Jump to content
IGNORED

Position at Address and Impact. Why do We Set up Differently?


Note: This thread is 976 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
3 minutes ago, KelvinPDX said:

Wow that’s perfect thanks. He’s basically  doing what I’m describing. It’s not the same but it’s closer than addressing the ball face forward. Is that photo of the end of the pump or a setup position? I’m going to have to find more stuff on his swing. My difference is I wouldn’t pump but would go from a static position. I’m wondering if he pumps so he can get more dynamic action into the backswing. This is perfect thanks so much. This site is awesome. 
 

His setup is pretty normal. He “pumps” to that spot, resets briefly, and goes. It’s a way for him to feel the “open” hips even though it really looks very little like his actual impact position.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

And as a conclusion I was hitting more balls in my garage with this in my head and it seems the ultimate reason for this type of setup is to take Dustin Johnson’s method of minimizing the movement in your wrist to only one axis (take away the cupped/bowed to flex movement in as much of the swing as possible) or finding the bio mechanical limit of your wrist joint and sticking with it for as much of the swing as you can deal with. This was fun. Thanks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'm no golf instructor but there is a lot more to an impact position than having your hands ahead of the ball. (Tiger and Rory and Rahm)

Tiger-Woods-face-on-impact.jpg

C5XUS70UoAA1WTJ.jpg

Screen Shot 2021-03-20 at 12.12.38 pm.png

Edited by Shorty

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator
10 hours ago, KelvinPDX said:

Absolutely! It’s just that’s what I’m looking at at the moment 😌. I’m just searching for that ever elusive consistency and it seems like this may be a viable path.

I really fell the best way to do this is to film your practice and work with a good instructor. I film most of my swing work hitting into a net. I use MirrorVision with my iPhone and iPad and review what I am working on. It takes discipline but it really shows you what you are doing. A good instructor can guide you to correct issues. I use Evolvr

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 3/19/2021 at 6:49 AM, Vinsk said:

Essentially the ‘conventional’ method used by pros generates power by a series of proper weight shifting and timing/routing of the club. The golf swing is usually best suited when it’s swung in a ‘circular, shallow, descending inside to out pattern. If you set your body into position so that this is performed, closed stance with weight forward, and you hold that position, you will quite immediately begin hitting some nice shots.

However, despite what JV argues you’re losing sources of power. Eliminating weight shift, hip turn, shoulder turn, eliminates these sources of power.

Are we talking essentially single-plane, or one-plane, swing, here?

I tried it last fall.  I did indeed start hitting nice shots.  Reduced fade.  Slice went away completely.  Also experienced much more consistency in finding the bottom.  Much fewer instances of hitting them fat or thin.

But I lost about twenty yards across the board and, try as I might, I was not getting it back.  This, coupled with the fact I could find no instructors nearby that taught single-plane swing and I got no response from Todd Graves' school inquiring of same, caused me to abandon it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


55 minutes ago, SEMI_Duffer said:

Are we talking essentially single-plane, or one-plane, swing, here?

I tried it last fall.  I did indeed start hitting nice shots.  Reduced fade.  Slice went away completely.  Also experienced much more consistency in finding the bottom.  Much fewer instances of hitting them fat or thin.

But I lost about twenty yards across the board and, try as I might, I was not getting it back.  This, coupled with the fact I could find no instructors nearby that taught single-plane swing and I got no response from Todd Graves' school inquiring of same, caused me to abandon it.

I don’t really dabble in all that plane business. I haven’t lost 20yds but I wasn’t a great ball striker before this method either. My golf woes weren’t due to lack of distance, they were from poor contact. And I think that many people who claim they’ve ‘gained’ distance with these alternate methods really just improved their contact so that a well struck 85mph 7i is better than a toe shot with a 90mph swing.

