit the ground running with some warmer temps and better weather in Ohio, hopefully. I would really like to get more out on the course and the range.     
    • Day 580 - 2026-05-04 Played eight holes. Sometimes golf kicks you in the nuts. 😉 
    • I work with a lot of golfers who want more shaft lean at impact, who currently have AoAs that range from +2° to -2°, and who love to see the handle lower and more "in front of their trail thigh" from face-on at P6. And a lot of these golfers try to solve the issue by working on the downswing. They do something to drag the handle forward. Or they just leave their right thigh farther back so the same handle location "looks" farther forward. Or they move the ball back in their stance. Or they push themselves down into the ground to get the handle lower and increase (decrease?) their AoA (to be more negative). The real fix is often to get wider in the backswing. To do LESS in the backswing. To hinge less, fold the trail arm less, abduct the trail arm less. I had a case of this over the weekend. Before, the player had 110° of trail elbow bend, "lifted" his trail humerus only a few degrees, etc. The club traveled quite a bit around him, and he tended to "pick" the ball from the fairways. In the "after" swings below (which are mild exaggerations — this golfer does not need to end up at < 70° of elbow bend. These were slower backswings with "hit it as hard as you normally would" intent downswings), you can see that he bent his elbow about 70° instead of 110° and lifted his right arm an extra ~15° or more. You can't see how much less this moved his hands across his chest (right arm abduction), but it was also decreased. His hands stayed more "in front of" his right shoulder rather than traveling "beside" them so much. The two swings look like this: The change at P6, without talking about the downswing one little bit (outside of him telling me that he tends to pick the ball), is remarkable: Without 110° of elbow bend to get out (which he gets to 80°, a loss of 30°), the golfer actually loses slightly less elbow bend (70 - 50 = 20), but delivers 30° less elbow bend, lowering the handle and letting the elbow get "in front of" the rib cage… because it never got "behind" or "beside" the rib cage. If you look at this video showing the before/afters of P6, you'll note the handle location (both vertically and horizontally) and the shoulders (the ball is in the same place in these frames). This golfer's path was largely unaffected (still pretty straight into the ball, < 3° path and often < 1.5°), but his AoA jumped to -5° ± 2°. I've always said, and in talking with other instructors they agree and feel similarly, that we spend a lot of time working on the backswing. This is another example of why.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.