Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
joekelly

John Daly again. Now in So.Africa

15 posts in this topic

Tourney in South Africa, where the summer is just around the corner, and JD is one of 3 Americans in the field. Besides some of the local guys, he may be the best known.  He says he has rercovered from elbow surgery and is 'good to go'.  Whatever that means in his case.

When i was a boy, elbow bending was considered a 'sport'.  You know 'bending the elbow to bring the beer stein to the lips'.

More info

http://espn.go.com/golf/leaderboard?tour=euro

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

I imagine Daly will show up wherever and whenever there is appearance money to be paid. Anybody who quits on the course does not deserve to take a place away from somebody else.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I imagine Daly will show up wherever and whenever there is appearance money to be paid. Anybody who quits on the course does not deserve to take a place away from somebody else.

Yeah, but you can't blame him for taking the money if it's offered.  Sad that anyone running a tournament would extend him an invitation given his past transgressions.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I feel for JD though. I still am a huge fan. The guy has soo much talen it's too bad he let the sauce get in the way of a brilliant career and what could have been.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Daly played (well) on the South African tour from 1987 to 1990 -- before he broke through in the US. So he has a following down here.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Update. JD shot even par, 72,  Round 1. Low score was -7, so he's in the middle. Other American, B. Paolini shot +1 and final yank J Hahn,  DQ for reasons i do not know.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Update. JD shot even par, 72,  Round 1. Low score was -7, so he's in the middle. Other American, B. Paolini shot +1 and final yank J Hahn,  DQ for reasons i do not know.

Bad dancing? :-P

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=soEA3HkZ4XQ

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Different Hahn. John not James. And he was DQed for a very large brain fart.

http://golfweek.com/news/2013/nov/29/john-hahn-european-tour-dq-alfred-dunhill-champ/

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I read that article and would say 'what an ******* rule', pardon my french. During a stroke i have no problem but during an idle moment waiting around and merely swinging your club (oh, small stick also in the vicinity)=U R outta'  here.  What if he had placed 8 dead leaves in a straight row?  Also DQ?

And Ole JD missed the cut.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Different Hahn. John not James. And he was DQed for a very large brain fart. [URL=http://golfweek.com/news/2013/nov/29/john-hahn-european-tour-dq-alfred-dunhill-champ/]http://golfweek.com/news/2013/nov/29/john-hahn-european-tour-dq-alfred-dunhill-champ/[/URL]

Oh my, that's practically a brain poop! Where was his caddie?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I read that article and would say 'what an ******* rule', pardon my french. During a stroke i have no problem but during an idle moment waiting around and merely swinging your club (oh, small stick also in the vicinity)=U R outta'  here.  What if he had placed 8 dead leaves in a straight row?  Also DQ?

And Ole JD missed the cut.

It's a very simple, straight forward rule.  He should have known better.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It's a very simple, straight forward rule.  He should have known better.

Agreed. But I hope Mr. Hahn is not too discouraged, because I'd love to see more young US players giving it a go out in the rest of the wide world. Leopard Creek is an amazing track in the middle of proper, wild Africa and it's mind-expanding just being there. I wish they had managed to seal the deal on making it a WGC event. But the downside of being so remote is the support infrastructure becomes an issue.

Anyway, Schwartzel won again and sounded kind of pissed off that he made one bogey over the 4 days. He owns that course.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Agreed. But I hope Mr. Hahn is not too discouraged, because I'd love to see more young US players giving it a go out in the rest of the wide world. Leopard Creek is an amazing track in the middle of proper, wild Africa and it's mind-expanding just being there. I wish they had managed to seal the deal on making it a WGC event. But the downside of being so remote is the support infrastructure becomes an issue.

Anyway, Schwartzel won again and sounded kind of pissed off that he made one bogey over the 4 days. He owns that course.

Good grief, I'm happy if I get away with one bogey every 4 holes ! ;-)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Good grief, I'm happy if I get away with one bogey every 4 holes!

You and me both!

Last year Charl finished 24 under at the Dunhill to win by 12 strokes -- so I think it's fair to say that the layout suits his eye ...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I imagine Daly will show up wherever and whenever there is appearance money to be paid. Anybody who quits on the course does not deserve to take a place away from somebody else.

