Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3662 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Posted
42 minutes ago, collapse said:

My experience with the palm /fingers issue  is it doesn't matter if the club is in the palm or "fingers" of the lead/upper hand as long as the pre-hinge and cocking are done correctly,but the club can only be in the palm of the lower hand if using a ten finger grip otherwise fingers are required for the interlock or overlap.

Putting the grip too far in the palm inhibits cocking/hinging the club properly.

30 minutes ago, craps said:

For golfers who cannot swing that good because of athleticism, a strong grip with 2 knuckles showing and a right hand underneath so that palms facing each other couple with swinging out to 1 o'clock works the most. Mind you that this grip will show a closed face. You have to forward press to make it square at address.. In addition make sure your sternum has to be inline with the low point which is usually the 1/3 back part of the ball. Works beautiful for me. It might work for you!

Two knuckles is a strong grip now? I can take an awfully weak grip and see two knuckles.

I also don't know what you mean about how a grip will "show a closed face." The grip is round: without moving your hands if you could twist the club in your grip you could point the clubface anywhere.

@craps, seriously pal, I don't mean to keep harping on this, but you seem to have some strange ideas about the golf swing, and if you're really a 24 handicap, there are way, way more important things for you to worry about than your grip being palmy or "two knuckle strong" or what have you.

Post a Member Swing here. You'll get help.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, collapse said:

My experience with the palm /fingers issue  is it doesn't matter if the club is in the palm or "fingers" of the lead/upper hand as long as the pre-hinge and cocking are done correctly,but the club can only be in the palm of the lower hand if using a ten finger grip otherwise fingers are required for the interlock or overlap.

I find that if I grip more along the base of the fingers I feel like I have better control of the club face/back.

However I don't feel I can get as much power.

When hold the club more along the "meaty" part of the hand I can sustain the pressure from CF more effectively.

There's pros and cons from both. So there's nothing definite for me, it just depends.

But more of a CF swing coupled with positive AoA seems to work better for me.

if I have to hit down then I tend to grip more towards the fingers.

Edited by dchoye

  • Administrator
Posted
Just now, dchoye said:

I find that if I grip more along the base of the fingers I feel like I have better control of the club face/back.

However I don't feel I can get as much power.

When hold the club more along the "meaty" part of the hand I can sustain the pressure from CF more effectively.

CF? Are we talking MORAD stuff?

Generally you can get more power by putting the club in the fingers a bit more because you can hinge/cock the wrists more. The club can load more and thus build more speed.

Palmy grips, blech.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, craps said:

For golfers who cannot swing that good because of athleticism, a strong grip with 2 knuckles showing and a right hand underneath so that palms facing each other couple with swinging out to 1 o'clock works the most. Mind you that this grip will show a closed face. You have to forward press to make it square at address.. In addition make sure your sternum has to be inline with the low point which is usually the 1/3 back part of the ball. Works beautiful for me. It might work for you!

Essentially for any technique to work,the lead/upper hand has to be turning over as it approaches impact but in a controlled manner so as not to hook the hell out of the ball nor hit enormous fat shots.

Edited by collapse

Note: I do not answer direct questions or points raised against my untested and unproven theories, have no history of teaching anyone, and post essentially the same nonsense in everyone's Member Swing threads.


Posted
9 minutes ago, collapse said:

Essentially for any technique to work,the lead/upper hand has to be turning over as it approaches impact but in a controlled manner so as not to hook the hell out of the ball nor hit enormous fat shots.

How much do you feel as though you have to consciously turn your bottom hand over, as opposed to it happening "naturally" on its own? I realize this might be a stupid question.

Jon

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
56 minutes ago, JonMA1 said:

How much do you feel as though you have to consciously turn your bottom hand over, as opposed to it happening "naturally" on its own? I realize this might be a stupid question.

Haven't you noticed that on this forum those instructors that are teaching golf do gave out sound facts BUT golf is more about execution. I know what a model swing is but can you execute? Why do Mr. Fuyrk swing like that? He has to go through those actions to get desirable results. I can imagine lessons with these guys would make you very mechanical. Some people just want to enjoy golf. Able to keep pace. Just Bogey golf. If you try to teach too difficult stuff, then it would be a struggle.


Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, iacas said:

CF? Are we talking MORAD stuff?

Generally you can get more power by putting the club in the fingers a bit more because you can hinge/cock the wrists more. The club can load more and thus build more speed.

Palmy grips, blech.

I wasn't sold on the "palm grip" that Nicklaus advocates when I started playing, but its starting to grow on me.

CF momentum is in all swings right?  Some can generate more speed from CF than others.

I dont fully understand Mac's description of CF swing. 

 

 

 

1 hour ago, JonMA1 said:

How much do you feel as though you have to consciously turn your bottom hand over, as opposed to it happening "naturally" on its own? I realize this might be a stupid question.

not a stupid question.

I used to have my right hand turn over so much that my hands oppose to much.

Now I feel its more strong/strong appearance than strong/weak appearance.

I feel my top/lead hand turning over a fraction before my bottom hand.

Don't waggle as much. I tend to hinge my wrist or bend my elbows as preshot routine.

I think this keeps my palms more parallel.

However, there are trouble shots around the 100 yard mark I like to waggle and get my hands opposing but I feel more confident when I switch to ten fingers specifically for those shots,

otherwise I'm interlocking for regular ones.

Edited by dchoye

Posted
4 hours ago, JonMA1 said:

How much do you feel as though you have to consciously turn your bottom hand over, as opposed to it happening "naturally" on its own? I realize this might be a stupid question.

IMO the lead hand turns over naturally when the pre-set hinge and cocking position are correct.This turning over has to be controlled however and I believe is typically done with the lower hand.If you take Bubba and Freddy with their super strong lead hand grip,you see them with an open stance and top hand small finger  purposely placed under the club grip which helps control the lead wrist which wants to cup out of control at the top and not return to square. 

bubba.JPG

Note: I do not answer direct questions or points raised against my untested and unproven theories, have no history of teaching anyone, and post essentially the same nonsense in everyone's Member Swing threads.


Posted

freddy.JPG

Note: I do not answer direct questions or points raised against my untested and unproven theories, have no history of teaching anyone, and post essentially the same nonsense in everyone's Member Swing threads.


  • Administrator
Posted
4 hours ago, craps said:

I can imagine lessons with these guys would make you very mechanical. Some people just want to enjoy golf.

You imagine incorrectly then. Simple as that. If a golfer is taking lessons they want to play better, and on the Internet since feels aren't real, the only thing you can discuss with any level of accuracy are the mechanics. It is up to the golfer, or in the case of a lesson, the instructor to find the feels the produce the proper or improved mechanics.

Also, in my experience, virtually every student who has a proper grip doesn't have to worry at all about rolling the hands over or anything like that. 

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3662 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6* ⬛⬛🟦⬛🟧 ⬛🟧🟧⬛🟧 🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧 Awesome, @WillieT! Go get another!
    • Wordle 1,631 2/6* ⬛🟩🟩🟩⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.