Jump to content
IGNORED

Course Rating/Slope discrepancies


No Mulligans
Note: This thread is 3216 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Tecolote Canyon Golf Course

The course scorecard:  58.6/101

DiabloGolf.com (Official USGA HI's from this site): 55.6/91

USGA course database:  55.2/99

I find these kind of differences on many of the courses I play.  I've assumed that the USGA site is the 'bible' when it comes to the rating/slope and I override diablogolf.com rating/slope with the USGA numbers.

Anyone else notice this?

Which is the correct and most current?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

I just ran into the same issue at Mid Pines in North Carolina, the Ghin numbers didn't match the scorecard.  I checked with the USGA website, and it matched the Ghin, so that's what I used.

If none of the three agree, I'd check with the course.  Its possible that its been re-rated, and they haven't printed new scorecards, or ran out and are using old cards.  You might also email Diablo Golf and ask them to check, especially if these are courses you play regularly.

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I just ran into the same issue at Mid Pines in North Carolina, the Ghin numbers didn't match the scorecard.  I checked with the USGA website, and it matched the Ghin, so that's what I used.

I just plug the information into the GHIN. It's up to them to keep the database up to date.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The USGA numbers are what you should use. Courses will sometimes not reprint scorecards when they're re-rated, simply to save the cost/waste.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I found the same situation with a course I played out of town (a one time thing). I emailed the course PGA pro, and he confirmed the numbers on their scorecard and website are correct and not the usga numbers. So I emailed the usga about it; they forwarded my inquiry to the state golf association. They said the usga numbers were correct and didn't want to verify or find out the reason for the discrepancy, even with the course pro stating he had he correct numbers. I gave it one more follow up email (trying to be polite but feeling like a nuisance). No reply.

Craig
What's in the :ogio: Silencer bag (on the :clicgear: cart)
Driver: :callaway: Razr Fit 10.5°  
5 Wood: :tmade: Burner  
Hybrid: :cobra: Baffler DWS 20°
Irons: :ping: G400 
Wedge: :ping: Glide 2.0 54° ES grind 
Putter: :heavyputter:  midweight CX2
:aimpoint:,  :bushnell: Tour V4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I found the same situation with a course I played out of town (a one time thing). I emailed the course PGA pro, and he confirmed the numbers on their scorecard and website are correct and not the usga numbers. So I emailed the usga about it; they forwarded my inquiry to the state golf association. They said the usga numbers were correct and didn't want to verify or find out the reason for the discrepancy, even with the course pro stating he had he correct numbers.

I gave it one more follow up email (trying to be polite but feeling like a nuisance). No reply.

Yeah, I just went to the local association as you did (I went via the internet though).

Did a bit of google research and found that local association does the ratings.  In the case of Southern California it's the SCGA.org rating teams which do the ratings.  I check three courses where I had discrepancies and was happy to see that the SCGA.org data agreed with the USGA data.  That's good enough for me and those are the ratings I'll use.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I check three courses where I had discrepancies and was happy to see that the SCGA.org data agreed with the USGA data.

I should hope so. The local authority do the rating legwork (measurements etc) on behalf of the USGA, who then take the figures and produce the actual ratings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 3216 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • I honestly believe if they play longer tees by 300-400 yards, closer to or over 7,000 yards, more rough, tougher greens, women's golf will become much more gripping.  BTW, if it weren't for Scottie killing it right now, men's golf isn't exactly compelling.
    • Day 542, April 26, 2024 A lesson no-show, no-called (he had the wrong time even though the last text was confirming the time… 😛), so I used 45 minutes or so of that time to get some good work in.
    • Yeah, that. It stands out… because it's so rare. And interest in Caitlin Clark will likely result in a very small bump to the WNBA or something… and then it will go back down to very low viewership numbers. Like it's always had. A small portion, yep. It doesn't help that she lost, either. Girls often don't even want to watch women playing sports. My daughter golfs… I watch more LPGA Tour golf than she does, and it's not even close. I watch more LPGA Tour golf than PGA Tour golf, even. She watches very little of either. It's just the way it is. Yes, it's a bit of a vicious cycle, but… how do you break it? If you invest a ton of money into broadcasting an LPGA Tour event, the same coverage you'd spend on a men's event… you'll lose a ton of money. It'd take decades to build up the interest. Even with interest in the PGA Tour declining.
    • Oh yea, now I remember reading about you on TMZ!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...