Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
imsys0042

Anyone play the "Monster" course in the NY Catskills ?

13 posts in this topic

I did a quick search for it here. I didn't see anything. It's a course at a popular resort from the 50s and 60s. They have a second course called the International that is decent and privileges at a third course called the Grossinger. The Grossinger was a pretty nice course as well. I think it's not very well visited these days. Anyway the Monster's claim to fame is length. It's a long course that requires you to hit a lot of long approach shots. I played it on two different occasions and had a nice time. Wonder how it holds up to modern distances however. It had a 250 uphill par 3 that would still require a 3-wood from me today. Surrounded by bunkers, iirc. Or anyone play anything else with that kind of punishing length?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

I played it a few times about 20 years ago when I was in college. Don't remember anything specific about it.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Never been there myself, but I've read that the old resort buildings are basically falling apart. You drive past them on the way to the course.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Bumping it up from another thread in the Grill Room.   The Monster basically relies on length to beat you up.   A lot of long irons and hybrids will be hit into greens.   Some notable holes are:

#4 -  par five.   you get left with a tight second shot, lake on the left.   If you lay up in front of it, you basically cannot get on in 3.  You need to take the path to the right which is tight.

#6 - one of only 2 par 4s that are under 400 yards from the men's tees.

#7 - uphill par 3 that is 231 from men's tees.   elevation approx 30-40 feet, IIRC.

#13 - to get a short-ish shot to the green , I think your best bet is to launch it through a gap in some trees.

It's fun, but it's a long, long course.   Would be interested to see how I would play now.   Beautiful too.   I haven't played in over 7 years.

 

Monster-Scorecard.JPG

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Thought I would add the GG course information. http://www.gamegolf.com/golfcourse/11210

Here's a round by Joe http://www.gamegolf.com/player/knowprblm/round/436012 Looks like he played the back 9 twice and shot 88.

Here's a compete round: http://www.gamegolf.com/player/toddshaffer13/round/363744

Wow, the 4th hole is long. . .Todd drove 301 yards and still doubled the hole!

It really looks like a monster.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Looking at where Todd drove it, that's a bit risky as well.   That lake is really in play, especially for longer hitters.   I'm surprised by the CR/Slope.   I would have thought the slope would be higher.   My home course is 6600 (7000 from the back) and slope of 145/148.   I would imagine it's because it's a pretty course with not a lot of tricks to it.   If you hit the ball straight and "long enough" you'll do fine.   Just be hitting longer clubs that you are used to, all day....

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

30 minutes ago, imsys0042 said:

Looking at where Todd drove it, that's a bit risky as well.   That lake is really in play, especially for longer hitters.   I'm surprised by the CR/Slope.   I would have thought the slope would be higher.   My home course is 6600 (7000 from the back) and slope of 145/148.   I would imagine it's because it's a pretty course with not a lot of tricks to it.   If you hit the ball straight and "long enough" you'll do fine.   Just be hitting longer clubs that you are used to, all day....

Yeah, I noticed that as well, but that's probably one of many reasons a long hitter like Todd is a 30 handicap.

I also noticed that GG seems to rate courses lower than other sources, however, it also seems to be very generous with handicaps. This is the only time where I think I can enjoy being a 7 handicap, but I'm sure it will settle up to my actual handicap soon. For a brief moment, I was even 6.4 until it figured out how I actually play. :-D

Strange, but I figure it will improve as they improve and update the SW.

The course is beautiful, and I really like the GG map of it. . .

 

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 minute ago, Lihu said:

Yeah, I noticed that as well, but that's probably one of many reasons a long hitter like Todd is a 30 handicap.

I noticed that GG seems to rate courses lower than other sources, however, it also seems to be very generous with handicaps. This is the only time where I think I can enjoy being a 7 handicap. For a brief moment, I was even 6.4 until it figured out how I actually play. :-D

Strange, but I figure it will improve as they improve and update the SW.

 

 

I thought it was generous with handicaps because it rated courses as more difficult. Though I guess it's hard to say because they don't use course ratings or slope for their calculations.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

10 minutes ago, SavvySwede said:

I thought it was generous with handicaps because it rated courses as more difficult. Though I guess it's hard to say because they don't use course ratings or slope for their calculations.

That explains a lot! GHIN calculates and displays differentials. So, at least on the non-practice rounds I can display a differential with the GHIN application.

In any case, the GG depiction of my home course seems relatively accurate, so I am guessing it will be roughly the same for Monster as well.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 minute ago, Lihu said:

That explains a lot!

GHIN calculates and displays differentials. So, on the non-practice rounds I can display a differential.

Yeah GG is predominantly yardage based. But the benefit of their system is that the yardage is determined by where you tag and not by the scorecard. So you could play from multiple tee boxes in the same round and it would still give you an accurate calculation of performance.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

3 hours ago, imsys0042 said:

I'm surprised by the CR/Slope.   I would have thought the slope would be higher.

I'm guessing it's because while it's really long, there aren't a ton of forced carries that would really challenge a bogey golfer.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, natureboy said:

I'm guessing it's because while it's really long, there aren't a ton of forced carries that would really challenge a bogey golfer.

There are probably 2-4.  My own place has a lot more.   

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

38 minutes ago, natureboy said:

I'm guessing it's because while it's really long, there aren't a ton of forced carries that would really challenge a bogey golfer.

With the course rating so high the slope rating doesn't have to be very steep to push the differentials.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Played better at Western Gailes yesterday and loved the course - very welcoming and had me thinking much more than Turnberry did as the greens were smaller with danger pretty much everywhere. I started out brilliantly, playing the first 4 in -1, but then turned into the wind - into and off the right - and immediately lost a ball playing for too much wind on the hardest hole, which I'd have bogeyed anyway. Putting again wasn't as good as it has been and I just haven't felt like I'm going to hole anything outside of 6 feet. Highlights were the first four holes, particularly feeling like DJ or Rory on the 4th, a good par on 7 (see below) and a good last four holes - bar another lost ball on 18...  http://www.gamegolf.com/player/benpage101/round/1072354 My par on the 7th - only swing I recorded was a really nice punch 5 iron from 170 into a strong breeze: 3rd tee: 'Secret' 6th green: Looking back on the 13th green: I get a few days' rest now before my last couple of rounds, both at Machrihanish Dunes. I've learnt a lot about my game playing these two rounds that I hadn't known beforehand. I find it really hard when I don't know the line and have to guess and commit to the shot far less. If I can see it though, it's generally fine. I need to sort the driving in the wind out as there's just no room for error - a slight mishit and a ball that would be safe is gone. Additionally, particularly at Turnberry, I need to stop overthinking things. Occasionally I'd find myself trying to hit a 7 iron with the ball miles back in my stance to deloft it, aiming way left to compensate and just should have hit what I felt comfortable with and taken the hit with the wind. My putting has to get better as well, particularly from range. So much fun though and I will definitely play Western Gailes again (probably more of a certainty than Turnberry) - I loved the course and the welcome you get was amazing.
    • Played better at Western Gailes yesterday and loved the course - very welcoming and had me thinking much more than Turnberry did as the greens were smaller with danger pretty much everywhere. The main thing I've taken away from this trip though is that I need to control my driver in the wind better. A lot of times, it was definitely the play and my second shot was excellent, but I lost too many going with the wind, which probably wouldn't have been too bad without it. Partial wedges were really good again and approach play was generally alright. I started out brilliantly, playing the first 4 in -1, but then turned into the wind - into and off the right - and immediately lost a ball playing for too much wind on the hardest hole, which I'd have bogeyed anyway. Putting again wasn't as good as it has been and I just haven't felt like I'm going to hole anything outside of 6 feet. Highlights were the first four holes, particularly feeling like DJ or Rory on the 4th, a good par on 7 (see below) and a good last four holes - bar another lost ball on 18...  http://www.gamegolf.com/player/benpage101/round/1072354 My par on the 7th - only swing I recorded was a really nice punch 5 iron from 170 into a strong breeze: 3rd tee: 'Secret' 6th green: Looking back on the 13th green: I get a few days' rest now before my last couple of rounds, both at Machrihanish Dunes. I've learnt a lot about my game playing these two rounds that I hadn't known beforehand. I find it really hard when I don't know the line and have to guess and commit to the shot far less. If I can see it though, it's generally fine. I need to sort the driving in the wind out as there's just no room for error - a slight mishit and a ball that would be safe is gone. Additionally, particularly at Turnberry, I need to stop overthinking things. Occasionally I'd find myself trying to hit a 7 iron with the ball miles back in my stance to deloft it, aiming way left to compensate and just should have hit what I felt comfortable with and taken the hit with the wind. My putting has to get better as well, particularly from range. So much fun though and I will definitely play Western Gailes again (probably more of a certainty than Turnberry) - I loved the course and the welcome you get was amazing.
    • Lake Mead. It's down 150' +/-, and still losing about 5' every year. 
    • Well the head of the pros looks quite steady in the horizontal movement. I just want to emphasize that swing in a barrel and steady head can harm your swing especially if your swing is already good. 
    • Sounds similar, I have never heard any one with this swing thought just hope it's not a one time fluke.It makes sense though if your belly button follows your club head all the way back and through with arms connected to body you can't get ahead or behind with your swing , if  that make sense , don't have to think of anything else it just happens naturally perfect rythem  and a nice draw I also visualize the swing path and try to keep club head on that path
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Erg
      Erg
      (49 years old)
    2. irishmike27
      irishmike27
      (37 years old)
    3. Tutenharman
      Tutenharman
      (27 years old)
  • Blog Entries