Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3511 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I've seen stuff in a few more places lately suggesting that people get away from the standard teaching method of chipping where one places the ball back in the stance and hits down on it, instead playing it middle to front of stance, less shaft lean, even striking the ground a bit before the ball with the bounce on the club.  The latter method is supposed to prevent the leading edge from digging in and give more room for error. 

Are folks employing this method and how are they liking the results if so?  I started practicing this last night.  Results are mixed, but no chunks where the ball goes 1' and you want to bury your head in the sand in humiliation.  The miss, though, is still pretty ugly -- leading edge to equator rarely imparts spin or elevation. Particularly off really tight lies, I don't see how you can really avoid equatoring.

How is this working for you?  Tips? 

Edited by tdiii
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Just a bit of language clarification ... You're striking the ground BEHIND the ball with the bounce.

I pitch like this and have had fantastic results.  There are a few threads on here explaining it - search "quickie pitching technique" or something to that effect.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Just now, Golfingdad said:

Just a bit of language clarification ... You're striking the ground BEHIND the ball with the bounce.

I pitch like this and have had fantastic results.  There are a few threads on here explaining it - search "quickie pitching technique" or something to that effect.

Yes, striking the ground BEHIND the ball. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
8 minutes ago, tdiii said:

I've seen stuff in a few more places lately suggesting that people get away from the standard teaching method of chipping where one places the ball back in the stance and hits down on it, instead playing it middle to front of stance, less shaft lean, even striking the ground a bit in front of the ball with the bounce on the club.  The latter method is supposed to prevent the leading edge from digging in and give more room for error. 

Are folks employing this method and how are they liking the results if so?  I started practicing this last night.  Results are mixed, but no chunks where the ball goes 1' and you want to bury your head in the sand in humiliation.  The miss, though, is still pretty ugly -- leading edge to equator rarely imparts spin or elevation. Particularly off really tight lies, I don't see how you can really avoid equatoring.

How is this working for you?  Tips? 

Coincidental that you'd post this right now.  I just got back from the practice range a few minutes ago, working with my 52 and 56 wedges.  The club pro happened by and asked how things were going.  I said "Fine, except I've been hitting the occasional hozel rocket."   (Maybe 1 out of 20 or 30 shots.)  He had me try the exact thing you mention in your first sentence above.  He said that would cut down on the hozel rockets.  I hit a few, but will need to hit a bunch more to get a feel for that technique.  


Posted

The link up above will help you more than you can believe. Alongside the 'accompanying' book  "Your Short Game Solution" by James Sieckmann it's transformed my short game, from a nervy stab at the ball using the traditional method to using my equipment and swing properly to get much better results.

For me a large part of conquering this game is empowering you to realise why things have gone wrong in real time on the course. For me with the short game it when I stray too far from these teachings. 

Hi, My name is Matt.


Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Dinoma said:

The link up above will help you more than you can believe. Alongside the 'accompanying' book  "Your Short Game Solution" by James Sieckmann it's transformed my short game, from a nervy stab at the ball using the traditional method to using my equipment and swing properly to get much better results.

A truly amazing book that has really helped my short game.  This book really helps with the seemingly difficult wedge shots.  SHots like carrying a bunker, hitting from a tight lie, etc. Now instead of hoping I can get the ball on the green, I am confident I can get it close to the pin.

Edited by pumaAttack

Tony  


:titleist:    |   :tmade:   |     :cleveland: 


Posted (edited)

Messing about with it.  Still equatoring and I don't hit it all that high. 

Edited by tdiii
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, tdiii said:

Messing about with it.  Still equatoring and I don't hit it all that high. 

Check the thread links above. There's likely something on how to deal with tight lies. I find this shot challenging on tight lies that are partly bare and unusually hard. I suspect that when you have the technique down pretty soundly that the your AoA on even a poorer strike becomes shallow enough so that any deflection of the bounce from contact with the ground is minimal. The shallow AoA of attack makes the any bounce contact more oblique so you get more 'glide' and less 'bounce'.

I suspect that you may be coming down on the ball too steeply so that when you do contact the ground you get a significant deflection of the bounce bringing the equator up into the back of the ball. Not sure if it's correct per the advised technique, but you might try to swing the clubhead around your body more to flatten out the swing arc and shallow the AoA.

Edited by natureboy

Kevin


Posted
22 hours ago, tdiii said:

I've seen stuff in a few more places lately suggesting that people get away from the standard teaching method of chipping where one places the ball back in the stance and hits down on it, instead playing it middle to front of stance, less shaft lean, even striking the ground a bit before the ball with the bounce on the club.  The latter method is supposed to prevent the leading edge from digging in and give more room for error. 

