Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2426 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

If you can find them, the Nike Lunar Control 4 is the best shoe I've ever worn

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The only golf shoes I ever kept for 10 years were Allen Edmonds. Back in 1980, I had the opportunity to caddy at a pro-am. The golfer I was with got a gift basket which included a gift certificate for a pair of Allen Edmonds shoes. He gave it to me, saying he had plenty of golf shoes. At the time, I think they were $350 to $400 depending on the style. Top of the line, way before athletic type shoes came along. The shoes were so comfortable, if they didn't have spikes, I would have worn them all the time. They wore out, Allen Edmonds discontinued manufacturing golf shoes, and wouldn't rebuild mine. I ended up tossing them out, but after 10 years, free shoes, I can't complain.

Driver: Callaway Mavrik 9.5o - 3 wood: Callaway Mavrik 15o - 3 Hybrid: Callaway Mavrik 18o - Irons: Callaway Mavrik 4-PW, AW, GW, SW - Putter: TaylorMade T.P.A. X - Ball: Callaway SuperSoft - GPS: Garmin S20 GPS watch - Rangefinder: Bushnell Yardage Pro

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

My golf shoes are so old, I'd have to look at them to see what brand they are. Spauldings? Maybe 25-30 years old if I were to guess.  

They are still in good condition, only because I don't wear them hardly at all. Last time I put them on was at Bandon, last year, because it was raining. Needed the extra traction. 

99 .999% of the time when golfing,  I wear tennis shoes, or my hiking shoes.  

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
10 hours ago, colin007 said:

If you can find them, the Nike Lunar Control 4 is the best shoe I've ever worn

I had the original Lunar Controls and just recently got a pair of the Lunar Command 2s and like them both a lot. 

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
12 hours ago, jamo said:

I had the original Lunar Controls and just recently got a pair of the Lunar Command 2s and like them both a lot. 

Yeah, I think Nike makes a good product. I have narrow feet and they fit me really well and outlast any other shoes I've owned. Plus they look great.

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I have tried them all.  They are made different and some brands just will not fit right.  First with me is comfort.  For the past 5 years I have been wearing New Balance golf shoes.  They come in wide and are very comfortable and light.  I would recommend replacing the innersole of your golf shoes and buying a good pair of innersoles, it makes a world of difference...


Posted

Bought a pair of Callaway chevron shoes 2 years or so ago, they have supports for the arc in each foot. They are more comfy than my everyday trainers. Not great in summer mind you so spent £18 on a pair of Woodworm golf Surge spikeless.

Woodworm are relatively new to golf as they specialise in cricket but the shoes aren't bad at all.

Russ, from "sunny" Yorkshire = :-( 

In the bag: Driver: Ping G5 , Woods:Dunlop NZ9, 4 Hybrid: Tayormade Burner, 4-SW: Hippo Beast Bi-Metal , Wedges: Wilson 1200, Putter: Cleveland Smartsquare Blade, Ball: AD333

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2426 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 22 - 2026-01-11 More mirror work. Back outdoors tomorrow.
    • Day 11, 1/11/26.  Today was putting, along about 6' of carpet, with coins on the ground to keep me cognizant of what I'm doing.  I think this is the at-home drill from LSW. (Ugh, missed two of the last four days -- 1/10 and 1/8)
    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.