Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2724 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Try the Tour Gorge before you commit to the set wedge in the two highest lofts

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 5 years later...
  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Moderator
Posted

Taking a shovel to this thread.

I've been thinking about replacing all my wedges and getting fit for them, but the one thing I'm not sure about is whether I should replace my PW or not. It's a Mizuno MP4 and I use it primarily for full and flighted shots, but rarely for partial shots or around the greens. I really like it for what I do with it.

I'm wondering though if I'm limiting myself because I'm not using this club for more options. Maybe because it's basically an iron, that's the reason I don't use it for more finesse shots? Part of me thinks having more options in the bag and my game can't hurt, another part of me wonders if that's really worth spending $150 on a club I don't really need.

Thoughts?

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

Some Pro’s use a specialty wedge (46 degrees) instead of their set pitching wedge because the specialty wedge gives them more spin and allows them to make a greater variety of shots. I think for amateurs the set pitching wedge is fine. I do prefer a specialty wedge as a gap wedge, not the set gap wedge, because I like more weight in my short wedges. 

Edited by arturo28mx

Posted
On 7/28/2018 at 9:46 AM, billchao said:

Taking a shovel to this thread.

I've been thinking about replacing all my wedges and getting fit for them, but the one thing I'm not sure about is whether I should replace my PW or not. It's a Mizuno MP4 and I use it primarily for full and flighted shots, but rarely for partial shots or around the greens. I really like it for what I do with it.

I'm wondering though if I'm limiting myself because I'm not using this club for more options. Maybe because it's basically an iron, that's the reason I don't use it for more finesse shots? Part of me thinks having more options in the bag and my game can't hurt, another part of me wonders if that's really worth spending $150 on a club I don't really need.

Thoughts?

I assume the MP4 PW, since it is almost 6 yr old, that it has a traditional loft of about 47-48. I use my Gap (which is 50 and comparable) for running chips around the green, and like you, for full, partial, flighted shots, depending on conditions. I think of the last 2 wedges in a lineup, traditionally the 54-60, as specialty wedges with a grind and bounce that offer versatility, so I would not be concerned about replacing your PW, but to focus on sand and lob wedge and what fits your swing - steep or shallow, and the types of shots you tend to create around the greens - look at the grind.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 7/28/2018 at 7:46 AM, billchao said:

Taking a shovel to this thread.

I've been thinking about replacing all my wedges and getting fit for them, but the one thing I'm not sure about is whether I should replace my PW or not. It's a Mizuno MP4 and I use it primarily for full and flighted shots, but rarely for partial shots or around the greens. I really like it for what I do with it.

Why don't you use it for partial shots?  I would suspect it's a lot more versatile than my W (44.5 degree Ping G-400) and I use that for full shots, flighted shots (which I think of as a 3/4 shot), half shots (gets me about 55 yards) and quarter shots (40 yards, give or take from run).  

Is it that you can't get the shot to come off or that you don't like doing that shot with clubs from your iron set?

I also have measured half and quarter shots with my 9-iron and 8-iron for what it's worth.

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
On 7/28/2018 at 3:13 PM, arturo28mx said:

Some Pro’s use a specialty wedge (46 degrees) instead of their set pitching wedge because the specialty wedge gives them more spin and allows them to make a greater variety of shots.

Those are both perfectly good reasons for me to get one.

10 hours ago, Mr. Desmond said:

I assume the MP4 PW, since it is almost 6 yr old, that it has a traditional loft of about 47-48. I use my Gap (which is 50 and comparable) for running chips around the green, and like you, for full, partial, flighted shots, depending on conditions. I think of the last 2 wedges in a lineup, traditionally the 54-60, as specialty wedges with a grind and bounce that offer versatility, so I would not be concerned about replacing your PW, but to focus on sand and lob wedge and what fits your swing - steep or shallow, and the types of shots you tend to create around the greens - look at the grind.

The MP4 PW is 46°. My wedge set right now is 50°, 56°, 60°. I'll probably go 50°, 54°, 58° if I get new wedges. If I'm like most people I'd end up with three different grinds on those wedges.

I need a new GW for certain and a new SW, but my LW is newer so I can keep using that without giving anything up TBH. Even if I go 50°, 54°, 60°, I almost never hit my LW full anyway so the extra 2° isn't going to hurt my game.

I guess it really comes down to whether I feel like I can hit all the shots I need to with my set PW versus a specialty wedge.

10 hours ago, Shindig said:

Why don't you use it for partial shots?  I would suspect it's a lot more versatile than my W (44.5 degree Ping G-400) and I use that for full shots, flighted shots (which I think of as a 3/4 shot), half shots (gets me about 55 yards) and quarter shots (40 yards, give or take from run). 

The answer is dumb - because I never mapped it. I used my Mevo and mapped my partial wedge shots and wrote them in a notebook I carry in my back pocket on the course. I don't generally use my PW inside of 100 yards (with some exceptions) because I know what combination of swing I need with another club to hit a variety of distances.

10 hours ago, Shindig said:

Is it that you can't get the shot to come off or that you don't like doing that shot with clubs from your iron set?

The only other thing I can think of is I rarely hit a long running greenside chip, so the PW just doesn't come to mind much as a greenside option. I kind of prefer to fly my ball closer to the hole. I can't say for certain if that's actually a good strategy or not. I don't like to chip with irons and I think of my set PW as an iron.


I thought of something as I was typing this response and based on some of the feedback, I'm probably not going to replace my set PW with a 46° wedge (though I'll work on incorporating it into my game more). I just don't think I'm good enough for it to matter and I'm already playing a blade for a PW so I don't think I'll see much difference from the club design by switching to a blade-style wedge.

Thanks for the input, guys.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
38 minutes ago, billchao said:

Those are both perfectly good reasons for me to get one.

The MP4 PW is 46°. My wedge set right now is 50°, 56°, 60°. I'll probably go 50°, 54°, 58° if I get new wedges. If I'm like most people I'd end up with three different grinds on those wedges.

I need a new GW for certain and a new SW, but my LW is newer so I can keep using that without giving anything up TBH. Even if I go 50°, 54°, 60°, I almost never hit my LW full anyway so the extra 2° isn't going to hurt my game.

I guess it really comes down to whether I feel like I can hit all the shots I need to with my set PW versus a specialty wedge.

Thanks for the input, guys.

Personally, I like your 50, 56, 60 setup. I play fast greens and like a little more loft. I don't think of a 45-46 club as a specialty wedge - I think of it as an iron. My specialty wedges are  56 and 60 with different grinds, although I use the 50 for long bunker shots and running chips. The Gap typically does not have a "creative" grind. Good luck. I went to the Glide 2.0 Stealth recently in 50, 56ES and 60SS, and am finding them very agreeable and versatile - nice looking head and excellent stopping power.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2724 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.