Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Caddies lining up putts for their players


Note: This thread is 4496 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

1 member has voted

  1. 1. Should caddies be allowed to line up putts for their players?

    • Yes
      37
    • No
      43


Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Posted
A unique situation arises when hitting to a blind target (such as an approach where you cannot see the flag.) The caddie can go forward and stand or indicate the line of flight, but before the stroke, I think he should move away from the line. I don't remember whether this is required

It is required that they move away.

The only problem I really have with players lining themselves up is that it seems to slow down play sometimes. Beyond that, it seems like a crutch. If a pro golfer needs another person to help him line up, then he or she almost seems to be admitting defeat. If it were made illegal, I wouldn't care much (though I do think you should still be allowed to indicate where the target is per the quoted part above), but as it stands right now, legal, I also don't care much.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Its not a big deal. Most of those guys on the different tours probably played without caddies for most of their jr golf and college days, so if they're on tour they can do it alone if they need to. But if you can have help from time to time, why not take it?
THE WEAPONS CACHE..

Titleist 909 D2 9.5 Degree Driver| Titleist 906f4 13.5 degree 3-Wood | Titleist 909 17 & 21 degree hybrid | Titleist AP2 irons
Titleist Vokey Wedges - 52 & 58 | Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2 Putter | ProV1 Ball

Posted
The caddie is not allowed to place the ball on the ground for the player, and is therefore not allowed to physically line it up, how is standing behind their player telling them to move an inch left any different to that?

The caddie can place the ball for the player if he lifted it.

From Rule 20-1: A ball to be lifted under the Rules may be lifted by the player, his partner or another person authorized by the player. From Rule 20-3 (a): If a ball is to be replaced, the player, his partner or the person who lifted or moved it must place it on the spot from which it was lifted or moved. I don't see what the big deal is. I could sort of see the logic behind no standing on the line after address, except you'd have to be more subtle to make this work since you could hover the putter while being aimed to avoid addressing the ball. As someone said above, golf is a de facto team game when you consider the existence of caddies.

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"


Posted
I would have to respond with "no." They are the professionals, they should do all of the work themselves. The caddies job is to carry the clubs and help with distances, not to basically play the game themselves.

Posted
I think it sucks.

But it's legal, and can't fault a guy or gal for taking every possible advantage allowed if they want.

I vote for outlawing it, not that it means anything.

In the Bag...Ping Hoofer

3dx Tour Square - UST V2 HMOI X Flex
3dx 15* - X flex
Baffler DWS 20* Aldila NV Stiff 4-GW 600XC Forged Irons- S Flex 55* SW - Burner XD 60* LW - Burner XD Craz E Putter <----ProV1x---> Pellet


Posted
i'm going to say no for the reason stated in the very first post here - if the golfer can't do it themselves, they shouldn't be out there in the first place. a caddy's job is to cite yardages and carry/clean the clubs.

Posted
I am personally against it myself due to the facts that most people are saying, these are professionals playing a game that they get paid to do. I would even go so far to say i dont like caddies helping them read the shot, you have someone helping hold your gear and that is where it should end.

In a friendly game of golf help your friends out, when your getting paid to play your best you shouldn’t need anyone else.

Posted
Here is one for thought, do you think that a caddie should be allowed to line up a putt for their player....I personally think that it should not be allowed and here is the reason....If a professional is unable to line themselves up to putt then as far as i am concerned they have a major flaw and therefore are not good enough to play the highest level....

I voted yes though I don't care all that much. After all, the player still has to execute the putt correctly.

:P
In the bag Nike SasQuatch SuMo 10.5* {} Tiger Shark Hammerhead 3w, 5w, 3h {} Nickent 3DX Pro 5i-PW {} Titleist Vokey 250.08* {} Cleveland CG11. 54* {} Callaway X-Tour 58.11* {} Carbite Tour Classic Putter {} Titleist ProV1x


  • 3 years later...
Posted

Thank you.  I was wondering if anybody notices on the LPGA that many had their caddy to line up EVERY shot, especially the Asian country female golfers.  It feels like cheating.


  • 5 months later...
Posted

Please provide a reference to a rule or decision to support your statement: "The caddie is not allowed to place the ball on the ground for the player". My readings of the rules allow the player, partner, or any authorised person to mark and/or place the ball."

And I can't seem to find any ruling that prohibits the player, partner, or authorised person (e.g,, caddy) from lining up the ball while placing it.

Mae Jo Captain


Posted

if a caddie is not allowed to line up a putt or a shot in general there wouldn't be an LPGA....seriously there are many players there who get lined up on every swing by the caddie. silly in my opinion.

Driver- Callaway Razor somthing or other
3W- Taylor Made R11S
3H Rocketballz
4I-PW- MP-59
Gap- Vokey 54

Lob- Cleveland 60

Putter- Rife

Skycaddie SG5  


Posted

Caddies should be lining up putts on the practice green but not in competition.

Why?  The caddie is there to assist the player, not just be a beast of burden.  He helps to choose the right club, paces off yardages, does any number of detailed tasks to help the player as he plays his round.  The rules bar the caddie specifically from doing a few things, but the rest is fair game.  They often read greens better than the player does, do a better job of picking the line of the putt, and that is part of the job - always has been.  If you go to Scotland and play with a caddie, he will help his player with aiming his tee shots and reading the greens, picking a line for putting.  I see nothing at all wrong with helping the player with his alignment before the stroke.  You are allowed to lay a club down on the ground to help you with your alignment for a shot as long as it is removed before you make your stroke.  I don't see any difference having the caddie do the same thing.

The player and caddie are a team, and with a few restrictions for the caddie, they are both allowed to perform many of the same tasks, and they face the same penalties for any breach of the rules.  It's been that way since the job of caddie was created, and I don't see anything wrong with what they do.
Has anyone actually done any research as to the efficacy of having the caddie assist with alignment?  Is there any quantitative data to show that any given player is actually a better putter for it?  Or is it just more of a psychological boost.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Why?  The caddie is there to assist the player, not just be a beast of burden.  He helps to choose the right club, paces off yardages, does any number of detailed tasks to help the player as he plays his round.  The rules bar the caddie specifically from doing a few things, but the rest is fair game.  They often read greens better than the player does, do a better job of picking the line of the putt, and that is part of the job - always has been.  If you go to Scotland and play with a caddie, he will help his player with aiming his tee shots and reading the greens, picking a line for putting.  I see nothing at all wrong with helping the player with his alignment before the stroke.  You are allowed to lay a club down on the ground to help you with your alignment for a shot as long as it is removed before you make your stroke.  I don't see any difference having the caddie do the same thing.

The player and caddie are a team, and with a few restrictions for the caddie, they are both allowed to perform many of the same tasks, and they face the same penalties for any breach of the rules.  It's been that way since the job of caddie was created, and I don't see anything wrong with what they do.

Has anyone actually done any research as to the efficacy of having the caddie assist with alignment?  Is there any quantitative data to show that any given player is actually a better putter for it?  Or is it just more of a psychological boost.

Ahhh back from a golf trip and on to the TST. I understand your thinking Fourputt and I agree that the caddie is more than someone who simply carries the bag - however aiding in the players alignment on the green or anywhere on the course for that matter appears to be an unfair advantage from my standpoint. And I can't remember seeing a player in tournament conditions put down a club or alignment sticks to help him or her before the stroke. In practice sessions absolutely positively yes use as many training aids as possible for alignment, stroke, gaining driving distance, honing in your iron play and all that. In tournament conditions that's when the player hitches up their trousers and sets off to conquer on their own.


Posted

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fourputt

Why?  The caddie is there to assist the player, not just be a beast of burden.  He helps to choose the right club, paces off yardages, does any number of detailed tasks to help the player as he plays his round.  The rules bar the caddie specifically from doing a few things, but the rest is fair game.  They often read greens better than the player does, do a better job of picking the line of the putt, and that is part of the job - always has been.  If you go to Scotland and play with a caddie, he will help his player with aiming his tee shots and reading the greens, picking a line for putting.  I see nothing at all wrong with helping the player with his alignment before the stroke.  You are allowed to lay a club down on the ground to help you with your alignment for a shot as long as it is removed before you make your stroke.  I don't see any difference having the caddie do the same thing.

The player and caddie are a team, and with a few restrictions for the caddie, they are both allowed to perform many of the same tasks, and they face the same penalties for any breach of the rules.  It's been that way since the job of caddie was created, and I don't see anything wrong with what they do.

Has anyone actually done any research as to the efficacy of having the caddie assist with alignment?  Is there any quantitative data to show that any given player is actually a better putter for it?  Or is it just more of a psychological boost.

Ahhh back from a golf trip and on to the TST. I understand your thinking Fourputt and I agree that the caddie is more than someone who simply carries the bag - however aiding in the players alignment on the green or anywhere on the course for that matter appears to be an unfair advantage from my standpoint. And I can't remember seeing a player in tournament conditions put down a club or alignment sticks to help him or her before the stroke. In practice sessions absolutely positively yes use as many training aids as possible for alignment, stroke, gaining driving distance, honing in your iron play and all that. In tournament conditions that's when the player hitches up their trousers and sets off to conquer on their own.

How can it be an advantage or unfair when it's available to all players?  That isn't even a reasonable argument. If you were playing at the level where a caddie was a regular part of the game, you would use him in any way allowed to help you win.  I really don't understand why this particular task is singled out as distasteful while the other caddie duties seem to be okay.  It's still the player who has to make the stroke, to bring the club back on the right plane to hopefully hit the ball where the caddie aims him.

Admit it - the only reason you have for disliking it is that you just don't like how it looks on TV.  There is no other argument that holds water, and even that one is leaking like a boat made out of knotty pine. :doh:

:smartass: By the way, the player is not allowed to use alignment sticks or any other training device during a stipulated round.  However, he may use a club in such a fashion as long as it is removed before he makes his stroke.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I played in a tournament yesterday where caddies were assigned to each foursome, I'm a believer.  Having someone, who knows the greens, tell you where to aim and the relative green speed makes a big difference.  I haven't done the statistics yet, but I'd guess I cut at least 1/2 putt per hole off my average, maybe more.

As for whether the LPGA should allow it?  I get the argument that its available to all players but in my opinion it takes away some of the skills the pro needs to have and assigns them to the caddie.  I don't have an issue with consulting with a caddie, discussing club selection, etc but when a caddie gives you the line and relative speed it does make putting easier.  If I had a competent caddie out with me every round reading greens and lining up putts for me I'm confident I'd drop at least 6 strokes off my handicap.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4496 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.