Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4583 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. Does green side spin make a noticeable difference from tour to entry level balls?

    • Yes
      16
    • No
      4


Recommended Posts

Posted

After my round this morning I went to the practice green just to hit some little pitch and chip shots around the green,  I used two balls, my normal ProV1x and a DT SoLo.  I will be honest if you took the labels off the ball and told me to hit them, I would probably not be able to tell you the difference.  Granted this was not a large sample size, but I am not so sure that most of us hit green side shots with enough speed to have noticeable difference in spin.  Even though many people here probably think that they do.  Where I think it could make a difference is in your half wedge shots, but even there I am not sure how much.  Talk me off the ledge or push me over.

Nate

:tmade:(10.5) :pxg:(4W & 7W) MIURA(3-PW) :mizuno:(50/54/60) 

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I found a DT solo on the course and played it for 2 rounds before the lake monster got it. I was very impressed with it, felt great off all my clubs. Think that'll be my next ball.

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I am probably going to try it out over the next couple rounds as well.  I played it for the last two holes this morning and it played nicely.

Nate

:tmade:(10.5) :pxg:(4W & 7W) MIURA(3-PW) :mizuno:(50/54/60) 

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by cipher

After my round this morning I went to the practice green just to hit some little pitch and chip shots around the green,  I used two balls, my normal ProV1x and a DT SoLo.  I will be honest if you took the labels off the ball and told me to hit them, I would probably not be able to tell you the difference.  Granted this was not a large sample size, but I am not so sure that most of us hit green side shots with enough speed to have noticeable difference in spin.  Even though many people here probably think that they do.  Where I think it could make a difference is in your half wedge shots, but even there I am not sure how much.  Talk me off the ledge or push me over.


i don't play the prov1 but i swear when i find one on the course and use it, i notice a big difference in chipping.  it does the hop twice and check immediately vs. most other balls i play with having a bit more roll.  that would be very interesting to try a dt solo, i always thought they were for distance and not spin.


Posted
Originally Posted by cipher

After my round this morning I went to the practice green just to hit some little pitch and chip shots around the green,  I used two balls, my normal ProV1x and a DT SoLo.  I will be honest if you took the labels off the ball and told me to hit them, I would probably not be able to tell you the difference.  Granted this was not a large sample size, but I am not so sure that most of us hit green side shots with enough speed to have noticeable difference in spin.  Even though many people here probably think that they do.  Where I think it could make a difference is in your half wedge shots, but even there I am not sure how much.  Talk me off the ledge or push me over.

I agree.  I always used proV1's (or x's) basically "just cuz" and have started messing around with other balls this year to see if I notice much difference.  I've gone through Callaway Hex Chrome, Bridgestone e and B series, TM Penta 3 and 5, and a sleeve of Erik's "Kick X" balls.  I have not been able to tell the difference in any of them from putting to 75 yards and from 115 out.  I do feel like the Prov1's (and the Kick X as well) had a lot more spin on those 3/4 to full swing wedge shots, but other than that they all felt pretty much the same.

And, ditto on the lack of scientific evidence based on the small sample size.  I acknowledge its possible I didn't hit the same shots with the different balls, or have enough tries to compare thoroughly, so at this point, if you gave me any one of those without a label, I would not be able to tell much difference in playability.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

I notice it with chipping but not pitch shots.  From longer range, say 150 yards, there is a big difference with holding the green on approach shots for me.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Golfingdad

I agree.  I always used proV1's (or x's) basically "just cuz" and have started messing around with other balls this year to see if I notice much difference.  I've gone through Callaway Hex Chrome, Bridgestone e and B series, TM Penta 3 and 5, and a sleeve of Erik's "Kick X" balls.  I have not been able to tell the difference in any of them from putting to 75 yards and from 115 out.  I do feel like the Prov1's (and the Kick X as well) had a lot more spin on those 3/4 to full swing wedge shots, but other than that they all felt pretty much the same.

And, ditto on the lack of scientific evidence based on the small sample size.  I acknowledge its possible I didn't hit the same shots with the different balls, or have enough tries to compare thoroughly, so at this point, if you gave me any one of those without a label, I would not be able to tell much difference in playability.

I would say you are pretty much right on IMO.  I also tend to play for more release green side and often if I miss am short anyway.  If I need to stop something quick I just hit it higher.  I pretty much don't even try to play hop and stop shots anymore.

Originally Posted by boogielicious

I notice it with chipping but not pitch shots.  From longer range, say 150 yards, there is a big difference with holding the green on approach shots for me.

For me on full shots I cannot get any ball to release much at all no matter what ball I am using.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I don't know.  I might be rolling into the qualifier tournament in a couple weeks with a bag full of DT SoLo balls.

Nate

:tmade:(10.5) :pxg:(4W & 7W) MIURA(3-PW) :mizuno:(50/54/60) 

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Usually i can tell on pitch shots. Chip shots are lower spin, so there isn't much disparity with golf balls. But pitch shots there is, i've had a few pro-v's spin back on me, when a mid range golf ball would one hop and stop. This also happens more on full shots as well with shorter irons.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by saevel25

Usually i can tell on pitch shots. Chip shots are lower spin, so there isn't much disparity with golf balls. But pitch shots there is, i've had a few pro-v's spin back on me, when a mid range golf ball would one hop and stop. This also happens more on full shots as well with shorter irons.

