Jump to content
Dormie1360

PGA/USGA Rules of Golf Workshops

34 posts / 7258 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

Again, this may be late into the discussion but something about these seminars that many people don't realize and Dornie1360 hit on it: it's the test for people to officiate.  Yes it is hard and yes 75% is  a great score. Very seldom does the average amateur golfer come across some of the situations listed on the exams. But being an official is more than knowing the rules. Granted, you can read and memorize the rules but that is only part of it. Understanding how each rule impacts the others is where it becomes difficult. Believe me, there have been situations where I have been involved that have matched the hardest questions on the exam. The test teaches you to think through the entire situation at hand, not just 'drop it two club lengths over there.' On the exam in each section, open book and closed book, there is a minimum of one difficult question on each rule and definitions. Learning how to research the answers by using the index is a big part of officiating. That is one thing they expect officials to know and learn to be efficient. I have also been involved when an official has made a mistake and needed it to be corrected by other officials. We (officials) do make mistakes. That is the reason for the Committee during a tournament: to review any decision in question. Committee makes the final decision if there is a dispute.

The classes can be a bit dry and long, but many of those in the room officiate and it's a great experience to talk with them about odd decisions made. One year, the official who made the ruling on the huge rock being a 'movable obstruction' for Tiger was sitting next to me. He stood and explained the reasoning behind the decision. I've learned to find key people in the room who can help guide me to improve the decision making process. That's what the test is about. During tournaments the official is under pressure when called upon...believe me... even the best ones. I have a close friend who does the U.S. Open every year and has been the official in the booth for clarification. He stressed to me to accept that every situation will have its own pressures but go in with confidence and it'll work out fine (like anything else).

That test gives you an idea of what the officials deal with during a tournament. Few people come across those situations but officials see them quite often. Officiating can be very enjoyable but mind boggling also. Some of these guys can quote almost every decision in the book. Not the rule...the decision,as example saying, 'In decision 14-3/4.5a it says..." Not me. I do have a decent understanding of the thought process for officiating and enjoy the difficult situations.

That's what test is really about. Is it hard? Yep!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to hide this ad? Register for free today!

http://www.usga.org/rules-hub/education/pga-usga-rules-of-golf-workshops.html
http://www.usga.org/content/dam/usga/pdf/2016/2016rogsched1014.pdf

There's the (for now) 2016 schedule.

I plan to attend the March 18-21 one in Pittsburgh. We only get them every five years or so in the Pittsburgh area. I will not have a chance to study or prepare. I know the Rules of Golf reasonably well, which already puts me above 99% of golfers, but I have to look things up* and couldn't tell you off the top of my head what rule 21 covers.

* I do think that having a reasonable logical capability makes this easy. I know, for example, that understanding the definitions and clearly defining the situation helps tremendously, and I understand where to look in the Rules of Golf as I find that the organization of the Rules is fairly straightforward.

Registration opens tomorrow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Since there's one in my town this year, I'll be attending the one in Nashville, TN.

I might go to that one, it's close.  Don't know if you've had them before but I think you will like Thomas Pagel and Chip Essig.  I believe Pagel is on the Rules Committee so he should have some good info on the reasoning behind the rules changes for next year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On October 26, 2015 at 9:44:57 PM, Dormie1360 said:

I might go to that one, it's close.  Don't know if you've had them before but I think you will like Thomas Pagel and Chip Essig.  I believe Pagel is on the Rules Committee so he should have some good info on the reasoning behind the rules changes for next year.

Yep, I had Thomas at my last workshop.  He's excellent.  

If you end up going, let me know so we can meet each other.

Edited by wadesworld

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On October 19, 2015 at 8:24 AM, iacas said:

http://www.usga.org/rules-hub/education/pga-usga-rules-of-golf-workshops.html
http://www.usga.org/content/dam/usga/pdf/2016/2016rogsched1014.pdf

There's the (for now) 2016 schedule.

