• Announcements

    • iacas

      Visit FlagstickRule.com   03/13/2017

      Visit the site flagstickrule.com to read about and sign a petition for the USGA/R&A regarding the one terrible rule in the proposed "modernized" rules for 2019.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
tuffluck

13th club for a long hitter

38 posts in this topic

I've had 12 clubs for some time: D, 3w, 3h, 4-PW, UW, and 56 degree.  Recently I made some drastic changes in my swing and got some amazing results.  I was hitting my 56 degree 75y total before on a full swing and UW 110y on a full swing, and now I'm hitting them 120y/150y respectively.  That range makes the <100y shots a little bit awkward with my highest wedge, the 56 degree.

I'm leaning towards a 62 degree wedge, and just doing some backwards math that club would be about 80y on a full swing, which would complete a pretty good lower range for me on full shots.  The Vokey is only offered in 62-07, and I'm not sure if that bounce is too low for some full shots with a 62 wedge, though.

I'm just curious what others recommend, specifically guys that hit most of their wedges over 100y.  Before it was a lot easier to justify the 56 degree as my only wedge, but now I'm thinking another wedge would be a smarter play.  Thank you!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

If you want a bit more bounce, you could always get a 60-10 and have it bent to 62. That would take the bounce up around 12.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'd just get into doing some distance control work with my 56. choke down to an exact spot on the club(3 inches is good) or only make a backswing 3/4 of the way to the top, even rank amatuers can control distance effectively by choking down and only taking a half(50 yards), a quarter(30) or 3/4(100 yards) I would guess that you'll hit a 60* wedge about 90 yards now, but that 100-115 gap is rarely a full swing for anyone. I like to hit a 50% pitching wedge.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest relearning how to stop delofting your wedges and how to hit them properly..... ;-)
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by tuffluck

I've had 12 clubs for some time: D, 3w, 3h, 4-PW, UW, and 56 degree.  Recently I made some drastic changes in my swing and got some amazing results.  I was hitting my 56 degree 75y total before on a full swing and UW 110y on a full swing, and now I'm hitting them 120y/150y respectively.  That range makes the <100y shots a little bit awkward with my highest wedge, the 56 degree.

I'm leaning towards a 62 degree wedge, and just doing some backwards math that club would be about 80y on a full swing, which would complete a pretty good lower range for me on full shots.  The Vokey is only offered in 62-07, and I'm not sure if that bounce is too low for some full shots with a 62 wedge, though.

I'm just curious what others recommend, specifically guys that hit most of their wedges over 100y.  Before it was a lot easier to justify the 56 degree as my only wedge, but now I'm thinking another wedge would be a smarter play.  Thank you!

I think the first thing you should probably do is get a putter! ;)

After that, I think it makes sense to go ahead and get a lob wedge.  Personally, I think 62 is bit a much - based on your sand wedge being 56, I'd probably go with 60 - but whatever you feel fills that last gap is your best bet.  My sand wedge is 54.5 and my lob is 59.  (Designed such that the gaps from 9 iron to the end are all 4.5 degrees.)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I suggest relearning how to stop delofting your wedges and how to hit them properly..... ;-)

Hitting my 4i 220 and drives 310, so I don't think I'm delofting anything, unless I'm delofting everything. Good suggestion about learning the 56 a bit better, I am pretty good controlling the distance with that club actually, but in a way I guess having a gap in distance and an extra spot in the bag is convincing I may as well get another wedge.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you've got room for an extra club, then I think a lob wedge is the only way to go. I have a 60, but anything between 60-62 would probably suit you well.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I have some buddies who are long hitters that carry 50, 54 and 58. I always thought 58* was more practical than 60* for full swing shots because you don't sky it quite as much which helps control distance into the green.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Would be helpful to know what the lofts of all your clubs are before making a suggestion. I've used three different setups this year and my wedge selection was based less on how far I hit my driver than what I needed to fill specific gaps. My largest gaps are on the long side of the bag because those clubs get me to where the shorter clubs make a difference. After I bought my current iron set, with 44* PW, which I use like a 9i, I went to a 48/10-52/10-56/14-60/12 wedge set.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by David in FL

I suggest relearning how to stop delofting your wedges and how to hit them properly.....


Do you mean that you need to use less lag for wedges, while still maintaining it for all other clubs?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Do you mean that you need to use less lag for wedges, while still maintaining it for all other clubs?

