• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
march11934

Lifting on the green

35 posts in this topic

Hey there. Posting this as a point of discussion, not as a confirmation of the rules.

I see a lot of people lifting their ball when they reach the green and i am fine with that. But when they put the ball back they have lines on it that they use to align their put.

b. Lifting Ball
A ball on the putting green may be lifted and, if desired, cleaned. A ball so lifted shall be replaced on the spot from which it was lifted.

So i do not see anything that determines how the ball should be returned to its original place, but doesn't it seem like improving your lie by using a line as an alignment aid? I use one for practice to see that the ball is rolling straight and my putting is not causing a side spin. But during the game?

Im just surprised that this is not something that has been addressed or clarified by the rules, especially after all this attention with the belly putter and unfair advantages.

Regards.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

I believe alignment aids are defined as something other than the ball or the club you are using for the stroke.  You are not really improving your lie with respect to the green either.  You are just orienting the ball so the lines are pointing in the direction you want to start the putt.

I don't use this technique myself because I find it distracting.  I generally place the ball so nothing is showing.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Well, two thoughts came to mind... The first is that it would be nonsense to try and press the person who lifted the ball to return it to the exact point that the ball was touching the ground initially.. Also, since the ball is regulated to begin with there is no advantage no matter where it is returned on the surface of the ball, and I think we all agree on that.. The second regarding the alignment line and most golf balls already have some sort of lines on it via manufacturer, and most of the time I am too lazy to draw a line so I just use the ball line no matter how small it is, it is still a line. So, the question is, does a little longer and bolder line really give an advantage to anyone? In my opinion, no..
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Hey there. Posting this as a point of discussion, not as a confirmation of the rules.

I see a lot of people lifting their ball when they reach the green and i am fine with that. But when they put the ball back they have lines on it that they use to align their put.

b. Lifting Ball

A ball on the putting green may be lifted and, if desired, cleaned. A ball so lifted shall be replaced on the spot from which it was lifted.

So i do not see anything that determines how the ball should be returned to its original place, but doesn't it seem like improving your lie by using a line as an alignment aid? I use one for practice to see that the ball is rolling straight and my putting is not causing a side spin. But during the game?

Im just surprised that this is not something that has been addressed or clarified by the rules, especially after all this attention with the belly putter and unfair advantages.

Regards.

Here's the Decision:

20-3a/2 Using Line on Ball for Alignment

Q. May a player draw a line on his ball and, when replacing his ball, position the ball so that the line or the trademark on the ball is aimed to indicate the line of play?

A. Yes.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's the Decision:

20-3a/2 Using Line on Ball for Alignment

Q. May a player draw a line on his ball and, when replacing his ball, position the ball so that the line or the trademark on the ball is aimed to indicate the line of play?

A. Yes.

Well, that's no fun ending the discussion that quickly! :-D

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I think the OP knows that it is legal. They want to discuss why it should or should not be.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I think the OP knows that it is legal. They want to discuss why it should or should not be.

I think my first reply still stand then :dance:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I think the OP knows that it is legal. They want to discuss why it should or should not be.

Correct. To further my thought, I was just interested in what people think about altering a ball other than what the manufacturer printed on the ball. The fact that someone is placing the ball back in a manner that gives an advantage over the original resting position doesn't seem like outside of the spirit of the rules? To make things even, if a line were printed by the manufacturer, then everyone using that ball would have to deal with or use the line to their advantage.

I just find it odd how some rules are all about standardizing and evening out the playing field, like the putting stroke, but other rules allow a level of personal decision like drawing lines to further alignment on a ball.

Thanks

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, two thoughts came to mind...

The first is that it would be nonsense to try and press the person who lifted the ball to return it to the exact point that the ball was touching the ground initially.. Also, since the ball is regulated to begin with there is no advantage no matter where it is returned on the surface of the ball, and I think we all agree on that..

The second regarding the alignment line and most golf balls already have some sort of lines on it via manufacturer, and most of the time I am too lazy to draw a line so I just use the ball line no matter how small it is, it is still a line. So, the question is, does a little longer and bolder line really give an advantage to anyone? In my opinion, no..

I guess an approach to the first note is that there could be a detail that describes the process in placing the ball. Kind of like when setting your feet in a bunker, you're allowed to dig your feet into the sand to a point where you're not testing the sand. You would be able to place the ball on the green but not in a manner that is obviously lining the ball up.

I guess the second note is truly a matter of opinion. I know some people do it. I prefer not to. But i have seen where they line the ball up and then line the putter up with the line on the ball. Just doesn't seem like a legitimate put without a bunch of extras...

Thanks

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe alignment aids are defined as something other than the ball or the club you are using for the stroke.  You are not really improving your lie with respect to the green either.  You are just orienting the ball so the lines are pointing in the direction you want to start the putt.

I don't use this technique myself because I find it distracting.  I generally place the ball so nothing is showing.


I'm very torn on the method of using alignment lines on the ball, I more often than not don't like the way the line looks when I stand over the putt, and I know I'm looking from a different angle than when I lined up the ball but I think it just screws me up worse when I stroke the ball on a different line than what the alignment one shows. I find I'm more comfortable stroking the ball towards a spot that's a little discolored or alongside a repaired mark. I think today will be a no lines showing day.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact that someone is placing the ball back in a manner that gives an advantage over the original resting position doesn't seem like outside of the spirit of the rules? To make things even, if a line were printed by the manufacturer, then everyone using that ball would have to deal with or use the line to their advantage.

I just find it odd how some rules are all about standardizing and evening out the playing field, like the putting stroke, but other rules allow a level of personal decision like drawing lines to further alignment on a ball.

Thanks

There are many allowances given a player once his or her ball is on the green.  You can lift it and clean it.  You can fix ball marks.  You can wipe loose sand & soil from your line.  It does not seem out of line to allow a player to align the ball with either a pre-printed or added line.

That being said, the emphasis some players place on aligning their ball is a bit tiresome.  In a small way, the alignment aid on golf balls has made the game just a bit slower and that is a problem.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Just a word of warning.

If you are adjusting the alignment of your ball, make sure the marker is still in place. Don't remove your marker then, realising you need to realign the ball, forget to replace the marker before touching the ball.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's true about pace of play. 4 guys aligning their golf balls can add a few minutes to a hole.

Good point about the mark. Although i doubt the guys i play with would ever enforce a stroke on moving a ball that isn't marked. But that's another topic of discussion i've see on other posts. :-)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Before the idea of drawing lines on your ball became a common practice, people just lined the logos up.

It's allowed because how can you require people to put the ball down in the same orientation in which it lands? You don't have to do that any other time you get to place the ball, so why should you have to on the putting green?

And if the rule was simply that you cannot line something up to your target, who are you to say how close "towards your target" is? What if you put it perpendicular to your target? What if you drew a bunch of lines going all sorts of directions so that one of them was always close to the right line?

You can't really write a rule, so the rule is the much simpler "pick it up and put it back in the same spot, in whatever orientation you want."

Sometimes the "reason" a rule exists is simple practicality.

I don't line up my ball, btw. I just use a white area on the ball. You'd be amazed at how many people can't hit the cup with their lines on their golf balls from ten feet out.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Quote:

Originally Posted by boogielicious

I think the OP knows that it is legal. They want to discuss why it should or should not be.

Correct. To further my thought, I was just interested in what people think about altering a ball other than what the manufacturer printed on the ball. The fact that someone is placing the ball back in a manner that gives an advantage over the original resting position doesn't seem like outside of the spirit of the rules? To make things even, if a line were printed by the manufacturer, then everyone using that ball would have to deal with or use the line to their advantage.

I just find it odd how some rules are all about standardizing and evening out the playing field, like the putting stroke, but other rules allow a level of personal decision like drawing lines to further alignment on a ball.

Thanks

I think that the relaxed attitude in the rules about this is partly due to the fact that the "help" one gets from it is mostly mental.  The actual physical assistance offered from a 1½ inch long line is minimal at best when setting up a 25 foot putt.  If you miss aim that line on the ball by even 1/64 inch, and otherwise set up to it perfectly, you will be 4.5 inches off line by the time the ball gets to the hole.  It really isn't much help compared to using an alignment rod, or placing some other object on the green to provide a better or longer sight line - these are what the rule is essentially intended to prevent.

Those who use a line will swear by it, but I've tried both ways and I find that my method of spot putting (using an imaginary spot a foot in front of the ball) is more accurate, at least for me.  I've never known anyone using the line who was better than I am at starting the ball on it's intended path (which doesn't mean that the path I've chosen is always the right one, just that I usually hit the ball where I aim it :roll: ).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Before the idea of drawing lines on your ball became a common practice, people just lined the logos up.

It's allowed because how can you require people to put the ball down in the same orientation in which it lands? You don't have to do that any other time you get to place the ball, so why should you have to on the putting green?

And if the rule was simply that you cannot line something up to your target, who are you to say how close "towards your target" is? What if you put it perpendicular to your target? What if you drew a bunch of lines going all sorts of directions so that one of them was always close to the right line?

You can't really write a rule, so the rule is the much simpler "pick it up and put it back in the same spot, in whatever orientation you want."

Sometimes the "reason" a rule exists is simple practicality.

I don't line up my ball, btw. I just use a white area on the ball. You'd be amazed at how many people can't hit the cup with their lines on their golf balls from ten feet out.

I agree, Erik. The RBs would rule it out if there were a way to convince ball manufacturers to make balls without logos. We would need further language in the Rules to prohibit "lines" in any form of identification mark and prohibit orientation of the ball on the putting green.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The same then, could be said about alignment aids on putter heads. Or the mark on the crown of a Driver... And to take it to the extreme, the implied lines on the irons where the grooves end can be used as an alignment aid as well. The makers of balls wouldn't like it very much if the rules dictated that no logos be put on a ball because they could be used as "alignment aids".
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't you think that marks on a club are rather different? The mark is not in (the same) position during the stroke.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Golf Evolution
  • Posts

    • How to eliminate blowup holes
      I know your pain, somewhat. I, unlike you, can usually pin it on a club. My 4 iron can get me into trouble. For whatever reason, I tend to ground it more than any other club, to the point I deliberately stand a bit more upright to counter it. Something about that 4, it just makes me want to drop my lower body a little more or something. So, just to use my example, I changed my stance to counter a bad habit because it got to the point that I made that move consistently, and the countering stance change has mostly fixed my problem. Now, my problem is the sub-50 game, especially in the range of 1-10 yards from the green. My short-range chipping just needs work. I've started treating it more like a wedge putt, but that light push doesn't fit well with an uneven surface (clipping a small hill that kills the speed and gets the ball nowhere). It'll mostly come down to recognizing what kinds of things you screw up. Like people said, those "hero shots" can be a killer because they usually require perfection, and when you don't get it, you're in a position that can add 2 more to the score to get out of those woods or that sand trap. Damage control's a big thing to recognize and strive for. Anyone here can only help you so much, especially with a general "how do I do better?" question like this. If your screw-ups aren't a consistent problem, a solution is hard to find beyond "play more, get better." You kind of have to eat the occasional bad hole because you're not striving for perfection and putting in the hours many have over the years. It's not to suggest an inability to improve, just to say that if you can't identify where you're making mistakes most, there's no way anyone here can.
    • 2016 TST Initiative: Forward Tees Tournament
      In Lowest Score Wins, we recommend that golfers play from the forward tees in order to experience "breaking 80" for the first time, or shooting 65, or having more birdie putts than they've ever had, or whatever. This year, in 2016, we're taking it one step farther: we're encouraging everyone here to work with the head pro at your home course (or, if you play multiple courses, the head pro at each of them!) and to set up a serious "Forward Tees Tournament." A Forward Tees Tournament (FTT) will be: FUN! Enlightening Unique Challenging I'll give anyone who creates and/or participates in a FTT this year the special achievement/award seen to the left. Anyone with this award will be entered to win a TST prize to be determined at the end of the year (and I'll do my best to make it a fairly good prize, but that shouldn't be the main reason why anyone should do this). You can play: With or without handicaps. With or without brackets/divisions/flights. Stroke play or match play. 18, 27, 36, 54+ holes. One day, two days, three days. Etc. I think golfers will love playing in this type of tournament. I think it will challenge them to think about how they play and score. I think it will result in faster play, more fun, more birdies, more chances to hit 7-iron into par fives and feel like a Tour player for once, and… lower scores (or higher scores for the dumb players!). So there you have it. What can you do from here? Pledge here in this thread to talk to your head pro. Recruit your buddies and local golfers to play in your event. Work with your head pro to make the event a success. Play in the event! Post here after your tournament has been played to claim your super-exclusive award/achievement! I'm in. I'll be doing this, hopefully at multiple courses this year. Are you?
    • Posting old scores
      I haven't had an official handicap for about 15 years because in the past several I've only been able to play 6-8 times per year. This year I joined a club so that I could play in tournaments and since I need five scores to get a handicap, I entered some scores in GHIN from my last few rounds in 2015 (since I play so rarely, I can remember them). When I was doing this, I forgot to change the date when posting a score from August so it defaulted to today and is now my most recent reported score. GHIN won't let me change the entry but says to "contact my club" to fix it, which seems like a hassle for everyone involved. It's not my lowest score but it's close, so it will probably be included in my handicap calculation for quite a while unless the date is changed. How big of a deal is this?
    • How to eliminate blowup holes
      Another thing is sometimes to 'give up' on par. For example, as a bogey golfer, if I hit a bad tee shot and end up say 220yds from the hold on a par 4 rather than the usual 130yds, play the hole as if bogey is the new par. You've made the hole more difficult for yourself and rather than trying to hit the green with a 3 wood (a green designed to be hit with a mid/short iron), take 2 shots to get on the green and 2 shots to get down. 1 220yd par 4 is an easy hole (could even make birdie (which becomes par and a great save) whereas a 220 yd par 3, not off the tee, is asking for trouble. Not always the best way to play golf (read Lowest Score Wins) but the best way to avoid blowing up.
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      Find it yourself please. I don't think that would provide much insight. Courses, technology… all very different. Too many differences. People who qualify for the Opens rarely actually compete for them. The winners and top finishers almost always come from those who qualify automatically. I'm not. Very few foreign golfers played on the PGA Tour in the 60s. It's been steadily growing - and travel has made it easier, too - through to now. And even now we're starting to see Asian golfers really take over. The only Asian golfer many could name who competed against Nicklaus was Isao Aoki. Maybe Jumbo Ozaki. I'm just talking about the number of golfers. There are a ton more now. I don't care. I realize perhaps your condition forces you to take everything literally, but I wasn't being literal here. The PGA Tour takes the best 150 players or so out of X. As X grows, the amount of separation between those top 150 players narrows. We're in a very narrow phase right now. When Jack was playing, the gap was significantly wider. No. Tiger was quite a bit more dominant and "above" even MORE highly competitive fields. Both halves of that are true: Tiger won by larger margins and against stronger fields. I agree. And I've said similar things. No…? You don't say? (On page 273 of a thread doing just that…)? You seem to be the only person who regards WGCs as weaker fields that offer a "competitive break." It says a lot about how others should consider your opinions on strength of field. You're assuming or haven't read many of my posts in this thread, because I've said several times that I'd put it within a few points of 50/50. Maybe 55/45. Hardly what I'd call "strong." Of course we're both "estimating." Tiger's record, IMO, against significantly stiffer competition, puts him ahead. Not by a lot. Not really. If only 30 players had a realistic chance to win a tournament, adding players beyond that 30th player does little to affect the strength of the field. The WGCs could add 200 club professionals that would never win and… the strength of field would remain exactly the same. Where have I said this? Because even if I did, it doesn't support whatever you're trying to force it into supporting here. The odds of a club pro beating anyone on the PGA Tour these days are slim to none. They were slightly more likely back when fewer "A" players played the PGA Tour… like in the 60s and 70s. A "C" player's game almost never varies enough - not for four days - to beat even 10 or 15 "A" players. Here's an opinion, but one I could probably back up if I cared enough to take the time (I do not): a modern WGC has a stronger field than many (perhaps all) of the majors Nicklaus won. I've said this before, and will say it again here: In Jack's day, there were maybe 10-15 "A" players, 25 "B" players, and the rest were "C" players. Today there are 100+ A players and the rest B players. I'm also going to request, mostly because of the number of times I've had to repeat myself in this thread, that you not quote or respond to me, @natureboy, in this thread. I'm not keen on repeating myself about something that, ultimately, I don't care that much about. It is what it is, their records are what they are, and they could only beat the guys they played against.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    No users celebrating today
  • Blog Entries