Jump to content
IGNORED

A Decibel Meter as a Free Speed Meter?


Recommended Posts

20 hours ago, iacas said:

So bad, I'm not going to spend the ten minutes it would take to do such a thing, because I know what the results would be.

An you still took several minutes to write several posts and talk to sound engineers. I appreciate that you did!

21 hours ago, iacas said:
  • temperature
  • distance of max clubhead speed from the microphone
  • angle (both axes) to the microphone
  • clubface orientation (a face open or closed will change the frequency)
  • location of the max clubhead speed (reaching peak speed at the same exact place)
  • everything in the vicinity, including the shoes and clothes you're wearing, the surface you're on, etc. ideally with all of them producing virtually no noise even when moving.

 So they basically tell you is possible but you need to be very restrictive. The same thing I found on my research. 

Temperature: is not going to change much between swing A and swing B.
Distance of max club head: even the PRGR take the fastest speed recorded, not the speed at the ball. But this could be diminish by swinging several times each swing and average the results. 
Angles: also PRGR returns less speed swinging on a certain degree. 
Clubface orientation: it is also an issue with launch monitors that are not reading the center of the mass of the club. You can have a lot more club speed if your face rotation is higher and your lunch monitor is reading the toe of the club.
"Other stuff in the room": are the same from swing A to B, or you can just swing naked! haha 

21 hours ago, GolfLug said:

He said he installed a free decibel app on his phone. He himself has a PRGR apparently but if the idea had merit, others could benefit.

This is the main idea, I have a PRGR and Skytrak. There are plenty of people, more here in Argentina, that can't afford a launch monitor. Also wanted to share the idea and let it be challenged by others. I don't mind been wrong, is part of experimenting. 

20 hours ago, GolfLug said:

I would have thought that would be the first thing to do if to see if this had merit. Maybe he has.. @p1n9183?

I did and all the swings were close to 85 dbs, me swinging at 90 m/h. But I don't mind doing a proper test later in the afternoon writing down the results. I need to find and app that also have frequencies in order to test both. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
12 minutes ago, p1n9183 said:

Temperature: is not going to change much between swing A and swing B.

But it will change from session to session, from one person’s location to the next, etc. If your goal is to figure out X db = Y mph in swing speed to share with others, that matters.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
43 minutes ago, p1n9183 said:

An you still took several minutes to write several posts and talk to sound engineers. I appreciate that you did!

You could have saved us all some time by realizing I tend to know what I'm talking about when it comes to science and tech. 😛 

43 minutes ago, p1n9183 said:

So they basically tell you is possible but you need to be very restrictive. The same thing I found on my research.

What?

The only way they would imply that it would be "possible" is if you were able to spend six figures (minimum) AND that doesn't include the swing robot that could reach peak speed at the same exact location every time.

No, they didn't say it was possible for someone like you to do anything remotely good.

43 minutes ago, p1n9183 said:

Temperature: is not going to change much between swing A and swing B.

Session to session.

43 minutes ago, p1n9183 said:

Distance of max club head: even the PRGR take the fastest speed recorded, not the speed at the ball. But this could be diminish by swinging several times each swing and average the results.

The PRGR doesn't work the same way - it samples the speed, from behind (inline with the direction of travel) with radar, and takes the highest number it registers. The distance from the PRGR isn't super relevant.

43 minutes ago, p1n9183 said:

Angles: also PRGR returns less speed swinging on a certain degree.

Clubface orientation: it is also an issue with launch monitors that are not reading the center of the mass of the club.

You're not reading. Or understanding. No to both.

The former is because of the microphones, and the latter is because a clubhead swing more closed versus more open will have a different air flow and thus a different pitch and volume. Clubheads are not symmetrical.

43 minutes ago, p1n9183 said:

"Other stuff in the room": are the same from swing A to B, or you can just swing naked! haha 

You're missing the point. How reflective some of that stuff is could matter. The sounds it generates to background noise could matter.

43 minutes ago, p1n9183 said:

I did and all the swings were close to 85 dbs, me swinging at 90 m/h. But I don't mind doing a proper test later in the afternoon writing down the results. I need to find and app that also have frequencies in order to test both.

85 dBs is generally considered ear-injuring volume.

You don't "need to find an app" because this will not work at all.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Decibels is sound 'pressure' not wave frequency. From that perspective a SGI Iron will have very different pressure wave than a blade even with the same speed and other variables considered equal. Additionally, since your phone will not be in direct path the turbulence difference (which generates the sound 'pressure) will have much lesser variance. In other words you will have convergence at one particular speed. Maybe it's this 90MPH speed with your 6i. But I doubt you will have proportional deviation above or below the speed to give you anything will reliability. 

2 hours ago, p1n9183 said:

I did and all the swings were close to 85 dbs, me swinging at 90 m/h. But I don't mind doing a proper test later in the afternoon writing down the results. I need to find and app that also have frequencies in order to test both. 

And other speeds? 80, 90? 

Vishal S.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,195 4/6 ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ ⬛⬛🟩⬛🟨 🟩⬛🟩🟩⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Nice!
    • I'm behind and I just saw Xander and Finau miss par putts to hand the Ints a hole.
    • The International Team is tanking on putts. 
    • Decibels is sound 'pressure' not wave frequency. From that perspective a SGI Iron will have very different pressure wave than a blade even with the same speed and other variables considered equal. Additionally, since your phone will not be in direct path the turbulence difference (which generates the sound 'pressure) will have much lesser variance. In other words you will have convergence at one particular speed. Maybe it's this 90MPH speed with your 6i. But I doubt you will have proportional deviation above or below the speed to give you anything will reliability.  And other speeds? 80, 90? 
    • You could have saved us all some time by realizing I tend to know what I'm talking about when it comes to science and tech. 😛  What? The only way they would imply that it would be "possible" is if you were able to spend six figures (minimum) AND that doesn't include the swing robot that could reach peak speed at the same exact location every time. No, they didn't say it was possible for someone like you to do anything remotely good. Session to session. The PRGR doesn't work the same way - it samples the speed, from behind (inline with the direction of travel) with radar, and takes the highest number it registers. The distance from the PRGR isn't super relevant. You're not reading. Or understanding. No to both. The former is because of the microphones, and the latter is because a clubhead swing more closed versus more open will have a different air flow and thus a different pitch and volume. Clubheads are not symmetrical. You're missing the point. How reflective some of that stuff is could matter. The sounds it generates to background noise could matter. 85 dBs is generally considered ear-injuring volume. You don't "need to find an app" because this will not work at all.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...