Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4071 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I recently purchased a new driver (Cleveland custom classic), but it seems way too light for me. I thought it was this specific driver, but it seems as though all new drivers are extremely light. I'm used to playing with my old TaylorMade R7 (460cc) driver, and still prefer hitting it. I think it's due to the heavier clubhead. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Should I ditch the new driver? Are there any new drivers that are heavier like my old R7? Cheers

Posted


I've had 3 Cleveland drivers in the past (HiBore, Launcher 460 and Classic), and all 3 of them felt excessively "light" to me. I could rarely find the sweet spot, and most often felt like a tin can on a stick. I haven't had the same experience with any other major brand. If I were you, I would trade it in while it is still worth something. After 3 attempts, I doubt if I would ever consider another Cleveland driver again.


Posted

You could try an R1 and put heavier moveable weights in the heel and toe..., or remain with the current driver...

place lead tape across the sole of your current driver in strategic places; golf works also sells tungsten weights that adhere to the sole like glue, and/or cut the current driver from the butt to 45 inches/44.5 inches.

Good luck.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Like above, lead tape will usually do the trick just go easy it only takes a little bit to change the swing weight pretty dramatically.

Rich C.

Driver Titleist 915 D3  9.5*
3 Wood TM RBZ stage 2 tour  14.5*
2 Hybrid Cobra baffler 17*
4Hybrid Adams 23*
Irons Adams CB2's 5-GW
Wedges 54* and 58* Titleist vokey
Putter Scotty Cameron square back 2014
Ball Srixon Zstar optic yellow
bushnell V2 slope edition


Posted

I recently purchased a new driver (Cleveland custom classic), but it seems way too light for me. I thought it was this specific driver, but it seems as though all new drivers are extremely light.

I'm used to playing with my old TaylorMade R7 (460cc) driver, and still prefer hitting it. I think it's due to the heavier clubhead.

Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Should I ditch the new driver? Are there any new drivers that are heavier like my old R7?

Cheers

Cleveland has a number of lightweight drivers, not sure which one you have exactly, but they usually weigh around 305 grams unless you purchased their 270 gram or 290 gram models.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

You could try an R1 and put heavier moveable weights in the heel and toe..., or remain with the current driver...

place lead tape across the sole of your current driver in strategic places; golf works also sells tungsten weights that adhere to the sole like glue, and/or cut the current driver from the butt to 45 inches/44.5 inches.

Good luck.

+1 on the lead tape.  It could just be the swingweight as compared to your other clubs.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I've had 3 Cleveland drivers in the past (HiBore, Launcher 460 and Classic), and all 3 of them felt excessively "light" to me. I could rarely find the sweet spot, and most often felt like a tin can on a stick. I haven't had the same experience with any other major brand. If I were you, I would trade it in while it is still worth something. After 3 attempts, I doubt if I would ever consider another Cleveland driver again.

The Cleveland HiBore, and classic are terrible drivers, the Launcher 460 was probably one of the best drivers Cleveland ever made.


Posted
[QUOTE name="Archie Bunker" url="/t/77533/my-new-driver-seems-too-light-need-suggestions#post_1063558"]   I've had 3 Cleveland drivers in the past (HiBore, Launcher 460 and Classic), and all 3 of them felt excessively "light" to me. I could rarely find the sweet spot, and most often felt like a tin can on a stick. I haven't had the same experience with any other major brand. If I were you, I would trade it in while it is still worth something. After 3 attempts, I doubt if I would ever consider another Cleveland driver again. [/QUOTE] The Cleveland HiBore, and classic are terrible drivers, the Launcher 460 was probably one of the best drivers Cleveland ever made.

I am gonna disagree with you. I have played with too many fellows in too many games where they scored in the 60s to hear that statement without an AHEM!

Tom R.

TM R1 on a USTv2, TM 3wHL on USTv2, TM Rescue 11 in 17,TM udi #3, Rocketbladez tour kbs reg, Mack Daddy 50.10,54.14,60.14, Cleveland putter


Posted

I've tried to hit the Hibore and couldn't find a hot spot anywhere on the face, the classic not as bad but the Launcher 460 is pretty consistent across the face.


Posted
I tried the Hibore and the 290 because my groups were using them at that time and were impressively long. That 290 shaft was whippy. I wouldnt start anybody with a shaft that long either.

Tom R.

TM R1 on a USTv2, TM 3wHL on USTv2, TM Rescue 11 in 17,TM udi #3, Rocketbladez tour kbs reg, Mack Daddy 50.10,54.14,60.14, Cleveland putter


Posted

Cleveland should probably just stick with making wedges.