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yeah don’t think I’m addressing plane issues here but it’s probably connected. What I’m finding through swing iterations in the garage is that the key to what I’m trying to do is to maintain the flex/bow angle (if the hand were flat on a table the movement in the wrist up and down or off and on the table) and the pronation/ supination (rotation of the hand in the axis of the forearm) in my wrist, with only the side to side movement (ulner and radial deviation) being variable as I go through the swing. This is done in order for me to not cup my wrist at address then having to transition at some point to the proper wrist orientation (flat or bowed ala DJ). It’s just another variable that I’m trying to eliminate and it seems like low hanging fruit.

Following the desire for this wrist position it kinda works itself back into the body setup because when you have your wrist flat at address it starts asking the body to position itself into the position Shown below 

2E98259E-3AFA-45D6-91A0-B1A995AB3727.thumb.jpeg.3472f092cd02d816cb575f05b68338c8.jpeg
 

If I use the same flat wrist position with a traditional face forward address the club face is severely closed resulting in an uncomfortable relationship between that position and where the ball actually needs to go. It just seems to me the cupped wrist requirement when addressing the ball with hips square is only because the traditional face forward address is the way it’s been done but that feels like it’s the tail wagging the dog.

416F7DC6-F2D4-4219-8650-0E8B58394BF5.thumb.jpeg.1befcc5e7c1d1e537363bca8b041b241.jpeg
 

Anyway I’ll be pursuing this. It’s been pretty fruitful at first blush.

and to clarify... everything I do after this setup is a classic, or as close as I can get to it, golf swing. Just trying to eliminate that wrist movement after address.

 

So I read through this thread and what is so cool is that I started this thread thinking this was a body position issue but as the conversation developed and I took the pieces of thoughts out to the garage for analysis, what I discovered is it’s the wrist orientation that allowed for more consistency. The body position was just the doorway to get there. So interesting...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator
10 minutes ago, KelvinPDX said:

Yeah don’t think I’m addressing plane issues here but it’s probably connected. What I’m finding through swing iterations in the garage is that the key to what I’m trying to do is to maintain the flex/bow angle (if the hand were flat on a table the movement in the wrist up and down or off and on the table) and the pronation/ supination (rotation of the hand in the axis of the forearm) in my wrist, with only the side to side movement (ulner and radial deviation) being variable as I go through the swing. This is done in order for me to not cup my wrist at address then having to transition at some point to the proper wrist orientation (flat or bowed ala DJ). It’s just another variable that I’m trying to eliminate and it seems like low hanging fruit.

Following the desire for this wrist position it kinda works itself back into the body setup because when you have your wrist flat at address it starts asking the body to position itself into the position Shown below 

2E98259E-3AFA-45D6-91A0-B1A995AB3727.thumb.jpeg.3472f092cd02d816cb575f05b68338c8.jpeg
 

If I use the same flat wrist position with a traditional face forward address the club face is severely closed resulting in an uncomfortable relationship between that position and where the ball actually needs to go. It just seems to me the cupped wrist requirement when addressing the ball with hips square is only because the traditional face forward address is the way it’s been done but that feels like it’s the tail wagging the dog.

416F7DC6-F2D4-4219-8650-0E8B58394BF5.thumb.jpeg.1befcc5e7c1d1e537363bca8b041b241.jpeg
 

Anyway I’ll be pursuing this. It’s been pretty fruitful at first blush.

and to clarify... everything I do after this setup is a classic, or as close as I can get to it, golf swing. Just trying to eliminate that wrist movement after address.

 

So I read through this thread and what is so cool is that I started this thread thinking this was a body position issue but as the conversation developed and I took the pieces of thoughts out to the garage for analysis, what I discovered is it’s the wrist orientation that allowed for more consistency. The body position was just the doorway to get there. So interesting...

Your grip looks a bit off. The left hand is weak and the right hand more neutral.

 

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

(edited)

This is my point, if I setup classically, with my left wrist cupped the grip is perfectly neutral or even a bit strong. 🤓 The issue is the elimination of that transition from cupped to flat in the backswing.

Edited by KelvinPDX
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator

Ok so I hope you take this the right way, but @KelvinPDX you are way overthinking things. If the setup helps you strike the ball a little cleaner, that’s great, but don’t expect a minor static change to significantly change the way you swing the golf club.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

You hit it on the head there Bill. That’s kinda what I do. Bit of an entertainment for me. 🤓 Probably shouldn’t air it in public too much but I thought I’d try how the process would be if I did. It’s actually been helpful for me but not sure how entertaining it is for the folks in Internetland. 🙂

btw in the end I think all of these steps are just that. Steps to a more perfect swing. It’ll never be perfect just better...

... and I think I’ll be settling on a face forward body position, with my wrist set flat, so my arm will be in a straight line with the club at address... for now 😉.

and BTW Bill, I totally understand that I’m talking about a detail in a very complex system. Thanks man. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Ok, I think I see what you're getting at.

What our pro taught us, when I took lessons last year, was ball centered, set the face of the club perpendicular to the desired ball flight with the end of the club handle pointing roughly between your first and second belt loops, then lay the grip along the crease between your fingers and palm such that, when you close your hand your thumb points down the shaft slightly right of the center of the shaft.  Lay your right hand atop your left such that its lifeline follows the left hand's thumb, which, when the right hand is closed, should result in it's thumb laying slightly left of the center of the shaft.  Your left arm and the club's shaft will form a straight line--or nearly so.

All this results in your hands leading the club head at address, with a neutral grip.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
3 hours ago, SEMI_Duffer said:

crease between your fingers and palm

Sounds too far in the palm.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

9 minutes ago, SEMI_Duffer said:

Video submitted for the grip portion of my current training:

https://www.linxnet.com/misc/images/Golf/IMG_2591.MOV

 

This should be interesting. I always hear how the grip is such a personal/preference thing yet anytime a grip is shown someone has something to correct about it.🙄

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

48 minutes ago, Vinsk said:

This should be interesting. I always hear how the grip is such a personal/preference thing yet anytime a grip is shown someone has something to correct about it.🙄

Well, that grip was taught to us by the PGA pro/instructor that taught our group classes last summer.  I submitted that video to my current, on-line instructors, and they didn't correct it, so I assume they found it acceptable.  I'll double-check with them to make certain, but I would expect that if they had a problem with it they'd have said so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 976 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,055 4/6 ⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨🟨 ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • I saw this video yesterday, couldn't figure out what he meant, then saw this thread and thought "oh maybe someone knows what he was talking about" and you guys are in the same place as me.  I *think* what he's suggesting is that you play a game such that going low is expected. He said there are different variations of it. I think his variation is you get three goes at a shot. You hit your first shot and it's good enough, then you just take it. If it's not good enough then you can abandon that shot and play another. If you still don't like it, you can hit it a third time, but then you're stuck with it. He's good enough that three goes at a shot ought to give him one that's good enough to move on. He did mention his parameters for what counts as "good enough", although I do note that he should have hit a third go on that pitch from the hazard based on that. He holed the putt though so it worked out in the end. I think if you're not as good as he is (which let's face it is everyone here and virtually everyone on the planet), then you'd adjust those rules to make it such that you might manage to make 5 birdies in a row. So maybe you play a two ball scramble with yourself and if you don't like either one then you can abandon those and hit a third or you play a three ball scramble or whatever it is that you need to make your standard work.  At its base though, it's just like going out and playing from the front tees or playing a scramble with yourself. The goal is to gain comfort with making lots of birdies and going way under par, so that when you find yourself in that situation in a real game, you don't panic. It's an interesting variation and if I ever got to play "for fun" at my home course, then I'd definitely try it.
    • Timing yes, feeling maybe not exactly 😉 Weight shift forward can start as early as A3. Weight shift is a lateral sway.  
    • Wordle 1,055 5/6 ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨 ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟩 ⬜🟩🟩⬜🟩 ⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • That sounds good. And, yeah, the default camera app tries to take in as much light as possible.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...