• Announcements

    • iacas

      GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Contest   09/22/2016

      Join our GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Challenge to win an autographed GAME GOLF, a Pebble Steel watch, and many more great prizes!
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
BuckeyeNut

It was an uncomfortable round last weekend...........

75 posts in this topic

I paired-up at 7am on the toughest course in the area on Sunday.  Groups of 5 are not allowed and this rule is in BOLD for anyone making reservations, but they arrived with 5 players anyway, so the group was split into a group of 3 and 2..and I was paired with the latter 2-some.

One of the guys couldn't hit the ball in the air to save his life.  Virtually every shot was a duff.   My thoughts were, what in the hell is this guy doing on a big course like this during early prime time????  Aaargh.....!!!!   He did pick up a lot so I give him credit for that.

Their 3-some friends in front of us were no better.  We played around in 5 hours!!  Keep in mind we teed off at 7am!!   Slow play like this should never happen this early in the morning, but it only takes 1 group....People like this have no business on the golf course this early!!!  My group was OK, only because we kept up with their brutally slow friends in front of us.  I felt horrible for everybody on the course behind this clusterFK.   I wished I got out of bed 30 minutes sooner to get in front of this...

Shockingly...I played my best round of the year so far in spite of the slow play.  Those duffers witnessed a pretty fine round of golf...LOL    They were good company, but the slow play was painful.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Hey, don't make those guys tee off in the afternoon with me! They can let all the terrible golfers off at 10AM.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

After the 5hr round of golf, I took my son bowling and we bowled for 4hrs!   I may need to take Mondays off to recover!!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So what is the rush? It's golf, not the Olympic 100m final. Mailman
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

So what is the rush? It's golf, not the Olympic 100m final.

Mailman

Seriously... 5 hour rounds are absolutely ridiculous, and for it to happen that early in the morning is even worse. I understand that it is golf, but that doesn't mean that it has to be painfully slow. I'm not saying that people need to run to their balls or anything, but 5 hours is not right. Where the hell were the marshals?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think 4.5 to 5 hours is a pretty normal pace of play for busy courses like my home course who averages 220-250 players on weekends.

Also they paid their money as well.. They have just as much of a right to the course as you.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So what is the rush? It's golf, not the Olympic 100m final.

Mailman

IMO...this is a stupid comment.  What is the rush?

There is no rush...here's the catch............golf should not take 4hrs when you tee off at 7am.   Golf isn't an ALL DAY event.....casual play is 4hrs or less...................... 5hr rounds are for late day hackers.   All kidding aside...good golfer or bad, how well you play is not relevant.    If you can't play in 4hrs, you don't deserve to be on the course before 10am.

The early groups usually play around in 3.5hrs or less...........1 slow early group backs up the course for the rest of the day.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly...just enjoy the scenery, engage in some banter with your playing partner and enjoy the day out. Regards Mailman
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I guess if you enjoy snail-mail....that may be OK.   LOL

People that play early don't like to stand around waiting to hit a shot all the way around.......for 18 holes.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO...this is a stupid comment.  What is the rush? There is no rush...here's the catch............golf should not take 4hrs when you tee off at 7am.   Golf isn't an ALL DAY event.....casual play is 4hrs or less...................... 5hr rounds are for late day hackers.   All kidding aside...good golfer or bad, how well you play is not relevant.    If you can't play in 4hrs, you don't deserve to be on the course before 10am.

Oh get over yourself pal. If you are playing golf then you should be prepared for what ever the pace of play is! Getting your panties in a twist because the round has taken you half an hour longer? Really? If that's what's working you up stick to tiddlywinks. Mailman

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Oh get over yourself pal. If you are playing golf then you should be prepared for what ever the pace of play is! Getting your panties in a twist because the round has taken you half an hour longer? Really? If that's what's working you up stick to tiddlywinks.

Mailman


That is wrong, people should not be allowed to cause a backup on the course just because they paid their money, all it does is ruin the day for others behind them but unfortunately most of these jerks really don't care.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you need to keep things in perspective Flopster. Golf is a long game to start with and while it can be frustrating to take a little longer than normal to complete a round it is what it is. If you aren't prepared for what ever the pace of play is on the course at the time then perhaps people should be thinking of playing other sports.

If the pace of play is truly that abysmal then call the pro shop and demand them to get someone out to marshall the course and get people to speed up...otherwise enjoy the fact you can afford to be playing golf and, more importantly, can afford the time required to play the sport.

