Jump to content
Note: This thread is 2279 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

recently ordered 2 dozen Pro V1's  from Lostgolfballs.com

Although I ordered the 5A , they were really no different than the 4A. I suspect that they are mixing in some of their lower quality as one that I have been batting around outside, It got quite dingy quickly. They are not supposed to be refurbished but I suspect they are. Granted being left outside, they won't keep their luster as new, but it just seems as if the coating just doesn't hold up as well. Performance wise, its hard to say. I will know after a few real rounds. I think I paid around $58 including shipping for two dozen.

 

"James"

:titleist: 913 D3 with Aldila RIP Phenom 60 4,2 Regular Shaft,  :touredge: Exotics XCG-7 Beta 3W with Matrix Red Tie Shaft:touredge: Exotics EX8 19 deg Hybrid w UST Mamiya Recoil F3 Shaft:touredge: Exotics EX9 28 deg Hybrid w UST Mamiya Recoil F3  shaft, / Bobby Jones Black 22 deg Hybrid:touredge: Exotics EXi 6 -PW  w UST Mamiya Recoil F2 Shaft, SW (56),GW (52),LW (60):touredge:  TGS),/ ODDYSEE Metal-X #7 customized putter (400G, cut down Mid Belly)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
5 minutes ago, Hacker James said:

recently ordered 2 dozen Pro V1's  from Lostgolfballs.com

Although I ordered the 5A , they were really no different than the 4A. I suspect that they are mixing in some of their lower quality as one that I have been batting around outside, It got quite dingy quickly. They are not supposed to be refurbished but I suspect they are. Granted being left outside, they won't keep their luster as new, but it just seems as if the coating just doesn't hold up as well. Performance wise, its hard to say. I will know after a few real rounds. I think I paid around $58 including shipping for two dozen.

I don't buy used golf balls anymore for all the concerns you just shared.

For $4 more you could have bought some brand new Snells.

  • Upvote 1

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Also no longer buying used balls. The last batch I got ("5A") had a very noticeable loss of distance on all clubs compared to brand new balls of the same make and model. I tested them side by side during a practice round. Not worth saving $10 on balls when I'm already paying a green fee which is much more expensive than that. 

 

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

8 minutes ago, billchao said:

I don't buy used golf balls anymore for all the concerns you just shared.

For $4 more you could have bought some brand new Snells.

Yup.

And there are a lot of very good balls that you can buy for even less than that.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I stopped using the used balls when it became clear to me a lot of them were balls I lost already....so right with Kirkland, Snell and Cut golf balls priced so well why use a ball that has already figured out how to get away from you....


I bought some used 5A Bridgestone E6 and some Srixon Q-Star from Amazon.   The Q-Star were good but the Bridgestone golf balls were duds.   They were about 15 yards shorter than the Titleist DT Trusoft that I purchased.   

I'll never buy used/reconditioned/refurbished again.   There are many good choices under $30 / dz.

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • iacas changed the title to lostgolfballs.com Caution
Note: This thread is 2279 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I don't think the viewer at home can pick up on pace of play, unless the announcers mention something. The telecast has the luxury of bouncing from player to player, which ensures we the viewer always have something to watch.  I think we would notice pace of play if the camera just followed one golfer for an entire round. Or  You were actually golfing behind the slow group Or  The slow group is the last to only group left to finish the tournament.  I like the idea of having a person carrying a digital clock, following each golfer. When the golfer gets to the ball and the group in front of them has cleared they have 60 seconds or they get a penalty stroke. Maybe a second violation is a 2 stroke penalty.  Or as I have said before, every golfer wears a shock collar!!!!! at 1 min 1 second that golfer if going to drop. It will take them a good 30 second to recover, leaving them with another 30 seconds to hit the shot. The course would be littered with golfers just convulsing on fair way from an endless cycle of shocks because they cant seem to hit their ball and keep pace of play. 
    • This isn't the same thing.  This is entirely a time of year thing. Not a trend.  This is the COVID year.  There are many who think the Masters viewership was actually way up. The 2024 ratings being down is only for CBS televisions. It doesn't include anyone (including me) who watched it online. 
    • Ha, I didn't even notice that "NFL competition" part… I just dismissed it on face because pause has very little if any role in TV ratings.
    • Wait a second. That is a bit misleading to drag a 4 year old headline about the ratings when the Masters was delayed during the pandemic. The 2024 ratings were down but not to the extent that this headline would imply. Also, @iacas is correct. Any ratings drop has very little, or perhaps, nothing to do with pace of play.
    • Wordle 1,252 5/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨🟩🟩⬜⬜ 🟨🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...