Jump to content
IGNORED

Prove Your Drives- GPS


muttbag
Note: This thread is 3881 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Since there seems to be a running dispute on perceived driver distance vs. real driver distance, I'd like to propose an idea.  Using a GPS-enabled golf app of your choice and your phone's screenshot capability, start documenting your drives on STRAIGHT fairway runs.  I do not believe this will work on any type of dogleg fairway, because you can cut corners and skew the results since the yardage is based on the fairway route, not actual straight-line distance from tee to green.

* Stand on the tee box from the spot where you hit your drive with your GPS-enabled golf app displaying your distance to the center of the green and take a screenshot on your phone.

* Before hitting your 2nd shot, take another screenshot showing your remaining distance to the hole.

* Post both screenshots.

If I'm not thinking this through, someone correct me.  I'm sure there is a slight fudge factor involved and the distance will be give or take a few yards, but if you're in the middle of the fairway, I don't see this being that far off.  I'm doing this regardless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Most GPS devices, as well as phone GPS apps, have measurement capabilities.  Press button at tee, and press button at ball, there's your distance.  The hole shape is irrelevant. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Golfingdad

Most GPS devices, as well as phone GPS apps, have measurement capabilities.  Press button at tee, and press button at ball, there's your distance.  The hole shape is irrelevant. :)

That's google-worthy.  I haven't found that feature on my app yet, I use GolfLogix.  Sounds much easier!  I'd like to see actual distances posted, and I don't think I'm speaking for myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by muttbag

Quote:

Originally Posted by Golfingdad

Most GPS devices, as well as phone GPS apps, have measurement capabilities.  Press button at tee, and press button at ball, there's your distance.  The hole shape is irrelevant. :)

That's google-worthy.  I haven't found that feature on my app yet, I use GolfLogix.  Sounds much easier!  I'd like to see actual distances posted, and I don't think I'm speaking for myself.


If you have the premium version of GolfLogix, you can get distances to any point on the hole, including the tee box.

Tyler Martin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The best accuracy you can expect to attain with any GPS receiver without a correction method applied is within 15 meters (2D RMS) for the horizontal measurement. Vertical accuracy is within 25 meters. This is typically true for any commercial GPS receiver from any vendor.

http://www.spatial-ed.com/gps/gps-basics/135-differential-correction-methods.html

Craig

:wilsonstaff: - FG Tour F5
:wilsonstaff: - Fybrid 3W 15*, FY 19.5*, 4H 24*
:wilsonstaff: - FG 51 Tour Blade 4-9
:wilson: - Harmonized 50, 55, 60
Old Master - TZ Putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by CR McDivot

The best accuracy you can expect to attain with any GPS receiver without a correction method applied is within 15 meters (2D RMS) for the horizontal measurement. Vertical accuracy is within 25 meters. This is typically true for any commercial GPS receiver from any vendor.

http://www.spatial-ed.com/gps/gps-basics/135-differential-correction-methods.html

Well then, clearly, GPS systems used for golf apply a correction method ... otherwise there would be exactly ZERO market for golf GPS systems, and there would be exactly ZERO debate as to what is more accurate, GPS or laser.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by geauxforbroke

If you have the premium version of GolfLogix, you can get distances to any point on the hole, including the tee box.

Ah.  There's the culprit.  I'm still bumming the free version, but I don't mind the $20 (or whatever it is) to upgrade if I can access that feature.  As well as get rid of those annoying ads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by CR McDivot

The best accuracy you can expect to attain with any GPS receiver without a correction method applied is within 15 meters (2D RMS) for the horizontal measurement. Vertical accuracy is within 25 meters. This is typically true for any commercial GPS receiver from any vendor.

http://www.spatial-ed.com/gps/gps-basics/135-differential-correction-methods.html

I'm just going to trust it, as it is currently the most accurate way to determine distance as opposed to eyeballing course markers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I would prefer a way for people to prove their "tour quality" short games and how they are "money" fro 150 yards.

I never really cared for distance competitions.

I've seen too many guys who hit it 250 have low handicaps and too many huge hitters who've never seen a fairway.

And I've said it many times ------I am yet to meet a low marker who tells you how far he hits it, unless he considers himself a short hitter.

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by CR McDivot

The best accuracy you can expect to attain with any GPS receiver without a correction method applied is within 15 meters (2D RMS) for the horizontal measurement. Vertical accuracy is within 25 meters. This is typically true for any commercial GPS receiver from any vendor.

http://www.spatial-ed.com/gps/gps-basics/135-differential-correction-methods.html

Ha ha ha ha!

I guess laser range finders must be 15 meters off as well because the guys that use them come up with the same distances as my GPS. Oh, and all of the yardage markers on the courses I go to must also be 15 meters off because they are the same as my GPS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by MS256

Ha ha ha ha!

I guess laser range finders must be 15 meters off as well because the guys that use them come up with the same distances as my GPS. Oh, and all of the yardage markers on the courses I go to must also be 15 meters off because they are the same as my GPS.

Same here.  My SwingBySwing phone app is always within two or three yards of any fairway yardage indicators, marked sprinkler heads, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I would prefer a way for people to prove their "tour quality" short games and how they are "money" fro 150 yards. I never really cared for distance competitions. I've seen too many guys who hit it 250 have low handicaps and too many huge hitters who've never seen a fairway. And I've said it many times ------I am yet to meet a low marker who tells you how far he hits it, unless he considers himself a short hitter.

I see your point. But I don't see any way to prove short game performance other than having someone video your approach shots. I'm intrigued by driving distance and it seems to be a fiery red hot button on this forum, so I thought this would be a nice proving ground for all interested to put up or shut up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


This would be sort of interesting to see posted along with swing videos, but I don't see much point to it. Does it matter so much how far you hit it so long as it's in the fairway and close enough for a mid-short iron on a reasonable-length par 4? I like to track my accuracy stats off the tee much more than anything else since I know my carry distance cutoffs from experimentation for going over lakes or doglegs and that's good enough for me. There's just so much variability based off of altitude, humidity, temperature and ground conditions that I can't really see how the distances would be very comparable to anyone except yourself under the same conditions.

That being said, I don't want to poo-poo this thread and would be hopefully optimistic to see how well this method of measurement works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don't think it will prove or disprove anything necessarily, but might be fun. I'll try to figure out how to do it tomorrow while I'm playing.

~Justin

R11 9.5* w/Matrix Ozik Code 6.2
Taylormade 14* V-Steel w/ProLaunch Blue
Taylormade 16.5* V-Steel w/Aldila NV
Taylormade 21* V-Steel w/Dyanlite Gold S300
Mizuno MX 23 5-6 w/Rifel 5.5 SSx2
Mizuno MP 32 7-PW w/Rifel 5.5 SSx2
Callaway X-Forged 52*, 56*, 60*
Mizuno 0803 Custom Slighter

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I agree that it would be fun. From what I've seen on here, not many of us live or die by our driver. But I disagree that it wouldn't prove anything. Lots of users saying they can hit the long ball... and even more casting doubt on the validity of those claims. Let's make this real and put each other to task. Honestly, I want to see if one of my crushed drives actually measures out to what I think it does. I'm consciously working on the rest of my game more than my driver right now, but dammit, I want to know. This would require that a certain degree of honor be upheld. You can easily cheat the system here, but that would only confirm the lack of a soul in your worthless, subhuman cheater body. I'm off to New Mexico for business tomorrow and I'm taking my clubs with me. I plan on playing a round when I get in town and contributing stats tomorrow evening.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Quote:
You can easily cheat the system here, but that would only confirm the lack of a soul in your worthless, subhuman cheater body.

That's just the problem as to why I feel it wouldn't really prove much, is because you could cheat. If you lie about distance off the tee already, why bother to reveal the truth when you could easily cheat without anyone necessarily knowing it. People could still doubt it the same as a number off the top of your head, but I'm not sure it would change anyone's distances except those who only guesstimate at their distance and weren't intentionally misleading people.

I'm not trying to really say that people will try to mislead you here, but I feel that those who would try to mislead in the first place would either cheat anyways or avoid a thread like this. Unfortunately that is how the internet's anonymity affects some people.

That's still not to say that I'd be interested in seeing how this measurement technique pans out compared to using with a laser and shooting the distance back to the tee box/to the ball from the tee. I'm guessing the real difference may be in that the GPS has fewer depth perception/human errors of misjudging where the teebox was but less overall precision on the numbers by a slight amount.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think I said this in another thread somewhere, bloke above is correct in saying that GPS isn't a perfect measurement tool without some kind of adjustment. But it is however better than +/-15 metres.  Most handheld GPS units will get down around <+/-2 metres.

Using a basic GPS to measure against the quoted distance from tee to pin would probably put you somewhere within 15m from quoted as you would need to know the methods used to achieve the original measurement to get any better.

Using it to measure from where you hit the ball to where the ball stops would be within roughly a couple of metres as it's independent of the course and based purely on the difference in lat and long on a global scale.

Elevation can play a part in the difference between GPS and what you would get from a laser but you gotta be a fair way above sea level for it to really matter in terms of a golf shot and you'd have to be hitting the ball a hell of a long way too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 3881 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • https://static1.squarespace.com/static/603d222df4a6a57df7ef3e29/t/663cdba5d89e3a1848dab8d1/1715264422455/US_DIS_ILND_1_24cv3749_d34676497e293_COMPLAINT_filed_by_SuperSpeed_Golf_LLC_Jury_Demand.pdf The full complaint is there, but  basically, SuperSpeed (SS*) is claiming the Stack System (SS*) Stack System’s [sic] produces inflated metrics later used to, [sic] mislead and deceive consumers. Stack System’s marketing materials inflate apparent swing speed and distance gains through selective presentment of data without qualification that purported gains are not the result, in whole or part, of its training protocol and products. * Yes, I'm joking about abbreviating both "SS." SuperSpeed wants: A judgment that the Stack System has disseminated false and/or misleading information in violation of federal and Illinois law. The deletion of all false advertising distributed and recall of all packaging containing false advertising and a requirement that Stack System issue notices (written or otherwise) to that effect to all current distributors and retailers of its products and all distributors with whom Stack System has done business in the past eighteen months. Written confirmation within 30 days of an injunction detailing the manner and form in which Stack System has complied. An order that Stack System disseminate corrective advertising informing consumers, the trade, and the public of Stack System’s unlawful conduct. 3X all profits received by Stack System as a result of its unlawful actions. 3X all damages sustained by SuperSpeed (as a result of Stack System’s actions) The cost of the action All reasonable attorney fees All other relief to which SuperSpeed are entitled and such other or additional relief as just and proper. Oy.
    • I'm not doing this for the hundred and twentieth time. Sorry in advance, but you get the massively abridged version. Those guys also benefited from the weaker/shallower fields. Also, Watson's career doesn't overlap with Jack's like many think it did. Tom is nearly a decade younger. Jack won only like four majors only after Tom won his first. And Tom won more British Opens than he did all three of the other majors combined, as it was his specialty (not Jack's). Arnie's career similarly doesn't overlap Jack's as much as many think.   Jack would also tell you Tiger was the better golfer.
    • Weaker depth of fields for sure. Some of the top level guys with Jack were pretty awesome. Tom Watson had the lead on the 72nd hole of the 2009 British Open, an event where Tiger missed the cut. Old Tom was almost 60 years old. Jack himself at age 58 finished Top 10 at The 1998 Masters and scored better than Tiger, who won The Masters by 12 shots just a year before that.   The success of both Tom & Jack in older age gives some hope that maybe Tiger can find the magic again at some point. He’s still trying to figure out how to build the stamina for 72 holes after the leg injury. I would love to see him jump on the leaderboard in the coming years. I know a lot of people have given up on him at this point, but that was also true from 2014 to 2017 with the back injuries. He had a hell of a resurgence in 2018 & 2019. Would be fun to see it again. 
    • Perceptive rules question by caddie unlocks Tour pro’s ‘dead zone’ relief A perceptive rules question by Xander Schauffele’s caddie, Austin Kaiser, unlocked “dead zone” relief during the Wells Fargo Championship.
    • I ran across an interesting new clip, Johnson Wagner went into that spot with the Referee who allowed the relief.  Apparently there was a perfectly reasonable shot to be made, as Johnson clearly demonstrated, so relief from the TIO was perfectly appropriate.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...