• Announcements

    • iacas

      Introducing TST "Clubs!"   08/28/2017

      No, we're not getting into the equipment business, but we do have "clubs" here on TST now. Groups. Check them out here:
Sign in to follow this  
dfreuter415

Jack vs Tiger (vs. Your Age)

0  

  1. 1. Very simple, who is the better golfer, Jack or Tiger? Please make sure you click the appropriate age.

    • Tiger Woods (I am 35 years old or younger)
      7
    • Jack Nicklaus (I am 35 years old or younger)
      6
    • Tiger Woods (My age is between 35 - 55 years old)
      7
    • Jack Nicklaus (My age is between 35 - 55 years old)
      3
    • Tiger Woods (I am 55 years old or older)
      4
    • Jack Nicklaus (I am 55 years old or older)
      4


Recommended Posts

dfreuter415    77

There have been a number of polls on "who is better" Jack Nicklaus or Tiger Woods. I have a theory that it is age related. Those under 35 never saw Jack in his prime, and thus would favor Tiger. Those over 55 tend to think that "older is better," and this group would favor Jack. Then there is the in-between group who is probably split.

I'm not asking for much of a response from those of you who respond, because that has been done to the point of overkill, (although a short response is always nice), I'm just looking to see how much of a factor age plays in people's opinion of "Who is Better: Jack or Tiger?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

David in FL    1,519
Believe it or not, though I'm generally characterized as a Tiger hater, I'm over. 55 and voted for Tiger in the original poll. Of course, there's still time for that to change as time moves on..... ;-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Gunther    220
By jove, majority again. Damn, gotta start rethinking before I vote in these things.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

isukgolf    61

While I still believe strongly that we are blessed to have both players, and given their era they were the best ... so I have them as tied ...

However, a tie is not an option ... I am over 55 and vote for Tiger, because I have the ability to look at more than 18 vs 14 ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Golfingdad    1,850

I'm in the middle group, but have not voted.  I'm actually quite proud of the fact that I haven't voted in the big thread either ... even though I've made tons of arguments over there.

I just don't know.  I think, if forced, I might still lean towards Jack**, but I also recognize that Tiger's career isn't over yet.  We'll have to wait and see.

Not because 18>14 or any other such nonsense, but because of a much, much more thought out and sophisticated reason:  Just cuz.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

isukgolf    61

I'm in the middle group, but have not voted.  I'm actually quite proud of the fact that I haven't voted in the big thread either ... even though I've made tons of arguments over there.

I just don't know.  I think, if forced, I might still lean towards Jack**, but I also recognize that Tiger's career isn't over yet.  We'll have to wait and see.

Not because 18>14 or any other such nonsense, but because of a much, much more thought out and sophisticated reason:  Just cuz.

So if it is not a 18>14 thing, then what else does Tiger need to do or not do? :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

tefunk    17
I don't think the age ranges seem appropriate in the poll... I wouldn't think anyone under 45 would have really seen Jack in his prime. I'm 36, born in '78. I don't think he was in his prime anymore by the time I was even born... Let alone by the time I had a clue who he was

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Golfingdad    1,850
So if it is not a 18>14 thing, then what else does Tiger need to do or not do?  :-)

I dunno. Win 4 more majors maybe. Or win zero more majors. Or maybe just retire so I have the closure of comparing two complete careers. Mostly the last one, I think. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

boogielicious    1,159

Believe it or not, though I'm generally characterized as a Tiger hater, I'm over. 55 and voted for Tiger in the original poll.

Of course, there's still time for that to change as time moves on.....

Ha!  I still have six months before I move to the "old fart" part of the poll!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Parker0065    31

Interesting poll!

I like the idea of comparing age and how or when people took up the game. I'll use my Father in law as an example because he like so many average golfers never played or took up golf until he retired which happened to be right at the height of Tiger's dominance. My Father in law is(not quite as much since the fire hydrant incident) a huge Tiger fan. He never watched or followed golf back in the 60's/70's and although he's plenty old enough, never watched Nicklaus play. So I'm not surprised to see a lot of votes for Tiger from the over 35 crowd, it's who was winning as they got older and had more time/money to get into golf. It's no different in any other sport, the Patriots, Steelers, or Cowboys win 3 or 4 Superbowls and they instantly have fans from coast to coast selling jerseys like crazy!

I'm 48 and voted for Nicklaus, much like the 35 and under voted for Tiger. Nicklaus was who I grew up watching and idolizing like many of the junior players of that era that golf was their primary sport. I know people like to get all fired up about who was the greatest ever but I think it's more relevant to break it down into era's. Not just because the equipment was different but also because the world, travel, logistics, and standards of greatness were all different within each era.

Golf just like the rest of the world has gotten bigger, better(debatable), faster over the last +100 years which equates to each era having a different set of standards as to what was considered greatness! When Nicklaus got to 15 Majors(4 ahead of Hagen) most people that really followed golf thought that might stand for a 100 years. When he added 2 more in 1980 it was thought it may stand forever, yet 34 years later here we are with a guy within 4 that may or may not get there.

As far as Jack v.s. Tiger I will say Tiger had a huge advantage over Jack in popularity because Jack had to follow and dethrone "The King" Arnold Palmer. When I got into golf as a kid Jack was at his height and many people my fathers age were still huge Palmer fans and didn't give Jack a lot of love for taking down their guy! As for Tiger, there was no "Big Dog" to take down when he turned pro but he did spawn a whole generation of young guns that are now lighting it up, which outside of whether Tiger catches Jack or not may be Tiger's greatest legacy. He took golf into the era we are in now and earned his spot at the table as one of the greatest ever!

I guess it's fun to debate the greatest ever but I like to enjoy the accomplishments of each era so for myself it's a 5-way tie between Young Tom Morris, Walter Hagen, Ben Hogan, Jack Nicklaus, and Tiger Woods.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fourputt    922

Although Tiger was probably better in his best years, I voted for Jack because of his longevity.  I really think that Tiger is washed up at 37, while Jack kept his game well into his 40's.  I'd love Tiger to prove me wrong, but he hasn't yet done so.  Run this poll 10 years from now and I may or may not have a different opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

BrownCoast    4

I'm under 35 years of age and I think Jack is/was the better golfer stat wise. golfers today, including Tiger cant hit fairways as well as they did in the past. They really dont need to with the advances in golf equipment. Todays equipment makes it easier to hit farther, straighter and to get out of trouble. However Tigers approach to  the game far exceeded Jacks. who is all around better...matter of opinion I guess. Tiger has more wins (there is also more tournaments to play these days with more money to be won therefore one can pick and choose a prime schedule) Jack has more majors (todays group of golfers seem to be more competitive thus making it harder to win). As i said given the equipment and the stats I think the edge goes to Jack!

Great poll by the way!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    Talamore Golf Resort
    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Mission Belt
    Snell Golf
    Frogger Golf
    PitchFix USA
  • Posts

    • We got off a tangent so may be confusing. The point was it was commented that the 18th hole at Evian was difficult and that even the men (PGA men) would struggle. I don't see that at all. A 442yd downhill par 4 is hardly difficult for any PGA tour pro. But I do believe it wouldn't be difficult for any decent golfer. I don't think hitting a 3W from the fairway would be necessary very often for even a high handicapper. 
    • If you're recovering from surgeries, you might get a Titleist Performance Institute swing analysis. Two people do the analysis: a PGA golf pro, and someone from the medical professions (athletic trainer or chiropractor). You get analyzed on 29 different body movements. Then, the trainer/chiro gets you 18 workouts designed to shore up your movement weaknesses, and the golf pro helps you adjust your swing to compensate for the limiting effects of past injuries. see: http://www.mytpi.com/  
    • Was going to start a thread about this, but decided to just update my swing. This was tonight during a long practice session. I've been struggling big time with hitting down/ball first. As hard as I practice and try, I can't seem to get close to this position, even when trying to exaggerate it. I have some things I've been working on, but wondering if anyone has any suggestions. Also, does this type of change usually take a long time?   
    • The comment wasn't made about high handicappers, @JonMA1. It was made about PGA Tour players.
    • Oh, you bastard! While I'm not the world traveler like some here, I suppose I could cobble together a list of my ten best. 1. Fowler's Mill GC, Chesterland, Oh. A classic Pete Dye design on a beautiful piece of property! Did you know that Pete Dye was an Ohio boy? Country club conditioning at an affordable price. 2. Thunder Hill Golf Course, Madison, OH. Perhaps the single most spectacular course I have ever played! The unique design made it feel like the hole you were playing was the only hole out there. And it was HARD! Only problem was they built it way out in the boonies, and spent too much money on it. It's closed now. 3. Tippecanoe CC, Youngstown, OH. Perhaps the single most difficult course I have ever played! Played in an outing there, and went back later to ask who designed the place. Turned out the original design was done by Donald Ross. It's been "tweaked" a few times since. The greens are mind boggling! 4. Spyglass Hill, Monterey, CA. While beautiful and scenic, it is much less difficult than the 3 courses mentioned previously. You just get a buzz being from OH and playing golf in CA! 5. Manakiki GC, Willoughby Hills, OH. Another Donald Ross design and a classic! Built on the old estate of business magnate Howard Hanna, with the old mansion serving as clubhouse and entertainment center. Destined to remain a golf course due to the wishes of Hanna's decedents! Great golf! 6. Tanglewood National GC, Chagrin Falls, OH. Another difficult course. Fuzzy Zoeller was brought in for the inaugural round, and said, "You could grow the rough a little bit, and play the Open here!" It's long, with lots of elevation changes and water!  7. Hawthorne Valley CC, Solon, OH. Another Donald Ross design. Kind of in flux with changes of management.Used to be private, now semi. We'll see how things turn out! Great course, now needs dedicated maintenance. 8. Sleepy Hollow GC, Brecksville, OH. Just might be the hardest public GC in the state! But it's now owned by Cleveland Metroparks, and there have been differing opinions offered as to conditioning! 9. Yankee Run GC, Brookfield, OH. This is a spectacularly beautiful and challenging golf course that is right in my back yard! It has been in existence for close to one hundred years, but it's no old fogey. They keep re-imagining the course to keep it up to date. 10. Mill Creek Park GC. Youngstown, OH. Another old Ross design from the late '20's early 30's. This is where I Iearned to play golf! Lots of bunkers, but if you can fly the ball right, you can run it up on the green! Classic Ross design!
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Bryan Kasper
      Bryan Kasper
      (25 years old)
    2. Greg Pickett Golf
      Greg Pickett Golf
      (62 years old)
    3. hobecorning
      hobecorning
      (75 years old)
    4. Lfm
      Lfm
      (73 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon