Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4621 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I went into Dicks (coincidence?) to purchase a set of MP 53's Mizuno and was subsequently talked out of them. Apparently I swing too slow and thus can not carry the ball flight as far as the pro would like. This will change I'm sure in time, with more dedication and warm weather.

The software he used suggested a different club and shaft then what I went in to purchase. That software doesn't take into account all kinds of variables the least of which is not being warmed up, in the groove and so on. I clinch on stage...yada yada...

Is there such a thing as starter clubs? Aren't starter clubs just cheating your ability to find the correct swing path? I can't always find that sweet swing, but I know what it looks like and feels like and am in a continuous search to maintain that.

Am I better off starting with the best tool possible and then learning how to use it properly, or use starter tools until I become a master of the craft and can then take full advantage of the best tool?

I usually play alone, do not keep score often but am working towards club tournaments.

I want those F*ing clubs but nobody will sell them to me.


Posted

Mizuno must not be giving kickbacks like the rest of the manufacturers. MP 53's are a players cavity back, don't know why someone would try to talk you out of them unless your swing is just god awful and you need super game improvement irons just to make contact. It's your cash buy what you want. Tell the non expert at Dick's to shut up.

Danny    In my :ping: Hoofer Tour golf bag on my :clicgear: 8.0 Cart

Driver:   :pxg: 0311 Gen 5  X-Stiff.                        Irons:  :callaway: 4-PW APEX TCB Irons 
3 Wood: :callaway: Mavrik SZ Rogue X-Stiff                            Nippon Pro Modus 130 X-Stiff
3 Hybrid: :callaway: Mavrik Pro KBS Tour Proto X   Wedges: :vokey:  50°, 54°, 60° 
Putter: :odyssey:  2-Ball Ten Arm Lock        Ball: :titleist: ProV 1

 

 

 

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I would say- good on him. He didn't take your money for what would have been a bad call (apparently). If you were miserable with them because you can't hit them like (Mizuno Tour Pro name), you'd be all pissed at the guy who sold them and bad mouthing Dick's for a crappy job they did ripping you off. BUT- I'm sure if you are actually that 1 handicap as listed- IF you insisted on those clubs, he would have tried to match shafts, lengths and angles to get the best out of them for you. Whether or not you made the most of them would be your problem.

Posted

RayG is on point. No I am not a 1 handicap (did I mention handicap? I may have screwed up my profile) If my goal is to learn how to properly shape shots, is this not the tool to do that with? I can hit the ball consistently, I just have a slower swing speed then a pro apparently.

I have a set of burner 2.0 that I have been using for 2 years. I switched to them from a MB off brand set I inherited from my wife's 1st husband. After buying the Burners and using them, I discovered I wasn't hitting the ball on the same flight as my hand me down clubs and have since switched back to the hand me downs because I like the ball flight better. I feel like the deeper cavity on the burners is screwing me up.

Having left the sport for 25 years, I think all this newer technology aka the cavity back, is where I am confused. I know the elements of the golf swing, but consistently putting that together for a 1 handicap is not where I am.  It is however my goal. I am practicing constantly and positioning myself to play competitively (this is a process for me.) I regularly shoot in the low 90's, have broke 80 a few times and now seek to streamline all the strokes into a full game thus becoming competitive (locally).

If anything Dick's should be ashamed because they sold me the Burners 2 years ago and now I am back AGAIN looking for what I really want.

This idea of being 'good enough' for certain equipment, confuses me.


Posted
First, go get a second opinion from another reputable sales outlet. If you are dead set on those mizuno's then go to their website and locate a top mizuno outfitter in your area. From there if your second opinion says a lot of the same things maybe your just being stubborn and listen to there opinions. Golf is a process and some club designs are not for right for everyone. I play mizuno's and the salesmen talked me out of one model for another and after 4 rounds I couldn't be happier.

Posted

I think your right...it is a process, I'm just not convinced it's a staged gear process like NASCAR let's say. As each of us is on a different path, I think I was right to stick with the MB's all along as this is the club that is most similar to what I learned to play on 30 years ago. As I have an aversion to playing with dead men's clubs I sought out a new set only to buy the wrong thing, which were the Burner cavity backs.

I'm not looking for my club to fix my swing, I will fix my swing on my own. I really just want to be done using somebody else's clubs and I don't like the burners I bought.

But why this push by the pros to put me back into another cavity club? I like high flying ball flights and could never get that with my burners. Besides all that....maybe I just like the number 59.

This isn't the first time I have encountered this resistance by the pro's. I thought I would buy some Titelist MB 710's last year only to be pushed back out the door due to low swing speed. I let it rest till this season only to be right back into the same boat. I may just go have my wife buy them for me. I cant believe it's come to that....sad for all parties involved really.


Posted

Thank you for contacting Mizuno USA.  Overall, we recommend the MP 53 irons to players with handicaps of 0-14.  Even though it is a better players iron, it does offer a decent amount of forgiveness with the slightly deeper cavity, and milled pocket cavity on the 3-7 irons.  Without seeing you swing, it is tough for us to know exactly why the fitter would say that these irons are not for you.  It's certainly possible that they feel like your abilities would be better served playing a more forgiving iron.  That is something that you would have to decide.  We never like to talk anyone out of a product, but rather point them in a direction that might be more suitable for their current abilities.  The club fitter may feel more confident in you using an iron from our JPX category before stepping into an MP iron.  If you have any additional questions about what irons may be right for your current game, please feel free to let us know.

Best regards,

Mizuno USA

http://www.mizunousa.com
Consumer Support Division
1-800-966-1211

So here again we see mention of this stepping process of equipment. What would I learn from the JPX line that I couldn't learn from the MP line? Very cool of them to reply same day, no?

Are people concerned I will be frustrated with bad shots and leave the game? Is it not possible that the feedback I get from bad shots leads to great shots right after? What really sucks is that I think I told everyone MP 53 when in fact it was the 59's I was trying to buy. Forged blades is what I am after....


Posted
Why do you want an iron that will result in poorer shots and ultimately higher scores given your experience and skill level? Having said that, if you want them, buy them.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

who says it will result in poorer shots? Of course I wouldn't want such a thing. I have every confidence this will lead to better shots! Thus I want them. For all the fitter knows by using the MB's I just increased my control and distance by 10,000%. He has nothing with which to base my game other then a few swings, using his clubs. I may use a shovel and rake on my home course for all the fitter knows. But the fitter made certain assumptions about my game based on those few swings and I cant help but think it has more to do with worthiness then my needs. The fitter decided in three swings that I was unfit for the MP's and fit for the JPX.  Everyone seems to think that I need a cavity club or as Muzino puts it something else since I am not of the 'better players' category again based on 3 swings while being fitted.

I go home without the clubs but with a new drive to figure out why Muzino and the fitter think me unworthy. I'm already practicing in the yard, quickly discovering what I did wrong on the test and am now willing to go and retest albeit elsewhere. Silly this game marketing......and none of my story fits into their clip on club fitter.


Posted
First off, it is your money, buy what you want. I think most retailers will gladly take your money if that is what you want. They are suggesting a more forgiving club because they feel you might be more consistent. But I understand your motives and point of view. I have a pristene set of Titleist DCI Gold Triangle 1-PW from 1992. Your basic investment cast, hot loft(for the day)offset cavity back. I have a pristene set of 1979 Wilson Staff Tour Blades 2-PW. My scoring is similar to yours. I can play with either set and on any given day, my score wont be affected that much-maybe 2-3 strokes on average-but depending on how I am swinging. If I am swinging bad, I score bad, swinging good, I score good. That said, if I take both 5 irons and hit similar balls, say ten with each club, the center of the "group" will be maybe half a club longer, and the dispersion will be maybe twice as tight with the DCI's. The very best with the Wilson will be as long or longer than the DCI, but the worse ones will be worse. See my sig-I don't play with either set that much, but I do enjoy the blades and also often play with persimmon woods. I like it and enjoy it and like the way it looks and the way it feels when I occasionally hit a pure one. The points are: you will be more consistent with a more forgiving club. If the experience is more important to you than the score(I am kinda like that) then play what you want.

