Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3249 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hiya all

So treated myself to a Zepp swing analyzer over xmas and this tell me areas I need to look at(all basically but...) my first priorities are tempo and club swing plane, I'm OK with how to work on tempo as that is something I can suss with a range/club and a metronome but my swing plane is showing consistently between +30 & +50. I can get this into acceptable parameters when not trying to hit ball by dramatically pulling club under on back swing on downswing but this feels like it will make hitting ball square a non starter. Basically fells like I am shifting entire body to unnatural position just to get a swing plane to fall into "acceptable" levels?

Are there any easy methods for folk with + swing plane to reduce without it feeling so abnormal?

Cheers for any pointers ladies and gents.


Posted

depends why you feel the need to flatten it? is your current plane causing you issues?

 

:tmade: Driver: TM Superfast 2.0 - 9.5degree - Reg flex
:mizuno: 3 Wood: JPX800 - 16* Exhsar5 Stiff
:mizuno: 3 - PW: MP-67 Cut Muscle back - S300 stiff
:slazenger: Sand Wedge: 54degree, 12degree bounce
:slazenger: Lob Wedge: 60degree 10degree bounce
:ping: Putter: Karsten 1959 Anser 2 Toe weighted
:mizuno: Bag - Cart Style


Posted

Cheers for reply, I'd say I'm searching for resolutions to my main bug bear at moment, I am topping the ball a hell of a lot. As I say, I've gone and got a swing analyzer and looking at the figures and illustrations it shows me, I figured the fact that my downswing appears to be coming in from above of backswing, considerably most of time, perhaps this is contributing to it. Does this sound feasible, it is a straw I'm grasping :D


Posted

Lots of folks giving similar advice over on this thread:

(if I understand the question correctly)

  • Upvote 1

My Swing


Driver: :ping: G30, Irons: :tmade: Burner 2.0, Putter: :cleveland:, Balls: :snell:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
9 minutes ago, PabloMoorzio said:

Cheers for reply, I'd say I'm searching for resolutions to my main bug bear at moment, I am topping the ball a hell of a lot. As I say, I've gone and got a swing analyzer and looking at the figures and illustrations it shows me, I figured the fact that my downswing appears to be coming in from above of backswing, considerably most of time, perhaps this is contributing to it. Does this sound feasible, it is a straw I'm grasping :D

well its feasible i guess, when you do make good contact what type of flight do you get?

:tmade: Driver: TM Superfast 2.0 - 9.5degree - Reg flex
:mizuno: 3 Wood: JPX800 - 16* Exhsar5 Stiff
:mizuno: 3 - PW: MP-67 Cut Muscle back - S300 stiff
:slazenger: Sand Wedge: 54degree, 12degree bounce
:slazenger: Lob Wedge: 60degree 10degree bounce
:ping: Putter: Karsten 1959 Anser 2 Toe weighted
:mizuno: Bag - Cart Style


Posted

Low mostly..... Am really struggling to get flight on ball, especially off grass surface, a lot better results from range mats which is offering a false sense of security.


Posted

Hmmm sounds more like a struggle to hit down on the ball rather than your swing plane,....you can swing vertical or horizontal and still hit down on the ball to some extent, Ive tried to find a thread to link to you that details this

 

do you have a swing video you could post in the relevant forum section for people to look at?

Also @iacas is awesome at linking threads, maybe he can find the hitting down one for you 

:tmade: Driver: TM Superfast 2.0 - 9.5degree - Reg flex
:mizuno: 3 Wood: JPX800 - 16* Exhsar5 Stiff
:mizuno: 3 - PW: MP-67 Cut Muscle back - S300 stiff
:slazenger: Sand Wedge: 54degree, 12degree bounce
:slazenger: Lob Wedge: 60degree 10degree bounce
:ping: Putter: Karsten 1959 Anser 2 Toe weighted
:mizuno: Bag - Cart Style


  • Moderator
Posted
49 minutes ago, RandallT said:

Lots of folks giving similar advice over on this thread:

(if I understand the question correctly)

The above thread has lots of tips on flattening the shaft on the downswing. I'd also highly recommend you post video of your swing in the forum linked below, it's really hard to diagnose a swing without looking at it. There are some very knowledgeable folks here who can point you in the right direction. Flattening the shaft on the downswing is just one aspect, from my own experience, I can do a decent job of this, but there is still a lot of stuff I have to work on that happens after the downswing.

Member Swings Forum

 

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I've got a Zepp device and I've given up on the swing plane part. I can't get under 20% very often. I'm not even sure why I'm using it anymore. Just for something to look at, I guess.

Wayne


Posted
23 minutes ago, Blackjack Don said:

I've got a Zepp device and I've given up on the swing plane part. I can't get under 20% very often. I'm not even sure why I'm using it anymore. Just for something to look at, I guess.

I think it is definitely a clever bit of kit and seems to be accurate from the view point of swing-speed/plane/hand plane etc.. I think my issue is not understanding what each aspect relates to in the overall action of club moving back and around a point then back to meet a ball and send it on its way if you get my drift?

I think if I was a golf instructor and understood the whys and wherefores of a successful/unsuccessful swing/hit it would assist me a great deal. I quite like the idea of it though as a "coach" if you will, if 3:1 is the accepted "ideal"'ish tempo then Zepp is a great tool for refining. I think the fact it is giving me 6 or more pieces of data and they ALL require work I am being overfaced and confused with what order to attack these "faults". Is there an accepted order of priority for:

Swing Tempo

Swing plane

Swing club speed

Hand plane

Backswing degrees

So much to fix so little time.............................


Posted

This is a great drill that I did for a long time..and still do sometimes . .kind of a generic drill for "swing plane"...

Address the ball as normal.  Take the club back as normal but stop at the top.  Drop the clubhead to the ground...now pick it up and swing.  

 


Note: This thread is 3249 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.