Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3461 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I won't try to dispute the Tiger website, but it does seem to me when they show those stats that 125 is the best of the best. Bubba type stuff.  It seems I saw a decent amount of 115's in the last tourney I watched.

Correct.  The bulk of tour pros are in the 113-115 range.  The best of the best (i.e. Bubba, DJ, Woodland, and TIGER) are in the mid 120s.

Kevin

Titleist 910 D3 9.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Titleist 910F 13.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Adams Idea A12 Pro hybrid 18*; 23* with RIP S flex
Titleist 712 AP2 4-9 iron with KBS C-Taper, S+ flex
Titleist Vokey SM wedges 48*, 52*, 58*
Odyssey White Hot 2-ball mallet, center shaft, 34"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Correct.  The bulk of tour pros are in the 113-115 range.  The best of the best (i.e. Bubba, DJ, Woodland, TST Elite and TIGER) are in the mid 120s.

FIFY

Dave :-)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Correct.  The bulk of tour pros are in the 113-115 range.  The best of the best (i.e. Bubba, DJ, Woodland, and TIGER) are in the mid 120s.

This seems to validate the chart listed previously. I think of the best golfers to be around a 200yd 6i.  And that is roughly what the chart shows - 120mph being a 196yd 6i.

I'm not sure it validates the 225yd 4-irons claimed in this thread.  Unless they are playing with the same swing speed and purity as the longest pros.  I guess that is possible.


Posted
Quote:

Originally Posted by k-troop

Correct.  The bulk of tour pros are in the 113-115 range.  The best of the best (i.e. Bubba, DJ, Woodland, TST Elite and TIGER) are in the mid 120s.

FIFY

I love when people sit and call people liars in such backhanded ways. I've played with a few people on this forum on the course, they know I'm not exaggerating how far I hit the ball. That being said, I'm nowhere near consistent or nearly accurate enough. I've used gps to measure my distances and know approximately what how far I hit each of my irons base on that and course markings. These of course can't be counted as 100% accurate as there are always discrepancies in those measurements. Do I hit the ball these exact distances every time? Of course not, but you don't pull a club and go by the shortest distance you hit it, you go by the distance it goes when you hit it well. I don't average 300 with my driver, but I do hit at least 1 or 2 per round in that general range with most others being around 275 or at worst 240-250. You can scoff or call me a liar all you want, makes not a bit of difference to the truth of it.

KICK THE FLIP!!

In the bag:
:srixon: Z355

:callaway: XR16 3 Wood
:tmade: Aeroburner 19* 3 hybrid
:ping: I e1 irons 4-PW
:vokey: SM5 50, 60
:wilsonstaff: Harmonized Sole Grind 56 and Windy City Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Correct.  The bulk of tour pros are in the 113-115 range.  The best of the best (i.e. Bubba, DJ, Woodland, and TIGER) are in the mid 120s.

Pro's range from 105 to 130, mostly in the range you said. But some pro's don't hit it as far as you think.

I love when people sit and call people liars in such backhanded ways. I've played with a few people on this forum on the course, they know I'm not exaggerating how far I hit the ball. That being said, I'm nowhere near consistent or nearly accurate enough. I've used gps to measure my distances and know approximately what how far I hit each of my irons base on that and course markings. These of course can't be counted as 100% accurate as there are always discrepancies in those measurements. Do I hit the ball these exact distances every time? Of course not, but you don't pull a club and go by the shortest distance you hit it, you go by the distance it goes when you hit it well. I don't average 300 with my driver, but I do hit at least 1 or 2 per round in that general range with most others being around 275 or at worst 240-250. You can scoff or call me a liar all you want, makes not a bit of difference to the truth of it.

I guess i should vouch for this. I played a round with Jeremie a few Saturday's ago. He is correct, if his contact was better, he would be hitting 280-290 consistently with the driver, and maybe get near 300 if he tweaked out a few extra MPH in the swing.

There are some seriously big hitters in these forums. I wish I had that kind of length.

Fwiw, my swing speed is 95-99mph.

You guys must be generating 120mph of club head speed.

The problem with that chart, there is no standard 3 iron. I could have a 15 yard gap between irons depending on brand.

Last time I checked Tiger Woods hits a 9i about 140 average and I don't think the PGA tour average for PW was more than 128ish. Whenever you see something that exceeds the averages on TV it's always due to extreme conditions, elevated tees, tail wind, St. Andrews rollout etc.

That's tiger hitting easy. He's hit some monster iron shots. To say Tiger only hits his 9 iron 140 is crap. Cause i hit my 9 iron 145-148, i know i don't have Tiger Strength. I don't know were golf digest got their numbers, but their wrong.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I could probably de-loft my 9 iron and hit it 165 yards if I wanted. But not sure there's much benefit in that type of distance. Maybe I'm naive, but I think hitting 4i, PW on a 370 yard par 4 is a stretch. If I had that type of length, I'd be playing off 2.2. instead of 12.2.
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I guess i should vouch for this. I played a round with Jeremie a few Saturday's ago. He is correct, if his contact was better, he would be hitting 280-290 consistently with the driver, and maybe get near 300 if he tweaked out a few extra MPH in the swing.

*off topic*

My new driver broke off at the head just like many others said happened to them . Although I've heard that several other companies that have the "straight fit" type connectors have had the same problem. I guess I should just get a non-adjustable driver to save myself the headache.

That's tiger hitting easy. He's hit some monster iron shots. To say Tiger only hits his 9 iron 140 is crap. Cause i hit my 9 iron 145-148, i know i don't have Tiger Strength. I don't know were golf digest got their numbers, but their wrong.

I think the problem is once pros get down into those "scoring" clubs they rarely are hitting it with a full swing, like you said, so their average length isn't how far the club actually hits for them if they take a full swing. Same as the driving statistics being off because they don't use driver on every shot that is counted for driving distance.

KICK THE FLIP!!

In the bag:
:srixon: Z355

:callaway: XR16 3 Wood
:tmade: Aeroburner 19* 3 hybrid
:ping: I e1 irons 4-PW
:vokey: SM5 50, 60
:wilsonstaff: Harmonized Sole Grind 56 and Windy City Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Maybe I'm naive, but I think hitting 4i, PW on a 370 yard par 4 is a stretch. If I had that type of length, I'd be playing off 2.2. instead of 12.2.

Length isn't everything. Pavin hits a 4i about 185 (even when he was on the PGA tour) and he's a +2. And I used to play regularly with a guy who was 2 clubs longer than me; I'd give him 10 shots and beat him every time.

Kevin

Titleist 910 D3 9.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Titleist 910F 13.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Adams Idea A12 Pro hybrid 18*; 23* with RIP S flex
Titleist 712 AP2 4-9 iron with KBS C-Taper, S+ flex
Titleist Vokey SM wedges 48*, 52*, 58*
Odyssey White Hot 2-ball mallet, center shaft, 34"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I love when people sit and call people liars in such backhanded ways. I've played with a few people on this forum on the course, they know I'm not exaggerating how far I hit the ball. That being said, I'm nowhere near consistent or nearly accurate enough. I've used gps to measure my distances and know approximately what how far I hit each of my irons base on that and course markings. These of course can't be counted as 100% accurate as there are always discrepancies in those measurements. Do I hit the ball these exact distances every time? Of course not, but you don't pull a club and go by the shortest distance you hit it, you go by the distance it goes when you hit it well. I don't average 300 with my driver, but I do hit at least 1 or 2 per round in that general range with most others being around 275 or at worst 240-250. You can scoff or call me a liar all you want, makes not a bit of difference to the truth of it.

Not directed at Jeremie necessarily, but this is why so many amateurs come up short of their intended target the vast majority of the time.  You'll seldom see them past the pin.....

.......unless they blade the crap out of a wedge! ;-)

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Length isn't everything. Pavin hits a 4i about 185 (even when he was on the PGA tour) and he's a +2. And I used to play regularly with a guy who was 2 clubs longer than me; I'd give him 10 shots and beat him every time.

If I had the length to hit 4iron, PW into par 4's I round make more pars and less doubles than hitting driver, 8i. That's all I'm saying.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Not directed at Jeremie necessarily, but this is why so many amateurs come up short of their intended target the vast majority of the time.  You'll seldom see them past the pin.....

.......unless they blade the crap out of a wedge!

No, you mistake my meaning. I don't mean that 1 out of 20 hit that goes extra far, I mean the distance you hit it most of the time. I don't count the flier that goes an extra 5-10 yards. Also, typically, you don't want to hit it too far anyway, usually short is safer than long when it comes to approach shots.

KICK THE FLIP!!