Mailman

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Oh get over yourself pal. If you are playing golf then you should be prepared for what ever the pace of play is! Getting your panties in a twist because the round has taken you half an hour longer? Really? If that's what's working you up stick to tiddlywinks. Mailman

At 7am, that round took at least 1.5 hours longer than a leisurely round should have. Its inconsiderate and/or ignorant people that are driving people away from this game. And yes, the course is to blame if they don't aggressively manage pace of play. That's a little tougher with the first groups out, but they need to be told in no uncertain terms that they're setting the pace for the day and that they're expected to be quick, or they lose the privilege of the early time and can play later. Golf need not be a "long" game. If you want to commune with nature, and take 5+ hours doing so, go fish. At least you won't ruin the day for others.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

That's merely the luck of the draw David. Sometimes you win some and sometimes you don't. Get over it because being a little sooky bubba about it isn't going to make any difference. Mailman
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

5+ hour rounds are far and away the most frustrating part of the game. I have good friends who don't play anymore simply because they just can't spend an entire day out on a golf course. Heck, I didn't play for 15 years when my children were younger simply because I felt guilty about being away from the house for that long. The most maddening thing is that pace of play is absolutely controllable but it only takes one inconsiderate (and/or clueless) group to back things up for everyone.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had my first 5-hour round of the year on Sunday. I got really used to playing on empty courses during the cold weather, so it was a bit of a shock to the system.

Of course, as a hack of the first order, my rounds are always in the afternoon. I was in pretty good company though. The funny thing is that I stand and wait. When my shot becomes available, I'd been standing there so long that I rush. It's pretty stupid. Just going to have to get used to it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

That's merely the luck of the draw David. Sometimes you win some and sometimes you don't. Get over it because being a little sooky bubba about it isn't going to make any difference.

Mailman

I actually agree with you.  There are too many self-absorbed, inconsiderate people just like you out there.

Sadly, the rest of us can't do much about it, except to choose to play at courses that don't tolerate that type of behavior.  Fortunately, they exist.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don't like the attitude that "these types of players don't belong on the course at 7 am"... I definitely agree that slow golf is annoying, but the attitude in the post was somewhat arrogant. Should they have played faster, sure they should have, but not because it was "7 am". I would hazard to say that the attitude of "you don't belong here at this time" can be just as detrimental to the popularity of golf as slow play can be.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • No offense, but in my opinion this makes you unprepared to discuss it.
    • Every year, something is changed in a club design.  The real differences are minimal, assuming your current clubs are from within the last 10 or so years (just throwing out a random number).

      However, I just got upgraded to the Ping G driver from the Ping G30, and the big change I noticed is the face of the driver has a bit more friction on the G (at least as I understand it).  What it seems to do is reduce side spin, while retaining normal-ish back spin (I use the low-spin tec version).  When I miss-hit a drive with my old driver vs the newer one, I see noticeably less slice or hook with the newer version.
        When I go through those articles, I mostly read through the reviews of them.  It gives a better idea of what might be better.
    • Right, but then you're just getting into however different people value different things (including money, the performance of their golf clubs, the looks of the golf clubs, the value of a name brand, etc.). People have different values. For something like this, there's rarely any agreement on those, nor is there any "right" or "wrong" answers. I use a set of muscle backs that could just as easily be from the 1950s as now. The tech on those isn't really improving much (though the shafts are undoubtedly much better).
    • We went round and round a bit on this last year, but I don't remember seeing decision 15-3b/1 mentioned.  The difference between this decision and 27/6 seems to be that B's ball is found in a timely manner.  The finding of the "other" ball makes it virtually certain that A's ball was moved by an outside agency (Player B).  In the other thread, B's ball is never found.  27/6 allows the same kind of relief as long as the "other" ball is found within the 5-minute search limit.  As I read the rules and decisions, this is a timing issue,  the rules require a decision to be made within 5 minutes of beginning the search for A's ball.  If the "other ball" isn't found, its presumed lost.   In a way this is somewhat similar to another discussion we had, where a player's ball apparently hit a cart path and went much further than anticipated.  He searched and didn't find it at the expected distance, went back and played another tee shot for the lost ball, and eventually found the original much closer to the green.  He couldn't then put the original into play and "negate" the second tee ball, as he'd already searched for 5 minutes. I don't know if the difference in the timing of the discovery is adequate justification for the different outcomes, but that seems to me to be the defining factor.  It would be interesting to get the take of some of the USGA rules experts on this, not on what the rules say, but on why they draw the distinction.
    • I'd have thought there would be a sliding scale, akin to a volume discount. Not just $x/18 = per-hole cost. Or if there are obvious points where it's not terrible to get back to the clubhouse, make 3-hole, 7-hole, 11-hole, 15-hole, and 18-hole rates. Then you could even consider the par of the holes. Heck, if the course started par 5, 4, 5 I'd be tempted to just play the first three holes three times.  I'd get more for my money than playing holes 4, 5, and 6 which are pars 3, 4, 3.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. bandstan
      bandstan
      (46 years old)
    2. boobiemiles
      boobiemiles
      (25 years old)
    3. ElsieOlson
      ElsieOlson
      (77 years old)
    4. Matt66
      Matt66
      (26 years old)
  • Blog Entries