Not really. I was suggesting that short of tour pro swing speeds, the likely way to hit a gap wedge 150 yds is to have so much forward shaft lean at impact that the effective loft is reduced significantly. Of course it's possible that tuffluck has tour pro swing speed too...... I'm just jealous. I wish I could hit driver, wedge into those pesky little 470 yd par 4's.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by David in FL

Not really. I was suggesting that short of tour pro swing speeds, the likely way to hit a gap wedge 150 yds is to have so much forward shaft lean at impact that the effective loft is reduced significantly.

Of course it's possible that tuffluck has tour pro swing speed too...... I'm just jealous. I wish I could hit driver, wedge into those pesky little 470 yd par 4's.

I guess I missed that part of the OP.  I saw the 220 yard 4 iron (which is fine), and the 310 yard driver (uh-huh, sure) but somehow glossed over the 120 sw/150 uw part.  That is a bit ridiculous.

tuffluck, if you really do hit those 2 clubs that far, my first suggestion would be to try and keep your shoes on when you swing.  If you're hitting a 56* wedge 120 yards, I don't care how good or big you might be ... I think you're swinging too damn hard.  (I consider myself a fairly long hitter and a full swing with my 54.5 - that is 1" longer than standard - goes 110)

Secondly ... I'd suggest that you'd be better off with a setup more like mine, which means you'd have to dump the 56 too.  30 yards is waaaaaay too big of a gap between wedges, IMO.  Don't add a 62, but instead lose the 56 and add a 54 and a 58.  You say "UW" so I assume that you are talking about Pings, which means its likely 50*.  It also means that your PW is 45 or 46, so logically, it would make sense to have a 54/58 combo.  That means instead of going 150/120/80 and leaving 30 and 40 yard gaps, you'd be able to go 150/130/110, which is a little more sensible if you ask me.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Golfingdad

I guess I missed that part of the OP.  I saw the 220 yard 4 iron (which is fine), and the 310 yard driver (uh-huh, sure) but somehow glossed over the 120 sw/150 uw part.  That is a bit ridiculous.

tuffluck, if you really do hit those 2 clubs that far, my first suggestion would be to try and keep your shoes on when you swing.  If you're hitting a 56* wedge 120 yards, I don't care how good or big you might be ... I think you're swinging too damn hard.  (I consider myself a fairly long hitter and a full swing with my 54.5 - that is 1" longer than standard - goes 110)

Secondly ... I'd suggest that you'd be better off with a setup more like mine, which means you'd have to dump the 56 too.  30 yards is waaaaaay too big of a gap between wedges, IMO.  Don't add a 62, but instead lose the 56 and add a 54 and a 58.  You say "UW" so I assume that you are talking about Pings, which means its likely 50*.  It also means that your PW is 45 or 46, so logically, it would make sense to have a 54/58 combo.  That means instead of going 150/120/80 and leaving 30 and 40 yard gaps, you'd be able to go 150/130/110, which is a little more sensible if you ask me.


I really don't think I swing too hard. Plus, the numbers make sense if you start with a 4i @ 220 and work your way back ~10y per club...5i 210, 6i 200, 7i 190, 8i 180, 9i 170, PW 160, UW 150, 54 130, 56 120, etc.

The 56 is such a great and versatile club for me, I feel ditching it would be abandoning the "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" mentality, so I'm just trying to add something else that would compliment it for tighter/closer shots.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by tuffluck

I really don't think I swing too hard. Plus, the numbers make sense if you start with a 4i @ 220 and work your way back ~10y per club...5i 210, 6i 200, 7i 190, 8i 180, 9i 170, PW 160, UW 150, 54 130, 56 120, etc.

The 56 is such a great and versatile club for me, I feel ditching it would be abandoning the "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" mentality, so I'm just trying to add something else that would compliment it for tighter/closer shots.

Then I'd second Geauxforbroke's recommendation ... You want 62 but are concerned with 7* being too little bounce, so get the 60/10 and bend it to a 62/12.  Voila ... problem solved.

And regarding the swinging hard comment ... the reason why I say that is because I hit a 4 iron 220 when I hit it solidly, yet when I take what I consider to be a "hard" swing with my 54.5 SW it's only going 115.  If I had a 56, I would bet my "hard" swing would go 105 max.  Maybe "hard" isn't the right word though, because my "full" swings with wedges are not really as full as with longer clubs.  So perhaps your swing is a little too long instead of too hard.

My point simply being that you don't NEED to be hitting short irons/wedges that far.  There is no benefit, and in fact, as you are finding out, there is a detriment, because now you have problems when you're too close to the green.  (That statement should never have to be uttered ... nobody should ever be too close to the green)  A little bit shorter and smoother swings would bring down those distances such that the gaps are closer together and you have smaller gaps at the bottom and bigger gaps at the top.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by David in FL

Not really. I was suggesting that short of tour pro swing speeds, the likely way to hit a gap wedge 150 yds is to have so much forward shaft lean at impact that the effective loft is reduced significantly.

