Advertisement
Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
saevel25

2014 NCAA Football

931 posts in this topic

Well since my Buckeyes currently SUCK at basketball. I thought I start something a bit more uplifting. NCAA FOOTBALL!!! Never too early to start discussing it.

Well as of right now the current big thing is the new proposed rule change. Basically a "FALL START" penalty for offenses that snap the ball with in the first 10 seconds of the play clock. Here is why I think it is total BS. Another reason why I am glad that Bret "The Crybaby" Bielema is out of the Big Ten.

All though they wave the rule for the last 2 minutes. Some teams need to hurry up for as much as the whole fourth quarter for a comeback. So this will actually inhibit the excitement of a comeback. Unlike what has been said, fast pace offenses DO NOT cause more injuries. In actuality injury reports say they cause LESS injuries. Probably more to do with scheme then fast pace, it still is a blow.

Bret cited death certificates, basically throwing CAL University under the bus because one of their players died during a training run. Hence this was not in a scrimmage, not in a game, it was during training.  What Bret should have advocated is for better physical screenings to make sure players who might have some sort of heart defect or other physical problem that could arise are ineligible to play. They can also review the practice methods as well. Claiming just because CAL runs high pace offense and a player died has nothing to do with fast pace offense is horrible twist of a tragic situation for that university.

Those advocating the change are NOT those who run high pace offenses. It would be different if a coach who use to run fast pace came forward claiming he saw negative impacts on athletes from his offense and wanted to make sure that they are protected. If you look at the two teams that like to control the clock, run it down, slow the game down it is Nick Saban and Bret Bielema. Makes me wonder what agenda they have.

I know he use to be a coach for that team up north. I give Rich Rod props for standing up for his philosophy on football and producing this,

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

@saevel25 ,

It's March and there is a foot of snow on the ground.  I don't start thinking about football until I can smell fall in the air!

Agreed on the false start penalty.  It is exciting to watch fast pace teams.  Peyton Manning would have a stroke if this happened in the NFL.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It's never too early or too late to talk about football in this state. There's football season and getting ready for football season and no time in between. ;-) Of couse Saban wants a rule change to slow the game down. It's pretty obvious that a fast paced offense is his Achiles heel...And he is WAY too stuborn to use it to his advantage on offense (so far and I figure forever). When he threatened to walk if he didn't get a new contract I would have told him it's been really fun, we really enjoyed it, and don't let the door hit you on the way out.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope they were some good crab legs!!!

Ha ha!

BTW. How did the Buckeyes look in spring training?

Alabama looked like crap!

Of course playing against yourselves it's always hard to tell for sure.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Go Irish!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Ha ha!

BTW. How did the Buckeyes look in spring training?

Alabama looked like crap!

Of course playing against yourselves it's always hard to tell for sure.

A lot of guys sat out, so there were a lot of 2nd and 3rd string guys in there. I think it did well to show the depth. I know the score was low, but Meyer knows he has Braxton back. He has a stable of talented running backs. Some serious speed on the edge, and a few guys with a year under their belts. If the offensive line can solidify then that offense will score on anyone. So really I was more concerned with the defense.

The D-line is just stacked. They got 8-10 guys who could flat out start for any team in the country. They already talked about how they are getting away from 1st and 2nd team for the D-line, and move them into pods or platoons. This is Larry Johnson's idea to curb the fast offenses. They have 4 guys who can switch in and out FAST. They don't switch out one or two guys, but the whole line. So they got 8-10 guys who can flat out terrorize an offense. Think of it this way. They return all starting D-lineman from last year. This D-line was ranked 9th in rushing defense. They ranked tied for 7th with 42 sacks last year. Want to guess how many of those were coverage sacks. Probably about 5 of them. If the secondary plays better, this D-line will cause some havoc next year.

As for the linebackers, finally some players are stepping up. Looks like the depth is finally developing.

Now the secondary is what will make or break this team next year. With the addition of Ash as the co-defensive coordinator. He switched to a coverage scheme similar to Narduzzi at Michigan State. A lot of press coverage. Simplify things down, solidify the secondary with what the linebackers and d-line is doing. Really allowing the the DB's to play more athletically. So, we'll see how that goes. There is hope, the Ash guy looks to be a very good young, smart defensive minded coach.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/10868843/pac-12-coaches-critical-sec-decision-maintain-8-game-conference-schedule

The big, bad SEC is apparently afraid to play games against the big, bad SEC.  Methinks that if you choose to schedule one less game against a solid conference opponent and replace it with one more game against Northeast South Dakota A&M;, then you put a big ding in your argument about how tough your conference is.

I agree with the coaches in the article ... that all of the conferences should play the same amount of conference games.  Of course, I also think that they should all play solid non-conference opponents as well.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don't mind an 8 game schedule. I know the Big Ten is going away with scheduling non-FBS schools opponents. If things are heading towards the 5 super conferences. It would be interesting to see how that effects scheduling.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/10868843/pac-12-coaches-critical-sec-decision-maintain-8-game-conference-schedule

The big, bad SEC is apparently afraid to play games against the big, bad SEC.  Methinks that if you choose to schedule one less game against a solid conference opponent and replace it with one more game against Northeast South Dakota A&M;, then you put a big ding in your argument about how tough your conference is.