In the bag:
:srixon: Z355

:callaway: XR16 3 Wood
:tmade: Aeroburner 19* 3 hybrid
:ping: I e1 irons 4-PW
:vokey: SM5 50, 60
:wilsonstaff: Harmonized Sole Grind 56 and Windy City Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
No, you mistake my meaning. I don't mean that 1 out of 20 hit that goes extra far, I mean the distance you hit it most of the time. I don't count the flier that goes an extra 5-10 yards.

As I said......not necessarily directed at you, but a LOT of recreational golfers make their club selection based on the distance that results from as close to perfect contact as they ever come.  Most would be better off grabbing one extra club more often than not.  But then they'd have to admit to hitting 7-iron 160 rather than 9-iron. ;-)

Just as a fun exercise, next time you and your buddies play, keep track of how many approaches are truly pin-high or higher.  Don't tell anyone you're doing it.  When you finish the round, you'll be amazed.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

As I said......not necessarily directed at you, but a LOT of recreational golfers make their club selection based on the distance that results from as close to perfect contact as they ever come.  Most would be better off grabbing one extra club more often than not.  But then they'd have to admit to hitting 7-iron 160 rather than 9-iron.

True enough, though you just added 2 clubs to that selection... Either way, I agree some people tend to think " I hit this iron x distance one time, so I should use it every time for that distance". I know that just because I jacked my 9i 165 on time that's not how far I usually hit it.

KICK THE FLIP!!

In the bag:
:srixon: Z355

:callaway: XR16 3 Wood
:tmade: Aeroburner 19* 3 hybrid
:ping: I e1 irons 4-PW
:vokey: SM5 50, 60
:wilsonstaff: Harmonized Sole Grind 56 and Windy City Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
[U][/U][quote name="Jeremie Boop" url="/t/69462/playing-irons-only/90#post_892963"]True enough, though you just added 2 clubs to that selection... Either way, I agree some people tend to think " I hit this iron x distance one time, so I should use it every time for that distance". I know that just because I jacked my 9i 165 on time that's not how far I usually hit it. [/quote] The extra club is to account for the one club they already lie about! ;-)

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The extra club is to account for the one club they already lie about!

Ha, sneaky, one problem is some of the newer irons are so strong loft wise and have a little extra length on the shaft *Taylor Made especially* that a 9i is basically an 8i.

KICK THE FLIP!!

In the bag:
:srixon: Z355

:callaway: XR16 3 Wood
:tmade: Aeroburner 19* 3 hybrid
:ping: I e1 irons 4-PW
:vokey: SM5 50, 60
:wilsonstaff: Harmonized Sole Grind 56 and Windy City Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

As I said......not necessarily directed at you, but a LOT of recreational golfers make their club selection based on the distance that results from as close to perfect contact as they ever come.  Most would be better off grabbing one extra club more often than not.  But then they'd have to admit to hitting 7-iron 160 rather than 9-iron.

Just as a fun exercise, next time you and your buddies play, keep track of how many approaches are truly pin-high or higher.  Don't tell anyone you're doing it.  When you finish the round, you'll be amazed.

Yep. I'm constantly "helping" a friend of mine with his club selection. We'll walk up to a 160 yard par 3 and he'll grab his 8 iron. I'm like "Why don't you just hit a soft 7, you can control it better", so he does, and hits the green short of the pin.


Meanwhile, he swung a full swing with his 7 and was still short. I knew that would be the case, but worded it the way I did to help him out and spare his feelings. If I just said "You don't hit your 8 that far", he'd try to swing out of his shoes and shank it in the woods.

I have the opposite problem sometimes...if I'm 155 out, I'll sometimes hit my 7 iron, knowing full well a good shot is 165. But if I don't hit it perfect (which is often), I'll be good.

Ryan M
 
The Internet Adjustment Formula:
IAD = ( [ADD] * .96 + [EPS] * [1/.12] ) / (1.15)
 
IAD = Internet Adjusted Distance (in yards)
ADD = Actual Driver Distance (in yards)
EPS = E-Penis Size (in inches)
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

That's tiger hitting easy. He's hit some monster iron shots. To say Tiger only hits his 9 iron 140 is crap. Cause i hit my 9 iron 145-148, i know i don't have Tiger Strength. I don't know were golf digest got their numbers, but their wrong.

Whether it's his easy swing or not isn't relevant it's his average and they don't have to guess because the PGA tracks stats. But what I don't get is if the best players in the world aren't trying to nuke it every time why do amateurs do it?

Dave :-)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Its easier to just hit one number than try to scale back.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3461 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.