Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3637 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Did I just hear the FBI director say that if it were anyone other than Clinton they'd probably get charged?

Weirdest press conference ever.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
7 minutes ago, mcanadiens said:

Did I just hear the FBI director say that if it were anyone other than Clinton they'd probably get charged?

Weirdest press conference ever.

What he said was he doesn't think Clinton acted with criminal intent but...

Quote

To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.

 

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 minute ago, newtogolf said:

What he said was he doesn't think Clinton acted with criminal intent but...

 

I guess that reads a bit better than what I thought I heard.

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
5 minutes ago, mcanadiens said:

Did I just hear the FBI director say that if it were anyone other than Clinton they'd probably get charged?

Weirdest press conference ever.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/06/us/politics/hillary-clinton-fbi-email-comey.html

Quote

The F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, on Tuesday said the F.B.I. is recommending no charges against Hillary Clinton for her use of a personal email server while secretary of state.

and
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/07/05/james-comey-fbi-hillary-clinton/86702072/

Quote

"In looking back at our investigations into mishandling of removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts," Comey said.....

"Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information," he said.

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Bottom line is if she wasn't Hillary Clinton and running for POTUS she'd likely face some penalties.  

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Just now, newtogolf said:

Bottom line is if she wasn't Hillary Clinton and running for POTUS she'd likely face some penalties.  

Prove it. 

In the end it doesn't matter much towards her running for POTUS. Qualification for POTUS doesn't include security clearance. 

The only thing that mattered would have been criminal charges. If they wanted to they could take away her security clearance. Again, that doesn't matter when your POTUS. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Can't think of a better analogy than reckless driving. The intent is not to run somebody over but certainly not overly worried about it either. I can't see how NO penalties should be incurred. I don't know what fair penalty would be but IMHO leveraging this screw up against her as an anti-POTUS weapon bit overkill too.

In the least I would think if nothing happens (that would not be right) AND she goes on to be the POTUS (that would be okay-ish compared to the option I guess), this whole episode will serve as a major deterrent in her acting entitled or high handed in the future. Well, one can hope.    

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
32 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

Prove it. 

In the end it doesn't matter much towards her running for POTUS. Qualification for POTUS doesn't include security clearance. 

The only thing that mattered would have been criminal charges. If they wanted to they could take away her security clearance. Again, that doesn't matter when your POTUS. 

Read what he the FBI Director stated.

Quote

To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.

POTUS is required to have security clearances, they are just not formalized given the position of POTUS requires vetting that would make a formal security clearance process redundant.  

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
3 minutes ago, newtogolf said:

POTUS is required to have security clearances.  

I seem to struggle in finding the part were they are required to have security clearance? 

Quote

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

-The Constitution of the United States

I take your quotes statement above as the FBI is making their decision on if criminal charges should be brought against Clinton. They could be in wait and see mode if they want to levy down administrative or security sanctions. When he says, "But that is not what we are deciding now". Means to me they are sitting back and waiting to see how the DOJ handles it going forward. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

One week ago: http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/29/politics/bill-clinton-loretta-lynch/

Former President Bill Clinton "crosses paths" with Attorney General Loretta Lynch on tarmac. 

Today: Hillary's State Department is accused of being "extremely careless" yet she won't face charges

Interesting. 

Let there be little doubt that there are two sets of laws, those for "them" and those for the rest of us. We are playing a rigged game here. 

- Mark

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

" Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information."

"
In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts."

" As a result, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to Justice our view that no charges are appropriate in this case. "

So now do all the "Hillary's going to jail" people scream that the FBI is apart of a big "clinton for President" conspiracy?

Tin_foil_hat_2.png

In my Grom:

Driver-Taylormade 10.5 Woods- Taylomade 3 wood, taylormade 4 Hybrid
Irons- Callaway Big Berthas 5i - GW Wedges- Titles Volkey  Putter- Odyssey protype #9
Ball- Bridgestone E6
All grips Golf Pride

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
24 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

I seem to struggle in finding the part were they are required to have security clearance? 

I take your quotes statement above as the FBI is making their decision on if criminal charges should be brought against Clinton. They could be in wait and see mode if they want to levy down administrative or security sanctions. When he says, "But that is not what we are deciding now". Means to me they are sitting back and waiting to see how the DOJ handles it going forward. 

The POTUS is supposed to be vetted before taking the position so there isn't an official security clearance issued but the POTUS is cleared at the highest levels in order to make the decisions the job requires.  

I believe the Director is saying that others would have been sanctioned but they are not taking additional actions against Clinton, I think this is the end of the e-mail server litigation as DOJ stated they would follow the lead of the FBI after Lynch had the secret meeting with Bill Clinton on her plane.

8 minutes ago, Elmer said:

" Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information."

"
In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts."

" As a result, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to Justice our view that no charges are appropriate in this case. "

So now do all the "Hillary's going to jail" people scream that the FBI is apart of a big "clinton for President" conspiracy?

Tin_foil_hat_2.png

There are numerous instants where intent is not the only factor evaluated in determining if criminal charges are  applicable.  Willful negligence is very close to intent and that is what the FBI should be prosecuting Clinton on.  

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
24 minutes ago, newtogolf said:

The POTUS is supposed to be vetted before taking the position so there isn't an official security clearance issued but the POTUS is cleared at the highest levels in order to make the decisions the job requires.  

I believe the Director is saying that others would have been sanctioned but they are not taking additional actions against Clinton, I think this is the end of the e-mail server litigation as DOJ stated they would follow the lead of the FBI after Lynch had the secret meeting with Bill Clinton on her plane.

There are numerous instants where intent is not the only factor evaluated in determining if criminal charges are  applicable.  Willful negligence is very close to intent and that is what the FBI should be prosecuting Clinton on.  

The FBI does not prosecute, they conduct fact finding and make a recommendation to the justice dept.
The Justice Dept tends to prosecute cases they can know they will get a conviction.

Chances are the Justice Dept and FBI know that getting a felony conviction on "willfull negligence" is a long tedious court battle for very little pay off.

I think they have better cases to take to trial.

But YMMV!

In my Grom:

Driver-Taylormade 10.5 Woods- Taylomade 3 wood, taylormade 4 Hybrid
Irons- Callaway Big Berthas 5i - GW Wedges- Titles Volkey  Putter- Odyssey protype #9
Ball- Bridgestone E6
All grips Golf Pride

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
11 minutes ago, Elmer said:

The FBI does not prosecute, they conduct fact finding and make a recommendation to the justice dept.
The Justice Dept tends to prosecute cases they can know they will get a conviction.

Chances are the Justice Dept and FBI know that getting a felony conviction on "willfull negligence" is a long tedious court battle for very little pay off.

I think they have better cases to take to trial.

But YMMV!

Shouldn't be a long tedious battle, she admitted to knowing what the proper procedure was for handling her SOS e-mail and willfully decided to manage it using a private e-mail server, that's what willful negligence is.  

While I know you're celebrating the victory, I doubt you'd be as elated if this were a republican or Trump or was guilty of the same offenses and was just given a get out of jail free card by a republican POTUS and DOJ.  

HRC being given this pass doesn't mean she's not guilty, it just means DOJ and the FBI don't want to pursue it.  If you're okay with someone who doesn't take national security seriously becoming POTUS then Clinton is your girl.  

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Faith in government will take another hit, unfortunately.

A reasoned look at this shows that there is a law against gross negligence with classified material, and there is a separate law against deliberate mishandling of classified material (espionage, etc). When you violate the law against gross negligence, there may not be ever intent to violate laws. That's the whole point of the law- to be a deterrent against stupidity. If you access classified material, you take it seriously. I know I did when I had access. It's respectful of the country you serve. 

Ok, great, so we are about to elect someone who did not intend to be so negligent. Wonderful. Clinton was clearly careless (as Comey said). I'd confidently add that she (and her staff in particular, but she chose her staff and they reflect on her) showed disdain for the rules. This was not some minor oversight, as this email configuration took serious effort to set up, and serious ignorance to think it was ok (or safe from hackers in the way they did it). The docks my faith in government yet another notch.

My Swing


Driver: :ping: G30, Irons: :tmade: Burner 2.0, Putter: :cleveland:, Balls: :snell:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, Elmer said:

" Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information."

"
In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts."

" As a result, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to Justice our view that no charges are appropriate in this case. "

So now do all the "Hillary's going to jail" people scream that the FBI is apart of a big "clinton for President" conspiracy?

Tin_foil_hat_2.png

There are enthusiastic supporters of Donald Trump who still believe he's a Clinton plant, so the conspiracy is already all-encompassing and self-fulfilling.

In my UnderArmour Links stand bag...

Driver: '07 Burner 9.5° (stiff graphite shaft)
Woods: SasQuatch 17° 4-Wood (stiff graphite shaft)
Hybrid: 4DX Ironwood 20° (stiff graphite shaft)Irons/Wedges: Apex Edge 3-PW, GW, SW (stiff shaft); Carnoustie 60° LWPutter: Rossa AGSI+ Corzina...


Posted
6 minutes ago, Chilli Dipper said:

There are enthusiastic supporters of Donald Trump who still believe he's a Clinton plant, so the conspiracy is already all-encompassing and self-fulfilling.

There are also Trump supporters who feel Hillary should be in jail for "gross negligence", but have no issue with Trumps "deliberate fraud" with Trump U.

And is Trump is a Hillary plant, he deserves an EGOT, because he will be the best actor in the world!!!
 