I agree with the coaches in the article ... that all of the conferences should play the same amount of conference games.  Of course, I also think that they should all play solid non-conference opponents as well.


They should have gone to 9 conference games just to pacify the Pac 12. Would have made very little difference in strength of schedule anyway. Even Nick Saban wanted to go to 9 games.

After all we've heard for years that the bottom half of the SEC isn't any good!

Does seem a bit ironic that another conference would talk out of one side of it's mouth and say that the bottom half of the SEC is weak and out of the other side of it's mouth complain that another conference game wasn't added, thus weakening the schedule.

I really couldn't care less because a team in a conference with a weak bottom half might actually be toughening their schedule by playing less conference games.

What I do hate (and always have) is the scheduling of "rent a victim" directional schools no matter who does it.

If I could have my way all major conferences would play 8 conference games but be required to schedule teams from the other major conferences for at least 2 (preferably 3) of the non-conference games. That would be better for college football and would give us many more regular season matchups between schools from the major conferences. It would also give the playoff selection committee a much better cross reference of the strength of conferences every year. Over time it would level the playing field quite a bit.

I would love to see the equivalent of Alabama/Ohio State or Alabama/USC twice a year every year on everybody's regular season schedule.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They should have gone to 9 conference games just to pacify the Pac 12. Would have made very little difference in strength of schedule anyway. Even Nick Saban wanted to go to 9 games.

After all we've heard for years that the bottom half of the SEC isn't any good!

Does seem a bit ironic that another conference would talk out of one side of it's mouth and say that the bottom half of the SEC is weak and out of the other side of it's mouth complain that another conference game wasn't added, thus weakening the schedule.

I really couldn't care less because a team in a conference with a weak bottom half might actually be toughening their schedule by playing less conference games.

What I do hate (and always have) is the scheduling of "rent a victim" directional schools no matter who does it.

If I could have my way all major conferences would play 8 conference games but be required to schedule teams from the other major conferences for at least 2 (preferably 3) of the non-conference games. That would be better for college football and would give us many more regular season matchups between schools from the major conferences. It would also give the playoff selection committee a much better cross reference of the strength of conferences every year. Over time it would level the playing field quite a bit.

I would love to see the equivalent of Alabama/Ohio State or Alabama/USC twice a year every year on everybody's regular season schedule.

I don't think that anybody would argue that the bottom half of the SEC is not as good as Florida Atlantic, Southern Miss and Western Carolina though.  So if you're going to play the patsies with all of your non conference games, then it does seem fair that they should all play the same amount of conference games.

Stanford (whose coach was the main one quoted in the article) plays two really weak non-conference opponents as well, so his argument does make a lot of sense.  They have 2 "guaranteed" wins (their other non-conference game is ND) against UC Davis and Army, whereas Alabama has 3, against the aforementioned schools.

Of course, if the one game you are taking off the schedule is from the bottom of the conference, then, yeah, it doesn't make much difference, but that isn't always the case.  The two teams Stanford is not playing this year are both from the bottom half of the league.

Two of the teams that Alabama is missing this year are Missouri and Georgia ... not exactly bottom half teams.  If you're able to play one extra game against a C-USA team instead of Georgia, you're going to have an easier time of it.

But I'm mostly arguing just to argue, because I pretty much agree with everything you said.


By the way, this is music to my ears: http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/10872678/fewer-bowl-games-set-new-year-eve-day-accommodate-college-football-playoff

I loved growing up and being able to watch most of every game on New Year's Day, and also knowing that the only games being played that day, were games that mattered.  Now it's back to that, apparently. :beer:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It all depends on how the 5 conference come out of their talks and wanting to break away from the NCAA. I am sure the Big Ten is fine with 8 games or 9 games. So really if it comes down to it, you have the SEC wanting 8, and the Pac-12 wanting 9 games. Well I would prefer 8 games myself because if the trend is to play more FBS schools and more quality opponents, I want to see as many as those as I can. I rather see Ohio State play 3 good quality non conference games than 2 game + a Big Ten opponent. Just my take on it. I like variety.

To me it all depends on if expansion goes to 14 or 16 teams, and what bylaws they want on scheduling. I would hate for them to shun all non big-5 schools.

I would almost like to see a premiere soccer league style of play, were the worst team gets dropped from a conference, then you add someone who is on the list in a geographical similar area.

For example. Lets say you have 14 teams in each of the top 5 conferences. That is 70 schools. Currently you have 126 FBS schools. I would personally like to see 6 divisions, which could happen with the remnants of the expansion. Lets say you have 70, then say each conference has 10 schools in the subdivision. Those schools would battle to get into the top 5 divisions.

Just some ideas

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Somebody serious about naming the stadium after Johnny Manziel.

Really? :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh:

C'mon. Sure he was a good player. Even won a big game one time, but seriously...Not like he was a one man show either (note the NFL draft picks he had around him).

