Jump to content
IGNORED

Which is the tougher test - The US Open or the British Open?


Rojo0416
Note: This thread is 5774 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I know you have to take weather into consideration and venue, but it seems like the British is a tougher test than the US. JMO.

MP32
R7
Mezza Monza
RAC 60 degree

Link to comment
Share on other sites


The British Open is the tougher test IMO. Not only does the weather make it more challenging, the courses look to be tougher too.

Whats in my :sunmountain: C-130 cart bag?

Woods: :mizuno: JPX 850 9.5*, :mizuno: JPX 850 15*, :mizuno: JPX-850 19*, :mizuno: JPX Fli-Hi #4, :mizuno: JPX 800 Pro 5-PW, :mizuno: MP T-4 50-06, 54-09 58-10, :cleveland: Smart Square Blade and :bridgestone: B330-S

Link to comment
Share on other sites


For those of us who aren't used to links golf, the British Open may be tougher. However, some may also consider the US Open to be tougher if they're used to links golf. It's all a matter of preference. I believe that question may be too broad, as you can ask which courses are harder to play, British Open courses or US Open courses.

CPGA Member
Eagles Nest Golf Club
Toronto Highlands Golf

Link to comment
Share on other sites


British Open as the weather can either be terrible like this week or really good like last year and makes it impossible to hold it on the greens. It is a completely different course when playing the US Open as the courses are perfect and hardly a breath of wind!
Golf is a game whose aim is to hit a very small ball into an even smaller hole, with weapons singularly ill-designed for the purpose.
Winston Churchill

Taylor Made r7 425
Taylor Made V steel 3woodCleveland Halo 2hybridCallaway Big Bertha 4-9Taylor Made 48 & 56Taylor Made Tp 52Odyssey XG 2ball...
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I think they are different type of tests to be honest, Links golf and Inlands golf are completely different animals and the courses are set up in different ways.

In my Ping UCLAN Team Bag

Nike Sasqautch 9.5 - V2 Stiff
Cleveland HiBore 15 - V2 Stiff
Ben Hogan Apex FTX, 2 - PW - Dynamic Gold StiffNike SV Tour 52, 58 - Dynamic Golf StiffYes Golf Callie - 33 inchesBall - Srixon Z star X

Link to comment
Share on other sites


The weather is besting many at the Open Championship.

"You can live to be a hundred if you give up all the things that make you want to live to be a hundred." Woody Allen
My regular pasture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'd say the us open tests longer hitting whereas the british open is a test of character, accuracy and creativity around the greens. On a links course like birkdale, accuracy is key and there is not much room for error. I saw scott on day 2, he had a slightly over drawn tee shot with driver and fell into thick rough and ended up with double bogey. on an american style course he would've been in the first cut of rough

Driver: Taylormade R11 set to 8*
3 Wood: R9 15* Motore Stiff
Hybrid: 19° 909 H Voodoo
Irons: 4-PW AP2 Project X 5.5
52*, 60* Vokey SM Chrome

Putter: Odyssey XG #7

Ball: Titleist Pro V1x

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'd say the us open tests longer hitting whereas the british open is a test of character, accuracy and creativity around the greens. On a links course like birkdale, accuracy is key and there is not much room for error. I saw scott on day 2, he had a slightly over drawn tee shot with driver and fell into thick rough and ended up with double bogey. on an american style course he would've been in the first cut of rough

Exactly, on an American course you can make small mistakes and still recover but if you miss the fairway on a links course its a lot tougher to recover make par.

Whats in my :sunmountain: C-130 cart bag?

Woods: :mizuno: JPX 850 9.5*, :mizuno: JPX 850 15*, :mizuno: JPX-850 19*, :mizuno: JPX Fli-Hi #4, :mizuno: JPX 800 Pro 5-PW, :mizuno: MP T-4 50-06, 54-09 58-10, :cleveland: Smart Square Blade and :bridgestone: B330-S

Link to comment
Share on other sites


The wind is brutal and will test your nerves and patience just over a putt. I can't image how difficult it must be playing this years open. The cross wind on your driver and approach shots are so difficult and the wind in your face is near impossible to gauge what club to use? I saw Greg Norman hit a chip 5 iron close to the hole.

Titleist 910 D2 9.5 Driver
Titleist 910 F15 & 21 degree fairway wood
Titleist 910 hybrid 24 degree
Mizuno Mp33 5 - PW
52/1056/1160/5

"Yonex ADX Blade putter, odyssey two ball blade putter, both  33"

ProV-1

Link to comment
Share on other sites


The wind is brutal and will test your nerves and patience just over a putt. I can't image how difficult it must be playing this years open. The cross wind on your driver and approach shots are so difficult and the wind in your face is near impossible to gauge what club to use? I saw Greg Norman hit a chip 5 iron close to the hole.

Thats pretty much what Norman said when they interviewed him after his round today. He said that you have to take way more club than youd think you would because once the ball gets above the sand dunes and gets up in the wind, its like it hits a wall.

Whats in my :sunmountain: C-130 cart bag?

Woods: :mizuno: JPX 850 9.5*, :mizuno: JPX 850 15*, :mizuno: JPX-850 19*, :mizuno: JPX Fli-Hi #4, :mizuno: JPX 800 Pro 5-PW, :mizuno: MP T-4 50-06, 54-09 58-10, :cleveland: Smart Square Blade and :bridgestone: B330-S

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I agree with others that they are different tests of golf, you don't really see guys aiming 80 yards off line to adjust for wind in the US Open. Hard to say for me, which is harder. Both are penal for missed fairways(chunk out with a wedge if in the cabbage), British Open setups seem more penal for missed greens(pot bunkers, swales, gravel roads in play, OB 5 feet right), and US Open greens sometimes tend to be borderline ridiculous(speed-wise). But the weather they are facing this week would have worn me out mentaly after a practice round.
My Bag

Driver: Sumo 460 10.5º Stiff
4 & 7 Woods: T-40 Stiff
Irons: Tight Lies GT 3-PWWedges: Tom Watson SignaturePutter: Daiwa DG-245Ball: One PlatinumGone Golfin'
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'll go with the US Open. If Norman was on Oakmont this week he'd not make the cut.

2009 Burner R
FT-I Fusion Squareway 3W 15* Fujikura Speeder Fit-On R
5W R7 R
FT Fusion Hybrids Draw 3/21*, 4/24*
G5 5-PW X-forged Vintage: 52.12, 56.14MDScotty Cameron: Newport 2 ProV1

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'll go with the US Open. If Norman was on Oakmont this week he'd not make the cut.

On the same note, some of the Americans who made the cut at Oakmont may have not made the cut at Birkdale.

Its tough to compare them because of the fact that hey are two completely different types of golf, but this would be my evaluation. Putting: Both are very good putting challenges. However, the British might test your mental capabilities on the greens due to the strong winds and other poor weather. Short game: The British is by far a better test of the short game. At the U.S. Open, it has gotten to hte point where you gouge it out and hope it holds the green. You dont get to see all the brilliant shots that The Open Championship offers. You get a lot more guys that keep the 60* in the bag around the greens and play creative bump and runs, and things of that nature. Iron play: Both the U.S. and the British are excellent tests of iron play, but in far different ways. The British reveals who can work it around, vary trajectory. THe U.S. reveals who can hit the miraculous towering fades that can hold the slippery greens. Course Management: The British Open obviously makes one think his way around the course more. I mean, how often to guys hit irons off the tee on a 450 yard par 4? The Long Ball: U.S. open for obvious reasons.... Overall, two good championships. I would have to say that although the scores are often better, the Open Championship is the tougher test of the two.

Monster Tour 10.5* w/ Redboard 63
FP400f 14.5* w/ GD YSQ
Idea Pro 18* w/ VS Proto 80s
MP FLi-Hi 21 w/ S300
CG1 BP w/ PX 6.0 SM 54.11 SM 60.08 Sophia 33"

Link to comment
Share on other sites


In defense of the US Open, the rough is much more penal because you cannot run the ball onto the green. At the Open it seems far easier to gouge the ball out and get it somewhere for a chip. At the US Open its lay up time due to the ultra slick greens.

Approach shots seem much easier at the Open, mis-hits will still bounce and roll, chips, pitches, sand shots, all of them allow for a way to at least get it close. At the US Open you have to hit precisely the right shot to have any chance.

Power and precision vs imagination, different tests.

I'd feel a lot more comfortable playing the Open, the greens are far more receptive to all kinds of shots, if something isn't working, plan B might. But at the US Open if you don't have your A game you will be destroyed.

Of course the weather alters the equation, but that's a variable that's not always there.

