Jump to content
IGNORED

Ricky Bobby (Driver) vs. Shivas (Irons) - Who Wins in a Year?


iacas

Ricky Bobby vs. Shivas (Irons)  

7 members have voted

  1. 1. Who wins in a year (read the first post before voting)?

    • Ricky Bobby (the currently good driver)
      4
    • Shivas (the currently good irons player)
      3


Recommended Posts

  • Administrator

Imagine you have two players, identical as they can be without this being a parallel universes type situation, and both are… let's go with 9 handicaps. They're both 30 years old, no physical limitations, etc. One, we'll call him Ricky Bobby, is comparatively a great driver of the golf ball. The other, let's call him Shivas, is relatively a great iron player. Let's say their short game and putting are identical, so their "Create a Player" stats would look something like this:

Driver (Ricky):
OTT - 80/100
App - 50/100
ATG - 65/100
Putt - 65/100

Irons (Shivas):
OTT - 50/100
App - 80/100
ATG - 65/100
Putt - 65/100

This kind of assumes that maybe 65/100 is a 9 handicap level Create a Player.


Now, here's the question: If both players put in an equal amount of work with an equally qualified instructor, in a year, which player will be shooting better scores, and why? You also get to assume they only work on the full swing, and their short game and putting remain a constant 65/100 (or they both go up to 70/100, or whatever, but it isn't a differentiator between them).

To put it another way, Ricky Bobby and Shivas play 10 matches over a variety of courses at the end of the year: who wins the total match? Why?

I have an answer, but I'm going to hold off on sharing what I think for a little while.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Woof - fascinating question. So I think it’s a question of whether it’s easier to transition a good iron swing to the driver or a good driver swing to the irons. Speaking personally (which is really all I have to go on) I’ve typically throughout my life been a better iron player but my driving has improved massively lately with my iron play getting a bit worse. 
 

I think it’s probably easier to get your irons better if you’re a good driver than the other way but I’d say it’s pretty close. Took me years and a lot of work to get my driving better again. But I’m about 60% certain if that. I’d be very unsurprised if I’m wrong. I would obviously defer to people who’ve seen both and worked with both. 
 

I’ve heard both sides of it. Driver being longer means you have more time to fix stuff, but you have a smaller margin for error because more side spin to back spin with driver so it moves more if your impact conditions are off. Can also get away with more variance in club delivery with driver (since you have a tee) vs iron where ground impact is very destructive. I suspect at the end of the day the answer really is “it depends”. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I too think a better driver usually has an edge in this situation. Mechanically, irons are shorter and need less leverage and hence a good driver who has good leverage control over the longer stick has an advantage in learning and controlling the shorter sticks. I think descending AOA for irons is more matter of ball position at address than mechanics difference.

An inferior driver will also lose more shots to penalty areas and OOBs. Fewer GIRs with irons not as damaging, especially with reasonably competent short game.

In short, driver is king in golf. 

Vishal S.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

I’d go with Ricky too. I think becoming a better driver, including distance is more difficult to achieve than becoming a more accurate iron player. Ricky will be using shorter iron if he is loner off the tee.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I understand this is hypothetical but I think we still have to consider ‘realistic improvement’ for both of them. Shivas is the better iron player, Ricky the better driver. We know that APP has a higher SV than Driving, being #1 and #2. If Shivas slightly improves his driving while Ricky slightly improves his APP, they would continue to be equal no? I’m thinking should either one have a significant improvement in their iron play…all else being equal, Ricky would be the better player because his #2 SV skill is higher. Am I any where near the proper thinking on this?🥴

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

I voted Shivas. My reason is that good iron play requires good control over face and path as well as low point. The foundation of a good swing is more evident.

I’ve seen guys who are good drivers that flip the shit out of the club but it’s teed up so they can get away with it.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 248 - Wide backswing, good impact position, repeat 5x before hitting a ball. 
    • Day 62: did a stack session. 
    • Smart2Move https://www.smart2move.com/devices/3d-dual-force-plates I now have a set of the Smart2Move 3D Dual Force Plates. These measure forces and torques in all three dimensions, and are portable (somewhat — each plate weighs about 12 pounds) and run wirelessly to an iPad. I've already used them for a session or two, and often I would just AirPlay my screen to the TV in my hitting station. It worked really well in early testing, and I'm excited to continue to work with Smart2Move and these plates. @david_wedzik were among the first people in the world to own a SwingCatalyst. We have a BodiTrak as well. I'm on record as saying a few things regarding these things: You can "see" what golfers are doing with your eyes, even if it's not really measured. They were kind of a pain to set up and use. Students are bad at understanding forces and torques. Everyone has semi-decent nGRF; what you can gain from using them is somewhat limited, and instructors make too much out of GRF these days. ROI? In order… 1. You can see what golfers are doing with your eyes, even if it's not truly measured. They say "force precedes motion" and that's true. And I can see what golfers are doing - where they're applying forces, torques, etc. I don't know exactly how much, but my estimates would be pretty close. I don't necessarily need force plates to help golfers, or to see what they're doing, but… they do. Like I've found with GEARS, and my GCQuadMAX… golfers are more willing to make changes when they do something and I say "no, you didn't do it" when as I say that, I'm pointing to proof that they didn't do it. It carries more weight than just me saying "you didn't do it" based on what I saw. 😄  2. They were kind of a pain to set up and use. They were; that's still true. These S2M plates are not. They connect to an iPad, not an entire PC with a dedicated, wired camera that has a hard time getting a good frame rate. The iPad gives 240 FPS video. 3. Students are bad at understanding forces and torques. They still are. You tell someone to add pressure to their left foot, and they'll push with their right foot to shift their weight left… thus adding force to their right foot. But, that's where I come in — I can explain what we're trying to do, and narrow their focus to one graph or one number. 4. Everyone has semi-decent GRF; what you can gain from using them is somewhat limited, and instructors make too much out of GRF these days. To be honest, I still think this is mostly true, but… I'm seeing enough people these days who shift their weight into their trail side toes instead of back toward the heel a bit, or who are super late getting forward, or who don't do some other things pretty easily seen on a graph, that I think I can narrow their focus to just the one thing, explain that thing, and make good progress. Plus, for better players, sometimes this timing — or the amount that they do it — can lead to a noticeable change, even if it takes them from a +1 to a +1.4, or a 110 MPH driver swing to 114. 5. No, at $14k, there would be no good ROI argument to be made. 😛 Erie is a "thrifty" town, after all. I'm excited to have these again. Like I said, the old systems were a pain to use, and these are much easier, and need only an iPad. I'll be using them in "regular" lessons as well as in GEARS lessons. Any questions?
    • Day 269: 9/17/24 Indoor chipping followed by slow motion swings working on weight shift. Each day begins with a Par4Success workout.
    • Oh my, no. It's a wedge second shot. Your angle into the green doesn't matter. You should not be aiming for the "side" of a 30-yard wide fairway to give yourself a better angle to hit your wedge shot. Or almost any shot after that. If the mounds on the left were a pond, or horrible bunkers, sure aim left. But they're not. If teeing off from the right side gives you confidence, cool, but the angle changes like 0.5°.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...