That makes sense.  I must just not hit the ball hard enough on full shots or something to get the ball spinning back away from my pitch mark.  A little hop and then it might spin just a bit but never past the pitch mark and I usually don't get the ball to release.  I love it though because if you know your number you know where the shot will end up.

Nate

:tmade:(10.5) :pxg:(4W & 7W) MIURA(3-PW) :mizuno:(50/54/60) 

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Dont worry about spinning the ball back. It takes a good amount of clubhead speed, solid contact and a high spin ball, plus fast greens help as well. But its terribly uncontrollable. Look at all the pro's at Merion who were taking it off the green with to much spin.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by cipher

I love it though because if you know your number you know where the shot will end up.

Originally Posted by saevel25

Dont worry about spinning the ball back. It takes a good amount of clubhead speed, solid contact and a high spin ball, plus fast greens help as well. But its terribly uncontrollable. Look at all the pro's at Merion who were taking it off the green with to much spin.

That is what I am saying.  I don't worry about it and don't want to spin it back.

Nate

:tmade:(10.5) :pxg:(4W & 7W) MIURA(3-PW) :mizuno:(50/54/60) 

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by cipher

That makes sense.  I must just not hit the ball hard enough on full shots or something to get the ball spinning back away from my pitch mark.  A little hop and then it might spin just a bit but never past the pitch mark and I usually don't get the ball to release.  I love it though because if you know your number you know where the shot will end up.

This is what I'm thinking too.  Very, very few are the times that excessive backspin on a short approach shot has HELPED me recently. And while I'm sure that looks cool, I've come to the conclusion that I much prefer a shot that will just sit down where it hits. I have a hard enough time controlling distance ... I'm definitely not at the level where I can control spin. :)

However, one thing I will say regarding DT solo's and other balls at that price point ... I have always imagined that I could tell a difference between them and the "premium" balls off the putter.  The premium ones also feel (read: sound) soft off the putter, whereas I have always been under the impresson that the cheaper balls felt clunky or clicky or "pingy."

Side note:  I just remembered that before the days of the prov1's and even before the days of the Professional ... back when you really couldn't afford to play a pro ball unless you were a scratch golfer - because they would cut when you hit them poorly - the Titleist DT Wound was my favorite!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

IMO the best ball for hop and stop is the Srixon Z Star.

Still can't believe you guys don't notice a ProV1 on chip shots.  To me it is noticeably different, and a lot of times I'll play one without realizing it until I hit a chip, then I can tell.


Posted

A DT Solo is a better ball than the Precept Laddie so this may not apply . .but I definitely notice better spin even on short chips vs the Precept Laddie.  A whle back I bought a ton of refurbished Precept Laddies for cheap . . . so I use them a lot.  It's not huge - even the laddie will check up a bit when hit properly . .but I feel the roll-out is a bit less with the ProV1 (for say, a 3 yard chip hit with a sandwedge).


Posted
Originally Posted by Golfingdad

This is what I'm thinking too.  Very, very few are the times that excessive backspin on a short approach shot has HELPED me recently. And while I'm sure that looks cool, I've come to the conclusion that I much prefer a shot that will just sit down where it hits. I have a hard enough time controlling distance ... I'm definitely not at the level where I can control spin. :)

However, one thing I will say regarding DT solo's and other balls at that price point ... I have always imagined that I could tell a difference between them and the "premium" balls off the putter.  The premium ones also feel (read: sound) soft off the putter, whereas I have always been under the impresson that the cheaper balls felt clunky or clicky or "pingy."

Side note:  I just remembered that before the days of the prov1's and even before the days of the Professional ... back when you really couldn't afford to play a pro ball unless you were a scratch golfer - because they would cut when you hit them poorly - the Titleist DT Wound was my favorite!

FWIW I think the DT solo is pretty sweet off the putter.

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

That's because DT Solo is a bloody good ball. I would have preferred DT Solo with my standard of play over ProV1. I also liked its predecessor, the DT Spin over the Tour Professional 90. Apart from less durability, I didn't notice much difference between DT Solo and ProV1 in both distance and spin.


Posted
Originally Posted by Ernest Jones

FWIW I think the DT solo is pretty sweet off the putter.

Yeah, I thought it was surprisingly soft off the putter as well.

Nate

:tmade:(10.5) :pxg:(4W & 7W) MIURA(3-PW) :mizuno:(50/54/60) 

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by tuffluck

Still can't believe you guys don't notice a ProV1 on chip shots.  To me it is noticeably different, and a lot of times I'll play one without realizing it until I hit a chip, then I can tell.

Yes, but I don't have your ball striking skills.

Originally Posted by Ernest Jones

FWIW I think the DT solo is pretty sweet off the putter.

It's worth a lot ... $48 vs. $20 per dozen.  I may have to give them a shot ... if they worked out, my wallet will thank you!!!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4583 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.