+1 and then some .   There are legit reasons to quit (injury, e.g).   But this guy quit out of frustration by hitting all of his remaining balls into water intentionally.   He can't even feint an injury like others?   That's just one of his many dumb SOB acts.    And the sponsors keep rewarding him with invitations to tournaments.   Whenever he's on TV, it gives me a reason to channel surfing.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

Advertisement
Advertisement


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • These are myths that I hear a lot. Some are just eye rolling trivia but some can hurt. 1. Tour pros continuously vary their shot shape based on hole demand. Not true. They have one predominant shot shape they play almost all the time. Only when in jail or extreme condition do they actually try anything out of their comfort zone - which is smaller than most folks think. 2. Tour pros are like swing doctors. They know everything there is to know about the golf swing. Nope - they are simply phenomenal listeners and executors. 3. You must understand the swing in it's entirety to learn and become better - Yeah, good luck on that path.   4. To have lag just hold the angle of the shaft to forearm until impact. - Lag is a result of good mechanics and club position and path. Can't force it. 5. You must have a superlight grip pressure (2-3 on a scale of 1 to 10) to hit good shots. - While white knuckling is just bad, you do need more grip pressure than you think.
    •   The problem is the twitter length version, get it as close to the hole as possible, is easy to read as, hit the longest club.  Really the argument in LSW (backed by stats), is around a multi-faceted risk assessment.  Simplifying less than the twitter version, hit it as far as possible without bringing "too much" risk into play.  The long version is basically a law of total probability argument, where you assess the probability of various outcomes with each current shot choice, and weight them by the average shots to hole out given each outcome, and choose the lowest. For example, you're sitting at 250 on a par 5.  You go through the potential outcomes of an 8i and 3i and estimate average shots to hole out from each: on target, slightly off target, chunk, blade, in jail, in hazard, open look but super penal rough, OB, whatever.  Then you think about the chances of these outcomes, and calculate the total expected score from each choice. The point in LSW is that you can't go through a bunch of equations for every shot, but if you're accurate about your average shot dispersions across clubs, then the typical bogey or better golfer is often overestimating the increase in risk from going for the longer shot, and underestimating the decrease in expected number of shots to hole out from getting it closer. The rule of thumb is that if there's not something in the layout that is a big risk at the longer distance but not at the short one – so in your case lateral hazard or big fairway thinning or big fairway bunker or much or penal rough or the like that starts at 75 yards out – then generally your lower expected total score is from hitting the longer club.  The strokes you lose when you do hit an errant long iron but wouldn't have hit an errant short iron are more than made up for by the strokes you gain from having an approach half as long when you don't hit an errant shot. Of course, it's always case by case and player by player.
    • I've been working on changing that for two years!
    • If this is true, then club fitting would be purely entertainment also and make no difference.  We could all use different clubs every time we played with no measurable effect on our score.  I'm not so sure all the time, money and effort that has gone towards studying the benefits of club fitting and developing custom club programs and fitting carts and training techs how to conduct a club fitting session would have been spent if it's all just "entertainment". Now, will there be a huge difference between the e6 and e7 for the average player?  No.  They are both 3 piece distance balls with the same type of cover, so the differences are not huge.  Noticeable, but not huge.  The difference between an e6 and a Pro V1 though will be dramatic.  And the number of players that played the Pro V that have been recommended the e6 are in the tens of thousands.  Not only is there a difference in the performance of those balls, but when you factor in the tendencies of the player the results can be substantial.  If a 10-15 yard gain won't have any affect on the average player's score, then you wouldn't mind if you had to give up 10-15 yards of distance off your drives and 5-7 off your irons, correct?  How would it affect your score if you had to tee off 25 yds  further back on every hole?  I'm guessing it would cost at least a couple of shots. Can @iacas shoot 75 with his wife's clubs?  Probably.  That doesn't mean that the equipment doesn't matter.  He would certainly need to make adjustments in his swing to hit them, which is hard to repeat precisely, so it would limit him from playing his best.  
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Dragondrake
      Dragondrake
      (57 years old)
    2. Mistabigevil
      Mistabigevil
      (36 years old)
    3. Taylor56
      Taylor56
      (61 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon