Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
xerex250

Moe Norman's secret

8 posts in this topic

Basically, he just used less moving parts in his golf swing. He eliminated so many that he could hit 1000 balls a day without much strain or without getting even remotely tired. It's almost like he was just standing there. The single plane idea is false for this reason:

Moe never said anything about a single plane. When I heard him speak, he said the reason he put his arms all the way out there was because he was much less likely to move his arms around too much. He gave an example of this in the videos that i will post in here. He showed his arms flailing in the close body position, then said "but out here I can't!"

Another example of less moving parts is his placing the club behind the ball about a foot with his irons and about 2 feet with his woods. He said this eliminated a foot of the swing, put his left shoulder already in his turn, and he couldn't take it outside. I'm not saying this to make anyone mad, but it's the truth.

Think about it. How would you hit a ball if you arms were flailing all around and your head moving side to side? You couldn't even hit the ball! Let's say you keep your head still instead and kept your arms like we do today. How much better chance would you have of hitting the ball better, more square, and just in general hitting it to begin with?

Think before you post. Insults will NOT be posted. Any flaming and I will quit posting replies. Same with trolling or bullying. You're allowed to disagree, but do not insult other's opinions, or say that someone else is an idiot for their ideas, etc. Be nice.

In conclusion, less moving parts equals a better strike, and though you lose distance, you're dead straight. This was his secret

Videos:

Some extra info:

With less moving parts, you will also be able to control the distance of the shot better, and the direction.

Warning: you lose alot of distance. At least you're straight right?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Well, I can agree with the principles. However, Moe Norman certainly owned this unique technique. I honestly don't agree with this entire system being sold as a superior and easier way to play golf. I understand Moe was a bit odd and this was possibly why his success on the PGA tour was mediocre. The fact that the vast majority of professional golfers and low handicappers have the more traditional style has to say something. I don't see Todd Graves tearing up the PGA with this amazing discovery. And an important note to remember is that this swing style isn't easy to do. Maybe starting a newbie with this method would be interesting, but trying to get people to convert to this from the traditional fundamentals seems futile at best. Just my opinion and expressing my rights under the First Amendment. Hope you don't feel offended.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

There are already a few threads dedicated to this particular topic. Having said that... Moes "secret" was that he hit a zillion balls a day and had no life outside of golf. I don't think his mechanics were perfect; just well ingrained.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Moe Norman's secret is very simple. He understood his golf swing better than any other person living or dead. His understanding of what was required to strike a golf ball "PURE" was absolute and unparalleled. Just because he didn't share his knowledge with the general public, it became common thinking that Moe was unable to explain his method. He simply wasn't going to just give away, what he alone, had the brains and determination to figure out.

The good news for all of us is that Moe did share his swing secrets with one young Canadian club pro. Greg Lavern won the lottery when Moe took him under his wing and mentored and taught him for more that a decade.

Greg recently released his book "Finish to the Sky". Do yourself a favor and pick it up. You will learn exactly what Moe taught him during their many years together. Its simply amazing stuff.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm hung up on the idea that having your arms separated from the body makes it impossible for them to flail. I guarantee you that I could make my arms flail in just about every position not involving a straitjacket, provided I was trying. What exactly makes the arms "way out there" (as you say) position better than the traditional style of having them a bit closer in? What specifically does this do to make the swing more controllable? Also, how do you get your arms "way out there" without adding moving parts (which you're trying to eliminate) if you don't start in an unbalanced position with arms outstretched? Wouldn't keeping your arms at about the same length throughout the swing (in theory, this likely would be uncomfortable to do) eliminate the moving part of having a changing amount of arm extension? Sorry, but I prefer to read things that explain why something is better, instead of just saying it's better "because this one guy said so". I personally don't care if Tiger Woods or Joe Schmoe said it, it needs to have a bit of evidence as to why it works better than something else. Could you help me by clarifying why exactly this is a superior technique when data shows that distance at all levels is equally or more important (equally at PGA Tour levels of play, more important everywhere else) than accuracy after a certain point?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

flame me if you want, but i think his secret had to do with his mental condition.  he was like a savant, a Rainman for golf.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think the basics of golf are accuracy and power.

It seems that moe norman definitely had the accuracy part nailed down, which is quite spectacular in its own way.

Jamie Sadlowski or someone longhitter like him probably favours the other side of the equation so to speak.

As a beginner though, it boggles my mind to think how the longhiters are able to strike the ball so well... so well hit balls.

