Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3499 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
19 minutes ago, dsc123 said:

Sorry if this has been covered, but did they change the way putt distance works?  I used to enter my putt distances after each round and it was always distance to the hole.  I stopped doing that when I got the Live version because I stopped reviewing everything on a computer.  But today, I wanted to enter putt distances and it seems to give me the distance from putt 1 to putt 2 rather than to the hole.

I believe what I heard was that it assumes the last putt was a tap in. So if you two putt it just assumes your second putt was right by the hole.

KICK THE FLIP!!

In the bag:
:srixon: Z355

:callaway: XR16 3 Wood
:tmade: Aeroburner 19* 3 hybrid
:ping: I e1 irons 4-PW
:vokey: SM5 50, 60
:wilsonstaff: Harmonized Sole Grind 56 and Windy City Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
1 hour ago, dsc123 said:

Sorry if this has been covered, but did they change the way putt distance works?  I used to enter my putt distances after each round and it was always distance to the hole.  I stopped doing that when I got the Live version because I stopped reviewing everything on a computer.  But today, I wanted to enter putt distances and it seems to give me the distance from putt 1 to putt 2 rather than to the hole.

I don't think you ever entered your putt distances.

I always drug my markers around, and I believe it used to tell you the distance in yards for all shots, including putts, but now it tells you in feet.

But I've never seen it where you enter your putt distances in directly.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
On 6/5/2016 at 10:38 AM, Jeremie Boop said:

I believe what I heard was that it assumes the last putt was a tap in. So if you two putt it just assumes your second putt was right by the hole.

Yeah, I think that's how it works when it automatically puts your putts on there.

23 hours ago, iacas said:

I don't think you ever entered your putt distances.

I always drug my markers around, and I believe it used to tell you the distance in yards for all shots, including putts, but now it tells you in feet.

But I've never seen it where you enter your putt distances in directly.

Right, I didn't mean "enter" as in typing in the number but going back and manually dragging the markets until the #'s were correct.

So for example, I had a straight 28 foot putt and hit it 5 feet short (ugh!).  How I would expect it to work, and how I remember it working in the past, was that I would place the pin 28 feet from the first putt location and then put the second putt marker in between them.  But this time, when I moved the flag, it only changed the distance of the second putt.  So to get the putt distances to say 28 ft and 5 ft, I have to put the second putt marker 258 feet from the first, and the flag 5 ft past that.  I guess that's fine, if that how it works, I just don't remember that being the case.  It also messes with the approach shot accuracy, though perhaps negligibly so. 

 

Notice the first putt distances stays the same when I move the flag:

 

1.jpg2.jpg

Edited by dsc123

Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
4 hours ago, dsc123 said:

Yeah, I think that's how it works when it automatically puts your putts on there.

Right, I didn't mean "enter" as in typing in the number but going back and manually dragging the markets until the #'s were correct.

So for example, I had a straight 28 foot putt and hit it 5 feet short (ugh!).  How I would expect it to work, and how I remember it working in the past, was that I would place the pin 28 feet from the first putt location and then put the second putt marker in between them.  But this time, when I moved the flag, it only changed the distance of the second putt.  So to get the putt distances to say 28 ft and 5 ft, I have to put the second putt marker 258 feet from the first, and the flag 5 ft past that.  I guess that's fine, if that how it works, I just don't remember that being the case.  It also messes with the approach shot accuracy, though perhaps negligibly so. 

You're doing it wrong if you've changed that up recently. I don't remember this changing, but the proper way is that if you have a 30-foot putt that you hit five feet past the hole, and then make that one, to have GG show a 35-foot putt going past the hole and then a 5-foot putt returning toward the hole.

In your case, you'd see a 23 foot putt and then a 5-foot putt. GG can do the math and knows that you had a 28-footer that you left 5 feet short.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I don't usually have to move the putt tags just the hole location the tags are what they are. If the question is does GG ding you for a putt that travels 35 feet when your shot was really 30 feet from the hole I doubt the approach stats are that exact. Probably places more value in GIR than putt distances. Regardless if you leave the putt 5 feet short or 5 feet past you still have a 5 foot putt, either you make it or you don't.

Only time is looks goofy is the rare instances when the come back is longer than the first putt. I've had that happen a few times when I misjudged slope and speed. Looks uphill but fades away past the hole and the 5 foot putt I had trickles 15 feet past the hole.

Dave :-)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
8 hours ago, Dave2512 said:

I don't usually have to move the putt tags just the hole location the tags are what they are. If the question is does GG ding you for a putt that travels 35 feet when your shot was really 30 feet from the hole I doubt the approach stats are that exact. Probably places more value in GIR than putt distances. Regardless if you leave the putt 5 feet short or 5 feet past you still have a 5 foot putt, either you make it or you don't.

It still matters. If you have a 5-foot putt that you hit 10 feet or a 15-foot putt that you hit 10 feet… the first will lose strokes, while the second will lose significantly less strokes.

On putting. The first (the five-foot to the hole shot) will gain strokes on the approach, and the other (15 feet to the hole) will gain fewer strokes.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 6/6/2016 at 3:58 PM, iacas said:

You're doing it wrong if you've changed that up recently. I don't remember this changing, but the proper way is that if you have a 30-foot putt that you hit five feet past the hole, and then make that one, to have GG show a 35-foot putt going past the hole and then a 5-foot putt returning toward the hole.

In your case, you'd see a 23 foot putt and then a 5-foot putt. GG can do the math and knows that you had a 28-footer that you left 5 feet short.

Thanks.  :beer:

Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3499 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.