Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3639 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

The GolfSmith by my work has a Cleveland Black 19 hybrid that seems really easy for me to hit solid. In my bag I have an early generation Nickent hybrid of the same general dimensions. I don't hit the Nickent nearly as well.

I want to buy the Cleveland. Should I? Is there any new technology/feature that is really making it seem easier to hit solid?

 

I use old Taylor Made clubs from eBay and golf shops.


Posted

A number of factors to consider:

  • Head design. The position of the Vertical Center of Gravity (VCOG) influences which one will fly best for you. A player with a slower swing speed would benefit more from a VCOG positioned low and back (help get the ball up), while players with a fast swing likely would benefit from a VCOG positioned more forward and a bit higher (less need for launch help, would produce a more penetrating shot with potential for more distance. (And, other clubjeads fall between the low-back, and higher-forward extremes.)
        Also: Amount of offset. If you close clubhead more slowly, offset can help you square clubface by impact.
  • Shaft.  Common factors include overall flex, weight and kickpoint. OEMs are having second thoughts on the superlight shafts - some average golfers can have control problems because it's harder to "feel" the club at top. TaylorMade SLDR FWs and hybrids ended up with stock shaft weights in the 70+ gram range; I chatted online with a TM rep and asked why, and he said the heavier shafts give better control to average golfers.
        And, here are some refinements in charting shaft dynamics and flex:

Again, get on the launch monitor and hit the two clubs side by side. A good fitter can explain the numbers to you, which likely will give clues to why the Cleveland seems better. 

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
1 hour ago, gregsandiego said:

I want to buy the Cleveland. Should I? Is there any new technology/feature that is really making it seem easier to hit solid?

Sometimes certain clubs just "work" better than others. It doesn't necessarily mean the technology is better, could just be the look, shaft, weight, fits your swing more appropriately. 

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

Clubs ... I've had my share ... my ex would tell you more than my share.

You don't know until you hit them -- you can guess based on your ability and the description of the club, then it's how you hit them. 

The Nickents are fairly old, ball tech has changed, everything is lower COG, higher launch, balls now launch higher, spin less. Tech makes a difference, most probably in this case.

I played Nickents back in the day .. they always felt harder than a rock ... was not pleasing to me. If you hit the Cleveland better, it's the club. Go for it.

Edited by Mr. Desmond

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3639 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 ⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Is it? I bought the Stack radar to replace my PRGR based on what Stack told me! When I am swinging for speed, the PRGR would miss 50%-80% of my backswings due to a higher speed. The stack seldom misses those- at least for me.
    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.