Some of the more accurate long driver competitors... the're hitting actually 9/10 balls into the grid. I just watched today some old videos about bobby wilson in senior division long drive 2009 event... That oldie, was really bombing it, and accurately too into the grid! I think he would have been in the fairway/semirough at a real golf course...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My swing is similar to Mo Norman's, and he inspired me to change everything. Before I had a very "wrist-rotaty" swing, and I felt like I was trying to flip the clubhead through the ball and time it perfectly.

I think having your arms super straight and rigid at address is not the point, and not really what Mo did. The point is to address the ball in pretty much the same  arm position as impact so that it's just a back and through motion.

About 2 months ago I switched to the "Mo Norman grip" with your back hand under the club holding it in the lifeline. I like it for a few reasons. 1For one, I am able to eliminate all the wrist rotation movement. That was really causing me to spray the ball all over, and even my good shots were a few feet left or right at best. With this grip it's much easier to have the clubface square at impact, hence straight shots for me - not just straighter in general, but way fewer "really bad misses".

Another reason I like it is because of how it affects the way your wrists bend. Many vardon grip players have a real scoopy motion at the bottom of the swing. Among other things, this can really increase the chance of hitting thin.With the Mo grip I find it really hard to "over release" the hinge on the downswing so my hand never fall into the bad behind-the-ball position.

Another thing that has helped me is swinging "at the target". In Mo's videos he makes fun of other golfers, "When they are swinging where to their clubs end up? Around their backs. I want the ball to go to the target,I swing at the target. They swing around the golf course. Their club swing points right into the trees. So where does their ball go? Rightinto the trees!" When my follow through is finished I try to have my chest hands and clubhead all in a line pointing at the target, and well, a whole lot of the time it goes to the target!

I do feel like sometimes on my driver I come through on an out-to-in path that puts sort of an unwanted fade on the ball, but it's nowhere near as bad as when I wasn't using this grip.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Even if his equipment contract with Nike was still valid (which it isn't because of Nike's withdrawal from the equipment business), it still wouldn't be illegal. He'd just have to either have Nike work some magic and put the swoosh on the gear he wanted (it was rumored for a long time that Bridgestone actually made the balls for Nike tour pros) or pay some sort of fine specified in the contract. That said, Nike definitely wouldn't be happy if he broke the terms of the contract, but he is safe to play whatever equipment he chooses so long as it's TM now, since he chose to sign with them after Nike stopped producing equipment. I wonder what the terms of the contracts looked like and whether Nike had to buy out the remaining equipment contracts for their tour professionals like Rory and Tiger.
    • The are by Definition, Immovable Obstructions. It needs a declaration by the Committee to make them an IPC From England Golf: 4. Immovable Obstructions (Rule 24–2) include:
      a) All artificially surfaced roads and paths on the course, including those covered with wood chips. All other paths and tracks are integral parts of the course.
      b) White lined areas adjoining any immovable obstruction are part of the obstruction and not ground under repair.
      c) Stone-filled drainage ditches or channels.
      d) Sleepers, steps or wooden boards within bunkers.
    • Played a round at Pebble Beach and Muirfield Village on the simulator last weekend.  Low winds and gimme on the green.  Shot +2 and +1.  Even assuming I add on another 14 to 16 strokes, am happy to have played bogey golf on those courses.  Was beaming the rest of the day post that
    • He played Nike gear right up until they announced they were getting out of the golf equipment business.  The other equipment mentioned was from when he was an amateur and when he turned pro before Nike made clubs. His first equipment deal was with Titleist, but there was some lag time between turning pro until Titleist made him clubs to play.
    • Matsuyama, Spieth and DJ all winning in consecutive weeks is creating a lot of drama heading into the Masters, not to mention Justin Thomas emerging as a contender with his terrific play.  Already three wins for Thomas in the wrap-around 2017 season! You have to consider those four the big favourites....though there's also McIlroy going for the career grand slam, Day looking to contend again (though this could be a 'lost to swing changes' kind of year for him), Fowler looking to break through with a major, plus old standbys like Mickelson or Westwood likely to be buzzing around the leaderboard again.  Maybe we'll see Langer turn some heads again, or Couples once again be in the mix heading into the weekend. In short, this is promising to be a terrific Masters, even if/when Tiger has to WD again.    
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. bluebaws82
      bluebaws82
      (35 years old)
    2. g30rg35m1th
      g30rg35m1th
      (17 years old)
    3. Otis2014
      Otis2014
      (54 years old)
    4. Phil Marsh
      Phil Marsh
      (46 years old)
    5. SMOOTH1
      SMOOTH1
      (55 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon