• ### Announcements

• #### Create a Signature!02/05/2016

Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.

# Effects of Lie Angle on Varying Degrees of Loft

## 24 posts in this topic

This little project came about when John Graham, a fellow AimPoint instructor, asked me to do the math on building a formula to determine how much the aim of a putter face changed if you soled your putter on sideslopes.

I like triangles, and trigonometry, so I crafted this small diagram.

The big dotted lines are the axes. The origin point (not marked) is in the lower right, and "m" is the loft ( θL) , which would trace the arc shown as you move from what we call 0° lie angle to 90° lie angle. The loft creates the m-z-p triangle. The z side of the triangle is a constant, and at θA, will create the triangle x-y-z. We only know θA and z, but that's enough to determine x and y. We care about y because the triangle of which it is a part - the y-p-n triangle, will get us right back to θE, or the angle of error in this diagram.

Anyway, using some basic trig functions, you can get a lot of these things to cancel out and end up with an equation that gives you only θE, θL, and θA. Which is perfect... θL is the loft on the club, θA is the angle about which the lie angle has changed, and θE is how far offline the ball will start from the true target line.

Now, a few things were obvious from the start. One is that at 90° (we later flipped θA to be measured from the vertical axis - sine and cosine are nice like that :D), the θE will be equal to θL - the directional error is equivalent to the loft on the clubhead at impact. Also, the actual loft on the clubface at 90° is zero, because it is pointing 100% to the side. We could have figured that out as well, and still could, but we didn't see much point in it.

Anyway, knowing the θE or the angle of error, you can easily plug it in to determine how much you'll miss by.

So let's assume we have a putter with 4° of loft that we deliver to the ball with 2° of loft (still a bit too much, but we'll go with it). We're standing on a 4% slope (tan(x) = 4/100, x = 2.29°) and we want to hit the ball at a hole 50 feet away. If we absolutely nail the speed and read the green correctly, can we do it? Well, according to the formula, the θE will be 0.0799°.

http://thesandtrap.com/b/the_numbers_game/angles_of_error

On that chart, even putting to a hole that is only 2.3 inches wide (i.e. 1.15 inches on each side from the center), we have +/- 0.110° to play with, so we can even hole a 50 foot putt if our lie angle is off 2.29° and we deliver 2° of loft on the putter at impact (it's actually probably something like 1.9999° of actual delivered loft, because again as we approach 90° the loft decreases, but in the first 10 degrees of the quarter circle that loft decrease is very small as that portion of the arc is almost horizontal).

So then we considered how this affects fitting. How about a modern driver, which is typically swung at 45-48° or so, but which has a lie angle of 58.5° (http://www.titleist.com/golf-clubs/drivers/913D3.aspx). That's a huge difference, but it's minimized somewhat from toe droop, so let's take it at 54° and look at assume the player is swinging at 46° - an 8° difference.

The θE for this on clubhead delivered with 10° loft? 1.4°. This means the starting line of the ball will be about 1.4 degrees to the left if you deliver a clubface perfectly square to the target with 10° of loft and a clubface that's tilted 8° left of normal and which is delivered with 10° of loft (which remember, will actually be about 9.87° of loft due to the small loss from the tilting).

What's 1.4 degrees? If we ignore curve for now, a ball starting 1.4° left of the target (a righty golfer) will land 4.89 yards left on a 200-yard drive, 6.11 yards left on a 250-yard drive, and 7.33 yards left on a 300-yard drive.

But that's just the start line. How much will the spin axis tilt change the flight? Though θE is only 1.4°, we've grabbed the top vector of the D-Plane and rotated it 8° left, so our spin axis is -8° more than it otherwise would have been.

Trackman results say that:

a) For every 5 degrees of tilt in spin axis the ball will curve approximately 3.5 yards to the side per every 100 yards of carry. (Source: http://www.trackman.dk/download/newsletter/newsletter7.pdf).

So, 8° is 1.6 times 5, and so we can re-run our numbers: 200 yds -> = 1.6 * 3.5 * 2 = 11.2 yards. 250 yds -> 1.6 * 3.5 * 2.5 = 14 yards, and 300 yds = 16.8 yards.

Adding those to the lateral error, we get:

a) a 200 yard drive will finish roughly 16 yards farther left than it would have been otherwise.

b) a 250 yard drive will finish roughly 20 yards farther left.

c) a 300 yard drive will finish roughly 24 yards farther left.

How about a five-iron? Let's imagine your golf ball hung up in the rough and the fairway tilts at 15°. Using 23° of loft (delofted slightly from 27° or so), we'll see a θE of 6.27°. At 200 yards, that's a directional error due to the start line of about 22 yards, and a curve error of 21 yards for a total error of about 43 yards.

In other words, regardless of the shot you're playing, you'd better aim at a final target 40+ yards to the correct side of your final target if you need to hit a 200-yard five-iron off a 15° side slope!

(FWIW, 15° looks like this: http://f.cl.ly/items/1r2C2M2f2x0a0C3T1q12/Screen%20Shot%202013-01-13%20at%2010.34.15%20am.PNG - it's pretty severe. If you're standing 28 inches from the ball, the ball will be about 7.5 inches above your toes [and almost 11 inches above your heel] .)

Another quick example: you're chipping from a side slope and the ball is below your feet, so you stand closer and stand the shaft up, resulting in a lie angle change of about 20°. You're using a 60° wedge and you deliver 55° of loft to the club.

θE in this situation is over 26°!!! If you have a 30-yard chip shot, you need to adjust your aim by almost 15 yards (we'll assume no curve since it's a chip shot ).

So it turns out that this stuff starts to matter... even if it doesn't matter much on a putt that you're soling flat on the ground. And Steve Stricker's toe-down, heel-up putting style? That doesn't matter either. Not at the lofts he's delivering a putter (around 1°).

Here's a handy dandy chart John and I built showing some common lie angles and delivered loft angles:

To use the chart, imagine the lie angle change you'd want from a clubface that's oriented perfectly vertically, then the loft of the clubface at impact (I used the words "Neutral Loft" because, as I've said, a clubface oriented 90° from "square" will have 0° of loft, and "Neutral Loft" is all I could think of, because "Delivered Loft" didn't sit quite right with me), and where they meet is θE.

Given θE, the formula X * tan( θE) will give you the side to side dispersion of the start line at any distance X. (Note: that uses opposite/adjacent, and so the measurement is target distance . If you want to figure out how far offline a ball goes given ballflight distance using the start line error, use X * sin( θE). To show you how little that really matters, though, a shot that travels 200 yards along the adjacent side of the triangle and 20 yards along the opposite side would actually have to travel 200.9975 yards to reach "pin high"... If you use 200 in both formulas with a 10° final line error (curve + start line error rolled into one), you get 34.7 yards when you use ballflight distance and 35.3 yards when you take target distance - an error of less than 20 inches.

Remember too: if you're talking about curve, it's 3.5 yards at 5° tilt to the spin axis for every 100 yards of ball flight as a general guideline, and the spin loft is merely θA.

Ground-breaking information? Nah. Handy to know? Yes. Is it worth worrying about whether the lie angle on your 6-iron is correct to within a quarter of a degree? You can probably answer that one now... (Or if you'd rather I answer it, here it is: until you're pretty good, no, it doesn't matter much at all, and you have to be REALLY good for a quarter degree to matter consistently).

I'd like to thank John Graham ( @johngrahamgolf ) for asking me the question, verifying some of the math I did, and helping me get around one thing I couldn't quite conceptualize at first (we're in a bubble, not against a wall! ). You can follow me on Twitter at @iacas .

0

##### Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Finally, some equations!

1

##### Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Just because i like to i tried to get the equation for θE

Tan( θE) = Cos( θA)*Tan( θL)

is that right ? because when i plug in to get θE, i get 1.998°

z = p*tan( θL)

y = p*tan( θE)

cos( θA) = y/z

So if we plug in z & y, i get

Cos( θA) = tan( θE)/tan( θL)

tan( θE) = cos( θA)*tan( θL)

θE = tan-1( cos( θA)*tan( θL))

When i use my calculator at,

θE = tan-1(cos(2.29°)*tan(2°)) i get 1.998°

0

##### Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Never mind, figured out were i went wrong, i see why Erik has the x vertical now, and the y horizontal :p

0

##### Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

The math is good. Next we have to work on Erik's drawing skills.  I have Solidworks at work. I could make that little napkin drawing a bit spiffier for you.

0

##### Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I had a shot yesterday with the ball caught up in the rough next to a bunker that I had to stand in. The ball was probably about knee high. I aimed (what I thought was a fair amount right ... 20 yds or so) and I wasn't even close. I missed about 20 yds left!
0

##### Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

The math is good. Next we have to work on Erik's drawing skills.  I have Solidworks at work. I could make that little napkin drawing a bit spiffier for you.:-D

I have SolidWorks on my computer and I was a bit bored, so: Side Note: I'm not very good at SolidWorks. :-D

0

##### Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Jamo, that should be a full quarter circle. You're not even gonna get close. :)

0

##### Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Just move the origin of the circle to the intersection of zy.  Solidworks takes practice.  I'm not great at it, but functional.

0

##### Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I'm old school, blank sheet of paper, make a X-Y-Z coordinate system, then just lay down a quarter or bottle cap, and trace the half circle, its not tough :p

0

##### Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Here's a question, i feel like a ball above your feet will curve more left than a ball equally bellow your feat. I played a few times were the ball was at least 6 inches bellow my feet, and the ball didn't curve nearly as far right as a ball 6 inches above my feet. Is it due to the fact the club rotates open to close during the swing?

0

##### Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Here's a question, i feel like a ball above your feet will curve more left than a ball equally bellow your feat. I played a few times were the ball was at least 6 inches bellow my feet, and the ball didn't curve nearly as far right as a ball 6 inches above my feet. Is it due to the fact the club rotates open to close during the swing?

Here's my guess ... Your normal shot shape is a draw?? Everything shifts relative to that baseline so ball above feet magnifies the shot already curving left, whereas the ball below feet has to counteract that tendency?

0

##### Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Here's my guess ... Your normal shot shape is a draw?? Everything shifts relative to that baseline so ball above feet magnifies the shot already curving left, whereas the ball below feet has to counteract that tendency?

Yeah, that. Or if you don't play a draw, then this: your lie angle change was not equal or you put different swings on the shots.

It has nothing to do with the clubface closing.

0

##### Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Wow.  I feel like I'm back in school here...

This is why when I have a severe side hill lie - instead of hitting a long iron, which will curve more... I usually club down and just hit a wedge to get it back into play.  I think this ties into the effects of lie angle on varying degrees of loft.

0

##### Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Originally Posted by Beachcomber

Wow.  I feel like I'm back in school here...

Yeah ... mvmac told me during wood shop that tristan told him during lunch that he heard from jetfan in homeroom that iacas is giving us a pop quiz on this tomorrow.

By the way, did you watch the video Erik made (while procrastinating on the elbows video ) and put in the 5SK video thread?  If anything here is confusing, I think that video will clear it up for you.

0

##### Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Yeah ... mvmac told me during wood shop that tristan told him during lunch that he heard from jetfan in homeroom that iacas is giving us a pop quiz on this tomorrow.

By the way, did you watch the video Erik made (while procrastinating on the elbows video ) and put in the 5SK video thread?  If anything here is confusing, I think that video will clear it up for you.

I watched about 30 seconds of that video and then my ADD kicked in and I was off to something else...

0

##### Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Originally Posted by Beachcomber

I watched about 30 seconds of that video and then my ADD kicked in and I was off to something else...

And I'm not procrastinating on the elbow video, Dave is. He still hasn't published the video that's supposed to come out BEFORE the right elbow one. Edit: Good news. He's published it. But we're traveling next week so I don't know if the right elbow video will be released. And it's not magical. I don't know what you guys are expecting. :)

P.S. If you hit a wedge from a 45° side slope but don't actually change the lie angle, then it'll go straight, and the same is true for a 3-iron or a 6-iron of course... but I imagine most everyone figured that out. :)

0

##### Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Erik,

You gave the driver example, how do club companies combat this inherent built in tendency to start the ball left, since a golf will return a driver at a flatter angle than the standard lie of the golf club? Shouldn't then all drivers always start left?

0

##### Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

## Create an account

Register a new account

• Want to join this community?

We'd love to have you!

• ## 2016 TST Partners

• ### Posts

• Rickie Fowler's new high-tops & pants...NOOOO!
Me, too. Hi-tops are good, pants are not to my taste, but whatever works for those who want them.
• My Swing (Hacker James)
As mvmac stated, lots of arms, not enough use of hips to turn. Af first, it looked as if your weight was on its heels, and then you bring it to your toes right before you begin the swing - check your balance. Once thing I noticed is that you change your spine angle, get more vertical, when you get to the top - attempt to maintain your spine angle to the top. I think use of your hips will help get rid of the pull.
• 2016 Omega Dubai Desert Classic Discussion
Again a struggle for McIlroy on the front nine: +2. He needs a back nine like yesterday, but it looks like he won't battle for victory tomorrow.
• Iron Game Suffers when Driver Going Well
For high handicappers myself included, this is typical.   I think it is b/c we don't have the same swing for irons and longer clubs.  If we get them both right in the same round, it is probably by pure luck or coincidence.  Grin and bear, and enjoy the journey.
• Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
The topic title is the question who is the greatest golfer, the poll is the question who was the best. Two different things in my opinion. There's no doubt to me Tiger was a better golfer. How could he not? Spieth, McIlroy, Day but even guys like Wiesberger, Luiten and Donaldson play better golf than Jack. The game evolved so much over the years, and got so much more professional. If Jack would have been around in this era he would benefit from all that as well and be a better golfer than he was (and probably top those guys I just mentioned). But who was the greatest. How do you measure that (can you)? Tiger was dominant in a stronger field, winning more titles than you can count. Jack was the first of a kind, winning the biggest titles (majors) over an enourmous span and having the most of them. Isn't it mostly a matter of personal who you find 'greater'? For me Johan Cruyff is the greatest Dutch football player of time, but I have no doubt that Dennis Bergkamp and Arjen Robben were/are better because the game evolved.

• ### Today's Birthdays

No users celebrating today