Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1554 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I had a couple swing thoughts I wanted to post before I forget.

had a busy weekend. Couldn’t hit balls-only my mirror work/practice swings. Since I was lost/confused I read through my page again and realized I forgot 4 of the 5 simple swing keys (diagonal sweet spot I remembered) so I got out the book.

I was getting way to much weight back on the backswing 

Then, I couldn’t keep my head still and turn because I was keeping too much bend in my right leg. I let the right leg straighten in my slow swings and I could actually make a pain free centered turn while still getting weight/pressure to the back foot.

If I lose my “backswing-turn” again

Try this:

steady head

more centered pivot

let the back leg straighten earlier.  

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

NOTES FROM TODAYS LESSON

PART ONE: BACKSWING STUFF

E4BC2B10-DDAE-4916-81D1-2CB23CF20F37.thumb.png.4ba406cf8349169da8ea0899216d3702.png

Main Problems:

1. I was over-doing my back leg/hip pivot. My hip is so far to my lead side-I could not bump it toward the target in transition.

2. My neck was kinking to the left causing bad things.

Fix:

1. Less extreme back leg straightening (minor)

2. Fix head/neck (major). My feeling- must keep bill of hat “square to the ground”.  Also don’t let neck kink left.

I actually got a bigger shoulder turn and bigger swing arc when I turned my hips less. Plus it looks much better. As soon as this changed, I felt as if I had a lot more space/freedom to hit the ball.

 

PART TWO: DOWNSWING STUFF

996FB039-6A7C-4E58-82DA-0479C806D1AF.thumb.png.e5bfabd1405bad4bc816aaafe745b767.png

MAJOR-Must bump hips toward target laterally-NOT DOWNWARD

180EA236-56B7-48DA-AF7A-89D2465F36E3.thumb.png.b7e3f7c09a073119c4f30932100c8e28.png

Very scrunched on the left, pivot slowing down.

Feeling: Reverse-C through impact while posting lead leg.

Side note: my hips rotated more through impact. This was a side effect. Not an active feeling. 

9E3D90E2-6B92-49F8-95DF-EA5C586C7CBF.thumb.png.fd61647e373f2edb61a9238f52165f98.png

Wrists were still flipping too early.

Keep club from turning over just a little longer

  • Like 2
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Informative 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
17 minutes ago, Slim_Pivot said:

1. I was over-doing my back leg/hip pivot. My hip is so far to my lead side-I could not bump it toward the target in transition.

Same stuff that I fell into. 

What worked for me was setting up a chair or object near my left hip at address and I tried to work to not hit it. 

I try to feel like I gain width with my knees during the backswing and it feels kinda like I am loading right a bit. 

I like the feeling of loading right so I can be very aggressive shifting to the target. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
10 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

Same stuff that I fell into. 

What worked for me was setting up a chair or object near my left hip at address and I tried to work to not hit it. 

Thanks for the info. I will be able to steal that drill for myself. 👍🏻

13 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

I try to feel like I gain width with my knees during the backswing and it feels kinda like I am loading right a bit. 

I just came from getting too far behind it so I gotta be careful...I’m trying to find the Goldie Locks zone.

15 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

I like the feeling of loading right so I can be very aggressive shifting to the target. 

Agree. I have high hopes for accomplishing this lesson (relatively quickly) so I can actually start caring about where the ball goes.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

FIRST SESSION AFTER LESSON

MAIN OBJECTIVES:

1. Steady “square” head

2. Lateral Hips in transition

3. “Reverse C-feeling” follow through

After being sick for a week, I was a bit off to start. I got it straightened around-I think.

FIRST VIDEO AS BASELINE

FOLLOW THROUGH PRACTICE DRILL

FOLLOW THROUGH DRILL (SWING ONLY) different swing, later in session

 

SUMMARY:

I could not get face on view, cannot wait for warm weather. This dome is killing me.

1. Steady “square head”: I think this was a success. I felt like I was keeping my head square to the ground, not kinking my head left, and turning around my spine like a post. MUST BRING HAT NEXT TIME

2. Lateral hips in transition: this was not a success. I had a very hard time doing this. I think I developed something in my swing. I think I have this right side bend in transition-my arms are no longer free- so I pivot around. I don’t know if I should try to maintain my height in transition or if this is good. It effected goal number 3 however.

3. “Reverse-c” finish. I felt as if I was tightening my left side and letting my arms extent through on the follow through, but I felt like my hips didn’t bump enough to accomplish this.

I will wait for instruction before proceeding with my preparation for my next session.

 

The feeling I get with this transition “right side bend” is that the club is “under” and as I pivot into impact, the club comes  “up” from underneath. The grip definitely feels like it’s rising.

Whether this makes sense to anyone or not...I tried to explain the feeling of the position I feel trapped in.

Not trapped in a bad way, but trapped to where I must get to impact with my pivot and not with my arms.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
25 minutes ago, Slim_Pivot said:

I will wait for instruction before proceeding with my preparation for my next session.

Not sure what you mean here… Work in slow motion on one thing specifically. If it's the hips transferring forward, do that.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
34 minutes ago, iacas said:

Not sure what you mean here… Work in slow motion on one thing specifically. If it's the hips transferring forward, do that.

Sorry for not being specific. I meant not sure whether to stick with the side bend thing. Or stay tall in transition so I can use my arms.

i feel like there’s 2 paths to take, and I don’t wanna go down a wrong one.

If I can’t find the words to make sense, maybe I could text you a video where I act it out lol.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
8 minutes ago, Slim_Pivot said:

Sorry for not being specific. I meant not sure whether to stick with the side bend thing. Or stay tall in transition so I can use my arms.

i feel like there’s 2 paths to take, and I don’t wanna go down a wrong one.

If I can’t find the words to make sense, maybe I could text you a video where I act it out lol.

I never talked about "side bending."

With the hips in a "not too far forward" position, they can transfer forward a bit during the first 2/3 of the downswing, creating axis tilt, but I don't want you manually "right side bending" to do that. That won't push the hips forward, that just fakes axis tilt away from the target.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
10 minutes ago, iacas said:

I never talked about "side bending."

With the hips in a "not too far forward" position, they can transfer forward a bit during the first 2/3 of the downswing, creating axis tilt, but I don't want you manually "right side bending" to do that. That won't push the hips forward, that just fakes axis tilt away from the target.

I know you never talked about it, but it started happening. So I wanted to ask.

And ok, thanks for the clarification.

For the record, I think it was a little of both. I was driving my hips-combined with all my drills of staying deep in transition may have caused me to bend a tad

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

TODAYS PRACTICE SESSION

GOALS:

1. Continue steady, “square head”

2.Bump hips without side bend

3. “Reverse-c” finish with posted leg

Head movement was successful

club over took my hands too early.

More successful follow through. Not good enough, yet

video from down the line also. Another “ok job” of not letting the club overtake my hands

SUMMARY:

1. Steady, square head was successful.( I think)

2. Bump hips without side bend. There was no side bending, I’m not sure my hips are working well enough. This will be my main focus to prepare for next session. (More lateral hip bump)

3. Follow through. I did decent with not letting the hands flip. Less scrunch post impact. I think when I improve goal #2, I can fully accomplish this.

Contact was not good enough, too many fat shots. Also ball flight keeps getting lower and lower. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
1 hour ago, Slim_Pivot said:

club over took my hands too early.

????

1 hour ago, Slim_Pivot said:

Also ball flight keeps getting lower and lower. 

Uhhhhh… yes, as it would with this much shaft lean.

01.jpg

These look much better.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
14 hours ago, Slim_Pivot said:

club over took my hands 

 

12 hours ago, iacas said:

????

309B4AD5-A9C4-491A-812A-EDC1798739C4.thumb.png.70d6a8d7fb89f1524b4c7257e18c967b.png

I thought I flipped too early in the follow through on this one. But would this be considered success? If so-that’s good.

And what should I do concerning the shaft lean? Should I work on hitting good shots (with less shaft lean) while maintaining the picture above. 

Sorry for bothering you so much, Knowing success/failure is getting more difficult as our priority pieces get smaller.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

Upgrading the site right now, so I'm even trying to minimize the open tabs. Remind me to get back to this later today, please.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
23 hours ago, Slim_Pivot said:

I thought I flipped too early in the follow through on this one. But would this be considered success? If so-that’s good.