I plan to attend the March 18-21 one in Pittsburgh. We only get them every five years or so in the Pittsburgh area. I will not have a chance to study or prepare. I know the Rules of Golf reasonably well, which already puts me above 99% of golfers, but I have to look things up* and couldn't tell you off the top of my head what rule 21 covers.

Well, I went, and I think I did pretty well for not studying much. More tk later. I want to catch up on the rest of the forum here first.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 hours ago, Asheville said:

But, did you sit in the back row with the club pros who only go because they feel they have to? ;-)

Far back right, actually. :-) I like the back row because I can lean back with impunity and me checking my phone or whatever doesn't distract anyone.

Very few club pros. The guy who lead our class was the referee in the Rory McIlroy group at the PGA at Valhalla in the final round. ;-) He's a club pro…

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

14 hours ago, iacas said:

Well, I went, and I think I did pretty well for not studying much. More tk later. I want to catch up on the rest of the forum here first.

Just curious - where in Pittsburgh was it?  I looked around a bit on the site but couldn't find the location.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 minute ago, Hardspoon said:

Just curious - where in Pittsburgh was it?  I looked around a bit on the site but couldn't find the location.

The Hilton Doubletree in Green Tree.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 3/22/2016 at 8:27 PM, iacas said:

Well, I went, and I think I did pretty well for not studying much. More tk later. I want to catch up on the rest of the forum here first.

So how did you do? Will I see you in the 85+ class next year? ;)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Martyn W said:

So how did you do? Will I see you in the 85+ class next year? ;)

Yes, if I wanted to go to anything next year.

I most likely do not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 hours ago, iacas said:

Yes, if I wanted to go to anything next year.

I most likely do not.

I was the same way.  I made exactly 85 on the test the last time I went, but wasn't interested to going all the way to the east coast for a seminar that really wouldn't be of any finite benefit to me anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I attended the 2017 edition in Parsippany, NJ. About 20 minutes from USGA HQ. I was really looking forward to seeing Thomas Pagel again, but he was pulled away and we ended up with David Staebler in the end. Chip Essig was the PGA representative.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I didn't attend one in 2018, because of the rules changes I knew were coming, but I am attending one (apparently with @GolfLug! 😄) in March in Pittsburgh.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2018 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
    More to come…
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • It's speculation that doesn't actually matter. GOAT is not the longest driver or we'd already be throwing Cameron Champ's or Jamie Sadlowski's names in the discussion. He hit it about 267 or so when he was 40-43. Tiger hits it about 297 at the age of 43 with a fused back. And I couldn't care less… if Tiger hit it 350 or 250, he won a major this year. 15 >> 18, 81 >>> 72. That's 90% of the GOAT discussion for me. Y'all can make up whatever reasons you want, but own them, and accept that you're speculating on some of them.
    • How far would golf's legends drive the ball using modern equipment? At the 2016 Ryder Cup, the 6-foot-5 Thomas Pieters belted a drive 324...   An interesting article on how players way back would have driven the ball with today's ball and equipment.  I didn't realize that Jack had driven the ball 341 yards in a longest drive competition when he was 18.  
    • Oy. I don't give a shit about two top ten finishes in a decade. Nor am I comparing Jack to Vijay Singh, a guy whose putting stroke has been AWOL since roughly 2011. He wasn't. That's easily refuted. As for straighter you're not comparing like to like - you don't know what the fairway widths were, how far the ball bounced, etc. But we do KNOW that Tiger was longer than Jack. Tiger at 43 with a fused back is longer than Jack was when Jack was 40, 41, 42, or 43. Tiger @ 43: 297.8 Jack @ 40: 269.0 Jack @ 41: 264.3 Jack @ 42: 264.6 Jack @ 43: 266.1 Tiger was almost 30 yards longer at 43 than Jack was at 40, 41, 42, or 43. Now, several posts in, you're changing that up to say that, given modern equipment or whatever, Jack would probably have been as long as Tiger. But that's not what you said. Uhhhhh… He didn't do that. Neither did I. No they aren't. Furthermore, if all Tiger had to do was hit the ball 266 yards, he could probably hit 80% of the fairways. Fairways that are likely narrower, etc. So you lost the distance one, and if you want to measure "accuracy" by "fairway hit percentage" I again will point out you're not comparing like to like. They aren't playing the same golf courses, the same fairways, or hitting it the same distances. Furthermore, and more importantly, I don't care about stats like this when determining who the GOAT is. If you do, that's cool, but what I care about is wins, dominance, scoring averages, that sort of thing. I don't care who had a better short game (Tiger by far), who was a better putter (tie?), who hit a better 7-iron (almost surely Tiger), or whatever. I care about Ws. So not only are you provably wrong on distance, possibly off-base on accuracy, but you're arguing about things that most people don't even care about. Nobody considers Calvin Peete in the GOAT discussion because of how accurate he was off the tee. Huh? No. 🤦‍♂️ Uhhh, according to Jack, it was 118 MPH. I call bullshit on that. Oy. I don't give a shit about two top ten finishes in a decade. Nor am I comparing Jack to Vijay Singh, a guy whose putting stroke has been AWOL since roughly 2011. He wasn't. That's easily refuted. As for straighter you're not comparing like to like - you don't know what the fairway widths were, how far the ball bounced, etc. But we do KNOW that Tiger was longer than Jack. Tiger at 43 with a fused back is longer than Jack was when Jack was 40, 41, 42, or 43. Tiger @ 43: 297.8 Jack @ 40: 269.0 Jack @ 41: 264.3 Jack @ 42: 264.6 Jack @ 43: 266.1 Tiger was almost 30 yards longer at 43 than Jack was at 40, 41, 42, or 43. Now, several posts in, you're changing that up to say that, given modern equipment or whatever, Jack would probably have been as long as Tiger. But that's not what you said. Uhhhhh… He didn't do that. Neither did I. No they aren't. Furthermore, if all Tiger had to do was hit the ball 266 yards, he could probably hit 80% of the fairways. Fairways that are likely narrower, etc. So you lost the distance one, and if you want to measure "accuracy" by "fairway hit percentage" I again will point out you're not comparing like to like. They aren't playing the same golf courses, the same fairways, or hitting it the same distances. Furthermore, and more importantly, I don't care about stats like this when determining who the GOAT is. If you do, that's cool, but what I care about is wins, dominance, scoring averages, that sort of thing. I don't care who had a better short game (Tiger by far), who was a better putter (tie?), who hit a better 7-iron (almost surely Tiger), or whatever. I care about Ws. So not only are you provably wrong on distance, possibly off-base on accuracy, but you're arguing about things that most people don't even care about. Nobody considers Calvin Peete in the GOAT discussion because of how accurate he was off the tee. Huh? No. 🤦‍♂️ Uhhh, according to Jack, it was 118 MPH. I call bullshit on that. Ha ha ha.
    • I’ve never been one to sit on my donkey for too long. The past four and half decades have pretty much been work for me , as so I know, for many others as well.  Developing my golf game will (not) dominate my new found free time. It will though give me a new avenue of pursuits that I hope will keep my mind expanding. Thanks for the input and reply. 
    • That sort of extrapolation is not possible.  You are talking that he would be hitting the golf ball further than the average long drive competitor. I am not buying it. He would be one of the longer hitters on tour. Jack is not the physical freak like Dustin Johnson. I would put him probably a top 10 in distance yearly if he was in his prime competing today.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Dan42nepa
      Dan42nepa
      (63 years old)
    2. James Dalton
      James Dalton
      (78 years old)
    3. JMHARDING
      JMHARDING
      (29 years old)
    4. mwh1023
      mwh1023
      (52 years old)
    5. Skeesh
      Skeesh
      (47 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...