• Announcements

    • iacas

      Visit FlagstickRule.com   03/13/2017

      Visit the site flagstickrule.com to read about and sign a petition for the USGA/R&A regarding the one terrible rule in the proposed "modernized" rules for 2019.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
RJH999

Best and Worst Major Winners Year

13 posts in this topic

I was thinking..What year had the worst major winners. I noticed how Angel Cabrera, Lucas Glover, Stew Cink, and Yang have been playing quite miserably since 2009. However, Cabrera won earlier this year, so I guess that help. I think 2003 might take it with two flukes, but Weir and Furyk balance it out. I might have to go with 2009, I suppose. As for best, I think I'll go with 2000 with just Tiger and Vijay or 2006 with Tiger, Phil, and Geogilvy. Keep in mind I have pretty much no golf memory before 2000, so I'm probably missing some crazy year with Jack & Arnie & Whatnot.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

2009 was definitely the worst of my era. Outside of Cabrera, the rest of those guys were average at best. Cink had a couple nice years but nothing to write home about. Angel's proven himself though winning 2 majors and contending in many others. I actually think the last 2 years you've had some of the more impressive names of recent memory. I don't think you've had a major champion outside of the top 40 since Darren Clarke. All world clad players.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm.  Worst Major winner is like saying worst (Superbowl/World Cup/World Series/Stanley Cup/insert other major sporting event) Champion.  They won a major.  It is a tremendous accomplishments.  They may have had to play to their absolute best to achieve it, but it is still a great feat.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Hmm.  Worst Major winner is like saying worst (Superbowl/World Cup/World Series/Stanley Cup/insert other major sporting event) Champion.  They won a major.  It is a tremendous accomplishments.  They may have had to play to their absolute best to achieve it, but it is still a great feat.

I think the OP meant the worst slate of major winners in a given year. Still a bit odious, but I have found myself after the PGA Championship ends in a given year, 'Wow, that was an odd mix of winners.'

So I guess we would have to remove any years that Tiger won a major (I assume we don't want to go back before then). That takes out 1997, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2005,2006, 2007 & 2008.

That leaves us 1998, 2003, 2004, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Phil won majors in 3 of those years (2004, 2010, 2013).

Now we're down to 1999, 2003, 2009, 2011, 2012.

Toss out 1999 - Payne Stewart at the US Open.

Toss out 2011 & 2012 - Rory.

You're left with 2003 & 2009.

I would choose 2003 - Weir/Furyk/Curtis/Micheel - none have won another major.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Worst in the recent era? 2003.

Mike Weir

Jim Furyk

Ben Curtis

Shaun Micheel

No real competition…

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It depends on whether we're talking what the players became or what they were when the won. Because Mike Weir was a top-tier player when he won, as was Jim Furyk. I believe both men were ranked in the top-10 in the world when they won. I don't believe any of the guys were ranked in the top-50 from the class of 2009 when they won, even Cabrera despite his solid play in majors.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends on whether we're talking what the players became or what they were when the won. Because Mike Weir was a top-tier player when he won, as was Jim Furyk. I believe both men were ranked in the top-10 in the world when they won. I don't believe any of the guys were ranked in the top-50 from the class of 2009 when they won, even Cabrera despite his solid play in majors.

2009 brought us a guy winning his second major, Tiger being outdueled, and Tom Watson nearly winning. Plus Phil and Duval were in it at Bethpage.

I'm sticking with 2003.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2009 brought us a guy winning his second major, Tiger being outdueled, and Tom Watson nearly winning. Plus Phil and Duval were in it at Bethpage.

I'm sticking with 2003.

If we go by excitement, then yes, 2009 was better than 2003....although this year so far the first 3 majors have not entertained on Sunday. I thought the thread was talking about quality of champions, though.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If we go by excitement, then yes, 2009 was better than 2003....although this year so far the first 3 majors have not entertained on Sunday. I thought the thread was talking about quality of champions, though.

And even if it's just talking about that, 2009 has a multiple major winner, plus he was in a playoff at the Masters last year too.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

And even if it's just talking about that, 2009 has a multiple major winner, plus he was in a playoff at the Masters last year too.

You can make an argument for both years.

I mean 2009 had Cabrera, but 2003 had Furyk and Weir (both of who were among the best in the game that year). 2009 had Glover and Yang while 2003 had Curtis and Micheel (Yang total 2 wins, Glover 3 wins, Curtis 4, Micheel 1).  And then there's Cink in 2009 who just goes in that "Meh" category.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can make an argument for both years.

I could make an argument for 2000 but it wouldn't be a good one.

2003 was worse IMO. I've already made that argument.

You're welcome to make another for 2009, but you've already made it, so what are you doing now?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Hmmm... 2003 had Jim Furyk, one of the best players of the generation, and Mike Weir, a solid player who hasn't done much in 7 years. Ben Curtis was a huge fluke who ended up winning, but he's won a couple other tournaments since. Shaun Micheel was just a enormous fluke who hasn't done anything since except get diagnosed with Low T. Angel Cabrera is a bit of an enigma. So much talent, how come he only shows up a couple times of year? He very well could be a 3 time major champion(4 maybe, he had a chance in the Van De Velde major), so that really boosts his argument. I also think he was very happy to finally win a regular tour event earlier lol. Lucas Glover was a pretty decent golfer who had potential to be a T25 golfer, but has disappeared since. He's still young, maybe he'll get healthy and start to play well again. Stew Cink was one of the more solid golfers of the generation..multiple wins, almost won the 2001 US Open, etc...but hasn't done anything since 2009. Ye Yang isn't often mentioned as one of the worst to win a major, probably due to the way he won it, but I believe he should. I think if we're talking about who had the least success after the win, 2009 would win it. 3/4 of those guys are MIA. However, the overall careers in 2003 might be worse as a whole. 2003 does kill 2009 on wins, though thanks to Jim Furyk.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • I cannot supply scientific data on the old fashioned knee action.  I have only anecdotal support for it. In my own game focusing on pressure shift in the feet is not a feel that's effective.  Last time out I was not at my best and part of it was focusing on my legs for maybe ten holes probably due in part to this thread.  I was beat down hard by the golfing gods.  They even took away my putting also but threw in good chipping to further screw with me haha! Sadly,  I can only admit I am not as athletic as those golfers with that hyperactive left knee.  It's my theory that this active knee motion contributed something to their action,  perhaps helping their sequencing or power or possibly protecting the spine,  but I can't put forth a good argument based on solid evidence.   The shots of Nicklaus above are fascinating.  It's hard to believe they did that with that unforgiving equipment. Photos like the ones of Nicklaus and Wright are just amazing to me to look at.  How the heck were they able to be so dynamic looking and still crush a tiny headed persimmon driver with a tiny sweet spot/clubface?  It truly boggles my mind.  
    • It's now 8 months since I started playing golf.  I'm fairly happy with the progress I've made so far... ...I've (mostly) got past the impulse to try and whack the ball really hard ...I've (mostly) learned not to overswing and start standing up in the backswing ...I get the concept of the hips starting the downswing rather than the arms, and can see how this causes the club head to rocket through at the bottom of the swing AND I seem to end in a good finish position ...that said, I have also learnt to move my hips at a moderate pace rather than too fast, as that was making me slice it - confused me for a bit but I get it now ...fat shots are now a rarity rather than a constant plague - tend to now only occur on uneven lies but not too often ...I'm not yet as consistent as I would like to be, but I hit the ball cleanish and straight most of the time ...chipping and putting is reasonable compared with my playing partners ...I would expect to get 4 or 5 pars in a round, and mentally before each hole I tell myself a bogey is ok so better to be short of the green with a controlled swing than in trouble with a wild one.  A double bogey or worse is now a disappointment however. I am also starting to get a reasonably good idea of my distances for each club.  What I have noticed, however, is that my distances are much shorter than my friends.  I can hit straight drives about 210 yards, a straight 4 iron about 150 yards, a 7 iron about 120 yards.  Now, I'm ok with this, I'm not bothered about outdriving them or being a big hitter - I know that trying to match them club for club will not end well for me. My question is, will my distances increase as my swing develops and gets more consistent?  Looking at some of the swing speed charts online - for what they're worth - maybe my driver swing speed is around 80mph for those distances?  My irons are Callaway X-16 with new Dynamic Gold R300 shafts.  Are these a heavier shaft, and would I see an improvement with different shafts?  I've no intention of changing them just now, but have my 40th birthday next year so a new set might be on the cards then. I'm really enjoying my golf at the moment, and am quite content with my progress, but the desire to improve is very strong - I guess this happens to a lot of new golfers.  How might I expect things to go from here on?  I've been working it out by myself and with the help of YouTube videos and books, and lessons are not an option - the nearest pro is two hours away. Cheers, Joe
    • Umm, the penalty he took is directly related to that. It would be strange not to emphasize the reason why he took the penalty. 
    • Does anyone have a picture of the pin chart for this course? It's usually on the back of the carts but I can't find it online.  Thanks. 
    • If the fitter did not give you an idea of what shaft you need, you did not get full service.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Adunifon
      Adunifon
      (36 years old)
    2. Mech12
      Mech12
      (42 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon