Jump to content
IGNORED

Distance Ratio: Are your iron distances proportionate to your Driver


onthehunt526
Note: This thread is 3381 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I don't think this formula works for me. I typically have a 250 or more carry for my driver with more on "open" holes where I can launch it. I hit my PW about 110 normally. On my approaches, I swing for accuracy, not distance. If I want more distance I grab a longer iron. The exception would be forced carry and needing to stop the ball quicker (like over a tucked pin). On fairway shots that will land short of the ideal landing, I will swing harder to maximize distance and the formula might apply.

Driver.......Ping K15 9.5* stiff 3 wood.....Ping K15 16* stiff 5 wood.....Ping K15 19* stiff 4 Hybrid...Cleveland Gliderail 23* stiff 5 - PW......Pinhawk SL GW...........Tommy Armour 52* SW...........Tommy Armour 56* LW...........Tommy Armour 60* FW...........Diamond Tour 68* Putter.......Golfsmith Dyna Mite Ball..........Volvik Vista iV Green Bag..........Bennington Quiet Organizer Shoes.... ..Crocs

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I don't think this formula works for me. I typically have a 250 or more carry for my driver with more on "open" holes where I can launch it. I hit my PW about 110 normally. On my approaches, I swing for accuracy, not distance. If I want more distance I grab a longer iron. The exception would be forced carry and needing to stop the ball quicker (like over a tucked pin).

On fairway shots that will land short of the ideal landing, I will swing harder to maximize distance and the formula might apply.

This is curious, and I see your equipment is relatively standard stuff.

On top of this, I'm guessing your PW is 48 degrees or so? Do you take a half swing with it or something like that?

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

[Chris Berman] They call him Flipper! [/Chris Berman]

Dude, you should fix that.

i know, i know...its really been quite frustrating.  probably my biggest flaw.

Colin P.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

i know, i know...its really been quite frustrating.  probably my biggest flaw.

Don't be so hard on yourself.  You have plenty of other major flaws that I've seen. :whistle:

Christian

:tmade::titleist:  :leupold:  :aimpoint: :gamegolf:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I was fiddling around on the PGA website about the whole "Tee It Forward" thing and they had this chart that said how far you would expect to hit each club based on driver carry distance... I know we have a master thread on distance with each club... here are the percentages... Note this chart only goes down to pitching wedge.... and denotes carry distances not total distance

Driver: 100%

3-wood: 90%

5-wood: 84%

4-iron/hybrid: 77%

5-iron: 72%

6-iron: 68%

7-iron: 64%

8-iron: 59%

9-iron: 54%

PW. : 49%

Do your CARRY distances fall in those lines? Or do you think the PGA of America is pulling hogwash?

Here is my 2¢:

Club               PGA %               My %            Difference

Driver:            100%                100%                  ---
3-wood:           90%                   91%                   1%
5-wood:           84%                   82%                   2%
4-iron/hybrid:   77%                   77%                   0%
5-iron:              72%                   73%                   1%
6-iron:              68%                   68%                   0%
7-iron:              64%                   64%                   0%
8-iron:              59%                   59%                   0%
9-iron:              54%                   52%                   2%
PW. :                49%                   45%                   4%

Hm-m-m-m-m. Pretty close. :-O

Drivers: Bag 1 - TM R11 (10.5°); Bag 2 - Ping G5 (9°),
Fairway woods: #1 - TM RBZ Tour (14.5°) & TM System 2 Raylor (17°); #2 - TM Burner (15°) & TM V-Steel (18°)
Hybrid: #1 - TM Rocketballz (19°); #2 - Ping G5 (19°)
Irons: #1 - Ping i3+; #2 - Hogan Edge  (both 4-pw, +1" shaft)
Wedges: #1 - Ping i3+ U wedge (52°) & Ping Eye 2+ BeCu (60°); #2 - Ping ISI Sand BeCu (52°) & Cleveland CG11 lob (60°)
Putters: Ping B60i & Anser 2, Odyssey White Steel 2-Ball & White Hot XG #9, Lamkim Jumbp grips
Golf Balls: Titleist Pro V1, Bridgestone B330, Callaway SR1, Slazenger Grips: Lamkin Crossline
Golf Shoes: Footjoy & Adidas; Golf Glove: Footjoy StaSof®; Golf Bag: Ping Hoofer
I love this game! :-D

Link to comment
Share on other sites


This is curious, and I see your equipment is relatively standard stuff. On top of this, I'm guessing your PW is 48 degrees or so? Do you take a half swing with it or something like that?

My PW is 50*. It's not a half swing. I just don't swing as fast. I used to hit a 9 iron from 150. I still can. Now I hit a 7 iron. I would hit too many pulls and hooks and the occasional straight shot and fades. That made it hard to score effectively. When I swing harder, my transition is not consistent. When I control my swing, my transition is much better.

Driver.......Ping K15 9.5* stiff 3 wood.....Ping K15 16* stiff 5 wood.....Ping K15 19* stiff 4 Hybrid...Cleveland Gliderail 23* stiff 5 - PW......Pinhawk SL GW...........Tommy Armour 52* SW...........Tommy Armour 56* LW...........Tommy Armour 60* FW...........Diamond Tour 68* Putter.......Golfsmith Dyna Mite Ball..........Volvik Vista iV Green Bag..........Bennington Quiet Organizer Shoes.... ..Crocs

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Quote:

Originally Posted by Lihu

This is curious, and I see your equipment is relatively standard stuff.

On top of this, I'm guessing your PW is 48 degrees or so? Do you take a half swing with it or something like that?

My PW is 50*. It's not a half swing. I just don't swing as fast. I used to hit a 9 iron from 150. I still can. Now I hit a 7 iron.

I would hit too many pulls and hooks and the occasional straight shot and fades. That made it hard to score effectively. When I swing harder, my transition is not consistent. When I control my swing, my transition is much better.

My PW is also almost 50 degrees.

I also have a problem with sequencing during the transition, but if I slow down my swing all my clubs are affected equally. For example, if I drive 240 one day, then my PW is about 120, and if I drive 255 another day, my PW is about 127.

Even though my swing varies quite a bit from day to day (as I am just starting to learn how to swing properly), all my club's distance ratios seem to remain the same.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

My PW is also almost 50 degrees. I also have a problem with sequencing during the transition, but if I slow down my swing all my clubs are affected equally. For example, if I drive 240 one day, then my PW is about 120, and if I drive 255 another day, my PW is about 127. Even though my swing varies quite a bit from day to day (as I am just starting to learn how to swing properly), all my club's distance ratios seem to remain the same.

My distances for my irons do not vary very much except on days my bones are aching more than others. I have a different mentality when hitting approach shots than distance shots such as drives or fairway shots. My driver approach is much different than any other shot.

Driver.......Ping K15 9.5* stiff 3 wood.....Ping K15 16* stiff 5 wood.....Ping K15 19* stiff 4 Hybrid...Cleveland Gliderail 23* stiff 5 - PW......Pinhawk SL GW...........Tommy Armour 52* SW...........Tommy Armour 56* LW...........Tommy Armour 60* FW...........Diamond Tour 68* Putter.......Golfsmith Dyna Mite Ball..........Volvik Vista iV Green Bag..........Bennington Quiet Organizer Shoes.... ..Crocs

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I would follow suit and post my club comparisons, but it appears that I am the typical golfer.  Those percentages pretty much match my clubs exactly.  And fairway bunkers are always exactly the right distance to be in play for me.

Randal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Same here, spot on for me, especially with the mid-irons (predicted value of 7I was withing 1 yard of my actual 7I distance).

Driver: :cobra: BiO Cell (10.5º)

Wood: :ping: G15 3 (15.5°)

Hybrids: :callaway: Diablo Edge: 3 (21º), 4 (24º)

Irons: :callaway: Diablo Edge: 5-PW

Wedges: :cleveland:588 RTX CB 50º, Paradise Black Chrome II Sand Wedge 56º

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Driver: 100%

3-wood: 90%

5-wood: 84%

4-iron/hybrid: 77%

5-iron: 72%

6-iron: 68%

7-iron: 64%

8-iron: 59%

9-iron: 54%

PW. : 49%

Mine are give-or-take, and based on total distances.  Not really far off that chart.

Driver - 100%

3 Wood - 87.8%

2 Hybrid - 81.6%

4 Iron - 77.6%

5 Iron - 71.4%

6 Iron -  67.3%

7 Iron - 61.2%

8 Iron - 57.1%

9 Iron - 51.0%

Pitching Wedge - 44.9%

Gap Wedge - 36.7%

Sand Wedge - 28.6%

CY

Career Bests
- 18 Holes - 72 (+1) - Par 71 - Pine Island Country Club - 6/25/2022
- 9 Holes - 36 (E) - Par 36 - Pine Island Country Club - 6/25/2022

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3381 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Here's the thing, the Rules are fine here, the problem is at the local Committee (or lack of Committee) level.  The basic Rule is appropriate for most Temporary Water in a Bunker situations.  Indeed, it offers a bit more flexibility than the Rule for Temporary Water in the General Area offers, in that you're allowed to find the Point of Maximum Available Relief, instead of requiring Complete Relief.  And for more unusual circumstances, the Rules offer an alternative in for form of a Model Local Rule.  They don't want every single player to have the authority to claim "I have no possible relief in this bunker, I'll just take it out for free", they want that authority to be at a higher level. I speak only for myself, but the more I learn about the Rules, the more I respect the way they've been put together, and the consistency of concepts throughout.  Its easy to single out one rule in isolation that you dislike, but when you see how the rules fit together as a whole things often make a lot more sense.  No doubt, Rules should be reviewed and improved, really smart people are continually doing just that, looking for cracks and loopholes.  But the changes that actually happen are really tested to see if they actually improve things, change for the sake of change just isn't going to happen.  
    • Wordle 1,052 6/6 ⬜⬜🟨🟨⬜ ⬜⬜🟩⬜🟩 ⬜⬜🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩     I hear y'all. Could easily have been a birdie or par at worst.
    • Are you on the app or on the website? On the website, if you go to the performance tab, you can navigate with the side menu to see more detailed information. On those pages, you can switch between strokes gained and standard stats. You can see things like strokes gained from 50-100, 100-150, etc., strokes gained on lengths of putts. You can switch to standard information and see make rates on putt lengths. There's a good amount there to shape your practice. I don't use the app for this, so I can't help with that.
    • Temporary grandstands are in the general area though, a bunker is not so your relief options are different.  I don't really understand what is so difficult about this.  You should be more upset with whoever organizes/runs your league for not implementing GUR, not the rule itself. Especially since this is a league and if it's at the same course every time it's likely that this isn't the first time the bunker has filled up completely with water.
    • Not sure if this is best to post here or start a new thread but I'm curious which stats you pay most attention to/how you utilize Shot Scope's data/charts to drive your improvement/practice?   I have 81 holes in Shot Scope now so starting to get a decent sample size of data about my game. I can obviously see the strokes gained numbers but I'm not quite sure where to go from there in terms of how to assess what specifically I need to work on.  Obviously it's approaches and short game for me, but when I go into those tabs on the left for those specific areas, I'm not quite sure how to use the information to make it actionable in my practice.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...