Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Bogey Golfers Only (Index 16-22) / Breaking 90 Topic


Note: This thread is 1806 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
My Average score is about 86-92 (didn't understand the sand figure either, so left that out - FYI my sand percentage save is 42% average):
AVERAGE SCORE Relationship
CATEGORY 71 75 79 81 85 89 91 95 99
GIR 12 10 8 7 5 3 2 0 0 Strong
% Fairways 81 71 61 56 46 36 31 21 11 Weak
Iron Accuracy 80 68 53 47 33 20 13 0 0 Good
Putts per Round 29.0 30.3 31.7 32.3 33.7 35.0 35.7 37.0 38.3 Weak
Pitch/Chip/Sand 5.1 7.4 9.8 10.9 13.3 15.6 16.8 19.2 21.5 Strong
Birdies 3.2 2.4 1.8 1.5 0.8 0.1 0 0 0 Strong
Pars 11.8 10.3 8.8 8.1 6.6 5.1 4.3 2.8 1.3
Strong

  • Replies 2.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Not to belabor an old point, but in an email I got today was a link to this page .   The article was about using driver or 3-wood off the tee on tight par 4's.    The whole article was good but what brought me to write about it was the chart showing average proximity to the hole for tour players.  You can see the whole chart in that link, but after our discussion about proximity from 150yds, that specific yardage stood out.    From 150yds out (on the fairway), the average tour guy is 23-28 FEET from the pin.

So while we will aim for the center of that hypothetical 100' wide green and hope to be on it somewhere, they can aim their shot halfway between the center and the pin and still be playing what for them is a safe shot.

Razr Fit Xtreme 9.5* Matrix Black Tie shaft, Diablo Octane 3 wood 15*, Razr X Hybrid 21*, Razr X 4-SW, Forged Dark Chrome 60* lob wedge, Hex Chrome & Hex Black ball

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

My Average score is about 86-92 (didn't understand the sand figure either, so left that out - FYI my sand percentage save is 42% average):

AVERAGE SCORE

Relationship

CATEGORY

71

75

79

81

85

89

91

95

99

GIR

12

10

8

7

5

3

2

0

0

Strong

% Fairways

81

71

61

56

46

36

31

21

11

Weak

Iron Accuracy

80

68

53

47

33

20

13

0

0

Good

Putts per Round

29.0

30.3

31.7

32.3

33.7

35.0

35.7

37.0

38.3

Weak

Pitch/Chip/Sand

5.1

7.4

9.8

10.9

13.3

15.6

16.8

19.2

21.5

Strong

Birdies

3.2

2.4

1.8

1.5

0.8

0.1

0

0

0

Strong

Pars

11.8

10.3

8.8

8.1

6.6

5.1

4.3

2.8

1.3

Strong

You are on the verge of getting kicked out of this thread ... :beer: .   Your par & birdie numbers are impressive.

RiCK

(Play it again, Sam)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

My Average score is about 86-92 (didn't understand the sand figure either, so left that out - FYI my sand percentage save is 42% average):

AVERAGE SCORE

Relationship

CATEGORY

71

75

79

81

85

89

91

95

99

GIR

12

10

8

7

5

3

2

0

0

Strong

% Fairways

81

71

61

56

46

36

31

21

11

Weak

Iron Accuracy

80

68

53

47

33

20

13

0

0

Good

Putts per Round

29.0

30.3

31.7

32.3

33.7

35.0

35.7

37.0

38.3

Weak

Pitch/Chip/Sand

5.1

7.4

9.8

10.9

13.3

15.6

16.8

19.2

21.5

Strong

Birdies

3.2

2.4

1.8

1.5

0.8

0.1

0

0

0

Strong

Pars

11.8

10.3

8.8

8.1

6.6

5.1

4.3

2.8

1.3

Strong

I'm sorry, but if your average is 86-92, how are you a 16 handicap?

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

I'm sorry, but if your average is 86-92, how are you a 16 handicap?

That seems perfectly reasonable to me. Your handicap is your best 10 of your last 20.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Quote:

Originally Posted by Wardy

My Average score is about 86-92 (didn't understand the sand figure either, so left that out - FYI my sand percentage save is 42% average):

AVERAGE SCORE

Relationship

CATEGORY

71

75

79

81

85

89

91

95

99

GIR

12

10

8

7

5

3

2

0

0

Strong

% Fairways

81

71

61

56

46

36

31

21

11

Weak

Iron Accuracy

80

68

53

47

33

20

13

0

0

Good

Putts per Round

29.0

30.3

31.7

32.3

33.7

35.0

35.7

37.0

38.3

Weak

Pitch/Chip/Sand

5.1

7.4

9.8

10.9

13.3

15.6

16.8

19.2

21.5

Strong

Birdies

3.2

2.4

1.8

1.5

0.8

0.1

0

0

0

Strong

Pars

11.8

10.3

8.8

8.1

6.6

5.1

4.3

2.8

1.3

Strong

I'm sorry, but if your average is 86-92, how are you a 16 handicap?

I just looked at the handicap calculator, and if you take the average (not weighted) it comes out to 89. If you plug this into the calculator with a course rating of 72 and a slope rating of 113 you get a factored handicap of 16 with an index of 16.3.

Is this correct, or is this calculator incorrect?

EDIT: Did not see Erik's response.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

That seems perfectly reasonable to me. Your handicap is your best 10 of your last 20.

I'll accept that. I was going to qualify my original post by saying I'm not all that well informed about handicap calculations, so I demonstrated my ignorance, here.

It's just that people I know who score like that are in the 12-14 range, so there's the basis of my assumption.

Edit: I know that I had to take a few rounds out in the 85-89 range myself, and it brought my handicap up from 17, so I figured more rounds in the high 80s would yield a lower handicap. Maybe my scores are just too erratic.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Quote:

Originally Posted by iacas

That seems perfectly reasonable to me. Your handicap is your best 10 of your last 20.

I'll accept that. I was going to qualify my original post by saying I'm not all that well informed about handicap calculations, so I demonstrated my ignorance, here.

It's just that people I know who score like that are in the 12-14 range, so there's the basis of my assumption.


You're right, according to the same calculator, 86 comes out to 13hcp.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

It also depends on how difficult your course is.  I have been playing the same home course with 71.4/128 rating.    92 there is equivalent to 2 - 3 strokes lower from 72/113 course for bogey golfer.   Where you play most can be reflected in your stat.   Not so if you play numerous different courses with various difficulty.

RiCK

(Play it again, Sam)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Not to belabor an old point, but in an email I got today was a link to [URL=http://www.golfwrx.com/145045/hit-driver-not-3-wood-for-better-scoring-on-tight-holes/?utm_source=Newsletter+12%2F11&utm;_campaign=11-11&utm;_medium=email][COLOR=0000FF]this page[/COLOR][/URL].   The article was about using driver or 3-wood off the tee on tight par 4's.    The whole article was good but what brought me to write about it was the chart showing average proximity to the hole for tour players.  You can see the whole chart in that link, but after our discussion about proximity from 150yds, that specific yardage stood out.    From 150yds out (on the fairway), the average tour guy is 23-28 FEET from the pin. So while we will aim for the center of that hypothetical 100' wide green and hope to be on it somewhere, they can aim their shot halfway between the center and the pin and still be playing what for them is a safe shot.

I totally agree


  • Moderator
Posted

It also depends on how difficult your course is.  I have been playing the same home course with 71.4/128 rating.    92 there is equivalent to 2 - 3 strokes lower from 72/113 course for bogey golfer.   Where you play most can be reflected in your stat.   Not so if you play numerous different courses with various difficulty.

Makes sense. I play a handful of courses around my area and they range from 122-127 slope. I'm always surprised to see people post slopes in the 110s, I just have no idea what a course like that would play like.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Quote:

Originally Posted by rkim291968

It also depends on how difficult your course is.  I have been playing the same home course with 71.4/128 rating.    92 there is equivalent to 2 - 3 strokes lower from 72/113 course for bogey golfer.   Where you play most can be reflected in your stat.   Not so if you play numerous different courses with various difficulty.

Makes sense. I play a handful of courses around my area and they range from 122-127 slope. I'm always surprised to see people post slopes in the 110s, I just have no idea what a course like that would play like.


A lot easier for non-scratch golfers.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

A lot easier for non-scratch golfers.

On the flip side, I have played the Palm and Magnolia courses at Walt Disney World, and they're both 130 from the whites....

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Two words - Bogey Rating
the one number every golfer worse than a scratch should check before deciding which tees to play...

Club/Course Name

City State
Walt Disney World Resort - MAGNOLIA Lake Buena Vista FL
Tee Name USGA Course Rating (18) Slope Rating (18) Bogey Rating (18) Gender
CLASSIC 76.0 141 102.1 M
BLUE 74.0 137 99.4 M
WHITE 71.6 130 95.7 M
GOLD 69.0 121 91.4 M
GOLD 74.7 136 106.7 F
RED 69.6 126 99.2 F

Club/Course Name City State
Walt Disney World Resort - PALM Lake Buena Vista FL

Tee Name USGA Course Rating (18) Slope Rating (18) Bogey Rating (18) Gender
BLUE 72.3 126 95.7 M
WHITE 70.1 123 92.8 M
GOLD 68.5 119 90.6 M
GOLD 74.1 130 104.8 F
RED 69.2 122 98.0 F

A Rating More On Course

Quote:

Many players who fall into or near the bogey golfer category choose the tees they will play by consulting the yardage on the scorecard. Even worse, they just follow the rest of their group to a specific color tee and do not consider their capabilities against the challenge a different set of tees will provide.

