Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2971 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I was fitted for G400 irons, lie, length, shaft, grip. 

An item that was left open was whether to have the irons set to "strong".   Apparently this yields more distance and less loft.  I already hit VERY high irons (old Titleist DCI's) and receive a boat load of verbal abuse about nose bleeds and seeding clouds.  I play to about a 6.    Nevertheless, is there a downside to going "strong" if there really isn't a quest for more height?

Any opinions appreciated...

Thanks !


Posted

I found this buried on their site.   I don't necessarily want to decrease spin as I hit my irons into the green and typically have no roll, just 2-6 feet of suck up.   Works for me as I "high loft" my shots in.  The boost in iron distance by decreasing loft might be beneficial but it looks like just going with standard vs "strong/power spec" would probably be fine.    Opinions appreciated.

  • Power Spec: A fitting option for players looking to boost their iron distance or decrease spin to hit a desired trajectory window. The Power Spec is a custom-designed loft configuration that delivers a power boost in a calculated fashion without sacrificing the integrity of the club’s design.

Posted

My opinion is if you hit it really high then the Power Spec option might be right for you.  Do you have a way to contact your fitter and ask him about it?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

What is wrong with hitting your irons high? Especially your long irons! With the right amount of backspin, it helps hold slick greens. Check your yardages. Do you really need more? Or is this just dialing in to the never ending quest to hit it farther?  Analyze this and determine what works best for your game!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Hitting it longer is, typically, a good thing.   However, standard G400's as they are, will produce longer shots than 18 year old Titleist DCI's.   Height.... apparently G400's hit "high" in their standard state.   If I already hit high with my old beater clubs I really don't need higher (and higher and higher).    I supposed I need to go back to the fitter with more questions... 


  • Moderator
Posted
31 minutes ago, altos said:

I supposed I need to go back to the fitter with more questions... 

Just out of curiousity, if you already went through a fitting for the G400s, why didn't your fitter have you demo them in the Power Spec?

Seems kind of odd that they would fit you for a set of irons and then when you're deciding on your purchase for you to decide if you want the clubs with a different setting that can alter your fitting results.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

There are, particularly with Ping, a rather large set of variables.  And a large number of part options.  PowerSpec irons, as I understand, are "hosel bent" to reduce the loft.  Probably a bad description of what is done on my part but it, apparently, utilizes the cavity indentation near the heal/hosel.    Imagine doubling the number of parts in a Ping demo area.  Actually.... that's probably what they should do if they are going to offer it.  Regardless, it's back to the fitter time I am afraid.   


Posted

All Mfgrs. have found a design that is strong and still get the height most people need.    If you want to hit it lower go to a stronger shaft, there is not that much difference anyway.   Shaft flexes do vary per mfgr. and ones R is another ones S, or whatever.     Fact is if you have a competent fitter get what works best for YOU.    Most fitters have no clue.    Hit it on a range to actually see what you get and not into a net.    Ever hear of a Tour player getting fit in a net?     You have to see flight, distance, and direction to really know.

I am not knocking the guys that fit, it is just that  a lot of them don't get it or know.   They are trying but it is an art to do it right.                                                        

 


Note: This thread is 2971 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.