Of course it's possible that tuffluck has tour pro swing speed too...... I'm just jealous. I wish I could hit driver, wedge into those pesky little 470 yd par 4's.


I didn't catch that he hit his UW (~54 degrees?) 150 yards, either. If I could hit it that far the ball would travel about 120 to 130 yards up in the air. I understand now that he must be delofting it.

Thanks for the explanation, Dave.

To Tuffluck, you should get professionally fitted. I don't know how much you can get from the internet.

However, GolfingDad is really good , and if I were you I would try to listen to what he has to say. Keep in mind that he is a really big dude, and you might need to get shorter clubs.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Lihu

I didn't catch that he hit his UW (~54 degrees?) 150 yards, either. ...

No, a standard Ping UW (gap wedge, approach wedge, I think they're all the same) is 50*

We also don't know where he's playing.  If he's up in the sky somewhere (Colorado, Montana, etc, etc) then the 150 UW isn't crazy at all.

I am just stereotyping that a guy with a 15 handicap who hits it that far is probably swinging out of control in some way, shape or form.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Basically following up Golfingdad's posts.

If you really do just have natural ultra high swing speed or just aren't ready to hear it (I wasn't when i was playing off a 15) then it is what it is.  But before you start buying clubs, look at your FW% and GIR%.  I'm CAPABLE of hitting my 4i 220 and my drives 310.  But I'd play to about a 15-20 if I swung that way.  The longer I've played and the more I've learned, the easier I've swung.  In my standard SoCal dry hot sunny weather, I play my 4i to 200-205 instead of 220, and expect my drives to roll out to ~280 or so instead of 310.  I've started breaking 80 sometimes on easy courses swinging that way.  When I strike one of those clubs particularly well (when it's not cold or wet) they still go that far, or nearly as far.  But to average that distance I'd have to cut my FW% and GIR% in half, or worse.

One more thing to think about if you need the convincing is that pros really do dial it way back.  I saw Bubba in a Pro-Am Wednesday driving comp once where he was putting it out to 360-380.  In competition he drives it more like 320-330.  And as a spectacularly naturally gifted pro his fairway percentage when going from 85% to 100% drops WAY less than yours or mine.  You're a 15 right now.  Surely you don't want to go back to being a quite short hitter, but are you sure you aren't going 110% every swing and could shoot much much better scores swinging 80%?

