Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Ronda Rousey "most dominant athlete in the world"?


Note: This thread is 3353 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

5 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you agree or disagree

    • Agree
      2
    • Disagree
      10


Recommended Posts

Posted

I'd put Rory & Floyd Mayweather ahead of her (don't like either one but they are both great). 48-0 in boxing is more impressive than 11-0 in women's MMA IMO. I don't think I need to list off Rory's achievements on here.

You could make an argument for Mayweather based on his record for sure, but people have a problem with the caliber of some of his opponents. I don't know that Rory is anywhere near what I would consider "dominant".

KICK THE FLIP!!

In the bag:
:srixon: Z355

:callaway: XR16 3 Wood
:tmade: Aeroburner 19* 3 hybrid
:ping: I e1 irons 4-PW
:vokey: SM5 50, 60
:wilsonstaff: Harmonized Sole Grind 56 and Windy City Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
You could make an argument for Mayweather based on his record for sure, but people have a problem with the caliber of some of his opponents. I don't know that Rory is anywhere near what I would consider "dominant".

Questionable caliber of opponents compared to 11 women MMA fighters seriously?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Questionable caliber of opponents compared to 11 women MMA fighters seriously?

*shrug* Just saying that's what they'd say because they already question his record now over it. Also because he doesn't always dominate the scorecard when he wins. I'd say he should be on the list but I'd still put Jon Jones and Serena ahead of him also.

KICK THE FLIP!!

In the bag:
:srixon: Z355

:callaway: XR16 3 Wood
:tmade: Aeroburner 19* 3 hybrid
:ping: I e1 irons 4-PW
:vokey: SM5 50, 60
:wilsonstaff: Harmonized Sole Grind 56 and Windy City Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
*shrug* Just saying that's what they'd say because they already question his record now over it. Also because he doesn't always dominate the scorecard when he wins. I'd say he should be on the list but I'd still put Jon Jones and Serena ahead of him also.

If you don't watch boxing much then your kinda talking out of turn he does dominate most of his opponents. Serena I could see ahead of Ronda and whoever Jones is since again it's such a small pool of talent. But she's isn't ahead of Floyd IMO.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

If it means most dominant in HER sport than any other athlete in their particular sport, then yes. Quality of opposition should not matter. Nothing she can do about that.

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I'd put Rory & Floyd Mayweather ahead of her (don't like either one but they are both great). 48-0 in boxing is more impressive than 11-0 in women's MMA IMO. I don't think I need to list off Rory's achievements on here.

You could make an argument for Mayweather based on his record for sure, but people have a problem with the caliber of some of his opponents. I don't know that Rory is anywhere near what I would consider "dominant".

The problem is, like @jamo already mentioned (EDIT: and @GolfLug ), is that you are setting your own definitions for what dominant means.  Heck, for the Business Insider piece, their definition is written right into the article:

“No athlete is the best in their sport by a wider margin than Rousey”

That's how they define dominant, and that's how I think many others would as well.  Regardless of how her competition stacks up against the competition in the other sports, all that matters here is how the competition stacks up against her.  And based on the info in wikipedia, she is the epitome of dominant.  An Olympic Medal in Judo in 2008, then started MMA in 2011 and has been undefeated since.  I skimmed the entry but it appears as though an opponent has never even made it out of the first round.  And I know the latest two fights lasted a combined 30 seconds or so.

That's pretty freaking dominant.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
If it means most dominant in HER sport than any other athlete in their particular sport, then yes. Quality of opposition should not matter. Nothing she can do about that.

IMO most dominate athlete means you have to take competition into the equation. 48-0 >11-0, 11-0 is more impressive but a much much smaller sample size vs lesser competition. Rory 2 majors back to back, 2 wgc wins, he was what T-4 at the masters, number 1 player in world, race to Dhabi winne (I'm sure I'm missing more of his wins in the last year as well). More impressive vs top competition than 11-0 women's MMA.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The problem is, like @jamo already mentioned (EDIT: and @GolfLug), is that you are setting your own definitions for what dominant means.  Heck, for the Business Insider piece, their definition is written right into the article:

“No athlete is the best in their sport by a wider margin than Rousey”

That's how they define dominant, and that's how I think many others would as well.  Regardless of how her competition stacks up against the competition in the other sports, all that matters here is how the competition stacks up against her.  And based on the info in wikipedia, she is the epitome of dominant.  An Olympic Medal in Judo in 2008, then started MMA in 2011 and has been undefeated since.  I skimmed the entry but it appears as though an opponent has never even made it out of the first round.  And I know the latest two fights lasted a combined 30 seconds or so.

