Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
  • entries
    68
  • comments
    776
  • views
    17,017

Going from HD to 4K/HDR

nevets88

2,035 views

4K/HDR is better than I thought it would be.

Usually an earlier adopter regarding things tech so late to the 4K train, didn't think it would be that much of an improvement, but beginning to see more of a difference than when in the store, looking at different TVs. When you're at home, rewatching the shows you're used to seeing in HD, that's the better distinguisher. It helped that the new screen is bigger too, going to 65 from 50. Could have bought earlier, but saved a ton waiting a bit, got a decent deal, barely did any research and comparison shopping and got a decent set under $700, free shipping, no tax, was looking at sets costing $2K a year ago. Even the free economy shipping took only 2 days.

Amazon Prime's show, Mozart in the Jungle, was the first UHD content I tried and the color and sharpness stood out although I could barely tell the difference between that and and The Expanse, which is HD on Amazon, dunno if upscaling is helping or my eyes suck. Upgraded Netflix to UHD, watched Dark, and it was more obvious than Mozart, the picture quality. The kicker was Planet Earth II, which is UHD. This is obviously the show to tax a tv's ability to the limit.

Still assessing sports and output from the Bluray player. Guess there will be a movie that will eventually convince me to go Bluray 4K, The Last Jedi, but will have to see how the current Bluray library is, how well it upscales.

So with dramas, it's a little better, but with science fiction, like The Expanse, with detailed ships and planetary details, you can really see the difference. Looking forward to what The Masters will be like. Even though trumotion is turned off, still seeing a little Soap Opera Effect. Going to take a bit to play with all the picture adjustments.



13 Comments


Recommended Comments

I may look at moving to 4K once the prices have come down a little. My dad was thinking about it till i reminded him of when they moved to HD. He put some football on the tv and he was amazed, he was like "Russ, the picture is brilliant" to which i replied "Dad, you're not on the HD channel, its just regular definition". My parents are in their 70's bless 'em, 4K might be too modern for them to handle!

Share this comment


Link to comment

Keep in mind, the more pixels, the closer you have to sit (or the larger the TV you have to have) in order to actually get the benefit.  What you really want besides pixels is great color and great motion, very fast refresh rate and no motion blur.   I bought an OLED TV and it's fantastic.  It's 65 inches, and I can stand right in front of it, about 6 feet away, and it still looks like reality.   It saves a lot on airline tickets and hotel bills!

Halstatt, Austria, in 4K

Share this comment


Link to comment

OK, after watching a bit of sports through a STB and over the air (quality supposed to be better because no compression), I see the difference now. HD sports starting to look not so sharp. Kind of like looking at text on a 4K computer monitor vs 2K. 

I see the difference in brightness and colors pop out more too. The old tv (5 years old) and the new tv are about the same price. 

Golf in HD is looking a little dodgy now. So in 10 years what will be the popular (judging by number of models offered on online stores) size? 80 inches? I dunno maybe projection tvs might be the thing in 20 years. 100 inches? 

Share this comment


Link to comment
15 hours ago, nevets88 said:

Golf in HD is looking a little dodgy now. So in 10 years what will be the popular (judging by number of models offered on online stores) size? 80 inches? I dunno maybe projection tvs might be the thing in 20 years. 100 inches? 

I don't think I sit close enough to my TV for the difference to be noticeable.

Share this comment


Link to comment

The only difference I've noticed between my old TV and my 4K set is on this aquarium thing my kid enjoys to watch. The fishies look real AF on the 4K. Other than that,  I haven't noticed any difference at all with sports or TV. Even when the output is claimed to be 4K. 

Share this comment


Link to comment

My current TV is a 55"-4K and my old TV is a 40"-1080p. The 40" has a 51 ppi, and the 55" has 80 ppi. There is an improvement here. I can tell the difference on 4K movies, especially movies made on film.

 

 

 

Share this comment


Link to comment

I have The Matrix in Bluray, so if I get 4K, can compare and contrast. The Last Jedi is going to be released soon, 4K BR, the digital version is already out.

Already, the 40 inch HDTV feels like a big downgrade now.

Share this comment


Link to comment

I'm trying to wait for OLED to become cheap enough before I buy a new TV. Then I'll get the advantages of 4K, HDR, and OLED all at once, which I think will justify the cost of a new TV more than just 4K and HDR by themselves (especially since I don't have any 4K sources yet).

Share this comment


Link to comment
On 3/24/2018 at 10:26 AM, jamo said:

I'm trying to wait for OLED to become cheap enough before I buy a new TV. Then I'll get the advantages of 4K, HDR, and OLED all at once, which I think will justify the cost of a new TV more than just 4K and HDR by themselves (especially since I don't have any 4K sources yet).

That makes good sense. The tough part is not pulling the trigger when you see a good deal.

Bought the Planet Earth 2 4K Bluray and did some comparison with Netflix's UHD Planet Earth 2. Although switching back and forth was a pain, it took some tries, but I definitely see a bit of difference between the discs and streaming. It seems sharper not when there are lots of little things to render, but when there's not much on the screen ironically. Also the color depth is more pronounced from the disc. That said, will the 4K discs at $40 a pop is a bit much, I'll wait for the price to go down or for Redbox or other places to stock 4K BRs for rentals.

That said, the new set has changed some of the way I watch as watch more 4K content on YouTube now.

Share this comment


Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Blog Entries

  • Posts

    • I totally agree. I spent a lot of time on drivers that I had trouble controlling. They gave me some extra length when I hit them right, but I found myself out of the fairway a lot. Then I found my latest gamer and it wasn't cheap, an 8.5 degree Titleist 913D2 but the amount of confidence that I have when I step up to the tee is a great feeling. I literally know I'm going to hit the fairway with it. It's aging now and I am getting older too and the loss of distance is concerning, so following this post is great insight into the replacement process which will become eventual for me.    
    • It was a short 125 yard par 3 slightly up hill.  A well struck pitching wedge, but you can't see the bottom of the flag so didn't see it land.  I thought I'd gone too long, but my friend thought it was close.  Turns out he was right! I wish I'd taken some pictures from ground level, so I had a better chance of determining whether any part of the ball was underground.  Wasn't 100% sure of the rules at the time and didn't want to hold up the group behind by taking too long. It seems by the strict letter of the law that, as I don't think any of the ball was under the surface it isn't a hole in one.  But that just seems wrong as it was over half way in to the hole and clearly leaning in to the hole.  My friend gently centred the flag and it dropped in the hole. I'm just glad it wasn't my first hole in one as I would be really gutted right now!
    • I fully understand It may seem like from my post that I'm some kind of macho distance guy ... I've certainly seen my fair share of rolled eyes from other golfers around distances ... or from a nasty slice/hook etc ... something I'm working on as a 15HC player (as where the 3w is coming in with much more fairways hit these days) ... personal I think if you can constantly hit the ball cleanly with controlled power then why wouldn't you ... many times the difference between a 110mph drive and 118mph is an emotional factor, the actual distance isn't much at the end(Plus accurately is far better in lower controlled swing)   ...but sometimes after a 3-4 putt blowing a birdie etc, the tension releases makes me swing harder on the next tee..or maybe Bunker 260 out and I really want to pass it ...  I'm sure many Golfers are the same and hit the ball down there with a normal feeling swing. -----example-- where I was pissed at distance off the club....  last hole game very close to my best round 2nd shot PAR4...153 yards out to an ever slightly elevated green usually hit a PW full swing to around that distance.. Now the ball was in the first cut rough 10-15mph headwind so thought to take the 9 out full swing and it came off the face perfect high slight draw ... yes here we go >>>> down it came landed behind green ran up a gravel pathway onto some rough easy 15-20yards further than I expected ...Gutted 4 more shots to close out the hole..cost us the match and outright second place for the day
    • Thanks to all for sharing. I probably will find and join a league (hoping there are weekend leagues, great idea btw to meet other golfers). I will keep encouraging my friends and family to learn golf, joining a golf group at social media will help too. And, yep, playing alone occasionally could be nice.   
    • I do believe that some golfers "want it" more than others simply by putting more hours and effort into becoming great.  From what I've read about Hogan, I'd have to say that he wanted it more than others.  I'd say the same thing about Bryson.  And, of course, Tiger.  This is true in all fields, not just golf, and to me it's as plain as day.
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Antneye
      Antneye
      (51 years old)
    2. CapM
      CapM
      (54 years old)
    3. Cardsfan
      Cardsfan
      (27 years old)
    4. Mr Golf Addict
      Mr Golf Addict
      (15 years old)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...