2009 Burner R
FT-I Fusion Squareway 3W 15* Fujikura Speeder Fit-On R
5W R7 R
FT Fusion Hybrids Draw 3/21*, 4/24*
G5 5-PW X-forged Vintage: 52.12, 56.14MDScotty Cameron: Newport 2 ProV1

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I would say that the British Open is the tougher test because from the fairway at the US open you basically can just get a yardage and play to it whereas at the Britsh Open you can't do that most of the time and you have to hit punch shots, bump-and-runs and you have to work big draws and fades agains the wind.

Also the wind would make driving at the British Open very difficult.

In the bag:

driver Big Ben CS3 9.5º
3-wood 906F4 15.5º
hybrid rescue mid 19ºirons: MP-60 3-PWwedges vokey spin-milled 54º and 60ºputter tracy IIball Pro V1

Link to comment
Share on other sites


British because of the weather.

Driver Ping G10 10.5*
Hybrids Ping G5 (3) 19* Bridgestone J36 (4) 22*
Irons Mizuno MP-57 5-PW
Wedges Srixon WG-504 52.08 Bridgestone WC Copper 56.13
Putter 33" Scotty Cameron Studio Select #2

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'd divide it into two categories: With weather and without.

With weather, the British Open isn't so much golf as it is trying to land a hot air balloon on a coffee table in the middle of a hurricane. No question it's the tougher test then.

When the weather is calm, I give a strong edge in toughness to the U.S. Open. The distance factor just wears you down.

Both are incredible mental tests but from different aspects of the human psyche. The British Open tests the imagination. The U.S. Open tests mental endurance. You see your 10th consecutive par four at 470-plus yards and you'll start wondering if it's too late to take up baseball.

And I think you also can't forget this: I think, from purely a pressure standpoint, that being on the first page of the leaderboard on the last day of the Masters has to get an honorable mention, especially once you get to Amen Corner. You get that particular course with those galleries and those greens and it will fold a lot of people up.

Jess
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 5774 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • I didn't disregard it at all. I acknowledged and I am very well aware that the British Open often didn't have the best players (which was still true in the 90s but to a lesser extent), the PGA Championship had a lot of club pros and golf in general was a much less viable profession so the fields were more top heavy. Clemson plays college football in the ACC. The ACC is a much weaker conference than the SEC and Big Ten.  Clemson often had great teams that were discounted because people used the same thinking as you.  Just because the SEC is tougher doesn't imply that every team ore even the top teams are better.  This conversation would be more relevant if Jack only had a slightly better major record. The gap between Jack and Tiger in majors records is massive.  Tiger's 50th place finishes and DNPs aren't magically becoming 2nds in the 60s and 70s.
    • Wordle 1,057 4/6 ⬜🟨🟨⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 ⬜🟩🟨🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • For a large chunk of Jack’s early majors, he didn’t even have 10 people with a reasonable chance to win against him. You can’t just disregard that.
    • Tiger was way more dominant. Tiger won more tournaments against deeper fields in a compressed period of times  Anyone who disagrees with that statement is clearly wrong. But does that make Tiger the greatest? To you maybe. Not to those of us who combine dominance with longevity. Travis Kelce and Rob Gronkowski were clearly better tight ends at their peak but the GOAT is Tony Gonzalez. He made 14 Pro Bowls and was All Pro 10 times. Gronk was only 5 and 4 on those stats. Who is the greater point guard Isiah Thomas or John Stockton?  Stockton didn't win any championships but he is third all time in VORP, top 10 in Win Shares and 40th in PER. He was excellent for 19 years. Isiah is around 60th in VORP and outside the top 100 in other advanced metrics.  Jack's total output, particularly in majors, is lightyears beyond Tiger. They aren't close even when you adjust for field strength. Jack has 73 top 10s in majors. Tiger barely has that many total cuts in majors.  If Tiger started his career in 1960, the odds are 0.0000% he would have Jack's overall record in the majors if his career trajectory were the same. Tiger would not get to 50 top 10s in majors let alone 73 based on how his career played out.  You don't have to agree valuing overall output with dominance is the best way to decide. It is subjective. But saying Tiger has the better major record because fields were weaker is clearly wrong. Jack's strokes gained in the majors are so far ahead, that no adjustment for field strength gets Tiger in the ballpark. Jack has 37 top 2s in majors. Tiger barely has that many top 10s.  There were no shortage of guys in the 70s who would be top players in the late 90s, who would have provided plenty of resistance to Tiger. And the simple way to know this is those guys from the 70s were often still relevant playing against Tiger. 
    • Birdied #8 at Quail Brook. Made a casual 50-footer.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...