Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6526 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. What type of putting stroke do you use?

    • Inside-Square-Inside
      20
    • Square-to-Square
      16
    • What the hell is a putting stroke and what am I doing on this website?
      3


Recommended Posts

Posted
Last night, as usual, I was watching The Golf Channel (Game Improvement Night) and they had a teaching professional named Stan Utley on to talk about the putting stroke and other areas of the short game. Now, I've always been a proponent of the "square-to-square" putting stroke, but after hearing Stan talking about it, I'm starting to consider the "inside-square-inside" putting stroke.

Basically what Stan said is that an "athletic" (his term) putting stroke is one that incorporates the arms into it, adding feel and the ability to control the stroke more. I've always been of the opposite school of thought - "the less moving parts the better", but after considering it, the sense of touch and therefore the feel we get for the putting stroke lies within our hands and our arms, not in the larger muscles of the back, which fuel my current putting stroke.

So, what kind of stroke do you have and what do you think about what Stan had to say? I can't wait to get on a real green and test out both techniques!

Jeff Gladchun

In my bag:
Driver: TaylorMade R7 Quad, 9.5°, Aldila NV
3 Wood: Titleist 904F, 15°, YS-6+ StiffIrons: Titleist 695CB 3-PWWedges: Titleist Vokey 252.08, SM56.10 SM60.08Putter: Odyssey White Steel #5 Center-ShaftBall: TaylorMade TP Black / Titleist ProV1xHome Course: Oakland Hills...


  • Administrator
Posted

There are really about two methods: the Pelz and the Utley. I use their names mostly to mock them, though as the methods have been around forever.

I prefer to call the Utley method the 'arc' method of putting. Open on the backswing, close on the through swing. Scotty Cameron prefers this method.

So too does Dave Pelz' prize pupil, Phil Mickelson, despite Pelz preaching the "square to square" method. I've always found "square to square" require too much rotation of the wrists. The arc method requires none.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I'm a inside-square-inside guy right now (heh). My problem is that I get to technical and forget to just pull the club back and let it go. I think you have to rely on a little athleticism in golf and not distrust your natural abilities. Once you've mastered some of the fundamentals you can forget about the swing and just do it. When I swing the putter I'm pretty much a barn door guy as near as I can tell.

Jeff

10.5° Callaway FT-iZ Tour

18°, 20°, 23° Adams Idea Pro Prototype Hybrid

4-9 Titleist 690.CB
48° Titleist Vokey Tour Nickel
54°, 58° Titleist Vokey Tour Oil Can

Scotty Cameron NP2, 33"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I have a bit of arc in my stroke but not much. Last summer I tried hard to keep the putter square all the through the stroke and just couldn't make it work for me. Most misses were pulled and I always felt too tense about trying to keep it square.

The main thing that really helped me was to putt with a super light grip. That got me back to a slight arc and a nice release that gets the ball rolling nicely.

Posted
I have a bit of arc in my stroke but not much. Last summer I tried hard to keep the putter square all the through the stroke and just couldn't make it work for me. Most misses were pulled and I always felt too tense about trying to keep it square.

My problem as well. Using the "Pelz" method, most of my putts were slight pulls. I'm going to try to convert to the "Utley" method this summer.

Jeff Gladchun

In my bag:
Driver: TaylorMade R7 Quad, 9.5°, Aldila NV
3 Wood: Titleist 904F, 15°, YS-6+ StiffIrons: Titleist 695CB 3-PWWedges: Titleist Vokey 252.08, SM56.10 SM60.08Putter: Odyssey White Steel #5 Center-ShaftBall: TaylorMade TP Black / Titleist ProV1xHome Course: Oakland Hills...


Posted
I try to be as square as possible, but I have a slight inside to inside stroke. Heck, I may even be square to square on short putts, but on long putts it is nearly impossible to remain that way.

Fairways and Greens.

Dave
 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I too pulled putts with Pelz method of PILS(Pure Inline Square Stroke, or Square to Square) , after checking again the problem lay in the setup. I had grooved a stroke in the putting track, but my hands were not directly underneath my shoulders(just less than 1 1/2 inch too close to my body, hardly noticeable) which meant that the only way to keep the putter online was for my arms to slightly (only noticeable on close up camera) go away from my body. This meant that it was not natural as described in Dave Pelz (DP) Putting bible. I worked hard on checking that the center of the back of my right hand was directly underneath my shoulder joint and my arms and shoulder worked together as a unit, with shoulder moving in vertical plane (the shaft,rubber band and door frame drill in book for vertical shoulder rotation helps this greatly). This means gravity will (as long as you dont hit your putts but instead stay in rhythm) keep the putter square and online for you. So check your setup carefully before you discredit DP PILS method. Make sure your shoulders move up and down not around your body and that your hands are directly underneath your shoulders, with a little practice and fine tuning it will feel perfectly natural,stay square and online and work more consistently than the Screen door method (inside to inside). Sorry about the length of post but had to put up a fight for the DP method, anybody need any help just ask. P.S How do you change your profile details (my handicap index is not 36,lol)

In My Bag:
Driver: Trusty Taylormade 8.5 R580 X Stiff Graffaloy Blue
Wood: Titleist 980F 17.0 (4 wood) Precison Rifle 6.5
Irons: Ben Hogan Apex Plus (3-9i) Precision Rifle 6.5
Wedges: Titleist Vokey 200 series 48,52,56,60Putter:MacGregor M5K "Bobby Grace"Ball: Pro V1


Posted
I try to be as square as possible, but I have a slight inside to inside stroke. Heck, I may even be square to square on short putts, but on long putts it is nearly impossible to remain that way.

I'm the same way. I always thought I was a SQ-SQ putter but after I went through a putter fitting the cameras didn't lie and showed an In to IN stroke for anything longer than a three footer.

Personally, I don't think a putting stroke should be forced to one method over the other. Just use what's natural and it'll also be more reliable especially under pressure. For me it was just a little tweak in my setup that helped me out.
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 10 months later...
Posted
I think that trying to be arc or square putter is a mistake. Even more than other golf shots putting requires consistency in pre shot fundamentals. Grip, posture, stance, relaxation, tempo, feel. Knowing what your tendancies are mainly helps on narrowing equipment choices. I have noticed that working on my awareness of what it feels like when I get it right is just as important as feel in tee to green shots. I am an arc putter by the way. Oops I just saw that Everardo said the same thing only better.

1W Cleveland LauncherComp 10.5, 3W Touredge Exotics 15 deg.,FY Wilson 19.5 degree
4 and 5H, 6I-GW Callaway Razr, SW, LW Cleveland Cg-14, Putter Taylor Made Suzuka, Ball, Srixon XV Yellow


Posted
Knowing what your tendancies are mainly helps on narrowing equipment choices.

Good point. I did read Stan Utley's book "The Art of Putting" and enjoyed it. One thing I couldn't do from an arc putting standpoint is use a normal length putter (35"). It just felt too long and forced to me. I bought a 33" Monza Corza recently and even though I'm more over the ball than Utley recommends, my putting stroke is still an arc and feels natural.

Fairways and Greens.

Dave
 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 year later...
Posted
I putt well and i like it
In My Bag ...

Driver - Mx-500 9.5 Regular Shaft.
Fairway Woods - 3 & 7 F-50 Reagular Shafts.
Irons - Mx-19 3-Sw Dynamic Gold Regular ShaftsBag - Aerolite 2Balls - , & Any I Find!Putter - C-Groove Tracy 2Grips - Golf Pride Mulit-Compound Blue GripsA Member Of Hunley Hall G.C.

Posted
Ah, Putting... one of my many pet peeve topics when it comes to what many golf instructors tell you to do.

"Don't peek - keep your eyes down even after the ball leaves the putter." I tried doing just that, but I found that my putting became just a shot in the dark and a prayer that I get it close.

After much exploration, I've discovered a better way to go about it and since my discovery, I've become a MUCH better putter. And lemme tell you, it had nothing to do with "not peeking."

Not peeking is like telling a billiards player to keep focusing on the tip of his cue even after the cue ball has left the tip. That's like telling a basketball player to take a few looks at the basket before the shot, but from then on out, focus only on the index and pointer fingers of his shooting hand. Just doesn't work.

My stance is an isosceles triangle with the golf ball bisecting the base of the triangle exactly - which means the putter head would be a golf ball's radius behind the midpoint of the base of the triangle. After lining up the putt, I focus on the leading "edge" of the ball, take a few "pictures" of the hole as Tiger likes to say, pull back the putter head square (my eyes are still on the leading edge of the ball - since I know what the putter's going to do on its way back, I shouldn't need to watch), then watch the ball leave the putter face, THEN FOLLOW THE BALL WITH MY EYES TOWARDS THE HOLE. Most times, it goes in - or if it's a lag put, I usually don't have too much more work to do.

Don't get too anxious and look too early, but don't feel as if you need to keep your eyes on the spot where the golf ball used to be.

Just my $.02. :)

Titleist 905R 460CC Driver Fujikura Stiff 8.5
Titleist PT15* 3 Wood Dynamic Gold S300
Titleist 980F 19* 5 Wood Titleist Regular
Miura Forged Baby Blades 3-PW NS Pro Stiff
Miura Forged 56* Sand WedgeTitleist Vokey 60* Lob WedgeTitleist Scotty Cameron Studio Design Newport 35"Nike One Platinum...


Posted
Is the "in-square-in" stroke the same as a "barn door" stroke?

Hi-bore - 8.5* w/ 77g UST ProForce v2 stiff

PT- 21* x100 shaft

Ta3- Form Forged s300 shaftsVokey 52* 56*- Red X2 center shafted 33" ProV1x- High Numbers only (5's)


Posted
When I putt well

I don't know what is actually happening with you. Never seen ya'. I suspect that an UN-manipulated stroke will be in-square-in to some degree. Isn't a putting stroke a miniature golf swing?

Best, Mike Elzey

In my bag:
Driver: Cleveland Launcher 10.5 stiff
Woods: Ping ISI 3 and 5 - metal stiffIrons: Ping ISI 4-GW - metal stiffSand Wedges: 1987 Staff, 1987 R-90Putter: two ball - black bladeBall: NXT Tour"I think what I said is right but maybe not.""If you know so much, why are you...


Posted
I've tried both methods - end up using a combination on the course. Maybe that's why i'm a bad putter! I love putting and I believe I can hole all realistic opportunities - but by stroke isn't consistent enough.

From 5 feet in i'd remain quite square. Then for long putts i would (have to) use the arc method. My problem is the putts in between!

So i've invested in a Seemore to MAKE me use the arc all the time. Can't wait to sort out my putting!

WEAPONS:
Taylormade R9 10.5 L Grafalloy Prolaunch Platinum stiff 65g
Taylormade R9 15 NU YS+6 stiff 65g
Taylormade R9 19 NU YS+6 stiff 65g
Taylormade Tour Preferred 4-PW KBS Tour X-Stiff Cleveland CG12 RTG+ DSG 51Cleveland CG12 RTG+ DSG 55Cleveland CG12 RTG+ DSG 59Yes! Tracy II putterTitleist...


Posted
I've tried both methods - end up using a combination on the course. Maybe that's why i'm a bad putter! I love putting and I believe I can hole all realistic opportunities - but by stroke isn't consistent enough.

i have the same issue... my stroke just is not consistent enough. I used to be able to putt very well, and then my friend told me that i was doing it wrong and tried to change my stroke. ever since then, i have had a difficult time gaining consistency. this past summer, i switched from having my hands like a baseball grip when i putt, to having my left hand under, which definitely helped me regain a little bit of consistency.

a bad day on the golf course is always better than a good day at work."

http://www.golfenthusiastic.com


Posted
I switched last year to the left hand on bottom grip, and it helped my putting quite a bit. It just feels like it promotes more of a pendulum stroke for me. I also invested in a center shafted putter (red x 2) and I think that has helped my consistency too. I feel very confident over a putt that is 10 ft. or in.

Hi-bore - 8.5* w/ 77g UST ProForce v2 stiff

PT- 21* x100 shaft

Ta3- Form Forged s300 shaftsVokey 52* 56*- Red X2 center shafted 33" ProV1x- High Numbers only (5's)


Note: This thread is 6526 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Never practiced golf when I was young and the only lesson ever taken was a driver lesson. I feel like I'm improving every year. However, the numbers don't support my feeling about improving. I usually drop to 12-13 during the summer while playing the familiar courses around home and then go on golf trips in the fall to new courses and increase to end the year between 15-17. Been a similar story for a number of years now but hey, it's the best thing there is in life so not too bothered but reaching 9.9 is the objective every year. Maybe a few lessons and practice could help me achieve it since I pretty much have no idea what I'm doing, just playing and never practice.
    • I am semi-loyal. Usually buy four dozen of one ball and only play that until out and then determine whether to continue or try another one. Since starting my semi-loyal path to success, I've been playing the below, not in order: ProV1 ProV1x ProV1x left dash AVX Bridgestone BXS Srixon Z-star XV I am not sure if it has helped anything, but it gives a bit of confidence knowing that it at least is not the ball (while using the same one) that gives different results so one thing less to mind about I guess. On the level that I am, not sure whether it makes much difference but will continue since I have to play something so might as well go with the same ball for a number of rounds. Edit: favorite is probably the BXS followed by ProV1/Srixon Z-star XV. Haven't got any numbers to back it up but just by feel.  
    • Will not do it by myself, going to the pro shop I usually use after Cristmas for input and actually doing the changes, if any, but wanted to get some thoughts on whether this was worthwhile out of curiosity. 
    • In terms of ball striking, not really. Ball striking being how good you are at hitting the center of the clubface with the swing path you want and the loft you want to present at impact.  In terms of getting better launch conditions for the current swing you have, it is debatable.  It depends on how you swing and what your current launch conditions are at. These are fine tuning mechanisms not significant changes. They might not even be the correct fine tuning you need. I would go spend the $100 to $150 dollars in getting a club fitting over potentially wasting money on changes that ChatGPT gave you.  New grips are important. Yes, it can affect swing weight, but it is personal preference. Swing weight is just one component.  Overall weight effects the feel. The type of golf shaft effects the feel of the club in the swing. Swing weight effects the feel. You can add so much extra weight to get the swing weight correct and it will feel completely different because the total weight went up. Imagine swinging a 5lb stick versus a 15lb stick. They could be balanced the same (swing weight), but one will take substantially more effort to move.  I would almost say swing weight is an old school way of fitting clubs. Now, with launch monitors, you could just fit the golfer. You could have two golfers with the same swing speed that want completely different swing weight. It is just personal preference. You can only tell that by swinging a golf club.     
    • Thanks for the comments. I fully understand that these changes won't make any big difference compared to getting a flawless swing but looking to give myself the best chance of success at where I am and hopefully lessons will improve the swing along the way. Can these changes make minor improvements to ball striking and misses then that's fine. From what I understood about changing the grips, which is to avoid them slipping in warm and humid conditions, is that it will affect the swing weight since midsize are heavier than regular and so therefore adding weight to the club head would be required to avoid a change of feel in the club compared to before? 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.