Don

In the bag:

Driver: PING 410 Plus 9 degrees, Alta CB55 S  Fairway: Callaway Rogue 3W PX Even Flow Blue 6.0; Hybrid: Titleist 818H1 21* PX Even Flow Blue 6.0;  Irons: Titleist 718 AP1 5-W2(53*) Shafts- TT AMT Red S300 ; Wedges Vokey SM8 56-10D Putter: Scotty Cameron 2016 Newport 2.5  Ball: Titleist AVX or 2021 ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
If you want them, buy them. The MP 59 is a great iron.....for those with the swing to hit them consistently.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I went to Edwin Watts, I informed him I did not wish to be talked out of the MP 59! He said no problem I own them too, but you know what I play with JPX. Half hour later, I'm having dinner with my wife, no clubs, saying to her: see I'm not crazy. Nobody will sell me the clubs! We think we now understand the differing motives. I do not wish to mask my swing faults and he does. Maybe so I will purchase two sets like I've already done? Madness!

Posted

It's often mentioned but I don't get why people think that playing with blades is going to make them somehow magically improve their swing. Sure, you're going to feel mishits a little more, but that's not going to make it any easier to correct your swing faults.

The biggest difference between an MP-59 and a game improvement (GI) club is that the centre of gravity is going to be lower in the GI club. The lower centre of gravity will help you launch the ball higher. That may or may not be a good thing for your swing.

I find it very strange that in all of this there is no mention of shafts. The shaft you get will have more bearing over how the club plays for you than the clubhead will. It may have been that the only MP-59s they had in stock had heavy, stiff shafts in them and that may be why the salesperson was saying that they weren't a good fit for you. That would make sense to me.

In the end the most important thing is that you like and feel confident in the club you're playing. But do yourself a favour and go and find someone with the Mizuno fitting system. They will get you to hit with a device that measures your swing and will recommend a few shafts for you to try. They will then put those shafts into the clubhead(s) you like and let you try them.


Posted
I don't buy the argument that cavity backed clubs are a cost free benefit. Simple physics would dictate that a larger sweet spot means less mass across the entire sweet spot thus less of a sweet spot if the club remains the same weight. I think the only true comparison possible is to take my old club along and swing them all to see which I feel best with. If I were looking for consistency then maybe a cavity would work but MB clubs seem to offer loftier balls.

Posted
Originally Posted by Prodaytrader

I don't buy the argument that cavity backed clubs are a cost free benefit. Simple physics would dictate that a larger sweet spot means less mass across the entire sweet spot thus less of a sweet spot if the club remains the same weight. I think the only true comparison possible is to take my old club along and swing them all to see which I feel best with. If I were looking for consistency then maybe a cavity would work but MB clubs seem to offer loftier balls.

If by loftier balls you mean higher launch, then it's about where the weight (centre of gravity) is. It's lower in game improvement cavity backs, thus they launch the ball higher.

For many players, that higher launch is the "cost". I don't want higher launch. You also get a bigger clubhead and a larger sole, which have their disadvantages (and of course advantages).

I can't see you being happy with cavity backs, you've made up your mind but at least go and make sure you get the right shaft in them. If the salesperson didn't want to sell you his MP-59s because of swing speed, it was probably more to do with shafts. And shafts that are too heavy, too stiff or have the wrong launch profile for your swing are going to make it both hard to play, and hard to improve.


Posted
Is it at all possible that your swing speed isn't fast enough to get these clubs hitting the ball in the air? Could you possibly be over estimating your ability? How about posting a video of your swing?

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4621 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.