Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

your most comfortable 18 hole yardage is?


Note: This thread is 5855 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I really like playing the longer courses. 7000+ courses force me to play smarter and not just be in attack mode all the time.

My personal favorite course in the Louisville area is just over 7100 from the tips.

Driver: taylormade.gif Tour Burner 9.5*
4 Wood: taylormade.gif200 Steel 16*
Irons: taylormade.gif Burner '09
Wedges: taylormade.gif RAC TP Satin 54*, 58*
Putter: odyssey.gif White Hot Tour #9  Ball: bridgestone.gif B330


Posted
I try to find golf courses that are as long as possible. I like to have different types of approach shots on every hole. I get bored of hitting driver wedge into all of the par 4s. I like having to play intelligent golf around the course but some short courses can be fun once in awhile. It's all about the design of the course and how they use the terrain. Goofy greens with impossible pin locations are tough but still fun to play once in awhile.

I tend to score better on courses that provide many different shots. It keeps me on my toes, you'd think hitting wedge into every green would be the best for scoring but I keep my mind in the game much better if I'm presented with more options.

Driver: R11s 9 with a Fubuki Tour 63 X-Stiff
Fairway Wood: R11s 15.5 with Miyazaki Kusala Black 83 X-Stiff

Hybrid: taylormade.gif 4 with Fubuki 515 X-Stiff
Irons: titleist.gif Forged 660 3-PW with Dynamic Gold X-100

Wedges: callaway.gif CC Jaws 52 and 58 Degree
Putter: ping.gif In Anser 2


Posted
The length of the course doesn't really seem to affect my scoring, but usually shorter courses are also rated lower and are easier in general. When deciding between back/middle tee, I aim for 6,200 - 6,600 yards. Though I'm not a "championship" golfer, I'll always play from the backs if it comes in under 6,600. I hit my driver 270 - 300, so length is rarely a problem for me.

Posted

Wish I could hit the ball 270... I'd probably be single digits

In my (crossing my fingers for Syracuse Orange Cart) bag:
Tour Burner 10.5* Stiff
Walter Hagen 3 metal
Tour Preferred S300 DGs (3-PW)
Tour Preferred 52.08 GWWalter Hagen 56* SW Studio Stainless Newport 2 point 5 ProV1x's if i got em, but usually TP blacks


Posted
I like to stick in the 6200-6500 range... anything more than that and I am struggling to reach long par 4's in two.

In my (crossing my fingers for Syracuse Orange Cart) bag:
Tour Burner 10.5* Stiff
Walter Hagen 3 metal
Tour Preferred S300 DGs (3-PW)
Tour Preferred 52.08 GWWalter Hagen 56* SW Studio Stainless Newport 2 point 5 ProV1x's if i got em, but usually TP blacks


Posted
I like to play between 5800 and 6200 depending how easy/hard the course is. Not really sure how well I would score shorter or longer. Not really consistent enough to have an opinion there.

Grom stand bag
SQ 5900 - 9.5*
Burner 15* and 18*
MT 20* Hybrid
CG Gold 4-PW CG14 52.10 SM 56.14 IC 20-10a 34" Putter SDF balls (was on sale)


Posted
Wish I could hit the ball 270... I'd probably be single digits

Of course I pull hook left OB about 10% of the time and slice right about 40% of the time. Length does not equate to low scoring, but it is nice to hit in from 120 rather than 180, when I can hit the fairway


Posted
None of the munis I play are much over 6900 yds, and even though I'm losing distance (every year it seems), they are still shorter than I like. One muni has a par 5 on number 9 that plays about 480-485, that the LPGA used to play as a par 4, so I play it as a par 4, usually having to hit 4-6 iron for my second. I think that's the longest 'par 4' I play. I can still reach most par 5s on these courses in two, or have a very short u/d

sometimes I'll hit a long/mid iron off the tee on the shorter par 4s so I can have a different approach shot to make things interesting.

The course that I used to play that challenged me the most (length/difficulty) was Torey Pines in the 80s, but I don't remember what the south course used to play to back then. I doubt I could play it from the tips now.

In the Bag

Ping i15 8* Diamana Whiteboard

Titleist 909f3 13.5* Aldila NV

Ping S57 3-PW KBS C-taper

Macgregor 52, 56, and 60 wedges

SC Newport 2.5

 

Light travels faster than sound. That is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.

 


Posted
actually 2 part question...

1. doesn't matter the yardage, i'm a fairly long hitter and have played courses comfortable at lengths of over 7,000 yards.

2. i'm not so sure i'd score better, actually. i feel more comfortable with a five iron in my hand than with an 8 iron. but it's probably all mental. i'd much rather have a wide open course that's 7500 yards than a tight course with lots of turns that's 6500.

Posted
I have enjoyed playing executive courses 4500 yards is about right for stress free round playing solo. Got addicted on forward tees recently because the regular tees are being refurbished at my club.

Posted
there are some courses around here that are 5900 from the tips and ive actually scored worse there than my 7200 yrd home course
RUSS's avg drive - 230yrds and climbing

Posted
My ideal course length is 6600 yds. I obviously don't score at the distance as well as at 6200 yds, but I enjoy the challenge a lot more. I can use every club in my bag at that distance. Up to 7000 yds is still enjoyable. Over 7000 yds and the game begins to feel like work.

Driver: Burner 10.5 deg
5W: R7 18 deg
3H: Idea Tech
4-PW: MP-57
GW: Vokey 52 degSW: 56 degLW: 60 degPutter: Black Series 1 34"Ball: Pro V1


Posted
My ideal course length is 6600 yds. I obviously don't score at the distance as well as at 6200 yds, but I enjoy the challenge a lot more.

You would very much like the courses down here!

Most play between those yardages from the white tees, which is where most people play from. Honestly, really long courses here would be bad as we get a lot of old(er) Snow Birds down here during the winter. Many are showing up now.

In the Bag

Ping i15 8* Diamana Whiteboard

Titleist 909f3 13.5* Aldila NV

Ping S57 3-PW KBS C-taper

Macgregor 52, 56, and 60 wedges

SC Newport 2.5

 

Light travels faster than sound. That is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.

 


  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Home course is 6500 from the mids and 6950 from the tips. I can play either and it doesn't really change my score much. My specialty is missing greens and getting up and down, so missing from 130 or missing from 160 doesn't make much difference. I guess if I had to pick a distance at sea level, it's going to be around 6000 to 6300, but that depends on other rating factors like forced carries and water, etc., too.

On a really tough and unfamiliar course I'll play a shorter tee (I'll just try and pick one that lets me play my game). I'm out there to try and have fun, and beating my head against an indestructible wall isn't much fun.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5855 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.