That said, I'm a huge fan of the LW.  I played 2h, 3i-PW, 54˚ SW for a long time, and both my 60-80 yard shots and my green side shots improved dramatically when I got my 60˚.  It's low bounce, but I don't really find it a problem.  It means I don't feel super comfortable using it out of the sand much, but except in really hard bunkers I'm comfortable opening my higher bounce 54˚ up more and just pounding the sand hard to get more height.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • There are several statements that I disagree with which I feel are important to discuss: All golf balls do not go about the same distance.  A low compression, 2-piece Surlyn covered model will launch higher and with less spin than a 5-piece, high compression urethane covered model which will result in a noticeable difference in distance off the tee.  Dean even stated in another answer "The soft golf ball market has taken off due to the lower spinning balls means players can be longer in distance." Regarding balls for different swing speeds and compression:  3) Bridgestone (and I think Callaway) has come out with tour caliber balls for players who swing under 105mph. Is it possible to design a tour caliber ball for a specific segment of swing speed or is this just mostly a marketing thing?  DEAN: The whole swing speed story to me is one of the most over-rated stories in golf. Companies force or teach golfers to play low compression balls so their low swing speed can compress the ball. The problem with this is that low compression balls have the lowest spin in all shots, so they are pushing players to play a ball with no performance at all… and when you need that spin around the green, it's not there…            I almost don't know where to start on this one.  The concept of designing golf balls based on swing speeds doesn't teach or force players to use a low compression ball...it's about using a ball that has the appropriate compression for your swing speed.  Some players will have better results with a higher compression ball, others will have better results with a lower compression.  Keep in mind, there is a difference between "lower compression" and "low compression".  Most of the urethane tour balls have a compression rating somewhere between the mid 70s to mid 90s.  Tour models like the Chrome Soft, B330-RX and B330-RXS are in the mid 60s, which is lower.  Balls like the Supersoft and e6 are in the upper 30s and 40s, which is considered low.  Dean's statement that "low compression balls have the lowest spin on all shots" is somewhere between a little misleading and flat-out wrong.  It's true that a lower compression ball will spin less (and launch higher) than a firmer ball on full shots.  But on short game shots around the green, the ball is not compressed.  On pitch shots, chip shots, and greenside bunker shots for example,    the only part of the ball that is being activated is the cover. Notice on this chart that the lowest compression ball is very close to the highest spinning, and the lowest spinning ball has almost the same compression rating!  The point is, compression has little to no affect on short game shots...the cover is the main factor.  All 4 of these models have a urethane cover, but the two that provide the most spin have softer covers.  To put this in context, the chart below was a test Golf Digest did in 2015 which shows the performance on a partial wedge shot (I think it was 40 yds) with most of the balls on the market at the time The different colors represented the price point.  These results don't match the first chart I posted exactly which can happen when player testing (this one shows the B330 has higher spin than the RXS). Is there a difference between the lower spinning "red dots" and the highest spinning?  Sure.  There should be though.  Golf balls are designed to have different types of performance for different types of players.  The B330-RX has the lowest spin among the red dot models, but that doesn't mean it's lacking in performance...it spins exactly how the ball designers intended it to, because not everyone wants/needs maximum spin.  Notice the e7...this is a high compression ball very comparable to the B330, but has very different spin characteristics. So again, higher compression doesn't mean higher spin around the green and lower compression doesn't necessarily mean low spin.  About the only thing that I could agree with Dean's comment on would be that all the ultra-low compression balls are Surlyn covered models designed for distance, so it's true that these balls have low spin on all shots and will not offer the same level of performance around the greens, but again, that has more to do with the cover than the compression.  The fact is, there are lower compression balls that perform at the highest level. The B330-RXS is the same type of ball as the Pro V1 in many respects, and performs just as well as, or even better for many players, so I'm surprised by his comments that fitting for swing speed is over-rated and lower compression balls have no performance.  That's like saying getting fit for the correct shaft flex is over-rated, and softer flex shafts don't perform as well as stiffer shafts!  Does anyone consider the Dynamic Gold S-300 to be a lower performing shaft than the Dynamic Gold X-100?  No, of course not. They are designed to do the same thing, but because some players don't swing as fast as others the softer flex will give them better results, just like the B330-RXS is the equal to the B330-S, but will fit players who don't swing as hard better. I'm also not on-board with the opinion that fitting with a driver is a "mistake" and when testing to choose a ball based on 100 yds and in.  I'm not saying that short game performance isn't important, but wow...to claim that testing with a driver is a mistake is ridiculous.  I'll make a simple point on this...anyone can hit good wedge shots with a Pro V1 or B330 or Z-Star.  Fast swingers, slower swingers, high handicappers, low handicappers...it doesn't matter, they can all get good results on wedge shots.  Does that mean that's the ball they should play, and it will work equally as well for the other aspects too?  No.  A wedge can mask any issues in performance because of the loft and backspin, but the driver exaggerates issues.  The same players who hit respectable wedge shots with various tour balls might struggle to keep shots in play or lose potential distance. And before anyone tries to use the old "the driver is used 14 times a round, but half of the shots are inside of 100 yds" argument...save it.  If you play a high spin ball and you're struggling to hit the fairway with your tee shots, that ball will not help you save shots around the green.  Too much spin for players who can't control it is worse than a lower spinning model. Sorry Dean...not trying to blast you or anything, just putting in my two cents.  Ok, maybe more like four cents!
    • So......Is this your point @Jack Watson?
    • https://thesandtrap.com/b/clubs/titleist_716_ap1_review My review for the site is above. I've been using them since writing this review. Excellent clubs. One watch out is with short game shots with the PW and GW. They will go a bit farther than a corresponding chip or pitch with the equivalent wedge. The ball feels like it jumps off the face with good contact. So be careful with that.
    • Thanks for all the comments. I realize change is always hard but single length, lie and weight make so much sense to me. I am going to build a set of Value Golf clubs and see what happens. As improve I may go back to normal but who knows.  I think it will be better for learning the overall game. Which in my opinion and observance needs a lot of help. In my other hobbies that required learned skills it was easy to find groups to help you with the skills and drills to improve them. Businesses that the hobby supported held seminars and workshops covering all aspects. Trying to find help, other than paid lessons, is impossible, at least in my area. 
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Golfgirl10543
      Golfgirl10543
      (43 years old)
    2. jkettman
      jkettman
      (28 years old)
    3. old man1953
      old man1953
      (64 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon