Jump to content
IGNORED

USGA decides to go to 8 inch holes!


DirtCheap
Note: This thread is 4264 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. Would you support going to 8 inch holes?

    • Yes!
      15
    • No!
      84
    • Undecided.
      11


Recommended Posts

Got your attention, didn't I???

Actually, in Golf Magazine there is an article this month about that very thing.

The author of the article makes a VERY, VERY, (did I mention VERY) good arguement to open the holes up to 8 inches across. Evidently this has been proposed before.

Without stepping on copywright laws, I will tell you that IMO the best argument he made for it (among others) was to increase the pace of play.

Now, I have read a TON of threads on this forum, and the number one complaint I hear from you guys is pace of play . Problem solved!

He also went into why holes were the size that they are. Once you learn the reason that holes are only 4.5 inches across (happened completely by chance) then I think more people would support making the holes a more reasonable (IMO) size.

It's a really good article. Every point he made was very valid and made a believer out of me.

Opinions?

On my tombstone: "If this is the worst thing that ever happens to me, I'm doing just fine!"






 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


My question is, will this automatically affect the course ratings? Wouldn't an 8 inch hole pretty much take a stroke off of every hole (or every two - three holes more realistically) . Most of my missed puts are within 8 inches.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
Without stepping on copywright laws, I will tell you that IMO the best argument he made for it (among others) was to increase the pace of play.

I don't think this would affect pace of play at all. Most people seem to give themselves the four or five footers anyway.

Pace of play is bad because people don't take several clubs. They park in the wrong place. They wait for the green to clear from 270 out. They aren't ready to hit when it's their turn. They line up their putts from every side of the hole.
He also went into why holes were the size that they are. Once you learn the reason that holes are only 4.5 inches across (happened completely by chance) then I think more people would support making the holes a more reasonable (IMO) size.

They're 4.25", not 4.5", and in Ben Hogan's day they made the holes something like five inches wide (clarification: not officially, just as a test or something, IIRC). All they found was that the good putters made even more putts, while the average and poor putters made very few more. Why? Because good putters rarely missed by much (so they made some of those), and the bad putters still missed by a good bit.

And anyway, no, since we've had 4.25" for so long, there's no way in heck I'd ever want to change it.
Most of my missed puts are within 8 inches.

They'd have to be within two inches for this to matter. The hole's already four inches wide (4.25) and so you add two inches on each side and you're at 8 (really 8.25).

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

And anyway, no, since we've had 4.25" for so long, there's no way in heck I'd ever want to change it.

Using that logic, we should still be playing featheries and wooden clubs.

On my tombstone: "If this is the worst thing that ever happens to me, I'm doing just fine!"






 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


No - the whole point of golf is to get a tiny ball into a small hole 400+ yards away in just a few strokes, right?

I know that statistically, making the hole a little less than twice the size doesn't make the game easier, but I think most of us, in our hearts, wouldn't consider the game as challenging.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Got your attention, didn't I???

"Would you support going to 8 inch holes?"

-Not a chance. That is actually one of the dumbest things that I have ever heard. If one wants to increase the pace of play than a course can set etiquette rules such as: Pick up your ball after 10 strokes and move to the next hole. My girlfriend has only played golf a couple of times and she has yet to make a 10 on a hole. So in my opinion making the hole bigger isn't the solution. Etiquette rules are. The game of golf is about as pure as any game can be and making an 8 inch hole would make the game more of a joke. The hole is fine the way it is and it will NEVER go to 8 inches. Heck, if it went to 8 inches (which it never will) it would be hard to find the "Greats" because everyone would be shooting lower scores. Tiger's lazer like putting would merely be the same as everyone else's who can roll the ball even half decent.

Titleist 913 D3 10.5*

Adams Super XTD 17*

Adams DHY 21*

TaylorMade TP MB 4-PW

Titleist SM4 54*/58*/62*

Bettinardi SS 11

Leupold GX-3i Rangefinder

Titleist ProV1 Ball

Link to comment
Share on other sites


That's wayyy to big, there are other things to be changed in golf, why change something that doesnt need to be changed?
In My Bag

Driver: Sasquatch 460 9.5°
3 Wood: Laser 3 Wood 15°
5 Wood: r7 19° (Stiff)Irons: S58 Irons 4-PW Orange DotWedge: Harmonized 60°Wedge: Z TP 54°Putter: Tiffany 34"Balls: Pro V1 Shoes: Adidas Tour 360 IIThe Meadows Golf Coursewww.themeadowsgc.comAge: 16
Link to comment
Share on other sites


What are we trying to turn this into???.... disk golf?

In my Black'n'Red :

Driver: R7 TP 460cc 10.5* Reax 65 stiff shaft
3 Wood: Tour Impact 15*
Irons: Tour Impact 3-PWWedges: Vokey Oil Can Spin Milled 54.10, Golfco Baron 58* SWPutter: Tracy II 35"Balls: Prov 1Age:16

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Quite frankly, I think it's just about the stupidest idea I've yet heard. What would happen is that course would just cut the holes in more difficult places and it wouldn't change anything. It certainly won't help in pace of play. Most casual players give themselves anything within 3 feet anyway, so it's really not going to speed up that part of the game. Slow play doesn't happen on the greens alone, it happens everywhere on the course, and trying to change every course to the point where pace would actually be affected would make the game unrecognizable.

Have courses designed or maintained to be more player friendly. A golf course doesn't need water in play on all 18 holes, out of bounds within 20 yards of the fairway, 15 bunkers on each hole, and 2 foot deep rough. Make the average course so that the average player can actually play it. When he slices that tee shot 30 yards right, give him an out... maybe not a clear shot to the hole, but a chance for a recovery shot of some kind, and a reasonable chance at finding the ball. I was watching a local show today on a Colorado course that I wouldn't even want to step up to the 1st tee on. Every hole had OB on one side and water on the other (or water on both sides), and at least 6 or 7 bunkers on every hole. The fairways looked as narrow as US Open fairways. Any average golfer would shoot a bout 120+ and take 6 hours to do so there. Absolutely ridiculous.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

That's like changing the basketball hoop to 12 feet, or making a football field 110 yards. All previous records would be meaningless. I can't believe that this was even entertained in a mainstream publication. I can't believe we are entertaining this discussion

Link to comment
Share on other sites


That's like changing the basketball hoop to 12 feet, or making a football field 110 yards. All previous records would be meaningless. I can't believe that this was even entertained in a mainstream publication. I can't believe we are entertaining this discussion

Nicely stated!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


So, one thing I like is the ratio of ball size to hole size, as far as accuracy on putting. And how big would our drivers be if we adjusted the ball size?

In any case, I don't like the idea of a bigger hole for the same reason I switched irons: if the hole were larger, I could get lazier in my putting and then I'd make fewer.

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don't think they "whoever they are" would never do it. I wonder what a round of golf would be like if they were that big?

Driver - SQ SUMO2 9.5 stiff
3 Wood - SQ SUMO2 15* stiff
Hybrid SQ SUMO2 20* stiff
Irons - CCi steel stiff
Wedge - 56*Wedge - Knight 60*Putter - ITraxBall - platinum+Black but soon to be switching to pr0v1 SG 2.5

Link to comment
Share on other sites


terrible idea now if i was inventing golf for the first time i would do it just to put a bigger emphasis on ball striking. but golf has always been a putters game and always will be, so changing it now would cause rioting in the streets and armageddon. hell no
Link to comment
Share on other sites


terrible idea now if i was inventing golf for the first time i would do it just to put a bigger emphasis on ball striking. but golf has always been a putters game and always will be, so changing it now would cause rioting in the streets and armageddon. hell no

I hear ya!!!!! I'm in agreement....leave the hole size alone. If they want to change anything...make the dang things less deep so us old geezers don't have to bend down so far to get our balls.
909D Comp 9.5* (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-6)
Burner Superfast 3 & 5 woods (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-4.8)
G15 Hybrid 23* (AWT shaft)
G5 5 iron-PW-46*, UW-50*, SW-54 & LW-58 (AWT shaft)
Studio Select Newport 2 Mid SlantGrips: PING cords & Golf Pride New Decade Multi-Coumpound Bag: C-130...
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'm a Mac O'Grady and Ben Hogan fan.

After he retired from competition, so I read somewhere, Hogan did not putt much when he played. He thought it was unfair that if you hit it 10 feet and someone else hits it 35, the second guy can win. Most of his games were 'closest to the hole'.

Mac retired from the tour at around 37 years old. Paraphrasing, he said we was retiring because, "I can't stand the agony of putting one more day."

If all the work I put in this week doesn't pay off today, I'm definitely going with eight inches (and avoiding the obvious puns).

Best, Mike Elzey

In my bag:
Driver: Cleveland Launcher 10.5 stiff
Woods: Ping ISI 3 and 5 - metal stiffIrons: Ping ISI 4-GW - metal stiffSand Wedges: 1987 Staff, 1987 R-90Putter: two ball - black bladeBall: NXT Tour"I think what I said is right but maybe not.""If you know so much, why are you...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
Using that logic, we should still be playing featheries and wooden clubs.

No, that's not using "that logic." That's taking "that logic" to an absurd extreme in order to make a point: pure reductio ad absurdum. The point is simply that it's a fundamental change to the game, while no previous changes were as fundamental (unless you go back to the days when there were only 6 or 12 holes on some courses or something) as changing the size of the hole.

That's like changing the basketball hoop to 12 feet, or making a football field 110 yards. All previous records would be meaningless.

Yup.

Heck, why not eliminate putting altogether and just make golf a distance competition. Put the hole 400 yards away, call it a par three, and make the hole ten feet wide. There's some reductio ad absurdum in the other direction.
Heck, if it went to 8 inches (which it never will) it would be hard to find the "Greats" because everyone would be shooting lower scores. Tiger's lazer like putting would merely be the same as everyone else's who can roll the ball even half decent.

Not true. You didn't read what I wrote above about the experiment in Ben Hogan's day. He too felt that ballstriking should be rewarded more (given his ballstriking skills), and all he found was that the good putters putted even better while the average and poor ones putted about the same.

terrible idea now if i was inventing golf for the first time i would do it just to put a bigger emphasis on ball striking. but golf has always been a putters game and always will be, so changing it now would cause rioting in the streets and armageddon. hell no

Ditto what I just said. Making the hole bigger puts MORE emphasis on putting.

Make the hole smaller and you'll just add emphasis to short putts, like those inside of six feet, because people aren't going to make many putts into a 3" hole outside of six feet. I think the PGA Tour average is only 50-60% from that range already. I think 4.25" is pretty darn good. Sure, it may have been a bit of luck that put us at that number, but then again someone, somewhere had to decide what size pipe to use, and I think they chose very wisely. In their day, a two-foot putt wasn't a tap-in, given how bumpy their greens were.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4264 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • I kind of like this interpretation especially if you think about it the unplayable rule would probably put you in a better spot.  using back on the line releief.  
    • I did not realize that, I was thinking a more traditional golf club.  
    • Thanks for the feedback. @StuM, we are a "club without real estate" so no facilities or pro. We have a membership of around 185 players and we only play together as a group at our tournaments, which are held at public access courses. A group of us setup the tournaments, collect the money and dole out the prizes.
    • In general, granting free relief anywhere on the course isn't recommended.  Similarly, when marking GUR, the VSGA and MAPGA generally don't mark areas that are well away from the intended playing lines, no matter how poor the conditions.  If you hit it far enough offline, you don't necessarily deserve free relief.  And you don't have to damage clubs, take unplayable relief, take the stroke, and drop the ball in a better spot.
    • If it's not broken don't fix it. If you want to add grooves to it just because of looks that's your choice of course. Grooves are cut into putter faces to reduce skid, the roll faced putter is designed to do the same thing. I'm no expert but it seems counter productive to add grooves to the roll face. Maybe you can have it sand-blasted or something to clean up the face. Take a look at Tigers putter, its beat to hell but he still uses it.     
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...