Maybe for an exaggerated drill. Definitely not for a real swing.

23 hours ago, Slim_Pivot said:

And what should I do concerning the shaft lean? Should I work on hitting good shots (with less shaft lean) while maintaining the picture above.

Nothing, really. These are drills where you're exaggerating a feeling. I don't expect that when you get to playing that you're going to be delivering this much shaft lean.

You should be hitting the ball pretty well with these shots, and with not much curve. Yes?

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
26 minutes ago, iacas said:

You should be hitting the ball pretty well with these shots, and with not much curve. Yes?

My shots are tight draws, club is often bottoming out too soon.

27 minutes ago, iacas said:

Maybe for an exaggerated drill. Definitely not for a real swing.

Nothing, really. These are drills where you're exaggerating a feeling. I don't expect that when you get to playing that you're going to be delivering this much shaft lean.

I dont mean this in a negative way or am I complaining-so dont take it that way. I couldn't have made any of this progress without the coaching-as proven by 7 months of failing before I found this site.

But I think these drills have become my real swing. These are very very close to my real swing...just with the focus of not flipping at all and stopping at shoulder height. At minimum, the shaft lean is currently in my real swing. This is a good problem anyway. Doing less of the change is always easier than needing to do more of it.

On the bright side, I am implementing the changes you want! (I think)

Are we getting to a point in time where you show me how to really swing and hit shots....or am I not quite there yet?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Maybe I misunderstood...when I just go and play, a lot of these exaggerations will kind of disappear? 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
1 hour ago, Slim_Pivot said:

Maybe I misunderstood...when I just go and play, a lot of these exaggerations will kind of disappear? 

Generally, if you think of it on a spectrum: if your current swing is point A and your exaggerated drills are point B, your future swing will ideally end up being somewhere in the middle.

Unless you're like me and you overdo everything you've ever been taught 🙄

  • Thumbs Up 1

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

@Slim_Pivot… here's what I recommend.

Play some golf at the range. Pick a hole, hit a driver, and hit the shot that driver would have left you.

Play for awhile and then record a 6-iron later into the session. One swing thought at most, and see what the swing looks like (DL and FO) 2/3 of the way into your session.

Let's see what that swing looks like.

  • Thumbs Up 2

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1554 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 610 - 2026-06-03 Got some work in between lessons today. Rare late day, teaching until 7:30pm.
    • Let's continue on… Cool. The thing is, nobody's claiming par is "reliable" and par's inclusion piggy-backs in the course rating, which is awfully close to par and, thus, brings par in to make it make sense. Once again, for those in the back… (CR - Par) just makes it really easy to know what kind of score you need to shoot to best, match, or play worse than your handicap index. Yes, when par is different, the players from the higher par tees get an extra stroke (72 vs. 71, the 72s get an extra stroke. That makes sense and is a small complication (more info at https://www.usga.org/content/usga/home-page/handicapping/roh/Content/rules/Committee%20Content/USGA/LG_R6d.htm). However, most of the time, this adjustment will not be needed, as many courses play to the same par for the same genders from all sets of tees. And, the rare times it is needed, par (measured in whole numbers, integers) and strokes (also whole numbers/integers) map easily and the idea is easily grasped. Dean seems to be unaware of the fact that most every golfer carries something orders of magnitude more powerful than the highest end desktop computers available the last time he consulted with the USGA in their pockets. While it is quaint that his club puts printouts by the first tee… get with the times, Dean. Look up your handicap index and course handicap in the GHIN app and get on with it. It's a better system than the one that didn't account — at all — for a difference in the playing conditions (via an algorithm, not a judgment). Dean's assertions about the "less precise system because of par" continues to make absolutely zero sense. Right, it still changed tee to tee. Now it just changes differently… and in a way that more accurately reflects the score you need to shoot to play to your handicap. Previously, a 1.1 index would get 1 stroke on a 66.7/122 par-72 course. Now they give four strokes back to the course and must shoot 68 to play to their handicap. This makes way more sense. The 18-shot difference is a pretty extreme example. Maybe a long course that also offers a par-three set of tees could play that long, but… man, that's not going to be super common. Sensationalistic much, Dean? Also, once those unhappy (complete assumption) golfers realize a) what the change shows them (playing to net par = playing to your index) and b) realizes that their differential is going to be the same… I think they'll get over their initial questions. No. And yet… if he shoots the same scores, he'll get the same handicap index he has now. But he'll know on each course what score he needs to shoot to "play to his handicap." Sheesh, Dean. This stuff isn't that hard to figure out. Enough with the sensationalistic stuff. I don't find it "unacceptable" at all. Then again, I'm not nearly 80 and seemingly incapable of doing basic math these days. No. This literally makes no sense, as that part of the differential calculation and the course handicap calculation remains identical. Good! No. Categorically wrong. They should have been adjusting their handicaps all along. Previously it was by subtracting the course ratings. Which… is still basically what's done, with the addition of the course rating being "baked in" to the course handicap calculation. Dean is wrong here, or doing some math heretofore unknown by the world. When par is the same, what determines the difference in handicaps? The course rating, which Dean loves! Sheesh! You had to things when players were in situations like this before, too. This is getting exhausting. He keeps using words like "less precise" and "unfair" but does not seem to understand what they mean. This is like the Princess Bride meme: "you keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." The caps reduce upward movement. Committees have reign to reduce a player's handicap, and there's still an automatic Exceptional Score Reduction. I'm going through these more quickly now because… well, it's silly how badly Dean misses the mark with this blog post. Dean is literally confusing the upward movement (with the soft and hard caps) here with the exceptional score reduction which is used when lowering handicaps due to an exceptionally good score. The creators of the WHS are handicap experts. They know more about the current state of handicaps/handicapping than the Pope Emeritus. It's been shown to have almost no effect across all handicaps. Yes, some 36s under the old system are now 35s under the new system. Yawn. He should have stopped there. It's easier to apply and makes more sense. This makes no sense. It's "not complex" but players will have to guess? And, for men or women, the stroke index of each hole doesn't change because they play a different set of tees. They get a different number of strokes, but it's always been true that when you get 14 strokes you apply a stroke to stroke index holes 1-14, and when you get 11, to just holes with a SI of 1-11. Objection, your honor. Assumes facts not in evidence. Dean's just out here continuing to make shit up about "the inaccuracy of par" and ignoring that with Par (an integer) came the Course Rating, which he agrees is precise and accurate. No. No, this is inaccurate. Also, as noted, you can randomly assign stroke indexes, and so long as all the low numbers or all the high numbers are not clumped together at the beginning or ends of the 18 holes, matches generally work out the same. This is inaccurate. It is an algorithm that looks at scores. That's it. Also, this is better than a system like the prior one where no such thing existed at all. Wildly inaccurate and off-base. Did they do actual testing? No need. They have millions and millions of rounds and ran many, many, many simulations. That's testing. Dean seems to continue to be unaware of the fact that computers are more powerful now than they were in 2002. But, he's nearly 80, so we can understand if not going so far as to give him a pass on how much he gets wrong. Cool. Noted. For the most part that was because many countries haven't been able to rate enough of their courses. :sigh:
    • Day 3 (3 Jun 26) - More work on keeping arms connected today - hard foam balls with 7i and 5w…..
    • Day 274 6-3 flow drill getting chest through, arms in front. Arms get a little pinned to the side, not as much in front as I want them when I add speed. 
    • Shot 48 yesterday.  For me bogey golf is good.  I was 10 over through 7 and figured with a Par 3 and 4 coming on all I needed was birdie / par to get my 45. I had a great tee shot on #8 and sunk  a 5 footer for birdie, game was coming together, now just needed par on #9. Had a great tee drive and the green was within range for a hoped GIR or nGIR.  But I pulled the shot left into tall weeds and needed to take a drop.  So much for par, but a bogey for 46 is still good for me. I hit my lob wedge to get over a small tree and saw the ball riding nicely  on line to the pin when my club hit the ball a 2nd time on my follow through causing the ball to change directions and ended up @ pin high but along the same tall weeds I just took an unplayable out of.  had no room for a backswing, Just hacked at it and it shot across the green to the rough on the far side.  Needed a chip & 1 putt got a triple bogey. you can see the hole fall apart in the screenshot below.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.