Are folks employing this method and how are they liking the results if so?  I started practicing this last night.  Results are mixed, but no chunks where the ball goes 1' and you want to bury your head in the sand in humiliation.  The miss, though, is still pretty ugly -- leading edge to equator rarely imparts spin or elevation. Particularly off really tight lies, I don't see how you can really avoid equatoring.

How is this working for you?  Tips? 

I've been working on this for quite some time. When I get the setup correct, pick my spot and commit, I hit good shots. My misses now tend to be short, but not stub it and hit it fat. What I'm finding is that it takes a ton of practice to switch from a weight forward, shaft leaning, hit down on the back of the ball approach. Now I try to get the shaft with no lean forward and with the lie angle very upright. The heel cannot dig in with is setup. Again it takes a ton of practice for this setup and feel to be natural and I'm not there yet.

FWIW, I saw this approach on Paul Azinger's golf channel academy short game show. Dick Stocton's approach is similar as well.

Whatever method you choose, commit to it and practice, practice practice. It's probably going to take awhile to get the feel for it. Good luck!

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Worked at it last night again, this time taking about 30 chips off the practice green. One small nick in the green, but definitely getting the feel for it.  Also threw the ball in the rough searching out crummy lies.  Was surprised to see the method work there, too.  It will be interesting to see how it goes on the course!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On April 22, 2016 at 5:20 PM, tdiii said:

Messing about with it.  Still equatoring and I don't hit it all that high. 

You need to let the club release a bit early, think of it as a controlled flip. The club head should pass the hands coming through impact. If you don't get that flippy impact you won't get the height. 

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Can activate the bounce more by lower the hands and handle . This is great for splashing out of the sand. I tend to use more of the heel bounce "intentional fat heavy " lob out of sand


Posted

Has anyone who's thrown a frisbee 'forehand' found similar feels in the release for this shot?

Kevin


Posted
13 hours ago, tdiii said:

Worked at it last night again, this time taking about 30 chips off the practice green. One small nick in the green, but definitely getting the feel for it.  Also threw the ball in the rough searching out crummy lies.  Was surprised to see the method work there, too.  It will be interesting to see how it goes on the course!

I was too. I practiced a few low powered ones off my carpet and found some things I think I was doing. Basically too many full swing elements creeping in (it's early in the season).

Adjustments that seemed to help my results:

  • slightly more axis tilt feel toward the target (more level shoulders than full swing set up and impact)
  • shoulders more open to stance than normal for me (may not be officially advised but it improved my impact vs shoulders parallel to target line)
  • softer hands and arms (more 'floppy' and less 'engaged' through impact than in full swing)
  • takeaway with trail hand knuckles facing ground (a little like a forehand frisbee wrist cock) and releasing similarly 'under'
  • elbows slide back/behind along the side of the body on backswing and follow through
  • the biggest feel improvement was 'pulling the lead shoulder back / behind and level rather than raising the lead shoulder with an extending 'firm' lead side like in a full shot...at times it almost felt like the lead shoulder going 'straight' back behind me was pulling the relatively passive trail hand through the ball

Kevin


  • Administrator
Posted
12 hours ago, natureboy said:

Has anyone who's thrown a frisbee 'forehand' found similar feels in the release for this shot?

No. Generally speaking that would be way, way too much wrist involvement. Think back to the Tom Kite video…

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, iacas said:

No. Generally speaking that would be way, way too much wrist involvement. Think back to the Tom Kite video…

I was thinking more of the hand position - knuckles down, palm up and maybe a bit of similarity to a relatively soft forehand frisbee toss with the wrist reacting to the shoulder turn rather than a full out distance throw with a lot of active wrist snap.

I don't find a lot of active wrist involvement through release with the Pelz distance wedge technique either relative to the full swing. I feel the lead side extension (rather than primarily rotation) releasing the club.

Edited by natureboy

Kevin


Posted
1 hour ago, natureboy said:

I was thinking more of the hand position - knuckles down, palm up and maybe a bit of similarity to a relatively soft forehand frisbee toss with the wrist reacting to the shoulder turn rather than a full out distance throw with a lot of active wrist snap.

I don't find a lot of active wrist involvement through release with the Pelz distance wedge technique either relative to the full swing. I feel the lead side extension (rather than primarily rotation) releasing the club.

I'm confused.

:adams: / :tmade: / :edel: / :aimpoint: / :ecco: / :bushnell: / :gamegolf: / 

Eyad

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3511 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.