Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Mickelson's flop shot


Note: This thread is 5964 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I had never really respected Phil's short game as I should have until I bought an L wedge. I have worked with this thing until I've reached a point of going to my P wedge and just releasing to the green. I've found it virtually impossible to determine how far this damned thing is go to hit the ball. I vote to change the name of the L wedge to the F wedge or maybe the S wedge because that's typically what comes out of my mouth after trying to use it.
Mr. Mickelson sir..... I am humbled at the feet of the greatest short game on earth!

Duffy,

Striving every day to be the person my dogs think I am.
 

Driver; Ping G25, Fairway, Ping G25 3; Irons, Mizuno M59, wedges, Cleveland cg15, 54, 56, 60, Putter; See More Zack style.


Posted
Yes, Phil is pretty talented with this shot. I bought my first L-Wedge back in 1988 when they were all the craze. I didn't start using it on the course for a few months. I would pull it out on the practice green and practice with it until I became comfortable with swinging so hard for such a short shot. Once I became comfortable with it I would use it on the course but only when I short sided myself and had to carry a bunker or mound with just a few feet of green to work with.

Unless your just constantly short siding yourself on a super tight pin location there's really very few situations where you absolutely have to hit a flop shot in my opinion. This year I've only hit two greenside flop shots for the whole season. Luckily I got them both up and down but if I have any green at all to work with I'm going with a short pitch or bump and run. They are just a higher percentage shot.

Sometimes I think Mickelson uses the flop shot too much but he's so talented with it how can you argue with him using it!

Good Luck!

In My Bag:
Driver: :Cobra Amp Cell Pro 9.5*, Stock X-Flex

3 Wood: :Cobra Bio Cell 16*, Stock X-Flex

5 Wood: Cobra Bio Cell 20*, Stock S-Flex
Irons: Bridgestone J40-CB 3-PW, Project-X 6.0

Gap Wedge::Vokey: 52* CNC  

Sand Wedge: :Vokey: 58* CNC  

Putters: Scotty Cameron Newport II 

Ball: Bridgestone 330-S(2014)


Posted
It's not rocket science, half the shot is judging the lie if it's even possible to perform. If the ball sits up a bit it's about getting the club sliding under and the ball will pop up.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I do most of my chipping and pitching with my lob wedge.I close it down or open it up as I need to.I find it is much more versatile then my 56 degree sand wedge as it has 0 bounce.I do not use it in the bunkers or for shots longer than 35 yards.

In my new FT carry bag
FT-9 Tour nuetral 9.5
FT-15 degree 3 wood
Fussion Hybrids #2&4
Fussion irons with Grapholoy Pro launch Red shafts56&60 Cally X forged wedges with Red shaftsSG9 putterCally I ballBushnell Meadealist range finder


Posted
There's a video on youtube where he hits a backwards flop shot. like he lines up looking away from the hole and hits it backwards. pretty crazy.

  • Administrator
Posted
There's a video on youtube where he hits a backwards flop shot. like he lines up looking away from the hole and hits it backwards. pretty crazy.

Not that hard to do if you can find a slope. 45 degrees or so plus 60 from a lob wedge is 105 degrees, or backwards by 15 degrees.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Not that hard to do if you can find a slope. 45 degrees or so plus 60 from a lob wedge is 105 degrees, or backwards by 15 degrees.

The launch angle of the ball is not the same as the loft of the club. For example, in a recent Golf Magazine article where they had Paddy Harrington compare old clubs to new, the launch angle of his (current) 9i with 44 degrees of loft was 23.1 degrees. And the difference between loft and launch angle increases as you get to the higher lofted clubs.

Certainly you can increase launch angle by opening the face, but you're implying that launch angle = loft which is not true. Even if it were, your implication that it's not hard to take a stance and swing on a 45 degree upslope is also flawed. (Maybe not that hard for you Eric, but it would be for the majority of golfers.) Bottom line, I'm impressed by Phil's shot. - Bill

Bill


Posted
I've done that, not too hard with some practice. Paddy's launch angle is lower because he deloft the clubs. While this is common also with a wedge, for a flop shot you want more height and release the club under the ball, which would add loft rather than decrease it.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Truthfully, I don't use the flop shot enough. For some funny reason, it seemed to be the most natural golf shot when I first picked the game up and it has become my most reliable shot. Crazy eh? It shows off well in bunker play. Just chop right under it. Distance control is all based on feel and imagination so you really got to pay attention to your practice swings.
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
The launch angle of the ball is not the same as the loft of the club.

For that shot, and for all intents and purposes, it is. You're not compressing the ball and you're swinging very flat (up the slope). If you can find a 45 degree slope or more, you can probably pull the shot off too.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Not that hard to do if you can find a slope. 45 degrees or so plus 60 from a lob wedge is 105 degrees, or backwards by 15 degrees.

Yeah maybe so, but I'm still highly impressed.


Posted
i hate flop shots. You need like 100% confidence to pull it off. Phil, being the crazy person he is, always pulls off the flop shot magic because he has like 100% he can do it. Hes such a fun player to watch.
In my Warbird Hot Stand Bag:

Driver: R9 420cc 9.5° stiff
3 Wood: Burner 07 Fairway #3 Stiff
5 Wood: Burner 07 Fairway #5 Stiff3 Hybrid: Burner 08 Rescue #3 StiffIrons: MX-25 4-G Project X 5.5SW: CG12 STD bounce 56° Black PearlLW: CG12 STD bounce 60° Black PearlPutter: California...

Posted
Despite being a junior golfer, I could feel that the PW wasn't giving me enough loft on some closer shots. I really wanted something with more loft, so I got a LW. (Part of the reason my PW was annoying was that it had 14* of bounce -- annoying to hit off a groomed fairway.)

It's been a mixed blessing. I did not anticipate the difficulty in determining how far the ball would actually go when struck. I'm inconsistent, and it's proved annoying. A good shot has great payoff, but a bad shot... Sometimes I might as well have just used my putter and whacked the ball. But overall the LW has made harder lies and working around the green a lot more manageable, I'm definitely thankful for it.

"Golf is an entire game built around making something that is naturally easy - putting a ball into a hole - as difficult as possible." - Scott Adams

Mid-priced ball reviews: Top Flight Gamer v2 | Bridgestone e5 ('10) | Titleist NXT Tour ('10) | Taylormade Burner TP LDP | Taylormade TP Black | Taylormade Burner Tour | Srixon Q-Star ('12)


Posted
...Sometimes I might as well have just used my putter and whacked the ball...

Therein lies a lot of golf in a nutshell - percentages and picking the shot

you can pull off with the highest likelihood. Just because the average amateur can pull off a decent flop shot once, doesn't mean they can do it all the time. Same undoubtedly applies throughout the game but I guess that makes golf fun....and frustrating. A realisation of capabilities would, I think, benefit us all! Let's see "Oh, here it is. Not too bad a lie in the semi. Hmm, distance about 180 with water up the left-hand side. Earlier in the year I hit a great 4-iron from a similar position; I can do this! Damn, better find another ball........". Been there; done that .

Home Course: Wollaton Park GC, Nottingham, U.K.

Ping G400, 9°, Alta CB 55S | Ping G400, 14°, Alta CB 65S | Adams Pro Dhy 18°, 21°, 24°, KBS Hybrid S | Ping S55 5-PW, TT DGS300 | Vokey 252-08, DGS200 | Vokey 256-10 (bent to 58°), DGS200 | Ping Sigma G Anser, 34" | Vice Pro Plus

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Therein lies a lot of golf in a nutshell - percentages and picking the shot

Yep, very true. Some of my inconsistency is because I try to play to the shots I know I *can* hit, rather than what the shots I probably *will* hit.

Just got a 52* GAP wedge (the PW is close to landing in the water, it's annoying to hit) and I immediately felt better consistency with it. Some time on the chipping greens should help me sort out which one to use in which situations.

"Golf is an entire game built around making something that is naturally easy - putting a ball into a hole - as difficult as possible." - Scott Adams

Mid-priced ball reviews: Top Flight Gamer v2 | Bridgestone e5 ('10) | Titleist NXT Tour ('10) | Taylormade Burner TP LDP | Taylormade TP Black | Taylormade Burner Tour | Srixon Q-Star ('12)


Posted
Here is the video of Mickelson's backwards shot. Pretty awesome!!

Driver Hyper X 9*
3 Wood Tight Lies
Hybrids Hyper X 3 & 4
Irons 5 - 9, PW Mizuno JPX 800
Wedge 50, 54, 60 Vokey Spin Milled Putter Ping Anser Ball e7+


Note: This thread is 5964 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.