Jump to content
IGNORED

USGA Ban on High Lofted Wedges


Stacey_E
Note: This thread is 5397 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I saw a guy trying to play with a 73 deg wedge. Trust me, it wasn't making golf easier!

Driver: Nike Ignite 10.5 w/ Fujikura Motore F1
2H: King Cobra
4H: Nickent 4DX
5H: Adams A3
6I 7I 8I 9I PW: Mizuno mp-57Wedges: Mizuno MP T-10 50, 54, 58 Ball: random

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Ive always read that wedges and irons were best used by making full swings. Meaning the more irons and wedges in your bag, the better. But i don't know if i'd carry this. When i heard there was a 64* out, i laughed. 73* is ridiculous
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Anyone remember what Greg Norman could do with a 56° wedge? Of course, greens were a bit slower back then.

For what it's worth, I regret some of the time I put into learning my 58° wedge back in the early times. It saved me now and then, but I should have been learning some diverse shots around the green instead. But then, I don't mind what other people use - I figure the harder the club is to hit, the less it can help all but the most skilled, who could just figure out another way to pull off the shot.

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Ive always read that wedges and irons were best used by making full swings. Meaning the more irons and wedges in your bag, the better. But i don't know if i'd carry this. When i heard there was a 64* out, i laughed. 73* is ridiculous

theres also an 80º wedge "

Doctor Knockdown " lol http://fairwaymarketing.zoovy.com/pr...anded_NEW.html
Link to comment
Share on other sites


My first thought when i see these wedges is, what club would i drop from my bag if i were to have one of these? I carry a driver, 3,5, 4h, 5-lw and a putter. that puts me at 14. the club i use the least is the 5w. But i couldn't see myself dropping the 5 wood for either of these highly lofted clubs
Link to comment
Share on other sites


My first thought when i see these wedges is, what club would i drop from my bag if i were to have one of these? I carry a driver, 3,5, 4h, 5-lw and a putter. that puts me at 14. the club i use the least is the 5w. But i couldn't see myself dropping the 5 wood for either of these highly lofted clubs

dont even consider it. 58º or 60º at most is all you will ever need

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I agree, my pw is standard 48* gap is 52* sand is 56* and lob is 60*. I use the lob the least out of the wedges. I only use it when i have to clear a bunker to get to the green. I would never think of buying anything higher than 60*. the only reason i have the 60* is because i bought a wedge 3 pack and it was included
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I agree on banning a wedge that has more than 60*. I am thinking they should ban hybrid clubs also. I mean, since they are on PGA tour, you know. Let keep this game more challenging.

Another thing, club and ball makers are trying to improve their technology such as making the ball goes further and straigter. I wonder if one day USGA decide to make the course longer. For example, 700 yards par 5? That would be hard for them to walk. It would take longer to finish a round. I am thinking there's a chance since golf clubs and balls technology are always improving. And if they make the course longer, golf is not going to be fun anymore.

Driver TP Burner 8.5* Stiff
3 Wood SQ 15* stiff
5 Wood SQ 19* stiff
Irons MP 67 (3-PW) stiff
Wedge 52* and 56* stiffPutter Mtisushiba Ball

Link to comment
Share on other sites


High-lofted wedges with ridiculous lofts should be banned... i.e. 73 or 80 degrees... because basically after really 64 degrees a golf club loses its effectiveness anyway... as for hybrids they aren't going anywhere... as for square grooves being banned... that is a straight up not exactly... The rule effects the sharpness and the volume of the grooves... not the shape... If you can some how get a cross-sectional volume to be the same as a V-grooved club... (or slightly higher i think with the measurements) you can in effect still have square grooves... and only effects clubs with more loft than your 4-iron... and hybrids and drivers do not apply...

Besides that if some Joe blow golfer wants a higher lofted wedge than 60 all they have to do is take a forged wedge that says 60 on the bottom and bend it to whatever they want to... and in like club situations who would know... what is the USGA police gonna be out on the practice range measuring everyones highest lofted wedge at next year's U.S. Open?

I don't think they will... It causes too much chaos and it is too difficult to police because forged wedges bend naturally anyway... The groove thing I can see and its actually only targeted at better golfers... The high loft thing won't get off the drawing board... It's too difficult to police, and to disqualify a player for having a club that is 0.5 degree too weak, is just the USGA being Arbitrary and capricious... pros maybe... Amateurs and weekend golfers high lofted wedges will remain legal and available...
Green side shots are not that easy even with the 64 degree wedge or such...

What the USGA really needs to do is get rid of the 44 degree pitching wedges on the market and standardize iron lofts... within a certain range...

What's in Shane's Bag?     

Ball: 2022 :callaway: Chrome Soft Triple Track Driver: :callaway:Paradym Triple Diamond 8° MCA Kai’li 70s FW: :callaway:Paradym Triple Diamond  H: :callaway: Apex Pro 21 20°I (3-PW) :callaway: Apex 21 UST Recoil 95 (3), Recoil 110 (4-PW). Wedges: :callaway: Jaws Raw 50°, 54°, 60° UST Recoil 110 Putter: :odyssey: Tri-Hot 5K Triple Wide 35”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I hope this rule comes in,

aeroburner tp 10.5 stiff
superfast tp 2.0 3 wood stiff
Halo 25 and taylormade tp 19 degree hybrids
miura cb 202 and wedge
tp 52* wedge, tp 56* taylormade spider mallet putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I love my 60* lob wedge. I find it's far easier to hit it consistently than, say, a 4-iron. If they ban it, I'd be bummed. Well, that's not entirely true. I'd just bend it to 59*...
Driver: Callaway FT-IQ 10*
Fairway Woods: Callaway X-Hot 15*, Callaway X 2008 18*
Hybrids: Callaway X-Hybrid 21*
Irons: Mizuno MP-57 5-PW (27*, 31*, 35*, 39*, 43*, 47*)
Wedges: Eidolon V-Sole GW (52*), SW (56*), LW (60*)Putter: Odyssey 2-Ball White Steel BladeBall: Bridgestone e6 BallStand Bag: Ogio...
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Really? Wouldn't be bad thing IMO.

I agree with you, I don't understand their logic. It's really no easier than opening up a 56* or 54*?

No easier than opening up a traditional 55-56° SW? Using a lob wedge is a lot easier. You have to get a feel for how much to open up the 56° for a given shot as well as how much to put into it. You also, on most SWs anyway, have to account for the increased bounce when you open the blade up.

I saw a guy trying to play with a 73 deg wedge. Trust me, it wasn't making golf easier!

LOL! Did he smack himself in the face with the ball? Could be fun into the wind as well - the ball might end up behind you.

Anyone remember what Greg Norman could do with a 56° wedge? Of course, greens were a bit slower back then.

What about Seve as well? Were the greens really slower back when they were at their peak? I'm not so sure; at least not for the Majors anyway.

High-lofted wedges with ridiculous lofts should be banned... i.e. 73 or 80 degrees... because basically after really 64 degrees a golf club loses its effectiveness anyway... as for hybrids they aren't going anywhere... as for square grooves being banned... that is a straight up not exactly... The rule effects the sharpness and the volume of the grooves... not the shape... If you can some how get a cross-sectional volume to be the same as a V-grooved club... (or slightly higher i think with the measurements) you can in effect still have square grooves... and only effects clubs with more loft than your 4-iron... and hybrids and drivers do not apply...

I love my 60* lob wedge. I find it's far easier to hit it consistently than, say, a 4-iron. If they ban it, I'd be bummed. Well, that's not entirely true. I'd just bend it to 59*...

The bending would be difficult to police. That said, I thought golf was a game in which self-policing was a big part. Shame if people feel that they could cheat just because no-one could actually catch them.

Standardising (within a range) iron lofts would be no bad thing I think.

Home Course: Wollaton Park GC, Nottingham, U.K.

Ping G400, 9°, Alta CB 55S | Ping G400, 14°, Alta CB 65S | Adams Pro Dhy 18°, 21°, 24°, KBS Hybrid S | Ping S55 5-PW, TT DGS300 | Vokey 252-08, DGS200 | Vokey 256-10 (bent to 58°), DGS200 | Ping Sigma G Anser, 34" | Vice Pro Plus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
I think this is ridiculous, have you ever seen a hack try to use a 60° wedge. Using high lofted wedges correctly in itself is difficult and can only be done with a good amount of skill to begin with. The USGA has gone off their rockers this time.

I think that's the point (from their perspective): if they cap it at 58 or 60 degrees, it'd have the largest impact on the pros and not much impact on amateurs.

Most amateurs don't have and/or can't hit a 60 or 64 degree wedge, so removing it from their bags won't have much effect (just as most amateurs don't have the swing speed and make contact well enough to take advantage of square grooves). Thus, it's a "universal rule change" they might be able to apply that would affect only those who "need" it. At least, that's how they see it. They probably also see it as potentially taking the teeth out of their groove change: guys might just hit higher lofted "fliers" now to stop the ball quickly from the rough. Frankly, I don't really care one way or the other about this. I carry a 60 degree wedge but use it sparingly - only when necessary. I can see the point about greens being firmer and faster than ever, and pins being tucked more closely than ever, but the counter-point to that is: don't short-side yourself. I can't even say I lean ever so slightly in one direction or another. At this point, it's just a study - I may have an opinion when I see the results.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I can't loose my 60. I've learned how to love that club. When the ground is harder, I go with the lob wedge instead of my 56 sw. I also need it for those shots that are under 100 yards away. I play 4 wedges so that short game adjustability is pretty important to me. The less I need to shave off my swing for distance control, the better.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5397 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 65: did a stack session.
    • Day 272: 9/29/24 Putting through gates for about 30 minutes today. 
    • Ok, that makes sense. I was trying to wrap my head around that concept when I was writing my post.   
    • 78 today at Minnesott (36 front / 42 back) - a new first with an even par on the front.  A big day of up and downs for par.  Only 26 putts against 4 GIR and 5 nGIR.  Was a CPO (cart path only) day due to recent rains.  Overall game was on - until 18 where I was looking at having a first “no-sixes” and made a triple 7 (tee shot in the lake, 2nd tee in fairway, shot 4 approach to right of green pin high, shot 5 bogie on the green, long two putts for triple 7.  Still a solid round and new personal best. 
    • I believe that 76 bpms is the tour average (or somewhere around that). I think that's from taking it back to impact. I'm not 100% sure of exactly how it works since a typical pendulum is already moving when it starts going back. The putter on the throughswing ideally would work pretty much exactly like a pendulum though. To get the exact same time period from starting the putter back to impact, you'll have to accelerate it a lot faster on a longer putt right at the beginning until it gets to the speed it needs to be to make the putter move the right distance. Probably all way too much to think about while actually hitting a putt, but bottom line is I agree entirely that a metronome is a good thing to use if you're working on your putting tempo. As to the split between backstroke and downstroke, the tour tempo lot said 2:1 is the ideal. 3:1 for full swing. 2:1 for short game and putting. Whenever I go on a SAM I am about 1.7:1 I think and I can't for the life of me get my backstroke to be slow enough to get it to 2:1. Ho hum. Last comment - if you do have a perfect pendulum putting stroke and you have the ball slightly forward of the center of your stance, then the putter should be just starting to rise again at impact and with the way that pendulum motion works, it should be very slightly decelerating at impact, which I believe someone may have suggested once 😛 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...