Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3697 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

how does everybody think the reds are gonna do this year? i think they will do better than last year but still not great


Posted
10 hours ago, GolfClubbas said:

how does everybody think the reds are gonna do this year? i think they will do better than last year but still not great

I believe they will have a better year this round, as last year had its issues. Even though, I'm actually an Indians fan, being a transplant from Cleveland. I am hoping they have a better year too.

Dave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
14 hours ago, GolfClubbas said:

how does everybody think the reds are gonna do this year? i think they will do better than last year but still not great

They will probably end up in the bottom half of the NL. Something like 15-20 games under .500. 

4 hours ago, Dave325 said:

I believe they will have a better year this round, as last year had its issues. Even though, I'm actually an Indians fan, being a transplant from Cleveland. I am hoping they have a better year too.

Cleveland is projected to win the Central. Their pitching staff is legit. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I'm going to wait until we have pitchers in regular-season mode before I actually slit my wrists, but I'm figuring on a really bad one.

The bullpen ought to scare the poop out of anyone that roots for the Reds. You have a couple of youngsters in the starting rotation and there isn't much of a safety net for them. There are a couple of hitters in the lineup (Votto, Mesoraco, Phillips) but some real serious holes as well. The outfield, in general, is a concern. Not sure what they'll get out of LF. I'm not optimistic about Bruce and Billy Hamilton is essentially a second pitcher in the lineup.

Seriously, however bad it gets, let's just hope the club is stronger at the end of the year than it will be at the beginning.

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I use to be a Cincinnati fan but baseball has lost its luster for me.  I'm tired of the four hour games and 162 game season.   

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 hours ago, dennyjones said:

I use to be a Cincinnati fan but baseball has lost its luster for me.  I'm tired of the four hour games and 162 game season.   

I don't see what worrying about 162 games does. You don't have to watch them all, and can get by watching maybe half. I thin it's just not liking the sport, because it's not like cutting it to 154 or 148 or something would mean a shorter season. Instead, I think they'd just up the number of off days. As for the time complaint, it's uncommon for 4 hours to happen anymore. An extremely quick search had games under 3 hours, on average (a late-May article had them at 2:53).

Now, the Reds? They're bad. The bullpen is built on hopes and dreams and not too much proof. Homer Bailey is listed as their #1, but even if he's healthy and competent, he's more of a #3/4 on a respectable team. Iglesias might be their REAL best starter, but he's still unproven and was more of a #2 at his best last season. DeSclafani might be the #2, but that might also be a bit generous for him (though he had nice rate stats). The offensive really is a hole, though.

Cincy needed to get rid of Phillips, since the team won't compete. He won't end up making a bit of difference. Votto's almost all there is on offense, in a way. Hamilton's fast, but that's about it. Cozart's bat MIGHT be league average, with better luck and contact quality.  I like Mesoraco, but he's really hard to peg right now (how much of last season was playing hurt vs. just being bad?).

They might be better than the Brewers, but the Reds are ultimately fighting to be #4 in the division. It's a steep drop-off after the top-3.


Posted

For me, baseball is something I listen to more than watch. I put the game on in the background while I'm working. I honestly can't remember the last time I sat and watched a full game on television.

 

14 hours ago, Lilfrier said:

Cincy needed to get rid of Phillips, since the team won't compete. He won't end up making a bit of difference. Votto's almost all there is on offense, in a way. Hamilton's fast, but that's about it. Cozart's bat MIGHT be league average, with better luck and contact quality.  I like Mesoraco, but he's really hard to peg right now (how much of last season was playing hurt vs. just being bad?).

The Reds tried real hard to get rid of Phillips. They had a deal all worked out with the Nats, but BP nixed it. He has a no trade clause and chose to use it for whatever reason. Sort of seems like something that could blow up in his face, but we'll see.

After some real light hitting in past years, Cozart was looking real good up to the point of his injury last year. Not going to hold my breath, but he might yet have something for us.

Mesoraco only played 23 games last year before he got hurt. If he's healthy, he gets the benefit of my doubt.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
6 hours ago, mcanadiens said:

For me, baseball is something I listen to more than watch. I put the game on in the background while I'm working. I honestly can't remember the last time I sat and watched a full game on television.

 

The Reds tried real hard to get rid of Phillips. They had a deal all worked out with the Nats, but BP nixed it. He has a no trade clause and chose to use it for whatever reason. Sort of seems like something that could blow up in his face, but we'll see.

After some real light hitting in past years, Cozart was looking real good up to the point of his injury last year. Not going to hold my breath, but he might yet have something for us.

Mesoraco only played 23 games last year before he got hurt. If he's healthy, he gets the benefit of my doubt.

I think Phillips just seems to care more about comfort than a ring, or he just hates the clubhouse issues Washington's had. Mesoraco, I agree on, as it's hard to knock a guy who was probably playing hurt, especially over such a short period.

On that same note, it's hard to give Cozart too much credit for 53 games that were more not-terrible than actually good. His on-base is still atrocious, and his slugging was carrying his line. Maybe if he can get some better luck/contact quality, the BABIP can get him hitting close to .270. That would present a solid hitter. However, his career line of .245/.284/..375 is incredibly bad.


Posted
10 hours ago, Lilfrier said:

On that same note, it's hard to give Cozart too much credit for 53 games that were more not-terrible than actually good. His on-base is still atrocious, and his slugging was carrying his line. Maybe if he can get some better luck/contact quality, the BABIP can get him hitting close to .270. That would present a solid hitter. However, his career line of .245/.284/..375 is incredibly bad.

At this point, you try to take hope where you can find it.

Kind of frustrating when you are rebuilding but the youngsters are still some time away from being major-league ready.

  • Upvote 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3697 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Probably since the golfer has to swing the club back and up. The hands have to move back and up. You can feel them go back and up just by turning the shoulders and bending the right arm, because it brings your hands towards your right shoulder.  The difference is if you maintain width or not. Less width means a shorter feeling swing path so the more you need to lift the arms. Being as someone who gets the right arm bend at 110+ degrees, it's 100% a timing issue. I am use to like a 1.5+ second backswing. It probably should be like 1 second at most. Half a second or more will feel like an eternity. I have had swings where I keep my right arm straighter and I am still trying to time the downswing based on the old tempo.  Ideally, for me, it is probably going to be a much quicker and shorter (in duration) backswing, while keeping the right elbow straighter. Which also means more hinging to get swing length without over swinging. 
    • Wordle 1,789 5/6 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜ ⬜🟩⬜🟩🟩 ⬜🟩🟨🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • I'm currently recuperating from surgery, so no golf, but have been thinking about this quite a bit. This and the don't overbend the right arm thing. It's hard for me to even pose the position, so I'm not 100% sure, but I feel like it's impossible to have the right humerus along the shirt seam and not overbend your right arm, unless your hands are down near your hips. If the left arm is up at or above the shoulder plane and your right arm is bent less than 90 degrees, then your right humerus has to raise or your hands will get pulled apart. Your left hand can't reach your right hand unless either the right upper arm is up or the right arm is overbent. Is that right? If it is, then focusing on not overbending the right arm would force you to raise the humerus. And actually thinking further on it, if you do overbend your right arm, then you're basically forcing your upper arm down or forcing your left arm to bend. Since (for me at least) bending the left arm too much is not something I think I need to worry about, it means that the bend in the trail arm is really the driving force behind what happens to the right humerus. 
    • I managed to knock off a 3, a 13, and a 15 a couple of weeks ago. The 3 was a 185 yard par 3 with a 6 iron to 12 feet. 13 was a 350 yard par 4, which was a 2 iron and a 9 iron to about a foot. 15 was a 560 yard par 5 with a driver in a bunker, 4 iron into the semi, gap wedge to 8 feet and a putt.
    • Wordle 1,789 4/6* ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜ 🟨🟩⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.