Rich C.

Driver Titleist 915 D3  9.5*
3 Wood TM RBZ stage 2 tour  14.5*
2 Hybrid Cobra baffler 17*
4Hybrid Adams 23*
Irons Adams CB2's 5-GW
Wedges 54* and 58* Titleist vokey
Putter Scotty Cameron square back 2014
Ball Srixon Zstar optic yellow
bushnell V2 slope edition


Posted
Cleveland should probably just stick with making wedges.

I use their wedges and find them great, but their hybrids are even better! I've often wondered what drivers were like!

Gaz Lee


Posted
I have been sitting on a new set of rtx 2.0 that I want to use with a set of TMRB tours I have. I order them +1 to trim down. I guess I am waiting for a day my wife doesnt have something for me to do.

Tom R.

TM R1 on a USTv2, TM 3wHL on USTv2, TM Rescue 11 in 17,TM udi #3, Rocketbladez tour kbs reg, Mack Daddy 50.10,54.14,60.14, Cleveland putter


Posted

I just purchased the Cleveland Classic XL (Black) and love it, beats my Cobra Amp Cell which I am now selling. I hit the Cleveland longer and straighter. I guess it just depends on what suits your swing / game.


Posted
I recently purchased a new driver (Cleveland custom classic), but it seems way too light for me. I thought it was this specific driver, but it seems as though all new drivers are extremely light. I'm used to playing with my old TaylorMade R7 (460cc) driver, and still prefer hitting it. I think it's due to the heavier clubhead. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Should I ditch the new driver? Are there any new drivers that are heavier like my old R7? Cheers

Nobody mentioned it so in case you havent considered replacing the grip it might work out for you. 3 grams at the head is about 1 swingweight. The ratio from head to grip is roughly avg at 1:2. Losing 6g at the grip is roughly 1 swingweight. The UST grips are nice because they are somewhere around 40g instead of the traditional 52. Check out the specs on your grip though. If its light already, you may need a golf pride that is 25-30g. The gp superlight grips came out after that driver was introduced so it probably isnt that light. Get over to a proshop and measure the club you like and tell them what you want from that club sw.

  • Upvote 1

Tom R.

TM R1 on a USTv2, TM 3wHL on USTv2, TM Rescue 11 in 17,TM udi #3, Rocketbladez tour kbs reg, Mack Daddy 50.10,54.14,60.14, Cleveland putter


Posted
Cleveland should probably just stick with making wedges.

Whatever it's worth... I have a set of cleveland 588 TT Irons. Before that I had CG Gold tour irons. Both are great clubs.

In my bag Driver: Cleveland CG tour black Fairway Woods: Diablo Octane 3 wood; Diablo 5 wood Irons: Mizuno MP53 5-9 Hybrid: Cobra 3, 4 T-Rail Wedge: 46* Cleveland, 50* Cleveland, 54* Titleist, 60* Titleist Putter: Odyssey protype #6 Ball: Maxfli U4/U6... But I'm not really picky about the ball I use.

Posted

Try a Cobra Bio Cell +. I switched to this driver this year and the club was noticeable heavery than my Taylor Made Super Tri. I have problems hitting the light drivers due to a fast transition in my swing.


Note: This thread is 4071 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 12: stole about 10 minutes in the garage, doing my drill with foam balls. 
    • Day 116 12-6 Still working on getting to lead side. Tonight I also tried some skill work with clubface awareness.  Hit foam balls. 
    • To flog this subject even further, if that's even possible, this article from Golf Monthly just appeared today in one of my news feeds. Written by a golf writer in the UK who I never heard of, he's basically saying that there should be only 3-5 rounds from the most recent 20 that should count towards the average and only competitive rounds should count. He claims the erratic scorers would have less of an advantage than they do now. He makes a lot of references to "club golfers" in the UK being the ones who are mostly dissatisfied. https://share.google/qmZZBEoJvOxHxJGil  In my experience with my league where we have golfers with indexes ranging from 5 to 40, looking at the weekly results from the past two years, I can detect no pattern that would substantiate the claim that the current system gives an unfair advantage to either erratic golfers (aren't we all?) or higher handicappers. Apparently though, at least in the UK, this seems to be "a thing."
    • Day 26 (6 Dec 25) - Another day of rainy weather - got in some mirror work rehearsing forward weight shift as finishing back swing. 
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6* 🟨⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟩🟩⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 no eagle -  but a birdie is a nice follow-up
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.