I can think of absolutely no circumstances where a player that had just left (and without even winning a conference championship I might add) would make anybody think about renaming "Byant Denny", "Jordan Hare" or any other stadium that I can think of.

SMH!!!!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In most college football crazy areas, it is about getting as many home games as possible to generate revenue.  9 SEC games means having one less home game every other year which turns into millions of $$ for the university and the local economy.  Sure we all want to see Alabama, LSU, Auburn vs Ohio State, USC, FSU but the presidents and athletic directors want to see big bank accounts.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ohio State just landed the top inside linebacker and the 6th ranked strong side defensive end!! They are good pace to maybe grab the top dual threat QB, and a top 10 running back as well!!

Keep it up Meyer!!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Ohio State just landed the top inside linebacker and the 6th ranked strong side defensive end!! They are good pace to maybe grab the top dual threat QB, and a top 10 running back as well!!  Keep it up Meyer!!

Hes such a good recruiter he made Brett Bielema take his ball and go to Arkansas ha.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Hes such a good recruiter he made Brett Bielema take his ball and go to Arkansas ha.

I think Brett wanted to get out from under Alvarez's thumb at Wisconsin

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Some questions to kick off the run-up to and playing of the 2017 Masters Toonamint at Augusta National: Is Jordan Spieth the favorite to win after his collapse last year? Is it the best story in golf? If not Jordan, how about Dustin Johnson? Will Tiger Woods make the cut? Will he play? Will he surprise everyone (likely including himself at this point) and finish in the top ten? If he skips this tournament, will this be the last time anyone really cares? Last year's winner Danny Willett… does he contend again, or will his drop in play (evident at the Ryder Cup) continue? Ask any other questions you may have, and answer them, too.
    • One philosophy has pervaded my life. It's simple really, but doesn't seem to be easy to live with: "There has to be a better way." When I came to golf eight months ago, I applied this principle, as I had to everything I've ever done. Can this be better? Not just for me, but for others. I want to enjoy golf, and I want everyone to enjoy the game, even if they disagree with me or don't need any better. Recently I have been playing rounds of what some of us are calling Play 200. Each hole, I begin at the 200 yard mark (shorter par 3's excepted, of course). I start every hole from 200 yards from the green according to my Garmin GPS watch. Because I can't reach the green in one shot, I have to plan what club I'm going to hit, where I want to land it, from how far out I want to be to hit my second shot into the green. Yesterday, I shot 6 over for nine holes. It was fun. By eliminating the tee shot, I also cut my nine holes down to less than an hour and a half. I played a few holes with two other guys, so that slows it down. They didn't mind, after they understood what I'm doing. I'm practicing. I spent a hour on the range practicing my full swing. I spent a half hour chipping and putting. Then I played nine holes, (after 3 o'clock it's only $10), and was home in time to fix my wife dinner when she got home from work. That's what I call a great golf day. I left the course happy about how I spent my day. My driver is not reliable. My three wood isn't either. Even if it was, I would still keep playing from 200. Some say, "That's not golf!", but if you take the driver out of the bag, is it still golf? If you tee off with an iron every hole, the game has changed. If you "move up," to what? is it still golf? Yes. All of that is golf. So why not do something that works, that takes over half of the frustration out of the game? Why not try something that makes the game more fun, esp if you are over 100 avg.?   Thank you for the folks who have written in support. I know this is a place where people who push the envelope are not popular. I have run into this in many places where the status quo is well-protected. I push the boundaries. I think to myself, "How can this be better," and I work on it. This might be a way to get people to stay playing golf, when they might otherwise give it up. Golf is hard. For more than half of those who try it, it's too hard. They give up. This is way outside the box, but if you think that a without a driver, the game isn't the same, either. It's all golf. Once I can hit my driver, I'll be back on the tee box. Where the fun is one stroke more. Best wishes. Enjoy the process. Think outside the box.
    • I work at a Stations casino. Ours is a second tier house, not a break-in joint. And everything you said is true about 1999. After 2008, it is decidedly NOT true. Only the Wynn dealers have any chance of getting close to a hundred K a year. The vast majority are still making 30% less than 2006, or even less. We make $18 an hour in our casino. All of us. Even the lousy dealers. I've been doing this five years. I have been in Vegas for eleven. You have great insight, for someone who doesn't know. Today I begin forty hours a week, after working 24 hours a week for the last three years. It took THREE YEARS to gain full-time employment in my industry. I took home $25,852.65 last year. My wife does not have health insurance where she works. For the first time in several years, she'll see a doctor. Golf is expensive. Lessons are expensive. Disrespect is cheap. Esp here.
    • Good post. One slight correction is the split in his MP 29 & 14 was between the 4 and 5 iron rather than between the 3 and 4. An interesting side note...his Cobra driver was 43.625" and his 5 iron was 37.75" which used to be pretty standard at the time, but is short compared to most modern specs.
    • Here's the irons he's using.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. BreakingBadly
      BreakingBadly
      (34 years old)
    2. dreamcrusher28
      dreamcrusher28
      (45 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon