Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4176 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Hi Joe, I think the main reason the responses to your posts appear antagonistic, is simply that you entitled your swing video "150 yard PW". Then after someone questioned that distance, you stated that you are taller and stronger than most golfers. You seemed to have established yourself by saying "I am one of the world's fastest golfers because I am taller and bigger than most of you, but please help me get better". It came across as a bit arrogant, even if you did not intend for it to be. If anyone says you are flipping on this site, and no one else disagrees with them, you should probably take that comment into consideration. When someone says something wrong about what you are doing or what you need to work on, they will be questioned and corrected as well by everyone else on this site. This is the neat thing about this site. Everyone is here to help those who want help, but they need to get the facts right first. For instance, if you really do swing a PW over 96mph, you could possibly require different advice than if you swing 68mph. So, in order to help you they need to establish where you are first. No one intended to insult you or question your personal integrity. Best wishes for a fun golfing future.

Unfortunately Lihu, Joe apparently has lost this philosophy of golf. He's not interested in having any fun. A shame really. Such a wonderful sport despite its complexity, or maybe because of it. Joe has quoted " playing golf right now would be the worst thing I could do." He's become submerged in some obsessive quest to find a secret to make this game easier. Golf must've really did a number on him. Glad he's back with it, but I'm not so sure he's seeing the forest through all the trees. He's going to come back and totally ignore this post and regurgitate some more obsessive mechanics with pseudo-geometry and physics. If he does read this I hope he can just take a break and go play a round and just enjoy the game.

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Unfortunately Lihu, Joe apparently has lost this philosophy of golf. He's not interested in having any fun. A shame really. Such a wonderful sport despite its complexity, or maybe because of it.

Joe has quoted " playing golf right now would be the worst thing I could do." He's become submerged in some obsessive quest to find a secret to make this game easier. Golf must've really did a number on him. Glad he's back with it, but I'm not so sure he's seeing the forest through all the trees.

He's going to come back and totally ignore this post and regurgitate some more obsessive mechanics with pseudo-geometry and physics. If he does read this I hope he can just take a break and go play a round and just enjoy the game.


hard to admit failure, eh?

hard to admit getting beaten in the distance with your shots? especially by an older gentleman? :-D

For the record I've seen with my own eyes on the golf course, some good quality golf shots being made with the strangest of golf swings (with driver though, not pitching wedge.)

Presumably, it just has to do with creating good acceleration with the clubhead. That is, getting good clubhead speed at impact, with shorter range of motion(length of the backswing essentially). You must have good acceleration of the clubhead in  that case?

Whether it is an optimal swing or not, hell, who knows really... but if they're playing with it, I suppose it's fine by them?

:loco:


Posted
Presumably, it just has to do with creating good acceleration with the clubhead. That is, getting good clubhead speed at impact, with shorter range of motion(length of the backswing essentially). You must have good acceleration of the clubhead in  that case? Whether it is an optimal swing or not, hell, who knows really... but if they're playing with it, I suppose it's fine by them?

"Optimum swing" is not even in the picture if he flips his clubs before impact. Flipping takes a very large amount of the power out of the shot. In some cases up to 10%, and distance is robbed by up to 50% because the ball generally goes really high. If he hit his PW 150 yards with a flip and a high shot, his swing speed would be unbelievably high and does not make any sense. If he is accurately measuring and reporting his distance, then he is very likely thinning the PW 150 yards, and has created a swing that flips and hits low on the face. Which would not even close to a good swing and far from optimal. This is why it is important to get the correct information before any real advice can be given. Everything is a guess.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Presumably, it just has to do with creating good acceleration with the clubhead. That is, getting good clubhead speed at impact, with shorter range of motion(length of the backswing essentially). You must have good acceleration of the clubhead in  that case?

Possibly but that's not the case here, as @Lihu just said

"Optimum swing" is not even in the picture if he flips his clubs before impact.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
So when are we gettin the proof you been promisin' Joe?-Still waiting to see something verified that shows you can hit your 7-iron 150 let alone your PW 155. GOt rid of your big flip yet?-Played much golf or still trying to show the world that your swing pencil-triangle-paper swing can work?-Genuinley curious-and a bit bored.

"The expert golfer has maximum time to make minimal compensations. The poorer player has minimal time to make maximum compensations." - And no, I'm not Mac. Please do not PM me about it. I just think he is a crazy MFer and we could all use a little more crazy sometimes.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
So when are we gettin the proof you been promisin' Joe?-Still waiting to see something verified that shows you can hit your 7-iron 150 let alone your PW 155. GOt rid of your big flip yet?-Played much golf or still trying to show the world that your swing pencil-triangle-paper swing can work?-Genuinley curious-and a bit bored.

Last I heard, Joe had moved to San Francisco and was looking for a driving range.....

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
[quote name="Phil McGleno" url="/t/74788/my-swing-joe-hill/72#post_1013593"]So when are we gettin the proof you been promisin' Joe?-Still waiting to see something verified that shows you can hit your 7-iron 150 let alone your PW 155. GOt rid of your big flip yet?-Played much golf or still trying to show the world that your swing pencil-triangle-paper swing can work?-Genuinley curious-and a bit bored.

Last I heard, Joe had moved to San Francisco and was looking for a driving range.....[/quote] Not bad....

-Matt-

"does it still count as a hit fairway if it is the next one over"

DRIVER-Callaway FTiz__3 WOOD-Nike SQ Dymo 15__HYBRIDS-3,4,5 Adams__IRONS-6-PW Adams__WEDGES-50,55,60 Wilson Harmonized__PUTTER-Odyssey Dual Force Rossie II

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4176 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
    • Hi Jack.  Welcome to The Sand Trap forum.   We're glad you've joined.   There is plenty of information here.   Enjoy!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.