That's pretty freaking dominant.

I understand how they defined it. This is a discussion based on opinions generated from the declaration by the article and the SI cover. In MMA a lot of fights are over very quickly when opponents are unevenly matched. Yes, she won a gold medal in the olympics in judo, which is why I said she's dedicated her life to fighting whereas a majority of female fighters haven't. I'm sure that's changing and it should make things much more interesting. It's just my opinion that to be considered "the most dominant athlete in the world" more needs to be taken into account. I don't necessarily expect people to agree with me, I am thoroughly enjoying the discussion and viewpoints of people who disagree with me here. People are making good points, no doubt, however it hasn't swayed my position.

KICK THE FLIP!!

In the bag:
:srixon: Z355

:callaway: XR16 3 Wood
:tmade: Aeroburner 19* 3 hybrid
:ping: I e1 irons 4-PW
:vokey: SM5 50, 60
:wilsonstaff: Harmonized Sole Grind 56 and Windy City Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
The problem is, like @jamo already mentioned (EDIT: and @GolfLug ), is that you are setting your own definitions for what dominant means.  Heck, for the Business Insider piece, their definition is written right into the article: “No athlete is the best in their sport by a wider margin than Rousey” That's how they define dominant, and that's how I think many others would as well.  Regardless of how her competition stacks up against the competition in the other sports, all that matters here is how the competition stacks up against her.  And based on the info in wikipedia, she is the epitome of dominant.  An Olympic Medal in Judo in 2008, then started MMA in 2011 and has been undefeated since.  I skimmed the entry but it appears as though an opponent has never even made it out of the first round.  And I know the latest two fights lasted a combined 30 seconds or so. That's pretty freaking dominant.

So by that logic Mayweather should fight some dudes at the local YMCA for his next 2 fights, knock them out in 30 seconds so he's considered more dominant.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I understand how they defined it. This is a discussion based on opinions generated from the declaration by the article and the SI cover. In MMA a lot of fights are over very quickly when opponents are unevenly matched. Yes, she won a gold medal in the olympics in judo, which is why I said she's dedicated her life to fighting whereas a majority of female fighters haven't. I'm sure that's changing and it should make things much more interesting. It's just my opinion that to be considered "the most dominant athlete in the world" more needs to be taken into account. I don't necessarily expect people to agree with me, I am thoroughly enjoying the discussion and viewpoints of people who disagree with me here. People are making good points, no doubt, however it hasn't swayed my position.

I think it was only a Bronze medal. :-P

So by that logic Mayweather should fight some dudes at the local YMCA for his next 2 fights, knock them out in 30 seconds so he's considered more dominant.

That's a silly way to interpret that logic.  She is fighting the BEST competition available to her.  If Mayweather fought guys at the local YMCA then nobody would consider that dominant because there is much better competition out there and everybody knows it.

Mayweathers sport is World Championship boxing, not YMCA goofing off.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I think it was only a Bronze medal.

Whoops, I knew she won a medal just forgot what one it was. Her judo is so lauded in UFC that I guess I bumped it up to Gold rofl. Thanks for correcting me.

KICK THE FLIP!!

In the bag:
:srixon: Z355

:callaway: XR16 3 Wood
:tmade: Aeroburner 19* 3 hybrid
:ping: I e1 irons 4-PW
:vokey: SM5 50, 60
:wilsonstaff: Harmonized Sole Grind 56 and Windy City Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Whoops, I knew she won a medal just forgot what one it was. Her judo is so lauded in UFC that I guess I bumped it up to Gold rofl. Thanks for correcting me.

I almost did the same thing!  I wrote "gold medal" in my first post while I was rattling off her accomplishments and barely noticed right before I submitted. :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I think it was only a Bronze medal. :-P That's a silly way to interpret that logic.  She is fighting the BEST competition available to her.  If Mayweather fought guys at the local YMCA then nobody would consider that dominant because there is much better competition out there and everybody knows it. Mayweathers sport is World Championship boxing, not YMCA goofing off.

The best competition is non existent though. If there's some men's undefeated Foosball team in Europe that hasn't lost in 25 years would they be near the top of this list? Heck no because they are dominating at something that doesn't get top athletes participation. Do the best women athletes in the world fight in MMA or play soccer, tennis, ect.... It's harder to dominate when there actual competition.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The best competition is non existent though. If there's some men's undefeated Foosball team in Europe that hasn't lost in 25 years would they be near the top of this list? Heck no because they are dominating at something that doesn't get top athletes participation. Do the best women athletes in the world fight in MMA or play soccer, tennis, ect.... It's harder to dominate when there actual competition.

Well, do we know that to be true?  I mean, its a bit of a self fulfilling prophesy on her part, right?

If she won all of her fights but some of them were closer and she got bloodied up, it would give the appearance that she had tougher competition, but in reality it could be just that she wasn't training as hard as she was capable of.  Meaning, it's not the competition that is better, it is she that was "worse."

It's kind of ironic that she can lose points (with some people) towards her dominance BECAUSE of her dominance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Well, do we know that to be true?  I mean, its a bit of a self fulfilling prophesy on her part, right? If she won all of her fights but some of them were closer and she got bloodied up, it would give the appearance that she had tougher competition, but in reality it could be just that she wasn't training as hard as she was capable of.  Meaning, it's not the competition that is better, it is she that was "worse." It's kind of ironic that she can lose points (with some people) towards her dominance BECAUSE of her dominance.

I'm not saying she's not dominant she is. I'm saying I don't feel like the most dominant athlete in the world is (or could be) an MMA fighter male or female. MMA feels manufactured to me.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Well, do we know that to be true?  I mean, its a bit of a self fulfilling prophesy on her part, right?

If she won all of her fights but some of them were closer and she got bloodied up, it would give the appearance that she had tougher competition, but in reality it could be just that she wasn't training as hard as she was capable of.  Meaning, it's not the competition that is better, it is she that was "worse."

It's kind of ironic that she can lose points (with some people) towards her dominance BECAUSE of her dominance.

As far as I'm aware, it's a given that the competition in women's MMA is lacking still because it's relatively new. It took awhile before men's MMA really took off to the point where there were deep fields of strong competitors. During that time there were men who stood out in a similar fashion as Ronda does now. I hope things get better for women's MMA because otherwise it's going to go the way of the WNBA. One example I can remember was Rich Franklin, he was so good he regularly made his opponents look bad by comparison. Then he fought Anderson Silva, who made him look so bad it was crazy. Everyone thought it was a fluke and that Franklin just didn't prepare for the fight. The second fight was no better and Franklin got a pretty severe beating if I remember right. Silva held that title for quite awhile and he basically made just about every opponent look like an amateur regardless of how good they were. During that time, I would have said he was the most dominant athlete in the world without hesitation or reservation because he made the BEST fighters look bad. I will admit, perhaps Rousey really is that good and the women she's fighting are great, but I've yet to see any women's fights that were impressive. Perhaps it's hard for me to judge because I'm so accustomed to the way men fight that it's hard to appreciate the abilities of the females.

I'm not saying she's not dominant she is. I'm saying I don't feel like the most dominant athlete in the world is (or could be) an MMA fighter male or female. MMA feels manufactured to me.

MMA feels manufactured? Interesting, most of the fights are so dynamic that I never get that feeling. Now some of the fights where a wrestler type, who holds people down "lay and pray" or where it's all grappling can get very boring to watch for sure.

KICK THE FLIP!!

In the bag:
:srixon: Z355

:callaway: XR16 3 Wood
:tmade: Aeroburner 19* 3 hybrid
:ping: I e1 irons 4-PW
:vokey: SM5 50, 60
:wilsonstaff: Harmonized Sole Grind 56 and Windy City Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Rousey is a dominant fighter but I am not sure she can be "most" dominant until she beats Cris Cyborg.  Cyborg beat all the top female MMA fighters at the time, including Gina Carano.  Currently Cyborg fights at 1 or 2 weight classes heavier but is willing to cut down to Rousey's weight class since Rousey won't meet her at a mid-point.  Cyborg has also failed PED's tests in the past but supposedly is clean now.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

So by that logic Mayweather should fight some dudes at the local YMCA for his next 2 fights, knock them out in 30 seconds so he's considered more dominant.


If they are qualified opponents.

The problem is, like @jamo already mentioned (EDIT: and @GolfLug), is that you are setting your own definitions for what dominant means.  Heck, for the Business Insider piece, their definition is written right into the article:

“No athlete is the best in their sport by a wider margin than Rousey”

That's how they define dominant, and that's how I think many others would as well.  Regardless of how her competition stacks up against the competition in the other sports, all that matters here is how the competition stacks up against her.  And based on the info in wikipedia, she is the epitome of dominant.  An Olympic Medal in Judo in 2008, then started MMA in 2011 and has been undefeated since.  I skimmed the entry but it appears as though an opponent has never even made it out of the first round.  And I know the latest two fights lasted a combined 30 seconds or so.

That's pretty freaking dominant.


Si.

Additionally 'dominant' in my ultra super duper personal secret book of definitions that I keep locked up is that it implies that it is almost a foregone conclusion that she will win well before entering the ring.

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3353 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • The first post is here:   Do you have an overly long backswing that ruins sequencing and leads to poor shots? In nearly 20 years of teaching, I've found 5 common faults. You don't have to swing like Jon Rahm, but a shorter swing will probably help you #PlayBetter golf. Which is your fatal flaw? #1 - Trail Elbow Bend Average golfers ♥️ bending their trail elbows. It can feel powerful! Tour players bend their trail elbows MUCH less. A wider trail elbow creates a longer hand path and preserves structure. It also forces more chest turn; not everything longer is bad! Overly bending your trail elbow can wreak havoc on your swing. It pulls your arms across/beside your body. It requires more time to get the elbow bend "out," ruining your sequencing. The lead arm often bends and low point control is destroyed. The misconception is that it will create more speed, but that's often the opposite of what happens. Golfers often feel they swing "easier" but FASTER with wider trail elbows. Want to play better golf with a shorter backswing? Don't bend your elbow so much. #2 - Hip (Pelvis) Turn I see this all the time: a golfer's hips are only 5-10° open at impact, but he turns them back 60°+ in the backswing. Unless your father is The Flash, your hips are probably not getting 40° open at impact from there! That's more rotation than Rory! Golfers who over-rotate their pelvis often over-turn everything - trail thigh/knee, chest/shoulders, etc. They have more work to do in the same ~0.3 seconds as a Tour player who turns back ~40° and turns through to impact 40° or so. Want to shorten the pelvis turn a bit? Learn to internally rotate into the trail hip, externally rotate away from the lead hip, and do "less" with your knees (extending and flexing) in the backswing. Learn some separation between chest and pelvis. #3 - Rolled Inside and Lifted Up Amateurs love to send the club (and their arms) around them. You see the red golfer here all the time at your local range. The problem? Your arms mostly take the club UP, not around. Going around creates no height until you have to hoist the club up in the air because you're halfway through your backswing and the club is waist high and three feet behind your butt! 😄  Learn to use your arms properly. Arms = up/down, body = around. Most golfers learn how little their arms really have to do in the backswing. The picture here is all you've gotta do (but maybe with a properly sized club!). #4 - Wide Takeaway Width is good, no? Yes, if you're wide at the right time and in the right spots. Golfers seeking width often don't hinge the club much early in the backswing… forcing them to hinge it late. Hinging the club late puts a lot of momentum into the club, wrists, and elbow just before we need to make a hairpin turn in transition and go the other direction at the start of the downswing. When you're driving into a hairpin curve, you go into it slowly and accelerate out of it. Waiting to hinge is like coasting down the straightaway and accelerating into the hairpin. Your car ends up off the road, and your golf ball off the course. Give hinging at a faster rate (earlier) then coasting to the top a try. You'll be able to accelerate out of the hairpin without the momentum of the arms and club pulling in the wrong direction.   #5 - Sway and Tilt Some sway is good but sometimes I see a golfer who just… keeps… swaying… Their chest leans forward a bit for balance, resulting in a whole lotta lean. The green line below is the GEARS "virtual spine." Pros sway a bit, but stay ~90°. This sway often combines with the extra pelvis turn because this golfer is not putting ANY limits on what the "middle of them" (their pelvis) is doing in the backswing. These golfers spend a lot of energy just to get back to neutral! The best players begin pushing forward EARLY in the backswing. Often before the club gets much past their trail foot! Pushing forward (softly) first stops your backward sway and then begins to get your body moving toward the target. Push softly, but early!  
    • I  no longer spend the time and effort trying to sell something I no longer need. Instead, if the clubs are in good condition, I go to my local golf shop or even Dicks Sporting Goods. Trade the clubs in for store credit and pick up something I need, like a hat. Cause you always need another golf hat!
    • Day 205 3-10 Wider backswing, reconnecting arm in downswing/arching wrist through. Also worked on less pause at the top. Recorded and hit a few foam balls. 
    • I really enjoyed this episode with Nick from Callaway. I didn't know the problem with swing weight and female golfers, but it makes sense. I actually think swing weight might not matter that much. If everyone senses the club differently, then wouldn't it mean that people might feel swing weights differently? Swing weight is a way to classify how heavy a club feels during the swing. Yet for a 70-year-old golfer, a D0 might feel like a D4 for a 25-year-old golfer? I think stronger people would consider higher swing weights lighter. Maybe a C8 equals a D2 in terms of feel?   
    • Wordle 1,725 3/6 ⬜🟨⬜🟨⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.