Most bogey golfers would be better served looking at a combination of yardage, course rating and slope. For those inclined, a little math could lead to a more enjoyable round. Bogey players should take the slope rating, divide it by the set factor (5.381 for men, 4.24 for women) and add that to the course rating. The result is a target score for the bogey player, and is a truer yardstick of the challenge that lies ahead.

Or simply look up the Bogey Rating (from which the slope was originally determined) here .

Craig

:wilsonstaff: - FG Tour F5
:wilsonstaff: - Fybrid 3W 15*, FY 19.5*, 4H 24*
:wilsonstaff: - FG 51 Tour Blade 4-9
:wilson: - Harmonized 50, 55, 60
Old Master - TZ Putter


Posted
Quote:
Originally Posted by CR McDivot View Post

Two words - Bogey Rating
the one number every golfer worse than a scratch should check before deciding which tees to play...

Club/Course Name

City State
Walt Disney World Resort - MAGNOLIA Lake Buena Vista FL
Tee Name USGA Course Rating (18) Slope Rating (18) Bogey Rating (18) Gender
CLASSIC 76.0 141 102.1 M
BLUE 74.0 137 99.4 M
WHITE 71.6 130 95.7 M
GOLD 69.0 121 91.4 M
GOLD 74.7 136 106.7 F
RED 69.6 126 99.2 F

Club/Course Name City State
Walt Disney World Resort - PALM Lake Buena Vista FL

Tee Name USGA Course Rating (18) Slope Rating (18) Bogey Rating (18) Gender
BLUE 72.3 126 95.7 M
WHITE 70.1 123 92.8 M
GOLD 68.5 119 90.6 M
GOLD 74.1 130 104.8 F
RED 69.2 122 98.0 F

A Rating More On Course

Quote:

Many players who fall into or near the bogey golfer category choose the tees they will play by consulting the yardage on the scorecard. Even worse, they just follow the rest of their group to a specific color tee and do not consider their capabilities against the challenge a different set of tees will provide.

Most bogey golfers would be better served looking at a combination of yardage, course rating and slope. For those inclined, a little math could lead to a more enjoyable round. Bogey players should take the slope rating, divide it by the set factor (5.381 for men, 4.24 for women) and add that to the course rating. The result is a target score for the bogey player, and is a truer yardstick of the challenge that lies ahead.

Or simply look up the Bogey Rating (from which the slope was originally determined) here .


Thanks! I just looked up the course I will be playing tomorrow afternoon. I should score 95 if I have a handicap of 18, if I read it correctly.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Quote:

Originally Posted by rkim291968

It also depends on how difficult your course is.  I have been playing the same home course with 71.4/128 rating.    92 there is equivalent to 2 - 3 strokes lower from 72/113 course for bogey golfer.   Where you play most can be reflected in your stat.   Not so if you play numerous different courses with various difficulty.

Makes sense. I play a handful of courses around my area and they range from 122-127 slope. I'm always surprised to see people post slopes in the 110s, I just have no idea what a course like that would play like.

I just don't see too many courses with 110 rated tees.   I think there is too much of "good course = difficult course" perception out there and easier courses are relegated to beginner's haven.

RiCK

(Play it again, Sam)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Quote:

Originally Posted by billchao

Quote:

Originally Posted by rkim291968

It also depends on how difficult your course is.  I have been playing the same home course with 71.4/128 rating.    92 there is equivalent to 2 - 3 strokes lower from 72/113 course for bogey golfer.   Where you play most can be reflected in your stat.   Not so if you play numerous different courses with various difficulty.

Makes sense. I play a handful of courses around my area and they range from 122-127 slope. I'm always surprised to see people post slopes in the 110s, I just have no idea what a course like that would play like.

I just don't see too many courses with 110 rated tees.   I think there is too much of "good course = difficult course" perception out there and easier courses are relegated to beginner's haven.


It really depends what you are looking to do on the weekends.

I'm going to a 127 rated course tomorrow, but it is more for fun rather than a golf challenge. I could be just as happy playing on a 108 rated course as well, but that particular one is not a good "halfway" location between me and my playing partner.

I can see why you go to your course, the scenery and the winery/grill make it a really attractive weekend activity for you and your wife.

Getting to the point where playing these courses is fun is more important. Another benefit is that a nice swing feels good. It is a good feeling in an of itself, even if the ball draws/hooks OB.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

I just don't see too many courses with 110 rated tees.   I think there is too much of "good course = difficult course" perception out there and easier courses are relegated to beginner's haven.

I wonder if part of that has to do with the fact that golf courses have to cater to multiple handicaps? Example I'm thinking of, if you're a novice skier/snowboarder, you hit the bunny slopes, right? But the ski resorts offer different skill levels.

I think it's harder for a golf course to provide that kind of level of customization. You can adjust tee boxes to a certain extent, but a lot of the difficulty of a course comes from hazards, sloped fairways and greens, forced carries, that sort of stuff. If they make the course "good" by championship standards, us bogey guys are still experiencing a lot of the same obstacles, despite playing shorter distances.

Also, just thought about it myself, but a big, flat, open field would be easier to play, but terribly boring. I think the features that help make a golf course more interesting also happen to make them more difficult, and thus "good course = difficult course."

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1806 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • He's not and GEARS doesn't really measure toward your midline. It's measured at the joint. That's not why his use of "midline" is bad (part of the reason is that your "midline" is twisted, the top of your sternum can be pointed at a different place than the belt buckle, and your shoulders protract and retract, too. I think he's just trying to use midline to say which way the arm is moving. But they have terms for that — adduction and abduction — so whatever.
    • They weren't necessarily short - I don't remember the exact specifics of all of it, but some of them were missing a little left or right or both. Day 1 they were landing on the edge and kicking on, where day 2 they were just missing and kicking down into the bunkers and did it a lot. I think all told I actually went into bunkers on 8 holes. Some of them were not good shots. Like a few examples, on 8, the pin was in the back. I hit it solidly, but pulled it and it went long, over the bunker into long grass. I had the ball in sandy earth with long grass around it and about a foot below my feet. That next shot I tried to do what I could but it went into the bunker in front of me. Into a footprint. That one I dug out of the footprint, but still in the bunker. Got that one out of the bunker, but into the fringe grass in front of me. Chipped that one on a bit hard and two putts later made a 7. Another was on 14. The flag was on the little finger of green front left. I tried to play a little past it and a little right. Shoved it maybe 10 yards right of where I wanted to and the carry over the bunker gets longer the further right you go and that one hit the grass between the green and the bunker and came back down into the sand, left it in there and didn't get up and down on the next one. I think carrywise it carried about as far as I was planning on it doing so. Another was on 6, leaked my drive a little right into the fairway bunker. Hit a nearly good shot from there that went a little left and a little short and kicked into the bunker front left. That was a strike thing and just a hard shot. Did similar on 18. Drive in the right bunker, slightly heavy second that hit the bank between green and bunker again and kicked back into the sand. I think the tiredness manifested more as not squaring the face up so well and less as slowing down.
    • Depends on how short you were coming up on these shots. A bit more wind? Also, maybe you were swinging at 2-3 mph slower the next day.  I think the biggest thing is not adjusting. Like making assuming your stock shot is not enough and taking 1 club up. Not sure what type of adjustments you were making in your decision making. 
    • No one should measure a joint mobility away from that joint. If you go to physical therapy, they are not measuring your knee mobility based on your midline. It is based at the joint. Shoulder mobility should be measured in reference to the shoulder joint. 
    • He's using a driver swing, while I used the iron swing. Bryson goes from about 65° B to 15° B, hence the 50°. If you bend your right elbow, you're going to pull your hands across your chest some. Conversely, if you abduct your right arm and hold onto a grip with your left arm, you can see how extending the right elbow as we do in the golf swing during the downswing will "pull" the right shoulder/humerus forward (adducting it, as going from 65° to 15° of abduction is). Even people who pull their right shoulder WAY too far around them eventually get it "back in front" when their right arm/elbow extends. So, such a motion shows up as shoulder adduction even though the movement that causes it is just widening the trail elbow. The left hand on the grip almost "pulls" the hands forward as the left arm can't stretch much (there's some shoulder protraction, but that's almost maxed out at P4). Oh, I downloaded it and watched it (and commented there) before he blocked me. It's what led to him posting the comment in the "update" above. 😄  Single shoulder range of 75°, and that's going out well into the follow-through. 50° Max range up to impact. Manavian's video is bad. He keeps saying "midline" which is just a horrible way to look at it. He also kept saying that the club was moving that amount — also wrong. Adding left and right together is really freaking dumb. Another golf instructor said "That's like saying the player has 100 degrees of knee bend (adding left knee bend to right knee bend) 🤦‍♂️" (similar to what the biomechanist said about squatting). Also, see my post above about elbow bend. That's why Plummer’s alignment stick demo is so intellectually dishonest. A golfer can't get anywhere near that position on the left with his left hand on the alignment stick (quoted below).  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.