Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

2015 US Open Does Not Top 1951 US Open for Players Complaining


Note: This thread is 3811 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
Posted

http://www.golfdigest.com/blogs/the-loop/2015/06/us-open-chambers-bay-complaining-oakland-hills-ben-hogan.html

Quote:

In Tim Scott's, Ben Hogan: The Myths Everyone Knows, the Man No One Knew , the author chronicles some of the reactions Dan Jenkins reported hearing from the golfers who participated that week.

"You have to walk down these fairways single file." -- Cary Middlecoff.

"I thought I was going to a golf tournament, not a safari." -- Sam Snead.

"If I had to play this course for a living every week, I'd get into another business." -- Ben Hogan.

Hogan won with a winning score of seven over par thanks to a closing 67 and then at the trophy presentation famously said, "I'm glad I brought this course -- this monster -- to its knees."

The 1951 US Open at Oakland Hills is still the champion of player complaints. Hogan won (at +7) and even he complained about it.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I think players felt pressure from the USGA and PGA Tour to not be too outspoken about the course.  Horschel had to get his wrist slapped given his apology later on.  Jordan Spieth completely ignored the question about course conditions and talked about how great the fans were instead (very quick thinking on his part).

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
I think players felt pressure from the USGA and PGA Tour to not be too outspoken about the course.  Horschel had to get his wrist slapped given his apology later on.  Jordan Spieth completely ignored the question about course conditions and talked about how great the fans were instead (very quick thinking on his part).

I don't know what did or did happen behind the scenes, but I agree Jordan handled that line of questioning pretty well. I think the pros complain too much sometimes. The winning score was -5, so it's not like the course was too hard or anything. Plenty of people did well out there.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Some pros are more adaptable to different conditions and when you throw something like Chambers Bay at them, it'll throw them. It's different from most courses out there, at least in the U.S. Couple of observations though. 1 - Tom Watson hated links golf from what I've read when he first went over seas. Worked out well for him. 2 - Jack Nicklaus once stated that when he heard someone complaining about the course or conditions he crossed their name off as a potential competitor that week. Lords knows I've been picky about course setup and I did much better when I shrugged my shoulders and said "that's how it is. Accept it"

—Adam

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Hazeltine took a lot of criticism in 1970. Dave Hill, who finished second was even fined for his comments.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Some pros are more adaptable to different conditions and when you throw something like Chambers Bay at them, it'll throw them. It's different from most courses out there, at least in the U.S. Couple of observations though.

1 - Tom Watson hated links golf from what I've read when he first went over seas. Worked out well for him.

I think that was more that Links golf takes getting use to. Also back then it cost a lot of money to travel overseas and The Open didn't have a big payout.

Really, The Open was only popular in the USA back when Bobby Jones won it and then when Arnie made it his commitment to bring it back into popularity.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I think that if people go back and look at past us opens players and people complain pretty much at every us open.  The rough is too deep, the greens are too fast, too severe slope, no landing spots, too many trees, not enough trees, too green, too brown etc etc etc....

WInged foot was too fast and too hard, congressional was too soft and too easy, Pinehurst had impossible gimmicky domed greens,.........

USGA purposely sets up the us open to play around par as winning score.  Or they at least try to.  The vast majority of the field is gonna be over par at every us open unless something weird happens.  Fairways are gonna be harder to hit, landing spots are gonna be much smaller, rough is either gonna be almost unplayable or fairways are gonna run off.  Greens are going to be difficult in some fashion, whether its speed, slope, bumpiness whatever....

Joe blow pga tour golfer is not going to walk into a us open and shoot in the 60's by hitting iron off the tee then 7 iron into the centerish of a receptive green like they do at a regular tour event.

Its getting ready to head for Oakmont....and I know that it has been changed/renovated, but do people remember the carnage last time?  Cabrera was what +5, +6 as the winner....What are these golfers gonna do when the best scores out on the course is 70-74 and not 64-67????

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Its getting ready to head for Oakmont....and I know that it has been changed/renovated, but do people remember the carnage last time?  Cabrera was what +5, +6 as the winner....What are these golfers gonna do when the best scores out on the course is 70-74 and not 64-67????

I did a quick look, and when Cabrera won in 2007 at Oakmont there were 8 rounds under par for the whole tournament (played to a par 70).

Cabrera opened and closed with 69s, Nick Dougherty 68, Paul Casey 66, Tiger 69, Stricker 68 and AK 67 were the players and scores under par for the 4 rounds.

Players play, tough players win!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I did a quick look, and when Cabrera won in 2007 at Oakmont there were 8 rounds under par for the whole tournament (played to a par 70).

Cabrera opened and closed with 69s, Nick Dougherty 68, Paul Casey 66, Tiger 69, Stricker 68 and AK 67 were the players and scores under par for the 4 rounds.

Oakmont is going to absolutely destroy the field.


Posted

I did a quick look, and when Cabrera won in 2007 at Oakmont there were 8 rounds under par for the whole tournament (played to a par 70).

Cabrera opened and closed with 69s, Nick Dougherty 68, Paul Casey 66, Tiger 69, Stricker 68 and AK 67 were the players and scores under par for the 4 rounds.

Oakmont will demolish them. Besides Chambers Bay, Oakmont had the highest three putting percentage in 2007 of any US Open.

If players complained about Chambers Bay, I can see Davis just sticking it to the players. I'm not sure I would want to piss off the guy who has the final say on how the course is set up ;)

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I've already got my tickets for Oakmont next year.  Should be pure carnage haha.


Posted
Two things....... How much did we read about of players really taking several in a lot of practice rounds at Chambers Bay? I got the impression some of these guys just showed up and only plaed it once or twice. if I was Michelson for example I would played it dozens and of times this year alone. Next: as Mike Davis said, " if players are not complainting about the US open, then we are doing something wrong..."

Note: This thread is 3811 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.