In my Grom:

Driver-Taylormade 10.5 Woods- Taylomade 3 wood, taylormade 4 Hybrid
Irons- Callaway Big Berthas 5i - GW Wedges- Titles Volkey  Putter- Odyssey protype #9
Ball- Bridgestone E6
All grips Golf Pride

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
7 minutes ago, Elmer said:

And is Trump is a Hillary plant, he deserves an EGOT, because he will be the best actor in the world!!!
 

Take that, Lin-Manuel Miranda!

In my UnderArmour Links stand bag...

Driver: '07 Burner 9.5° (stiff graphite shaft)
Woods: SasQuatch 17° 4-Wood (stiff graphite shaft)
Hybrid: 4DX Ironwood 20° (stiff graphite shaft)Irons/Wedges: Apex Edge 3-PW, GW, SW (stiff shaft); Carnoustie 60° LWPutter: Rossa AGSI+ Corzina...


Note: This thread is 3637 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Well, this is interesting.  I think we discovered a few months ago that I haven't been following professional golf in a while (my confusion about Scotty's footwork confirmed that), so at least as I aim to follow a bit more I'll get something new to learn with all of you.  My very quick read of Erik's summary makes me think this new Challenger series fits somewhere between Korn Ferry and the Championship (not Champions, but I know I'm going to make that mistake a few times if I'm not careful!).   My recollection is that there were already second-tier events among the PGA Tour;  the Bob Hope didn't have the same quality of field as the event at Riviera (whose current name I forget, although now that I say that, I realize the Palm Springs event hasn't been called the Bob Hope in a few years either).   With the absence of the FedEx (if I'm reading that correctly), does that mean no more FedEx Cup at all? Hopefully I'll have time later in 2026 to sit down and see what we're in for in 2027, where one of my goals already is to follow more professional golf.
    • The highlights as I see them: Championship and Challenger Series The creation of the PGA Tour and the PGB Tour, in the words of Joel Dahmen a few years ago. They're calling them the Championship Series (23-24 events) and the Challenger Series (20+ events). Both run February to August. They feel this will achieve three things: increasing the consistency and quality of fields across the season creating a clear system for players to earn and retain status and delivering a more structured and competitive experience for fans and partners—all in an effort to strengthen meritocracy. Championship Series Structure and Eligibility The 23-24 events includes the Players, majors, season-ending events, and the Presidents Cup and Ryder Cup. These will be 72-hole events with a 36-hole cut to the top 65 and ties and purses of $20M+. 120 players without an alternate list. 90 players (roughly) from the previous year and 20 players promoted from the Challenger Series. Full eligibility will be finalized later this year. Sites (cities) to be finalized soon, but 10 of the 15 courses have already been determined. Postseason: includes retention and relegation and concludes with match play. The Tour Championship will also be played across a rotation of prestigious courses. Challenger Series Structure and Eligibility 20+ events. Running concurrently. Will feature players fighting their way back to the Championship Series or players graduating and on the upswing from the Korn Ferry Tour. Many of these events will be current PGA Tour courses. About 7 of the Challenger Series events will be during off weeks for the Championship Series with elevated purses and visibility. Purses of at least $4M, with cuts similar to the Champ series. 144 player fields. Competitive Fields for Both Series Players will be eligible for only one series at a time: Championship Series Players are not eligible for Challenger Series events. Championship Series members will have a known schedule with all events having the same eligibility. Players and Majors will have their own eligibility criteria. Championship Series players don't have to play all events. This begs the question about, say, the Canadian Open, and other "home-town" events that players might want to play, even if they're Challenger Series events. Will releases be granted? Promotion and Relegation At least 90 players will be retained in the Championship Series, and 20 players will be promoted from the Challenger Series each year. Battlefield promotion for two-time winners from the Challenger Series. Players relegated from the Championship Series will have a "last chance" opportunity to retain status, or will go to the Challenger Series. Criteria will be finalized before the start of the 2027 season. Points System New points system (not FedExCup points). Separate points systems for the Championship and Challenger Series. Elevated points in the Challenger Series for off-weeks on the Championship Series. More details tk. Elevated International Events in the Fall The fall schedule will include a limited series of elevated international events with top players from the Championship Series, with the intent to deliver in partnership with the DP World Tour as part of the Strategic Alliance. Last Chance Series The Tour will develop a “last chance” series of 4-6 events in the fall, with a limited number of spots on the Championship Series available for top finishers. Eligibility will include players relegated from the Championship Series, Challenger Series players, and other categories to be determined. Q-School continues, as do the Korn Ferry Tour and PGA Tour Latinoamerica. Also, Brian Rolapp is the new commissioner as of January 1, 2027.
    • You can download the PDF at this link or see the first page of it above.
    • Yes, because you have lifted to like 120° without bending the left elbow. So when you turn and the left elbow bends… it bends in such a way that you then lower your left humerus and pull the club around you.
    • Bob Parsons can be a bit much. But… we fit PXG clubs at our academy. Every Tuesday.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.